i'm going to go back to sherlock holmes. the silver plays, he's investigating the kidnapped horse with a typically clumsy inspector with him and as they are writing back, the inspector asked homes, is there any thing that you'd wish to bring to my attention? the famous quotes even people who don't read a lot on him probably know this quote. he said i will commend your attention to the dog in the ninth time, referring to the fact that the watchdog at the stable where the horse was didn't make any noise at night which for homes meant somebody on the inside did the job but was dumb and said but the dog did nothing in the nighttime. holmes said that's the curious incident. i commend to you the curious incident of the confederate forces of calvary on april 4 to hold open his door to the south, the answer is, there was none and that is the curious incident. midmorning, april 5 they moved south and found the roadblock by using calvary and fast arriving infantry. lee makes the most critical decision of the last campaign, the petersb

: when did you play sherlock holmes? >> on stage. it was a comedic interpretation of -- it was a bit of a stretch. [ laughter ] >> seth: how did it go it was not received? >> i had a full breakdown, no. we can't talk about it >> seth: okay, we won't talk about it, we'll move on. >> ptsd. >> seth: oh, i'm so sorry. i didn't mean to bring it up >> it's quite all right. i love him on that show. >> seth: this is very exciting that there's that new installment of "scream." >> yes >> seth: and i imagine this is something where it's very important not to let the plot leak to the public, but also to the cast to some degree. do they keep it secret from you? >> yeah. they have different scripts and different things they shoot. yeah, it's really -- it's a wonderful opportunity to be part of something for 25 years. i love playing the role of dewey. he's such an iconic character. >> seth: dewey is awesome, and i did not realize this, so -- dewey was supposed to die in the first "scream," and basically you were just too much of a hit.

you don't have to be sherlock holmes to understand what's going on. joe biden is a self-inflicted disaster. the democrats are. he stands at 36%. it's insane. and it's all self-inflicted. americans are hurting. the country is being divided like never before. everything joe biden promised he would do in the campaign, his inauguration speech, he's the opposite of what he promised to be. a lot of the americans are being red pilled. and bill maher is the tip of the iceberg. jesse: van jones and carville came out as well. and they know what they are talking about. they are obviously in touch somewhat with the american people. they are trying to warn the leadership on twitter and georgetown and manhattan. knock off the gender pronouns and the crt. can we stick to wages, healthcare and jobs for once? maybe that could kind of dig us out of the whole we are in. and i still don't even see the rest of the democratic party recognizing that they keep digging themselves deep and deep and deeper. >> the fish rots from the head first. joe biden is not even admitting h

did you have to do any magic jujitsu, sherlock holmes work to find this guy, did you know why it was untraceable? >> you know when we did the request to the secretary of state's office, they gave us the threats, they gave us the voice mail. and with that, they gave us the phone number. so, you know, really, all we did is call that number. >> wow. >> and, you know, the individual, when we first contacted him, he was -- he just basically hung up. he swore at us. but then we called him again and again and again. actually, it was only the second time that we called him, he really started opening up to us. and then over the course of a number of days, we spoke with him, in sort of multiple interviews that went on for -- i think in total, we talked three hours, we talked with him. and really got a sense, he wouldn't reveal his identity, his name, but we got a good sense of what was driving him. and he admitted to making the threats. and then, at a certain point, as we discussed in the story, he kind of turned on us as well. >> reuters senior editor jason szep, thank you very much, very muc

and i almost find it more suspenseful than, you know, is sherlock holmes going to find, you know, who dropped the five orange pits. i find it simply -- i find that one of the reasons i lo the essay form is because it primes my fiction reading devices more. it's almost like they kind of put emphasis in different places. and so i think both genres benefit at, like, the the edges of the genre are. i love an essay that somehow clears towards another genre, and i love a novel that veers towards another genre. >> going off of that, i also feel like it's when you talk about the edges of what exist on both, in both form, i think that there is a lot of blur. you might expect especially. as writers of these things that we would go to fiction to make things up and nonfiction to do more reporting. and i think that while that's true, you don't -- we're completely sort of mixed up in how we talk about these things in general. i feel like if i were to give you a novel and say it's just so realistic, it's so real, that would be a compliment. but i feel like the fundamental thing like you're on a sort

he's sort of like a black sherlock holms. he just knows how to solve a crime and he's a bright man. >> let's take a look. we got some morgan freeman. take a look. >> i'm a forensic psychologist. faster way of saying i'm a guy who determines the hows and whys. >> hold it right there. >> when you write, do you always know -- >> here i am saying how smart he is and you show stuff people blowing stuff up. >> you're the writer. we're just tv people around here. the last -- >> that wasn't in the book. >> last question i was going to ask, spoken like an author during an adaptation. the last thing i was going to ask is when you do write, do you think about how the typical reader will identify with? does it have to be someone who ultimately had good in them or not necessarily? >> i had a simple thing, when i'm telling a story i just finished auto biographer and pretend there is one person across from me and i don't want them to get up until i finish. >> wow. james patterson. >> thank you, very nice. >> oh, it was wonderful. i'd love t

often, as sherlock holmes observed about the dogs who do not bark, it may be revealing the propaganda minister serving on your sister company has been in the business of online propaganda, you're refusing to answer whether they fall under your privacy policy. that reveals a great deal. mr. beckerman: i'm am just trying to be accurate here. there is a lot of accusations that are just not true and i want to make sure -- sen. cruz: i will give you one more chance and my time is over. in baseball, three strikes you're out. let us see if a fourth strike you can actually answer the question. it is a simple yes or no. is beijing bytedance technology and other affiliate of our corporate group as your privacy policy find the term? mr. beckerman: as i pointed out before, the answer is the same. sen. cruz: you did not answer. mr. beckerman: i appreciate your time with gotcha questions. sen. cruz: i'm asking about your policy. mr. beckerman: if you could be truthful and accurate about -- sen. cruz: are you willing to answer the question? mr. beckerman: senator, i answered the question. i stated a

often as sherlock holmes observed about the dogs that do not bark, it may be revealing that the chinese propaganda minister that is serving on your sister company and who has been in the business of online propaganda, you are refusing to answer whether they fall under your privacy policy. that reveals i think a great deal unfortunately. >> senator, with all due respect, i am just trying to be accurate here. there's a lot of accusations that are just not true and i want to make it clear. >> i will give you one more chance, and my time is over. but, look, in baseball three strikes, you're out. tonight the astros are going to begin winning the world series. let's see if a fourth strike, you could actually answer the question. it is a simple yes/no. the beijing bytedance technology a, quote, other affiliate of our corporate group as your privacy policy defines that term? >> senator, as i pointed out before my answer is the same. >> yes or no. you didn't answer. >> senator, i appreciate you are trying with gotcha questions. i'm just trying -- >> it is not a gotcha question. i'm asking about