there is only one china, taiwan is part of china. this is acknowledged by the united nations by almost all the countries in the world, including all that you members states, including the united states, including all it's 5 i members, state your name it japan. acknowledge that this is the corner stone of china's foreign relations with all the countries in the world. with all the united nations, not the united states, cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leading taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to provide the relations between china and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declar

and china. it did not break new ground, except perhaps on china's commitment to reducing methane emissions, but a lot of people, easier knowing they could come together for a joint communiquÉ. taylor: in the past, we looked at it as u.s. versus china, and this represents a shift of u.s. and its allies pressuring china to play fair, to play by the fare rules. is that going to work better where you need the west pressuring china because the u.s. can't do it on its own? >> that is something we will see in the framework from the biden administration in which national security, a framework for asia that will work closely with allies, but again, there have been warnings from president xi about the rest of the world circling the wagons against china, and the extent to which the u.s. can cores its allies on a key issue to keep china out of the technology supply chain is certainly somewhat weak. other countries don't see china the same way completely, even though they oppose what they see as chinese bul

the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic military and cultural. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and from pedal by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we've faced as a nation before. from its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce neighbors in the maritime domain. ive to the crushing and religious autonomy of tibet and campaign of genocide against the uyghur people and digital authoritarianism. china today is more emboldened thavren before. there should be little doubt that the right framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is necessarily what we want. but because of the choices beijing is making. therefore if confirmed you will need to be cleared eyed about beijing's intentions and actions and play a key role in calibrating this administrati

however, the china is not the china local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually compete. level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean kind. glenn decent. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion, go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robots, and our whole team here by the this is al jazeera, it's november the 15th day, one of the new era and television news. if you have known that, that was the scale of bloodshed would you have still gone to moments ago to miss all landed about a 100 meters away from us. we're on the front line, but it's on we're being all that is it on is very, really, it is coming ou

and the world found itself with 2 chinas. at 1st, taiwan was seen as the real china. but that changed in the seventy's when the u. s . and the u. n. recognized beijing as the official, china and ty, ones, republic of china became what we have to day, a largely unrecognized non state. ah, the taiwanese means different things to different people. did the divide between those who say ty, one is the republic of china, which is the status quo, and others who say taiwan is just well, taiwan? ah, don't you, dear, is in the republic of china camp. this is common for families like he is who arrived from china after the civil war 70 years ago. it's willoughby, does this bill or forging foam? obeyed the man for life high? no, i'm a hyphen usually bigger for me is the way to the only thing i felt either how i got hired to run to meet with her or mental judges. man go me. yeah, ha, ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ha. dungeons ear lives with his wife, 2 kids and his elderly father. about tyler? oh, oh oh, i mean, oh oh oh, being wrong, granpa was a came t soldier who fought a

[inaudible] some is a justified and the response to what china did, so you know china did fail to refuse to cooperate. it became much more assertive and cracked down on hong kong and so even though trump sort of changed because he felt politically of frontage, china was giving many reasons for the community to respond in that way and i think by the time biden came in for president biden i don't think it was obvious, but he was going to pursue a very tough on china policy, but i think when he came in the situation was such h that it was what he was presented with, that he had chinese activity in a range of areas that he felt was unjustified and he needed to push back. now, the big question is how do we get to that equilibrium where you can compete responsibly and you also have some coronation you know some boundaries on the competition and that's the big challenge i think they and china have two figure out how to get to that point. we are not there yet. it could take some time. >> i mean, i do want to ask us china questions and maybe the view as i said earlier they can post questions , bu

china does so against particular interpretation of history. china is ambitious. china is aggrieved. and it is trying to increase its influence, especially in its neighborhood, in the south china sea and the taiwan straits. the united states, for its part, is worried about its relative decline, influence, and relative wealth. the two countries have truly begun clashing in the western pacific. they have interests that are clashing. i'm afraid that for the long-term this is going to be a worldwide competition in the security, economic, technological, and international law and ideology spheres. this is going to be with us for a long time. host: where do our interests class? guest: our interests clash in the western pacific, where the united states, she has not signed the u.n. convention on the law of the sea, never act in accordance with it. do not see this enormous area as china's leg. we see it as part of the global commons through which all countries should be able to sail or fly, in accordance with international law. whereas china increasingly is trying to assert its dominance in th

as i've said before the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic, military, and even cultural, with an alternative and deeply disturbing model for global governance. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and propelled by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we have faced as a nation before. for decades, we failed to comprehensively address china's growing reach of its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce its neighbors in a maritime domain. its dangerous flexing of military muscle against taiwan, and its campaign of genocide against the uyghur people as well as the imposition of the chilling system of digital authoritarianism to suppress its own people. they are more active and more emboldened than ever before. the right basic framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is

however, the china is not the china global change, and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually come. deep level are going to leave out there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all august to go hydro clean and glen d. c. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page, that's facebook dot com, forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a inside story for me, robots, and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah. a war in afghanistan is now told will non taliban figures make up a part of them that american youth can report within the caliber believe it. there will be a powerful itala baldessari inside story parker, a frank assessment of the days headlines subscribe. now, however you listened to podcast with the world's pollinators ar

increase the appeal of china. while the comically speaking, sometimes i often to remit and economies eat on image. ah, but by following it on path, it does not speak to me africa, nissan, anemic. in terms of balance. and i think those 2 things, one is to constants. however, our look at everything that means that by the leader of china as more public diplomacy, but it meant to be those of the continent. and generally, the local population that has been complaining about increased chinese influence in ways that sometimes these advantages efficient local antennae, golden are becoming. but for this question by 31 to andy mach bouncing spring in, earlier in the week we showed on al jazeera report, why chinese mind officials had sanctioned the beating of a local man in the democratic republic of congo for stealing cobalt rock. this was videoed, as we showed widely, we reported on it when anti mocked, says, you know, china's initial false, always the empathy with africa being equal with africa, understanding the needs of

we are not in china. rep. castro: this is not necessarily have to be something that in flames tensions towards china. there is already in the united states, and in the congress -- [no audio] -- also have to define when they cheat. this could be a way to a greater understanding of their perspective. there are challenges that americans and congress face. i do not believe we have clearly defined what it is we should compete with china when they are competing with the united states and other nations. when they are cheating and when -- and what we need to call them out and finally when we ought to cooperate on certain issues like climate change or security in different regions of the world. jonathan: this is no small feat getting bipartisan legislation related to this center. it was introduced alongside republicans like gallagher. both of you have spent time talking about china and the challenges it represents. what you talk about it it different ways. you have characterized a challenge in different ways. you said

and china. i think in china's case we might come to this in a second, it actually reversed 17 years or so of reforms on global public health where it was being more cooperative, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps throughout that period, and what 2020s did was bring it to a halt and reverse it. i think it is a separate dynamic and not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> i get to the subtitle but just on the u.s.-china stuff, china's lack of cooperation with the w.h.o., trump's got a very salty, not sure what the rules are on the commonwealth -- >> in the audience, probably the -- >> trump says something very spicy about what campaign has done to him, to them personally. but talk to us a little bit about what you discovered in terms of the w.h.o. politics. >> in trump's case the shock to him of having to shut down the economy really cost him to turn reinventions on xi jinping and doors those in his administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approa

if anyone in china wants to split any part of china against china or from china, he or she becomes our public enemy. >> xi and his loyalists often respond with what aboutism. they argue, what about american human rights abuses. >> if any country has practiced genocide, it is not china. enslavery of negro americans for example, for hundreds of years, that's the real crime against humanity. >> china's abuses are mostly hidden from western eyes. >> why you are here? >> we are here to believe what -- we are here to film what we believe are camps of uyghurs. >> xi's -- is part of a larger campaign to snuff out separatist threats everywhere. from xinjiang to tibet to hong kong. it's one of the final pieces of china's revolution under xi jinping. >> for years, china had had an almost apologetic approach to its human rights abuses. xi jinping said, that's no longer how we are going to talk about it. we are not going to apologize. they were just going do it. >> for all the criticism from the west, it's important to understand that in china, which is more than 90% hahn chinese, there is not much

-china. it comes to taiwan, though, the world has a different view of taiwan than it does of hong kong. there is great anxiety. the potential of a clash between the two is real as far as he is concerned. so we will have to watch what they do. shery: it was one virtual summit that really doesn't change the long-term picture. you need to have a better strategy for both sides to come together. this coming at a time when we continue to have all of these other issues in the background as well as supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures as well. haslinda: communications need to be kept open. they talked about how they want janet yellen to keep talking, communication has to be open. today there will be a discussion on emerging power. we have a minister of india who will be weighing in on the issue, coming as the backdrop of tensions between india and china as a border going on, and the clashes remained. shery: what to expect the rest of the day as we are wrapping up the final day of the b

china's foreign minister. and they worked out an agreement the taliban would promote and allow chinese investment. there's another great price in afghanistan. geologists estimate there is about $1 billion of rare earth minerals, critical for the construction of lithium batteries -- which are going to fuel our transport and much of our reserve power as we switch from fossil fuels to solar power -- afghanistan has $1 billion of rare earth minerals that are very valuable to china and the whole international economy. china will begin developing those in conjunction with the taliban. in effect, china sat back, surrounded afghanistan with its geopolitical network and waited for it to fall into its hands. and they did not pay a dollar. and we spent $8 trillion on afghanistan and got nothing . juan: professor, i wanted to ask you, in this conflict between china and the united states, these two countries are not alone, obviously. the belt and road initiative is meant to win friendship and support china from other parts

so, for example, china only has one military base outside of mainland china, and that's in djibouti. they're working very hard to place military bases in other continents around the world, but the united states is far ahead of china in that respect. still, they've done a lot of work under their belt and road initiative to expand their alliances around the world whether it's in africa or latin america or europe, just everywhere, and they're doing it very quickly. >> when it comes to diplomacy and who's winning sort of the game of influence between the united states and china, you know, china has distributed 1.1 billion vaccines. that's according to some data, guy. and the united states has delivered about 190 billion vaccines. you know, the chinese vaccine may not be as effective, probably as effect as u.s. vaccines, but how do you think the united states has faired when compared to china when it specifically relates to sort of vaccine diplomacy coming out of this coronavirus pandemic? >> well, i've been among the members of congress who have argued we should do more for the world. ob

china was quite different. link -- english language state media highlighted xi jinping's calls for respect and cooperation. >> beijing has described the meeting as fruitful and constructive and says it opened doors to future communication. chinese state media said it was reassuring to the international community that these two superpowers were trying to manage their differences. xi jinping went into this meeting wanting to appear strong, wanting to defend china 's interests. he did that in two areas. in trade, he said he wanted to fast-track economic exchanges between the countries and warned joe biden against using security issues this oppressed companies. the second topic was in regards to taiwan, arguably the most important topic for beijing. xi jinping warned president biden that any kind of talk of taiwan independence would be playing with fire and that in turn, they promised to abide by the one china principle. if you contrast the earlier meeting we had in alaska between the two sides, a meeting for love

however, to see a china, it is not the china needs to climb the local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the one format they can actually come, deep level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean and glen decent. thank you to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robotics and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah and a november 21st venezuelans head for the poles, teaches the regional and municipal representatives. after 4 years of election boycott can proposition party effect change at the ballot box and will this be a step towards progress for the rising number of those living in extreme poverty? the ve

in china, there is a process in china. if you allege someone did something to you, you can do this in multiple ways. posting ah, writing other internet is one of the many ways. and each way of dealing with this will trigger different consequences. i'm so happy that we all know that portray as a household naming china is highly liked and she is highly respected. she is no, not only in china, she is no everywhere and i'm pretty sure upon so i will continue to be very famous, very well liked and very well respected throughout the world. this is what matters the most. and i hope events like this will not be a highly publicized or politicized, because that's not the most constructive way to deal with. such highly personal matters to start with. and privacy need to be respected and privacy is what matters when you have, in a very, very personal things, emotional things like this. so i'm just going to share this with him later. this is from one of our viewers who've been following the story on my laptop, vincent comments, the chi

into china. the world needs china, china needs the world and we have henry kissinger talking about improvement, and optimism about the relationship. so it does seem that there's a continuing -- tinge of positive moving between china and relations with the world. mark: you're right, the narrative at the moment is definitely continuinged more -- tinged more positively. and the xi-biden summit or virtual summit where there was a positive takeaway. not a massive one. and they'll need to distinguish between the fact that it was definitely positive. jut very incrementally so. the fact that they met at all and as you say that's encouraged or furthered by some of the sounds we're hearing of the new economy forum here. we're hearing some generally very positive statements. but i wouldn't want to run too far. and i'm thankful you didn't ask me to explain that bit and crypto because i can never explain that asset class. dani: i don't know if anyone really can or we're taking a stab in the dark. really inter

into china? do they want to maintain the status quo? >> the question of taiwan is obviously and probably for its technology. allow would say is that there is a kind of -- i would say that there is a kind of different face in terms of the u.s.-china relations. competition is the dominant paradigm away from the management that was -- was marked with more potential for engagement or even some sort of accommodation. we see on the question of taiwan, it is not just that the united states, we have heard president biden making certain declarations that had to be walked back. strategic ambiguity, being reiterated. partners and allies on the matter of taiwan, going as far as the point where even european union is exercising its normative power over taiwan. something that we would not have seen a couple of years ago. i think these are significant developments that point to a much more competitive approach and disagreements where the two sides are at. >> great having you. university of sydney lecturer on th

tom: you talked about china. do you get the sense that markets are maybe underestimating the economic drag that a slowdown in china could have more could broadly have more for the global economy? >> i do. i i think markets have short memories. but markets in this casecase remember what happened last and the last sort of china slowdown. markets got over tight about it. at this point they are slightly underestimating the magnitude of change going onnchange going o r itn is the particular slowdown n the property sector. this is almost more important because it has become so significant to china and the demographics in china are not great. the median sainl now above the u.s. -- age is now above the u.s. tom: we're running short of time. we appreciate your insight. thank your insight. thank you. london royal asset management. coming up, it is shattering all kinds of records. the turkish lira will be focused on tom: good wednesday morning from bloomberg's european headquarters in london. these are the stories setting y

that means there's one china. taiwan and china. not china turns it one way. other countries interpret it another way. we maintained the illusion of one china. so this is a pretty big deal. i think it's dangerous because the more we push on taiwan to china, the more we risk a con in grags in the taiwan straits. >> there may have been semantic differences there in the president biden, what he's said, for example, at a town hall versus for example the summit he had with the leader of china last week. senior administration officials says biden was clearly reaffirming the one china policy. but ambassador, it's interesting. so china is threatened or upset by the united states' democracy inviting taiwan, a democracy, to a meeting about democracy. what's the threat for china? >> well, china sees taiwan not as a separate country. and china sees taiwan as an island over there that is democratic, but from china's perspective is chinese. and that's the main reason why china feels taiwan should not be invited separately to this summit. >> right. it's kind of like what it

so if you want to fuse the whole situation, just a found china, you know, we will stick by the one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in, because it's a button that he calls china explains, we're fully committed to one china policy just combo. but they don't repeat the rhetoric towards the international community. after getting off the call with china, the americans begin suggesting by one must have an independent representation in the urine, which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last that before the session. so in this, no, it's a little bit like your credit. you want to have it both ways. you say we're going to live by the agreements, but at the same time that you throw them away in order to and how's your strategic advantage? so it's very, how can you have diplomacy or, or is it must be very frustrating. well, in it but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professional isabel this? i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is soupy chic ambiguity. that that's the corners, the corner stone of it. ok. and

and china. in china's case, we might come to this in a second, it reversed 17 years or so on global public health where it was more cooperative,e, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps and 2020 brought that to a halt and reverse it so i think it. is a separate dynamc is not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> in a second i'll get to the subtitle, and of the old international order but on the u.s. china, fascinating material about china's corporation with the who, i'm not sure the language was. >> the audience evidence quote. >> he said something about what xi jinping has done to him personally but talk about what you discovered in terms of who politics. >> entrance case, the shock to him of having tohe shut down the economy in turn with a vengeance and xi jinping in the administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approach but after who questioned, this is fascinating, the who finds out they have this global crisis in the dictator in china, they beli

then china has decision. i can say i'll give up to live to fight another way or i can try to escalate this. they lost in the immediate battle and they can do that, they could blow some tankers in the middle east but have probably not matter that much. or they could see launch nuclear strikes in america in we're really going to be angry and we can impose costs back on them by then that context it will be the ones are been what i think of as the burden of escalation. they are going to seem like the aggressor and the bad guy and we will be, fdr talked about our righteous might or the flashing sort of anger or vengeance i should say. that's not going to end well for them either. that kind of mixture is the right for emphasizing to his right strategy plus the right strategy for the american people. we can't have a strategy that relies on acceptance risks with a think about how we would get there. >> we're going to go to audience questions next. i want to hit you with one more because of one mature we talked about

i would not say future for china. china is changing, and nobody can know what exactly the future is going to be. >> i wonder if that was a way of being careful to not say something. are you -- do you think about how your words are heard in china when you answer questions like that? >> i'm sure they're monitoring every words -- every sentence i talk. and -- but that will not affect me. but only when i'm trying to predict what is going to happen, there's many possibilities, and i don't think we can easily talk about it in my interview. >> but are any of them hopeful? >> i don't think so. not in a short time. >> you know, your fath was sent for reform through labor in xinjiang? you were with him there. and, of course, that is the site that today is a place where uyghurs are sent for forced re-education and labor camps. what is the west's responsibility with respect to human rights in china? >> what's the responsibility? i would think, if you just talk a lot, it would be empty words. morally and practically, if west are n

the so called one china principal. and it's very, very clear. there's only one china, taiwan, it's a part of it and it's capitalism, aging. so this is very explicit and this has worked for 40 years and from china's perspective, obviously it wants to have pie one back. but you can do this by peaceful means because it's power girls relative to us every year. so at some point they can, you know, gradually bring them in with comic incentives or however it is fun, but time is on china side. so really oh, as a result in the use, it's time is mostly on that side. over the past few years you see it's beginning to chip away then at the one china policy, upgrading official status. 1 referring to morrison and defend state, also the from boldly to taiwanese to maybe seek independence. so if the govern dependents, this is the one scenario where china will intervene militarily. so if you want to the fuel situation, just the found china, you know, we will stick by the one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in becaus

so standing alone, let's say that japan stands up to china, china would beat them around. and we're too far in our ability to project power so we need countries to work together. the question, what does that look like? i don't have a fixed view what's that going to look like. i don't think that we need an asian nato, it may involve too much commitment. this is something loosely that i'm talking about. so a country like india, our relationship right now is probably pretty good. that we're able to do more and more and more, but actually india pulls a lot of its own weight. it's know the interested in being a tributary of the united states. my view, we should outsource south asia to the indians and then we'll have to have more relationships and alliances. i think of alliances formal commitment as sort of the steel in the spine of the coalition. that's like japan, effectively taiwan, australia, if the chinese get out they'll push through the maritime approaches and if we can told them there, speaking of churchill one of my favorite quotes i think world war ii-- world war i or

china does so against particular interpretation of history. china is ambitious. china is aggrieved. and it is trying to increase its influence, especially in its neighborhood, in the south china sea and the taiwan straits. the united states, for its part, is worried about its relative decline, influence, and relative wealth. the two countries have truly begun clashing in the western pacific. they have interests that are clashing. i'm afraid that for the long-term this is going to be a worldwide competition in the security, economic, technological, and international law and ideology spheres. this is going to be with us for a long time. host: where do our interests class? guest: our interests clash in the western pacific, where the united states, she has not signed the u.n. convention on the law of the sea, never act in accordance with it. do not see this enormous area as china's leg. we see it as part of the global commons through which all countries should be able to sail or fly, in accordance with international law. whereas china increasingly is trying to assert its dominance in th

to have greater china's focus on china. when there is a lot of pushback in some of these recent decisions that i think really for the first time are showing that the rubber is starting to meet the road, in terms of a u.s. shift towards china. especially for example, the withdrawal from afghanistan or this recent deal with australia with a submarine. these are disruptive decisions, but they could be part of this larger shift. there is a lot of criticism, for both parties, two elements of those decisions. i'm wondering, how do you do that? >> i think the good news is, right now when it comes to china, they're strong bipartisan support both in the house and the senate. that we need to basically deal with the issues associated with china. there's a lot of legislation in the works. we've got the military build. the pacific initiative. they're building on that. the pentagon gets it. so, i actually think that is one of the real good things in our congress right now. people are are not fighting the problem in terms of understanding

and china or western countries in general and china are more interdependent than china -- and china is more wealthy than the soviet union was. >> that is right. china's greater wealth means it does turn into a cold war. it could last a great deal longer. the cold war was losing -- china has got a much greater capacity to select this out. this could drag on for decades. because the two are economically intertwined. on the u.s. end of it, u.s. business community has pushed back on hawkish voices in washington. against those who want to take a larder -- a harder line on china. u.s. business community softened on china. there have been a lot of issues with piracy and it alledge will property. i don't think the u.s. business community is deterring the hawks anymore. there is increasingly a bipartisan agreement that china is a strategic competitor. >> let's get the view from taipei. why do you of western interest has increased in taiwan lately? we have had not only this visit from embers of congress but we also had visits from european officials to taipei. >> whether this framework was -- th

and china. coming up next, pimco's analyst joins us to talk about the outcome and the outlook for the market. this is bloomberg. - ♪ >> if china is considered un-investable, then chances are whatever risk you are thinking about bearing in china, you would be ok to take it. china has not had a recession since the mouth -- the mouth -- the mao era, which ended in 1978. these things have not been tested, but we are optimistic. >> speaking there on the opportunities in china. let's bring in the coo of global credit at pimco. it feels like investors are starting to see the pockets of opportunity as being worth the risk. how do you feel about credit in china at the moment? >> we definitely have exposure in china, and it is more of a long-term view that china's economy is going to grow relatively fast over the next 10 years, particularly relative to developed markets. if you look at the consumer, the percent of the overall economy, it still has a lot of upside. those consumers will want to take more

china relations. can you elaborate a little bit more on that. >> there is something to the acceleration you know argument particularly with the u.s. and china. i will come back to that in a second but i don't think it really captures everything. populism was on the rise prior to covid and we can talk about it but arguably covid said it back, so it might have you know actually reversed the trend in the case of populism. some of the populace as you know -- very popular coming out of the pandemic but it was a big stumbling block for those in power so that was sort of acceleration of a trend and in the developing world in reverse and in decades, sort of plunged the country's back, so to me i don't think acceleration in a really captures it. most applicable is sort of the u.s. and china, but even there dramatic acceleration in my mind is not the continuation of the trend. it's a different scenario because going forward very rapidly has momentum and character all of its own. that sort of what happened in 20

of china of raping the united states, you want to call on china and you want to man handle china? china will stand up. known it, why don't you say so?♪ ♪didn't even notice,♪ ♪no punches left to roll with♪ ♪you got to keep me focused♪ we have to be able to repair the enamel on a daily basis. with pronamel repair toothpaste, we can help actively repair enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative. my go to toothpaste is going to be pronamel repair. ♪ ♪ there are beautiful ideas that remain in the dark. but with our new multi-cloud experience, you have the flexibility you need to unveil them to the world. ♪ hey! it's me! your dry skin! i'm craving something we're missing. the ceramides in cerave. they help restore my natural barrier, so i can lock in moisture. we've got to have each other's backs. cerave. developed with dermatologists. ♪ ♪ well would you look at that? ♪ ♪ jerry, you've got to see this. seen it. trust me, after 15 walks ...it gets a little old. ugh. i really should be retired by now. wish i'd invested when i had the chance... to the moon!

welcomes all countries to participate in the developer initiative of china and that china must aaron t quality of opportunity, rules, and that china should not force other nations. president xi jinping delivering the first doctrine on the communist party history in 40 years. rishaad: monitoring all things china today. with our chief north asia correspondent. i lot of, how can i say, justification, talking about common prosperity. things are being framed ideologically here. what is your take from that? stephen: it is the communist party of china. they talk in these ideological terms. essentially what the communist party officials are doing is putting a big, nice bow, wrapping up the plenum but of course wrapped up yesterday that essentially sealed this historic document, proclamation if you will, that xi jinping will be enshrined in the party way going forward, and it essentially gives him a mandate to potentially rule indefinitely. there is no heir apparent named or even promoted to a position where we would all assume this would be the person, much like was done when jintao was -- w

is working to counter china's influence. just 24 hours after she and biden met for the 1st time via video on tuesday, china's vice president's dress that beijing and washington should keep their focus on cooperation. managing control their differences to not only bring the bilateral relationship back on track, but also contribute to the world economic recovery and peace. joining us now to break all this down, professor richard, well, host of economic update always a pleasure to have you. professor will top us trade and commerce officials are meeting this week with their counterparts in japan, south korean india, but not china in attempt to build stronger economic ties with friendly nations and asia. why leave china out of these discussions? well, i think it's a combination policy. you'll reach out with one hand to china because you know, you have to. and then with the other hand, you kind of slap them a little bit, hoping that somehow this combination works better than the 2 alternatives by themselves. we've tried the bluste

the same applies when it comes to china. where are the stable and predictable policies we were told about? ah, to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess, jordan, samuel in budapest. he's a podcast to read the goggle and can, which can be found on youtube and locals. and in also we have these and he is professor at the university of southeastern norway as well as author of great power politics and the 4th industrial revolution. hi gentlemen, crossed out rules and effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i would appreciate it, it was good to glen in our slow glen over the last couple of weeks. we're getting a lot of different conflicting signals. let's focus in on the, from the bite administration on foreign policy. let's focus in on ukraine here as it's well known as the, the, to stop the worst part of the hostilities after the illegal takeover of power in 19, i'm sorry, 2014. we had the minster courts and russia is not a part of the conflict, but now we're getting from brussels in washington. now

and that is of real concern to china. but at the same time that china is a planned economy level, one of the last from a to find economies in the world and its current system for supplying power to the country simply has not kept up with the rest of technology. it's very rigid, and it really does require coal, it to simply, it does not kind of simply does not have the infrastructure required to link up all these renewable energy targets of renewable energy sources rather to these factories that needed thoughts. that being said, because of this power crisis we had on october 12, the chinese government announced what some analysts of cold attack tonic change. now, previously china had caps on coal fired power plants, caps on coal produced energy. and because of these caps on the pricing, this is what made coal so appealing because it was so cheap and so reliable. but now that china has removed these caps, it's liberalizing its energy system. coal will no longer be as cheap. and we know now the coal is no longer as reliable,

should china attack it or invade it? okay, well, so since it's what's causing them, the chinese is great anxiety about similar tenuously while that's happening in the south china sea or the indo pacific as, as we now call it the all because veal, the pull out of a get this done. i mean the obviously the we their easton took is done is that make the movement has been taken off the u. s. terrorist list and you, china is putting $2000000.00 of burn leave investment to have get this done. one f b i whistle blow, sybil edmund sydney to seize. jin chang is the next tie. one is actually it happening simultaneously. is that credible lid? no, it's a little bit. i think this is very credible because me and part of sullivan's talk, he said, part of setting the part of setting this new global order. in the c n n interview. he said, well, he said also it would be based on enshrining the text of the declaration, the universal declaration of human rights into every international institution as well as into the border. and i think it's

to the other case is a colony of china. and from the colony of u. k. but cartoon has always been very powerful that even the chinese government knows that to some extent they're quite afraid of. it was quite a little bit of lucky for me. i'm currently working from daddy and danny. i think this is the only 2 newspaper that allow me to, to cartoon. but there are a lot of father young cotton 1st off the job and they were quite afraid of the new national security law. they don't want to draw the national flag or the hong kong stack and they won't play with the national anthem. they used to make fun of seeing things so right right now they are afraid of doing as trying to cotton their red lines everywhere. and we won't know where the red line moved on one side from rock direction. and it's actually the casing right now in hong kong. me. so it's important for us to, to keep on trying to and to one day this is a lie. if the thing that they're, they're not going to do something i'm asked, but to me as a constant is of cause we have