he was the only one who really understood the paper by godel. he saw that this man's that the thinking machine would always be necessarily dependent on outside programmers or on over coals, like allen touring, how he defined them. and when they asked it was turing the universal computer architecture, that currently dominates our lives. he said, one thing i can tell you about the oracle, is that it cannot be a machine. and so von neumann was, by the way -- the von neumann computer architecture that still runs most of our systems -- but the new architecture is a powerful architecture that integrated a graphics processor. and it was invented by von neumann. and so [inaudible] machine -- by von neumann. and he understood the artificial intelligence could not compete with human minds. it's a necessary expression of the capabilities of human minds. being extended into the world. >> right. it's actually an extension and nada replacement. what you said a moment ago really is a way of capturing it. tell me again who it was that all this developed machine

he met this young student named kurt gÖdel who i believe was the inventor of the computer science of our day. kurt gÖdel, in 1931 i believe, introduced a paper which showed that mathematics was intrinsically and inexorably depended on axioms or propositions that couldn't be proven within the system itself. >> so, therefore, it couldn't be a fully self-contained system. >> they could not be a self-contained system. john von neumann was one of the greatest minds we produce over the last couple of centuries. .. dominates our lives. one thing i've been telling you about in the article is that that shame and i knowing by the way by knowing computer architecture that still runs both our systems but the new one is a massively powerful architecture with graphics processors andcurrently has taken over those status centers . it was also invented by newman. so it's headed by an ointment >> we understood the artificial intelligence. it was a massive expression of the disabilities of human lives extended into the world class it actually is an extension, not a replacement. what you said a moment

mathematics a completely self-sufficient and complete coherent system and he met this young man named kirk godel who i believed was the-- [inaudible] kirk, 1951, i believe had connie's berg introduced a paper that showed that mathematics was intricately-- entrance will be dependent on propositions that couldn't be proven within the system itself. >> self-contained system. >> could not be a self-contained system. and john who was the greatest mind in my judgment produced over the last couple of centuries by knowing that immediately concluded from this he was the only one who really understood the paper and he not only saw that this meant that thinking machines would always be necessary dependent on outside programmers, oracles and when they asked alan who was the inventor of the universal computer architecture. [inaudible] he said the one thing i can tell you about the oracle is that it can't be a machine. is the computer architecture that still owns most of our systems, but the new architecture is a massively parallel really originating with graphics, processes and has currently taken over the d

he met this young student named kurt gÖdel who i believe was the inventor of the computer science of our day. >> kurt in 1931, i believe, introduced the paper which showed that mathematics was intrinsically dependent on axiums or propositions that couldn't be proven within the system itself. >> couldn't be fully self-contained. >> it could not be a self-contained system. the greatest mind that we have produced over the last couple centuries, vonn noyman concluded from this, he was the only one who understood the paper, and he not only saw that this meant that thinking machines would always be necessarily dependent on outside programers or oracles. >> we understood the artificial intelligence. it was a massive expression of the disabilities of human lives extended into the world class it actually is an extension, not a replacement. what you said a moment ago really is a way of capturing it. tell me again who it was that made the point that all this developed machine intelligence would have to have a human mind as if it were an oracle. who was said the oracle business? >> that was alan