no, it's okay, mr. duffy. we love looking at you. >> clerk: yeah, it's still kind of going in and out. are you able to call in, maybe, to use the call-in number, and then, we could -- we could unmute you? so the -- not sure if you can hear me, joe. the call-in number is 1-415-655-0001. >> go ahead, sonya. give me the number. >> clerk: 415-655-0001. >> could you repeat that again? >> clerk: sure. 415-655-0001. >> okay. >> clerk: and there's an access code. it's 146-829-7021. did you get that, joe? >> operator: i just texted it to him. >> yes. >> clerk: okay. thank you. >> madam secretary, then, should we go to item 5 or should we just wait for joe to call in? >> clerk: it's up to you, whatever you'd like. >> let's just give it a minute, and if joe gets in in a minute, we'll go to item 5, and if not, we'll go to item 4, if that's okay with my fellow commissioners. >> clerk: okay. >> i'm trying to get in. >> clerk: okay. president mccarthy, would you like to go to item 5 and then go back to 4? >> let's do that if

mr. duffy instructed to withdraw the fire permit, and mr. duffy, on his own initiative, added the words laundry area to the replacement area, which is his prerogative. i'll note mr. duffy stated that he is [inaudible] to redesignate an illegal kitchen destroyed by a fire as a laundry. it was properly designated as a laundry in the march 2020 abatement permit, not that it's even required. there was no misrepresentation here. the department approved the subject permits with full knowledge. michael relied on the permits, did the construction permits with numerous inspections, and started on the work, and now is finished almost eight months later. planning now says there's a problem and suspends his permits? that's wrong. moreover, it's banned by the concept of latches. it's illegal, and a regulatory taking, and the city is barred from doing that by estoppel and invested rights doctrine. this is not a simple case of blocking authority to create a separation. it's also not the issue in this appeal, and that's important. the subject permits do not

i'm missing something here, i guess. >> president honda: mr. duffy? >> commissioners, joe duffy, d.b.i. so i -- you know, from what i'm hearing, i mean, it's a tricky one, as well. even if we ended up, the board of appeals handled this, what happens with the suspension from planning? if d.b.i. found out that this permit was reviewed and issued in error, we have the right to revoke that permit, as well. i just don't know the extent of the violations or the corrections that would need to be made. i would love to see the plans that goes submitted and what were approved. let me get back to you, but we've been on this 2.5 hours already this evening. >> president honda: we only have one case, you know that? >> i know, but it's definitely -- conditioning it, i don't know what we would end up conditioning. i don't know what we approved and what is really out there, and then, obviously, you've got planning, as well, coming in for their requirements. >> president honda: thank you. does that answer your question, commissioner lazarus? >> commissioner lazarus: ye

duffy and then i would like to speak. >> thank you. i just wanted to speak up and maybe i should have given you this information. i checked on the enforcement on this case and d.b.i. has an order of abatement posted on the property for that. i would need to probably go back to code enforcement to see how far that is down the road but that's going back to 20th of may 2020 and it was probably contacted and the last note was in may of of 2020 that there was a permit filed and the violation remains active with our progress so you know, i know that they want more time here but just if we have orders posted on this, i'm not sure how much time that would help because if they were refinancing or something like that on the property and there's anna baitment it can get messy at that point. obviously, happy to work with the board and the applicant on a good solution here and i'm just wondering, as well, in fact, sometimes i have seen people, i'm not sure what the structure looks like in its self but reducing it in side could be the best option an

for me, welcome back to mr. stuart varney and also my condolences on england last night. stuart: i knew you were going to go there i knew you were going to go there, going to read from the script i won't deviate from the script at all. good morning cheryl and good morning, everyone. it is great to be back, yes i was on vacation for ten days and had a very relaxing time but i came face-to-face with inflation, no matter what the official numbers tell us i am here to tell you that prices are rising for everything, we will get into that a little bit. i came home sunday morning and watch

for me, welcome back to mr. stuart varney and also my condolences on england last night. stuart: i knew you were going to go there i knew you were going to go there, going to read from the script i won't deviate from the script at all. good morning cheryl and good morning, everyone. it is great to be back, yes i was on vacation for ten days and had a very relaxing time but i came face-to-face with inflation, no matter what the official numbers tell us i am here to tell you that prices are rising for everything, we will get into that a little bit. i came home sunday morning and watch novak djokovic and then i watched italy beat england, very disappointing but it was great to see dramatic sporting events played from the massless crowds, i think sport one, covid lost, a lot more on that coming up, guaranteed. on the market this morning, not that much price movement that may change when the prophet reports starts to roll in and that starts tomorrow the major average close to record highs, the dow this morning will b