the united states. and that's kind of a rock, and there's no debt that the united states is determined that the man and you can only explain what is otherwise a highly irrational conduct calia rational conduct on a government which purports to subscribe to the rule of law. i'm wondering if at this point it's more of the case of political retribution, you know, making those embarrassing or revelations, or is it still about damage control as far as you can tell, do you think julian assange can still be in possession of some information that could be damaging the american powers that be i think that there is a combination of motivations for firstly, there is a determination by the security state to get anyone to days to ensure there's greater transparency in the way the security side. all right. and whether it's an individual, whether it's an organization, do they want to stop that person from doing anything else? i think in the assange case, it's probably at this point that is to keep going with this case

you don't have to set foot in the united states. it's enough that you have revealed and published material which the united states to be barren embarrassing a country to its national security. a low strike australian journalist, as i say, written the same thing. i want to stand the consequences of this case. so that's why it's really important. i mean, it's ironic of course to the your recently criticize the chinese government, the new laws in hong kong. 11 aspect of which was that any journals to criticize china, even without being in china, could be subject to the laws ms trying to write the criticized. this is no different. this is, this is the 1st time that mr. financial discretion. i'm that someone who has no connection to the us jurisdiction. now mister sounds has been able to evade extradition for almost a decade. but it seems that the spectrum of it is now more concrete ties than ever . you mentioned the, the ruling by british forth by the, in fact the u. k. high court that allows for that extradition. do you think we will s

the united states is truth, that involves many sounds. if not millions of people that also has to be mentioned is still just about the united states. it's about the security of the whole world. anyway, mr. barbie, we have to live here. thank you very much for your time. thank you. thank you for watching hope to hear again next week on the part in the me. ah. while our officers are facing an increasingly dangerous environment, we are seeing a growing debate about so called warrior cops. the term that i've heard in the militarization of believe this is an amber vehicle we acquired through the 1033 program, very free program and the government program that call us military property that is no longer use to local law enforcement. we're building an army over here and i can't believe if people aren't seeing those agency elder conflicts here. yeah. think of terrorism here because it again a feeling that hey, you have to deal with your hard practice. well, you putting in uniform got beds. it'll probably have like money in play tricks and people m

how is it that we can sit here in the united states? american diplomats can look at russia situation and not even understand that they have a legitimate national security interest when we're militarized around its border, especially caucasus right in eastern europe, going right to russia's doorstep. for me, i haven't trouble seeing this as diploma. so we have tried and said that he's going to focus on diplomacy, diplomacy. first, we're not going to fight wars and regime changing. we're going to focus in diplomacy has this diplomacy when you, when you came in display the most basic people skills that they didn't, scott, i'm glad that brad brought up the cuban missile crisis, because we go back in time. i mean khrushchev, we say, well, cube is a sovereign country, it can have any kind of weapons. it was going to have to be alliance relationships at once. and kennedy made it very clear. he said, if you don't take those missiles out, we will. why is this a reverse situation? because it seemed very clear to me, and this is what the russians

crushing everyone who questions the hegemony of the united states and the united states and lay to want to direct the resources of control europe and lead in america to attack those whom they consider their main threat in this whole story. neither spain nor the e u has any role our troops should not become cannon fodder for this most enormous machine of genocide in history for nato. on friday, russia's top diplomat spelled out clearly that the country does not want war, but that he can allow its interest to be ignored either for ministers. the gate of rob shed his thoughts during a 90 minute interview to russian media. history of the, the if it's up to russia, there will be no war. we don't want any wars. but ignoring our interest is not something we can allow either. americans are trying to create a hysteria of the escalation around ukraine, burrell and blink, and repeating it to some kind of a mantra. they say we hope that raja is going to choose the path of diplomacy. and i can tell you that is something we've always stuck to since soviet times. and the outcomes of this diplomacy inc

s custody but aren't entitled to say in the united states? if so, what happens if, like at gitmo, they are ineligible for transfer, we can't get the right security assurances, and they remain in immigration detention for a long period? then we have the potential for the supreme court, the prior precedent, to suggest that they have to be released into the united states. the odds of that, to be sure, are quite low. that being said, they are not zero, given the supreme court precedent on the question of the tension in the united states rights for detainees and immigration detention, and so we have to consider those facts also as we think about what to do with these detainees and whether bringing them to the united states at this point makes good sense. >> thank you. >> thanks, senator grassley. senator feinstein. >> thank, you mister chairman. i have thought a lot about guantÁnamo from the time i visited. i've served in my past on boards that sentenced women convicted of felonies in the state of california, did that for more than five years. an

for example, germany uk etc along with the united states. yes, they conducted in the 1990s operations with mi6 because poland had traditionally during communist times been in a place that exported weapons to terrorist organizations such as the ira in this case mi6 and the polls work together to export weapons to the ulster volunteer force, which was a protestant radical group in northern ireland that the weapons that were then captured by the brits and some ulcer volunteer force officials were rolled up the polls had very close relations with the israelis because the polls in 1990 1991 had an operation to move soviet -- from the soviet union to real and that needed a lot of security and the polls have had grown their relationship with the germans as well. and but particularly once germany was brought into nato the polls wanted to see that happen first, and then they opened really good relationship with the bnd the german forces as well. um, let me ask someone as commented did did poland at times feel or did polls feel insulted that they were

s custody be aren't it into told stay in the united states? what happens if like at gitmo they're ineligible to transfer and they remain in immigration detention for a long period. then we have the potential for the supreme court to have to be release into the united states. the odds of that to be sure are quite low that being said, they are not zero given the supreme court's precedent on the question of detention in the yeast, rites for detainees and immigration detention. sand we have to consider those facts as we think about what to do with these detainees and whether to do that makes good sense. >> thank you. >> thank you, senator grassley. senator feinstein? >> thank you, mr. chairman. i've thought a lot about guantanamo from the time i visit i've served in my past on boards that sentenced women convicted of felonies in the state of california. did that for more than five years and sentence add lot -- sentenced a lot of peoplele i know prisons. and when i saw guantanamo and realized the isolation and came on a small boat where it was, i b

of the united states state. and yet, listen to their etrhetoric. listen to their rhetoric. republicans and republican states are quote, jim crow 2.0. mr. president, i was on the floor last week talking in particular detail about my states laws. we are all different states here but i knowla my states laws. i know them well as it relates to voting rights. and here's one thing i said last week. in some of the most critical issues in terms of voting rights legislation, early in-person voting, automatic voter registration, and no excuse absentee voting, the republican state of alaska, the great state of alaska has voting laws that are significantly more expansive than the laws of new york, then the laws of delaware, then the laws of connecticut, then the laws of massachusetts and new hampshire. it is a long list, mr. president, a long list. and you can see why senators like me, my constituents in t particular find it more than just a little bit annoying when you have these smug arguments of republican states being ji

is release in the united states even a possibility? again foreign nationals captured in an ongoing conflict. they may get additional rights. . we bring them to trial in federal court, what about the fourth amendment, what about chain of custody? what about the rules of evidence? there are dozens of questions. exonerated. what will happen to them? they are in the u.s.'s custody but aren't entitled to stay in the united states. in gitmo they remain in immigration detention for a long period. then we have the potential for the supreme court to suggest they may have to be released into the united states. the odds of that, to be sure, are quite low. that being said, they are not zero. >> senator grassley. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i've thought a lot about guantanamo from the time i visited. i've served in my past on boards that sentenced women convicted of felonies in the state of california. i did that for more than five years and sentenced a lot of people. i know prisons. when i saw guantanamo and realized its isolation and came on the

and everyone who questions the hegemony of the united states was in the united states. and they to want to direct the resources of control to europe and latin america to attack those whom they consider their main threat. in this whole story. neither spaying nor the e u has any room us. our troops should now become cannon fodder for this most enormous machine of genocide in history for nato. yo and as a big foreign ministers meeting underway right now in brussels, that meeting of e u foreign ministers be keeping an eye to see what comes out of that. sure. to see ukraine, russia, and the relationship between the a, you and russia, dominating those, talk to soon as any news. of course, i'll bring it to you here and i'll see appreciated the latest there from a course from a p to oliver in berlin. run this course live now to can well, sybil is the form of foreign secretary of india a very good afternoon. see sir, thanks for your time. we've just brought our view is this news nato announcing it is. it's essentially moving great military forces to eastern europe. it's, it's, i

and they do in the united states. and so when they're being turned on in the united states they're, that's what's causing this interference. a new report is claimed, former pope benedict, the 16 failed to take action in full cases of alleged sexual abuse. while he was serving as archbishop of the german cities of munich and pricing, the study on german law firm looked into cases of abuse between 19452019. and how church officials handle the, according to the report over 2 thirds of people investigated, turned out to be priests. and the report also said the former pope suggested or supported this latest inquiry, but denied to any wrong doing. we spoke with wilfred fossil man who says he was a victim of sex abuse by the clergy during that period. he told us what he went through. that's why someone it happened in the summer of 979. i was 11 years old back then pastor act served as st. andrews church and when he left us and groups of people started attacking me, they knew i was one of the reasons he left. we moved to anot

states capitol, the president of the united states and i spoke from its hallowed halls. and we made clear. we swore to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the united states. and we will. we will fight. [applause] we will fight to safeguard our democracy. we will fight to secure our most fundamental freedom, the freedom to vote. and that's why we have come to atlanta today, to the cradle of the civil rights movement, to the district that was represented by the great congressman john lewis. [applause] on the eve of the birthday of reverend dr. martin luther king. more than 55 years ago, men, women, and children marched from selma to montgomery to demand the ballot. and when they arrived at the state capitol in alabama, dr. king decried what he called normalcy. the normalcy. the complacency. that was denying people the freedom to vote. the only normalcy anyone should accept, dr. king said, is the normalcy of justice. and his words resonates today. over the past few years, we've seen so many antivoter laws that there is a danger of becoming accustomed to these

states, doing business and treating the united states as a key partner for the pakistani private sector. we have been a trading partner for decades. we have strong people to people ties with the people of pakistan through civil society. they -- they have stated aspirations of the geo economic foreign policy demonstrates their interest in diversifying the relationship beyond beijing. if confirmed, i will -- it's a position i would look forward to working on those issues with pakistan. >> mr. mayor, great to see you again and congratulations to you and your family. i have a similar question about russia. india and russia have had a long-standing defense tie. prior to the passage of the sanctions in 20, india had begun to explore purchase of the air defense system from russia which could trigger sanctions. there is an executive waiver possibility. talk to us a little, as we are doing more and more together with india in military relations with joint exercises, what is the potential danger to the u.s. -india cooperation that the acquisition of the s-or hundred would create? mayor garcetti:

crush and everyone who questioned the hegemony of the united states and the united states. and they to want to direct the resources of control europe and lead in america to attack those whom they consider their main threat. ready in this whole story, neither spain nor the e u has any row. our troops should now become cannon fodder for this most enormous mission of genocide in history for nato. that has a big foreign ministers meeting underway right now in brussels. that meeting of e u foreign ministers be keeping an eye to see what comes out of that. sure. to see ukraine, russia, and the relationship between the a, you and russia dominating those talks. as soon as any news, of course, i'll bring it to you here and i'll see warships from russia's bowl take. please have that sell at the start of a major naval exercise, but you will the design to practice actions needed to protect russia, national interests and accounts, and military threats to the state. from the c. s. hotel of 140 warships are set to take part from a foreign minister of india camels. the bow believes europe

that is threats of punishment of united states citizens. understand what that is, then develop the algorithms and supporting technologies needed to defeat that. narrowly focus at, let's have it as a just break glass initiative. on a day-to-day basis these wouldn't be used, but when there is an intense crisis, over ukraine or whatever the crisis, then we would have something to fall back on. we would have some operational capabilities. above all, let's exercise those capabilities, because they are not real unless you exercise them first. mr. ferrari: one of the points made by the proponents of information operations in russia, and in china is that there is no time period between war and peace. we live in this constant gray zone, and both of you have made this point. first off, how would you exercise in case of emergency break glass, when really we are in this constant fight? second, to elisabeth's point on these c.e.o.'s of a lot of these large tech companies, i believe a lot of them view their role as global in nature. if you look at facebo

states or what would become the united states and that's an anachronism but where the colonies would become partners with the british motherland in a world empire so i found that really really interesting and i was wondering if you could elaborate on that ache as i think that's also a very fresh approach. >> so yes i do start the story in lexington and concord in before the french and indian war because what i'm trying to get at is this question of what causes a person to turn their back on the country and take arms against it? how are these rebels created? i don't think that they are born exactly think they become rebels rev period of time and one of the point to make in the book is that all of the individuals i look at the ones that become patriots and the ones who remained loyalist were born british subjects and they all thought of themselves as englishmen and englishwomen and for the most part they were proud of this because they looked at the rights they had as englishmen and they had a right to be represented in parliament in the right not to be taxed without their consent and

when the united states and the europeans violated all of their commitments under trump and the united states tore up the deal, the iranians continued to abide by all of their commitments. for a full year, iran was the only side abiding by its commitments, and then only after that, in five stages, which took a year itself — a second year — did the iranians gradually decrease their commitments to put pressure on the europeans to do something about these violations. yeah, i think we've gone through the detail and i'm not sensing much movement, and it's fair to say that there isn't much apparent movement in the us position or in the iranian position. do you accept that 2022 could be an extremely dangerous year in the middle east because the americans are convinced you are now, in the words of antony blinken, the secretary of state, a very, very short time away from iran getting enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon. and we know the israelis are watching this very closely. and their prime minister, naftali bennett, has reserved the right quite explicitly to not be bound by anyth

not not the united states. yes, they fought they fought wars with others and with cambodia and there's been plenty of conflict, but the every single village in vietnam has streets named after tranhungdao and the haibatrong and no queen and the great heroes who fought the chinese always their people who fought the fought the chinese. yes, ho chi minh and general zap are also heroes, but there aren't streets named after them in every village the streets named after those who fought the chinese and you know i had to think. did nobody tell president kennedy or president johnson that that the domino theory does just doesn't really apply here. they're not going to follow. the the chinese this is not in their history. it's not it's a it's totally counter to their dna and what i've concluded is that one of the one of the results of mccarthyism was that the state department had been wiped clean of people who really knew the region? and so there weren't people around to kind of check the not so good instincts of mcnamara

definitively their intention not just to leave the united states, but to dissolve the united states, right? the union subsisting between south carolina and other states under the name of the united states of america is hereby dissolved. in some ways. this is an acknowledgment of the problem of secession right if you withdraw from the union does the union continue to exist. lincoln is going to make the same kind of claim once he is going to give his inauguration in march in general the idea. is that the constitution only functions through comedy right through this compromise framework and if one state withdraws then the union is dissolved and this is echoed in almost all the newspapers in south carolina in the period following the december 20th vote. and so they're going to say that the union is dissolved. this language makes the case that south carolina's consent is required to be in the union. this is not something that lincoln and other republicans are going to accept but this is the argument that they are going to make. now south carolina is doing this but at the same time. federa

in europe is very expensive in the united states. when i go down to the pharmacy and they say, oh, what's going to be a $1000.00? i'm? i'm used to hearing that, so i just leave without the insulin. my solution right now is just to ration to a dangerous degree. i know that i need to stop doing that. ah, unlike in europe, there is no universal health insurance in the united states. the only americans to benefit from a limited public healthcare system are the very poorest members of society, any over 60 fives. every one else is either covered by their employers who pay most of the cost of health insurance, or they have to take out an individual health insurance plan like karen and her husband, eric some point of the site right now to look at the plans for next year okay. although they both work, they can barely afford the costly insurance premiums. oh, so for me, the premium is $695.00 and need to be covered in the united states. you must 1st pay a monthly premium. these are very high and the average premium for a family of 4 is $15000.

could the united states insist. he asked the united states had not expanded westward to the pacific by a vote of the people that had happened through military force with us army sweeping indigenous peoples out of the way. lodge also anticipated that all would go well in this new international community as long as quarreling nations agreed to abide by the league's rulings on their disputes, but what if one of them refused and declared war the league would have to call on its members to send troops to enforce its ruling which might well widen the war. lodge wanted to be constructive in this moment and in place of wilson's grand vision for the world. he offered a modest to-do list for the united states. build up national defenses work for arms limitation and assist with the restoration of the rule of international law which had been grossly violated by the perpetrators of the war. lodge admitted that these were small ideas compared to wilson's but he thought that all three were reasonable and sure to do substantial goo

india, asteria, united states, japan. if we pull those together, i think we can find a way to a situation where we can avoid the events of 2034. >> certainly hope we can find a constructive and pragmatic approach to how we address china and create less strategic framework that you're talking about. at the same time that we are trying to create that framework, we are sending very clear signals to the chinese that we will focus on multilateral cooperation and alignment in our own domestic competitiveness before we think about how we engage strategically the chinese. is that the right approach or should be doing it all at the same time? should we expect more from china in a bilateral framework than if we were relying on working with europeans and the administration for domestic competitors? i agree with you, but i think we have to have all three pieces of the pie. james: i think it is all six pieces of the pie that i laid out a moment ago. i agree, you cannot use one of them and except to be successful. we can't say we will

it followed on from the news that the, the embassies of the united states and the united kingdom in kiev would either be evacuating staff for the, at the families of staff from those embassies. heading into that meeting in brussels. the a, you foreign policy chief, yoseph burrell said no such action was going to be taken from the you side just yet . i don't thing. we had a time with eyes. as far as the negotiation going on on they are going on. i don't think that we had to let the plane and i leave. there are splits among the nato allies when it comes to what to do with nato when it comes to what to do with regards to russia and ukraine. we've seen a lot of pressure placed upon germany, where the chancellor all f sholtes has said that berlin won't be sending weaponry to ukraine. now, neighbors such as add those in the baltic states have been saying they should be stepping up and doing a lot more or less shots, remaining firm on this one, saying they won't be offensive weapon re sent from germany. what he has said though, is that should there be an invasion of ukraine that there would be

with the united states. so i believe we will absolutely be ready. all of that has to be ready to go. the support for countries in your community, they are on the four -- the first line economic assistance to ukraine, which we are looking at. i hope others are as well. making sure that we are sending messages of reassurance to ukrainian people -- i have no doubt russia is running information. we will find a pretext for whatever action they take. may put in people to say ukrainians are creating conflict and tension for russia. we have to be ready for all of these things and -- provide support in everyday that is appropriate to ensure russia understands the consequences it will face. >> it is very important what you just now said. it is very important that we underline we will not negotiate wind to make this. we cannot negotiate. this cannot happen. for you to hear about this recently conducted in the six western countries, u.k., the u.s., and germany, they are in many strong support of citizens for helping ukraine. supporting ukraine. including sancti

david: what do you think is the greatest military risk the united states faces? gen. milley: there is no question in my mind that the biggest geostrategic challenge to the united states will be china. ♪ david: as a military leader you're somewhat constrained about what you can say about issues. do you think officials should be commenting on issues like clement change or racial discrimination? do you think it is best for people to just do their jobs? gen. milley: americans are smart people and they should express their opinions. we have freedom of speech in that document for a reason. they should be able to express. david: do you look forward to the day when you are citizen and you can say whatever you want? gen. milley: we are unique. we are the 1%. we give up some of our rights so the 99% can have all of their rights. i don't actually have complete freedom of speech, even in retirement. i think it is good that any american expresses their opinion on a wide variety of topics. i think that is a demonstration of a healthy democracy. david: do you see a sense of the mi

s in the united states into all of you around the world. welcome. it was a spectacle which shocked america and the world, a mob storming the u. s. capital, the seat of the federal government in an attempt to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election a year to the day since those shocking events. president jo by today launched an outspoken attack on the rioters. and on his predecessor, he accused donald trump and spinning a web of wives to prevent the peaceful transition of power. and he said the rioters held a dagger to the throat of democracy, but he said they did not prevail tight security. for a dark anniversary, american leaders monkey day of remembrance at capitol hill, exactly one year after riotous storm, the building supporters of former president donald trump had sought to overturn the election result. after the former president made false claims of election fraud. we fight like hell. one year on president biden condemned the riotous and their attempts to undermine american democracy in west prison. they fail on this day. rem

please include pushy from the united states. great, great to, to me, got our in house in the previous year or so the united states actually will have an effect on the cut over. there's no doubt about and the question here is you can use the chinese, the really are too far away. i wrote this hiero, i'm, i'm, i'm sorry to interrupt. let me get back to you about that point that you're making about the other sanctions. well, in just a moment, cuz we are starting to run out of time. danny, let me ask you, you know, hi ro was just saying that if elections had been held properly, that present or take a would have lost. i want to ask you what your viewpoint is on that. how popular is ortega in nicaragua right now? and are there credible achievements that are being ignored by the international community? i feel like hiero in michael directly the conceptualized reset nicaraguan history, and over a century of nicaraguan history, the u. s. has done everything to intervene in nicaragua was the 1980s contra war. one of the great crimes of the

d, a was the last plantation in the united states. so this a long pattern up until today of specifically black farmers being dispossessed from the land, not being granted access to credit the same way. white farmers are given access to credit and financing. and so over the years there's been a decrease in black farmers over the years. and then if you look at other groups, indigenous people and immigrant communities, minorities, by any definition, it's hard to get into farming. but it's hard for anyone to get into farming in the united states, so there's racism. but then this is the corporate domination of the farming sector in the u. s. but also globally, obviously banks and then i, they conclude credit worthiness on, on the idea raises you painting some sort of apartheid picture that well banks will no one will say i am a racist, right? normally it's structural meaning, it's the pattern of how, how these loans are made and who gets those loans. and then if you added up in the aggregate, you see these very clear patterns of who's winn

you don't have to set foot in the united states. it's enough that you have revealed and published material which the united states seems to be barest embarrassing war, a country to its national security was trying to strike in journalists as written, assign st. i want to stand the consequences of this guy. so that's why it's really, i mean, it's ironic, of course to strike to racially criticize the chinese government, the new laws in hong kong. one of one aspect of which was that any journals to criticize china, even without being in china, could be subject to the laws most trying to criticize that. this is no difference. this is the 1st time that domestic is been honest, legislation has been aimed at someone who has no connection to the u. s. years now mr. sanchez has been able to evade extradition for almost a decade. but it seems that the specter of it is now more con critize than ever. you mentioned be the ruling by a british sport by the in fact the u. k. hi port that allows for that extradition. do you think we receive? well,

the united states is choose that involves many sounds. if not, millions of people that also has to be mentioned is still just about the united states. it's about the security of the whole world. anyway, mr. barbie, we have to live here. thank you very much for your time. thank you. thank you for watching hope to hear again next week. and of course in the me i welcome to max as his financial survival guide, looking forward to year as we go. yeah. this is what happens, dimensions in britain. del, at this happens, you watch kaiser report july, an annual festival in st. petersburg dedicated to dust i ascii. ah, the great writer, think around psychologist, people often turn to his work to understand russia and russians perhaps even themselves. they put, they sing on, what do you see, what they think about the flooding needs, changing a rita, transforming them as they read that does die. estes unique ability to stay ascii wants to tell us you can better yourself. he makes you face your true self and we could move beyond conventions, rules of sc

or is this normally the purview of countries like the united states? it's funny when you reading the objections of the united states representatives are putting forward, they're demanding that russia deescalate, their aggressive behavior stops. inflammatory rhetoric is almost like a, a bullet point list of what the united states themselves are either doing or not doing. so to come to sal giving new meaning to swiping left or right. and you tend to stop election app has got france in a flap is supposed to match, made for photos and presidential hopefuls. but if accused of having an unfair crush on one particular candidate is on that story, when we come in with ah, is your media a reflection of reality? in the world transformed what will make you feel safer? isolation, community. are you going the right way or are you being with what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend. i join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. now and all you see is a sphere. is your fast you're fall off and on the other side already came on your

nato membership is not just united states. within all of the 30 members, that is not the direction that our allies want to go because of the importance of upholding that principle. i do not think that some sort of tacit agreement is going to satisfy what putin is after. it is also about war and it is about nato and that is a key piece of it. for putin it is also about keeping ukraine in russia's orbit. even if we were to make some sort of agreement like that we should not be under any illusion that russia's attacks on ukraine and ukrainian democracies would subside. i do not think it is really what putin is after, it might be part of it, but that tacit peace is not early what he is after. he wants a formal guarantee and a tom amis for regions in the east that would give russia a permanent veeck -- veto over ukraine's foreign policy and that is what is at stake. host: richard in new york. good morning. caller: good morning. i want to say brian lamb is a patriot, and also there is a tremendous seaport that ukraine has that is ve

courts to the united states supreme court. recounts were undertaken in state after state. georgia counted its results three times with one recount by hand. phony partisan audits were undertaken long after the election, in several states. none changed the results. in some of them, the irony is that the margin of victory grew slightly. let's speak plainly about what happened in 2020. even before the first ballot was cast, the former president was preemptively sowing doubt about the relive -- election results. he built his lie over months. was not based on any facts. he was just looking for an excuse, a pretext to cover for the truth. he is not just the former president, he is a defeated former president. defeated by a margin of over 7 million of your votes. in a full and free and fair election. there is simply zero proof election results are in -- inaccurate. in every venue where evidence had to be produced, an oath to tell the truth had to be taken, the former president failed to make his case. think about this. the former pres

i think united states has to give up that pretence the united states is going to consult very closely with ukraine is going to consult very closely with our nato allies. in fact, we saw that this week, secretary of state and lincoln began, is european tour with a meeting and you praying with president lensky, his counterparts. foreign minister then went to prison to meet with ki nato allies before proceeding to geneva, or talk with a lot that i think is the appropriate way to conduct the set of negotiations. the united states is taking the lead on behalf of both nato and you and our ukrainian partners, thomas graham with the council on foreign relations. mr. graham, we appreciate your insights tonight. thank you. thank you. well, i want to take the story now to andre court, and he's director of the russian international affairs council. it's good to see you again, mr. corded off. let me ask you, what do you see when you see what happened in geneva today? is this a victory for diplomacy? well, it might be victory, but definitely it's not as flesh and success are they exchanged to use a

s in the united states into all of you around the world. welcome. we begin the day with biden blinking and staying on message about the real rush and threat. last night, you as president biden held a marathon to our press conference at the white house to mark his 1st year in office. he said, what was uncomfortable and obvious. nato was not always unified over what to do about russia. and he threw confusion on top of that by suggesting the u. s. and his allies might react differently to a minor incursion into ukraine by russia, as opposed to a full scale military invasion. his press secretary has spent the past 24 hours explaining what her boss meant to say, and on this side of the atlantic, it was clean up duty as well. for you as secretary of state anthony, blinking on a stop here in berlin. today he once again reassured, key of and u. s. allies in europe that the u. s. stance remains unchanged. any russian move against ukraine will result in severe consequences, piri, the stakes, a high us secretary of state antony, blinking, landing in berlin to

e, looking at it globally, it depends where the united states is fighting and killing people. and then the contracts when the united states stopped doing that kind of thing or stopped peace keeping the contracts are then wrapped up with the gun makers. and then there's a surplus of guns on the market in the us. now that, that, that may have been true around world war 2 and both before, but the civilians 520304050 times more guns in the united states than the military purchases and the guns, the militaries, primarily interested in aren't available on the commercial market for civilians the 2 separate and distinct markets. and so that, that's not true. and again, you know, i, i really agree with the pastor there, there is no one solution. and when he says, you know, the perfect, it shouldn't be, or rather the practical should be the enemy, the perfect. well, you know, in a perfect world, the smart gun would be the perfect solution. but it's got problems. it will always have problems. and frankly, those gangs could still steal the personalized guns and figure out how to aah, get

they've done so targeting the united states. so you have heard from our colleagues at the darrel of homeless, our colleagues at the white house, that we are preparing for every contingency. we are hardening what we can. we're taking preparation for sharing intelligence with our partners and allies, all in an effort to be ready for whichever path vladimir putin chooses. >> a very tense situation indeed. ned price, thanks very much for joining us. >> thanks, wolf. >>> all right. more breaking news we're following. moderna now announcing a major step toward an omicron specific booster vaccine as well as reassuring new data about its current vaccine in the case of the highly transmissible variant. i didn't know my genetic report could tell me i was prone to harmful blood clots. i travel a ton, so this info was kind of life changing. maybe even lifesaving. ♪do you know what the future holds?♪ since suzie's got goals, she'll want a plan to reach them. so she'll get some help from fidelity, and she'll feel so good about her plan, s