where ronald reagan was speaking and obviously ronald reagan would have been notable to people in california at the time due to being in movies. so paul ax salt and ronald reagan as respective governors of their neighboring states, california and nevada one of their big initiatives that they work together on was was really the the conservation of the lake tahoe basin and lake tahoe the lake itself. they formed what was called the tahoe regional planning agency trpa. and that was just that that was to try to stymie some of the development. try to make better water quality in the lake and and that kind of created a friendship that lasted basically for the rest of their lives the rest of their careers. in 1976 the the presidential election was coming up. so you have gerald ford running as the incumbent of the republican party and then you have jimmy carter who is running for the democratic party. paul laxalt again, like i said a minority within a minority there thought it would be a good idea. for ronald reagan, maybe to throw his hat in the ring and run for president. to run the primaries he t

ronald reagan library. it says what about where she was born? and and what's the real story? well, this was actually the library has it correctly, but i when i was in the library i came across her official biography. as california first lady and it claims that she was born in chicago the only daughter of dr. loyal and edith davis. in fact, she was born in new yorkn 1921. although for decades she would claim it was 1923. he was the product of very bad match between and ambitious actress and an unsuccessful car salesman whose marriage was effectively over went by the time this very inconveniently timed baby arrived. so her parents her biological parents go their separate ways. and as soon as nancy is out of diapers her mother. she continues to pursue her acting career pursue her very busy social life, and she leaves her daughter for the next six years with relatives in maryland. this child spent six years yearning yearning for this absent mother. and it really leaves a shadow on her spirit awareness on her sp

true to ronald reagan. she is suspicious of all the sort of reagan wannabes who sort of want to co-opt him and use his name and image for their own agendas. and she does something too that i found fascinating, which is that while on the one hand among conservatives ronald reagan becomes this icon and not always in ways that make her comfortable. she resists when they want to knock fdr off the dime and put ronald reagan on it, but she also knows there is still this perception of him among liberals, liberal scholars, liberal historians, his opponents that he, you know, that he was just an actor, you know? he wasat reading lines that othr people wrote for him. andd she decides the very best, truest record is to put out there his thoughts, his values, his belief in his own handwriting. so you see her decide to publish his diaries, you know, something that very few prime ministers had ever -- presidents had ever done, keeping realtime diaries so that people can see in his own hand what he was thinking at all the

reagan in a way that is true to ronald reagan. she does something that i found fascinating which is while on the one hand, conservatives ronald reagan becomes this icon. but she also knows that there is still this perception among the liberal scholars and historians that he was just an actor reading lines other people wrote for him. his value and belief in his own handwriting so you see he begins to publish his diaries, something very few presidents have ever done in keeping real-time diaries so people can see in his own hand at the crucial juncture. he publishes his letters and all the speeches that he was writing as he was getting ready to run for president and you can see in his own hand that these were his thoughts and values she didn't want it to be a monument just to the past but also to point to the future which is why you see that it's become a site for so many important events where george w. bush comes to lay out his vision and afford policy. i can't even count how many republican presidential debates have been held at t

to ronald reagan. he was a believer in the difficult prophecy of armageddon. hers reallyf was enough of my dealers who envisioned a world without nuclear weapon. that something she understood about him but not a lot of people did at that time. but again truly a marriage. so the two of them would have these arguments where she would want him to tone down his rhetoric. she was especially disturbed as an evil empire and iva pretty hilarious scene of the two of them over dinner one night. but she does understand that with gorbachev he potentially has a partner who could work with him on this. when she is just absolutely relentless in pushing for this to happen. her husband's own administration as caspar weinberger said in one of the oral histories i read, she really had -- with a lot more willing to trustli the soviets that a lot of us were because she had a lot of faith and her husband's ability as a negotiator. >> after president reagan wrote the letter to his people revealing his diagnosis with alzheime

there to brief ronald reagan. but it's a black eye on his administration. he had good intentions of freeing the hostages and the hostages were being tortured. no one profited from the iran-contra. it was wrong and reagan took his lumps and it is something that needs to be considered when you consider all the aspects of his presidency because i remember the time 1986 when his popularity, 65 approval raiding down to 45% approval raiding in a matter of days because of a controversy over the iran-contra. that certainly cost a lot of people their jobs and it was the month-long debate here in washington and in the united states before was cleared up. >> host: before we run out of time we have a half-hour left i want to make sure to get to your most recent book the untold story of george washington's mother and the rightol mary washington used the faÇade of motherly virtue to control her son in the same way he led the country to break away from his overbearing -- george had to struggle to find independence in his f own

there are two statues of ronald reagan. one down the river where he was a lifeguard and saved 77 lives as a high school lifeguard and near the boyhood home there on dixon so it's important and also important to remember he moved around many times as a child. his father was a shoe salesman well-known and took jobs in many locations including chicago and in many other places. this is important but there's a number of homes he lived in including college where he was a member and had been to church as well. once joked he served food and a women's sorority and joked later that it was the best job he ever had. >> george from manassas georgia texts in can you comment on the importance of the radio show that he did between 1976 and 1980 and he goes on to say i heard president reagan's begin 1975 and it changed me. it felt like he spoke only to me was his comment. >> what a wonderful letter. wi'm glad he brought up the rao show because it was important. this is the era before cable television and the internet. you are limited in you

peter: pointed you first meet ronald reagan. craig: i first met ronald reagan in 1978. i was working on the campaign and gordon humphrey was considered by everybody at the time is a long shot and actually ended up winning. over his incumbent, 6000 votes and reagan came up to campaign and obviously it was a very important primary and reagan did win new hampshire 1980 and he came up to campaign and ran for the election of the time and he came in to the hampshire hybrid hotel and did a phone commercials for humphrey and i was there in the lobby and is accompanied by two aides and so governor reagan and i just lobbying and you know, had been in this man for many years. he was completely jovial we talked about high school college boards only light. and about the weather and have he was utterly charming and kind. and there he was just the 21 -year-old kid talking to the national leader of american conservatism. leading contender for the republican nomination and he gave me nothing but kindness and generosity of his spirit. that was a memory that will carry with me for the res

we covered her at an event at the ronald reagan library. sandy in montgomery, alabama. >> i'm celebrating my sixteenth birthday today, i remember my dad saying in regard to fdr the day of infamy, he had 2 other brothers and four sisters and i remember him saying he and one of his siblings, were driving on their way to see my grandparents and the bulletin came over the car radio, the japanese bombed pearl harbor and my dad and my aunt looked at each other, they were thinking the same thing, stationed on pearl, a lot of things going through your mind, grandparents did not have a radio, my dad and my aunt decided not to say anything, luckily my uncle called, an inordinate amount of time, you can imagine what they went through, as time went on, my grandparents got word the japanese bombed pearl harbor. was in sick bay that day recovering from an appendectomy. >> host: can you bring this to a wrap? >> caller: basically nationalism was running very good. my other outs were making military, my other two uncles, my dad served in the marines, my unc

from the speech of ronald reagan was born an enduring movement. one that redefined a political party and reshaped the nation, no exaggeration. ronald reagan spoke that night of a time for choosing and over the following decades, americans would indeed choose a sunny yet serious conservatism, a conservatism that has been and animating force, the very lifeblood of the republican party that has been a beacon for freedom and liberty for nearly six decades. yet, as we gather here this evening, the republican party is facing another time for choosing. what will it represent in the years ahead? what does it stand for? where is it going? to rephrase that question from president reagan's farewell address in 1989, can you hear his voice as he asks, instead of how stands that shining city on a hill, how stands the party, how stands the movement on this night? it is a question a lot of people have been asking regardless who you might have supported in the last presidential election. it's a question the reagan foundation has come to answer with a speaker serie

the republican ticket of ronald reagan and w.h. bush went on to beat mondale and geraldine ferraro in the general election.

ronald reagan was goldwater reen c goldgoldw goldwater reincarnated. ronald reagan toke the goldwater message. >> he's at the sense of real triumph that america is going to change its fundamental ways. >> he was and is a republican icon for defeating the soviet union. >> but once again, a conservative darling shocked the base with his domestic policies. >> he didn't cut spending and he ended up as you know exploding the defibt deficit. >> the reagan revolution turned out to be more than reality. reagan even expanded medicaid. when reagan left office not having radically transformed america, conservatives became ready. the right long for a fighter. and reagan's successor, the elite, george h.w. bush did not fit the bill. >> conservatives felt betrayed one more time. now they found a new hero, the man who wrecked bush's president. newt gingrich. >> once the democrats was back in if white house, newt gingrich became leader of the opposition. >> we are going to change their world, they'll do anything to stop us. >> gingrich pioneered the fight club mentali

then in 1980, ronald reagan beat the pants off us. so tonight, i want to say something to those of you across the country who voted for ronald reagan, republicans, independents, and yes, some democrats. i heard you and our party heard you. after we lost, we didn't tell the american people that they were wrong. instead, we began asking you what our mistakes had been. and for four years, i listened to all of the people of our country. i traveled everywhere. it seemed like i had visited every area of america. it wasn't easy. i remember late one night, as i headed from a speech in one city so a hotel 1,000 miles away, a friend of mine said, fritz, i just saw you on tv. are those bags under your eyes natural? [ laughter ] and i said, no, i got them the old-fashioned way. i earned them. [ cheers ] [ chanting ] to the thousands of americans who welcomed me into your homes and into your businesses, your churches and your synagogues, i thank you. you confirmed my belief in our country's values. and you helped me learn and grow. so tonight wedg

ronald reagan was goldwater's r r reincarnated. >> it only took them 16 years to count the vote. >> ronald reagan took the goldwater's message and he put a sunnier face on. >> he had a sense of real triumph, america's society is going to change their fundamental ways. >> he was and is a republican icon for defeating the soviet union. but, once again a conservative darling shocked the base with his domestic policies. >> he didn't cut spending. he ended up as you know exploded the debt and the deficit. >> the reagan revolution turned out to be more rhetoric than reality. the great society state, reagan even expanded medicaid. >> when reagan left office not having radically transformed america, conservatives became more ready. >> the right long for a fighter, reagan, the elite, george w. bush did not fit the bill. >> conservatives felt betrayed one more time. now they found the new hero, the man who wrecked bush's presidency, newt gingrich. >> he went with the message of rage and resentment and betrayal and cultural war. >> we'll change their world, they'll do anything to stop us. >> gingrich

ronald reagan was goldwater reincarnated. only better looking and smoother talking. >> i think george will put it well. that barry gold water actually won. it just took them 16 years to count the votes. >> ronald reagan took goldwater message, but he put a sunnier face on it. >> some lights seem eternal. america's is. >> he had a sense of real triumph, a breakthrough, that america would change in some very fundamental ways. he was and is a republican icon for defeating the soviet union. but once again, a conservative darling shocked the base with his domestic policy. >> he didn't cut spending and he ended up exploding the debt and the deficit. >> the reagan revolution turned out to be more rhetoric than reality. the great society state, reagan even expanded medicaid. >> when reagan left office, not having radically transformed america, conservatives became more ready for a story of betrayal. >> the right longed for a fighter. and reagan's successor, the elite yale educated george h.w. bush, did not fit the bill. conservatives

in 1984 reran against incumbent president ronald reagan. here is her their second and debate held in kansas city, missouri, where they took questions on defense and foreign policy issues. the republican ticket of ronald reagan and george h.w. bush went on to defeat mr. mondale and his running mate, geraldine ferraro, in the general election. [ applause ] >> good evening.

including ronald reagan, and barack obama. jimmy carter. >> thank you so much for joining us today. welcome to the national building museum. my name is jeanne, on a volunteer tour guide for the museum. we are here today to go through what we call the presidential inaugural tours. we do this every four years, at inauguration time. because this building which was built as a federal office building, over 120 years ago turned out to be a wonderful place to have inaugural balls. what we want to do today is explain to you how this building got built, and it's history and how it ended up being so representative of the inaugural motion if you will. and how it is now being used. then we will show you some pictures of the inaugural balls, and history of them and put the two together and show some pictures of how the space looks when in fact the inauguration will fall is occurring in it. we will show you pictures of the last 40 years, where most of the presidents have had a ball. we are here in a space that is unusual in terms of washington d.c.. it's a city that now has mainly monuments of ma

ronald reagan was tough as nails in dealing with the soviet union. i am not awarenk of a single instance where ronald reagan was attacking individual leaders. he wanted to have results rather than domestic grandstanding. anchor: what are russia's options strategically? does russia have an option of embedding itself work closely with china? i know it has troops and an alliance with syria. does it help give chiron -- iran a sideways move in dealing with the u.s.? what are the elements of the great chessboard out there that will give russia strategic depth and options that would help maneuver around the united ates? >> russian options in that regard in terms of building strong alliances are not particularly good. i would refer again to my interview last week with president putin's press secretary. russia has good relations with a number of important countries, starting with china but russia has not seemed to realize u.s. expelling russian diplomats as assigned of solidarity with united states, not a single country is expelling american or european diplo

we'll get ronald reagan again in couple years. charles: i look ad that. i lived in new york at the time. i lived in harlem at time. i'm looking at the violence and numbers spiking across the country, i think there is a certain sort of confidence has to eminate from the president. i understand joe biden was able to win the presidency with a more negative tone. i think he has to stay negative, the notion that we're in an emergency to pass another 4 trillion in spending but i feel like it is backfiring. i do worry about the overall pulse. just saying morning in america with the confidence that ronald reagan did actually made it help to make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. >> i'm not sure i agree with you on the words being any different. i don't think words matter. i think what deeds matter. what ronald reagan did when he took office, firing air traffic controllers, threatening iran. iran returned the hostages. now we want to deal with iran? hello. also what you saw there on tax cuts and all the other stuff that he did. deregulation of energy. this guy's regu

finally, ronald reagan. and this is a more interesting comparison, in my view. because reagan famously campaigned on and then announced as he became president that government wasn't the solution, government was the problem. biden it seems to me is trying to put a-in front of that proposition. everything he does is unified by the proposition that in the circumstances we now face, government is the solution and not the problem. if he succeeds in establishing that premise in the minds of the american people as their default setting, and the jury is still out, the next decades of american public policy could be very different from the last decades, where the frame was the opposite. i will end on this morning -- ronald reagan's first year was not a single victory. it witnessed multiple legislative victories. if after the first year of the biden administration, we can see not only the rescue plan but some version of the jobs plan and some version of the family plan enacted as well as the other policies that camille and john and jon were talking about, then we can talk

his vision was, like goldwater and ronald reagan, tightly attuned to the religious topography of the oil patch. do his rise to billy -- through his ties to billy graham rather and son belt based ministries, he gained access to the aspirations of an ascendant force that would soon redefined the american political landscape. indeed, the energy crises of the 1970s would empower the self -- southwestern based evangelical and oil movement and republican right. on one hand, the global ruptures of the decade and the struggles of major oil companies to handle opec and the quest by arab oil producing countries to nationalize their industries undermined the multinational corporations and the civil religion of crude that rockefellers that once stood for. on the other, the prosperity gospel and [inaudible] that had captured the oil patch mindset in the 1930s now bloomed on a national stage, propelling the evangelical movement phenomenon that was associated as a whole into the national consciousness. famously, of course, one magazine declaring in 1976, the year of the evangelicals as well as oil

finally, ronald reagan. and this is a more interesting comparison, in my view, because reagan famously campaigned on and then announced it as he became president that government wasn't the solution, government was the problem. biden, it seems to me is trying to put a minus sign in front of that proposition and everything that he does is unified by the proposition in the circumstances we now face, government is the solution and not the problem. if he succeeds in establishing that premise in the minds of the american people as their default setting and the jury is still out on that, then the next decades of american public policy could be very different, from the past four decades where the frame was very much the opposite. however, and i'll end on this warning, ronald reagan's first year was not a single victory, it witnessed multiple legislative victories. and if, after the first year of the biden administration we can see not only the rescue plan, but also some version of the jobs plan and some version of t

on "in depth" live conversation with historian and ronald reagan biographer greg shirley, books include reagan rising, citizen news and very bald washington. on afterwords, sidney mccain talks about her life with senator john mccain in her book stronger. she is interviewed by former us senator joseph lieberman. watch booktv this weekend on c-span2. today on the communicators brookings institution vice president darrell west discusses his book turning point, policymaking in the era of artificial intelligence. >> not just one revolution taking place for 10 or 20 or 30 different things taking place simultaneously, the growing ubiquity of technology in all of our lives in every sector, in domestic policy applications as well as national defense. we have a long chapter on national defense and military applications of ai. that is the unusual aspect of this period and what makes it difficult to deal with, so much change on a widespread scale in a short time and we are all struggling to deal with it. >> darrell west today at 6:30 p.m. eastern on the communicators on c-span. sunday night on q an

bush was elected to succeed ronald reagan, no vice president was -- no sitting vice president was ever elected to the presidency other than john breckenridge in 1856, none was nominated to seek the presidency by a major party until richard nixon in 1960. and so at the beginning of the 20th century, there was a common joke that was told about the parents who had two sons, one went off to sea, the other became vice president. neither was ever heard from again. but at beginning of the 20 blg century, the vice presidency took some baby steps forward and toward the executive branch. president warren harding invited his vice president calvin coolidge to meet with the cabinet. the move was controversial at the time but vice president coolidge did meet with harding's cabinet and that became something of a tradition. frank lip roosevelt used john garner as a legislative liaison and sent him on some foreign trips before they had a falling out during the second term. president roosevelt used his second vice president henry wallace, it made him the board of economic warfare during world war ii. bu

mondale was defeated by incumbent president ronald reagan. ♪♪

it started with ronald reagan. they dismantled the unions which dismantles your pay scale which monitors how and when your working conditions are. also young people, organize, go to school. this is your golden opportunity to really be successful. be involved in your politics. host: one of those things that you talk about in your polls about political engagement amongst those polled, 36% of everyone 18 to 29 you polled said they consider themselves politically engaged. amongst whites, 36%, hispanics, 34%. how is the engagement showing itself out? guest: i love the fact that we have members of other generations using their experience to pass on in a positive way to younger people. one of the biggest divides we have in this country is the generational divide. i love the sentiment of that last caller. as you noted, we asked you to self identified and can you see yourself politically engaged. you saw how high it was with whites and blacks and hispanics, the highest in the history of the poll. every piece of data i can l

after all the things ronald reagan said, don't let him come near us. the white house is so concerned they call her son who was himself a former mayor to ask if his mother posed an actual physical threat to ronald reagan. that tells you something about the partisan route of nancy pelosi. >> you talk about how when nancy and her husband paul moved to san francisco with their children, they cannot find an apartment. tremendous pressure trying to find where they live and they finally find the perfect apartment until they find out that the landlord is going to washington. talk about that. >> so, they had four little children. they tried to find the perfect house. it's got a swing set, it's in the right place. they are about to sign the lease when they say why is this house available to rent and she says my husband got an appointment by richard nixon and that's why we are moving to washington and nancy pelosi said i can't rent a house that became available because richard nixon was elected and she wouldn't rent the house. it needed some work and that is how

buckley junior and ronald reagan were ecumenical leaders. sustaining this alliance because the theoretical instructor that came to be known as fusionism. that is a fusing or merging of the competing perspectives of therg libertarians. although with never without its critics and is and has political action proved to be considerable success. it taught libertarians andha traditionalists that they needed each other. an unmerited conservatism must not become sectarian or doctrinaire. from a historical perspective conservatism as a modus, held up pretty well during the cold war era. and for a time thereafter. about five years ago the alliance and its institutional manifestation inside the beltway came under blistering attack from the populist national eruption as it came to be called associated with donald trump. since then the conservative movement in america has been a house divided with factions engaged in an often languorous tug-of-war. no different observers use terms to characterize the contending factions elitists versus populists, the esta

and ronald reagan were its great ecumenical leaders. sustaining this alliance was a theoretical construct or modus avendy that came to be known as fusionism, that is a fusing or merging of the competing perspectives of the libertarianses and traditionalists. never without its critics, fusionism as a formula for political action proved to be a considerable success. it taught lib be tareans and traditionalists they needed each other, and that american conservatism must not become sectarian or doctrinaire. from a historical perspective, fusionism held up pretty well during the cold war era, and for a time thereafter. what five years ago the fusionist alliance and its institutional manifestations inside the beltway, came under blistering attack, from the populist nationalist eruption as it came to called associated with donald trump. since then the conservative movement in america has been a house divided, with contentious factions engaged in an often ran corious tug of war. now different observers use different terms to characterize the co

are you telling me george bush senior or ronald reagan would not say there is a federal solution to the horrific behind that is american childcare? diana: i would not say american childcare is horrific. there are many childcare providers and we can see in january and february 2020 that women were doing great. we need to go back to that time. 3.5% unemployment rate. jonathan: we need to get that back very quickly. we have to leave it there. diana furchgott-roth of george washington university. the debate starts with the economics but ends up in a political one. it is of little conversation in washington cured tom: it comes -- in washington. tom: it comes down to states rights versus a federal solution. republicans, especially entranced conservative republicans are looking at a states rights solution. all i know is every anecdotal evidence i have is women cannot go back because they do not have childcare. jonathan: cloud care issues. we saw that in the data on front desk childcare issues. we saw that in the data -- childcare issues. we saw that in the data on friday. it is the same thing.

senator, it reminds me of that we need an update about that promise famous ronald reagan quote, the most frightening words in the english lang which are i'm joe biden from the federal government and i'm here to help your family. he is that very clear tonight. >> yes. steve: great to see you. thank you very much. >> thank you. steve: alright, joining me now fox news contributor sara carter and author of always a soldier in host of the rob smith's problematic podcast, rob smith. rob, i want to get back to the beginning of how i got into this argument recently. i have always been a family policy something i've always focused on but the renewed interest in it from these terrible stories that we have been seen in these children are shot and killed in the question and you have been so vocal on this. the question is okay, fine, the left want to make it about race but no, it's about what is going on with the families of these people. speak to that now. you've been so powerful on that in the last few weeks. >> , absolutely. here's a little bit of information from the national institute of father.

reagan ronald reagan had that star wars program where he would say he could aim at these things and just shoot it out of the sky. i think we can do it, why not? >> on with the judge, sloppy labs, sloppy rockets, if this thing lands, hopefully it hits ben affleck. apparently, america is full of narcissists. people are saying they are a better person than everyone els they know, jesse, we will start that and work back around. >> i'm surprised you actually think i'm worse than half of th population. i am not a good person and i'm okay with it. >> how are you feeling about humanity? can keep me? >> juan? you know i find this in that it reminds me like my wife says to me when i said what are you singing and she says i'm just talking to myself i'm talking t the most intelligent person in the room and it reminds me that there are confident people out there, so i'd just take it as medicine, i'm surprised at how many people would say they are the smartest person. there are a lot of chips on shoulders around here. >> she is very intelligent and i'm sure you have some great conversations. i judge i

the reason ronald reagan was elected in a historic landslide is his efforts to cut regulation and benefit the people were benefiting people all across the country, but i think the important thing now, tiffany is not these civil and constructive dialogue you and i are able to have about disagreements between democrats -- traditional democrats and traditional republicans. we are now fighting about absolutely fundamental aspects of our country, commitment to democracy, rule of law, the constitution, those are things that republicans stand against now and that's what's terrifying. so you and i should continue to debate whether traditional republican or traditional democratic policies are better for america, but a far more important debate right now is at least one of those parties and the republican party no longer agrees in the middle ground about foundational, unifying things that should bring this country together. that's what's terrifying and i would end with saying, right now the biggest anti-democratic force in this country and the biggest danger to our republic is actually the republic

ronald reagan. >> ronald reagan? is that angelina jolie? >> ...thousands of them! >> it really became an obsession and a drug. >> an obsession that fathered this man's strange inheritance. >> i basically got hundreds and hundreds of boxes. >> this is truly unbelievable. what was your reaction when you saw the magnitude of what he

la última vez fue en 1986 la que firmó el ex presidente ronald reagan (nombre extranjero) nos explica de alguna de las propuestas pero propuesta migratoria presentadas este año en el congreso solo dos han sido aprobadas por una de las dos cámaras y no se sabe cuándo se llevará a un voto en la otra es parece que activistas están poniendo presión por la falta de acción me siento con mucha ansiedad de realidad estamos bien cerca después de más de una década de lucha >>> optimista se encuentra esta soñadora y madre de tres ciudadanos estadounidenses de que la administración de joe biden cumpla con su promesa de darle un camino a la ciudadanía a los 11 millones de migrantes en estados unidos que por las leyes actuales no han podido lograr este sueño la activistas temen que legisladores no actúen en este asunto por la crisis migratoria el tema de la frontera lo están utilizando como un tema para frenar los impuestos que hemos hecho para lograr una reforma integral una reforma que a verte una reforma que a verte que los 11,000,002 propuestas de ley se aprobaron en la cámara

ronald reagan who launched his campaign, america sometimes wrong but never me. you have a republican party today that revels in being wrong and is excited about being wrong and is as mean as they can be. i am worried about that in the direction they are going and also more important for the country, what are the things. what are the policies they are trying to put in place and get in the way of and be a hurdle to because of the tribalism? you know, liz cheney and other republicans can't pass the threshold. the threshold is to leech on and to perpetuate the big lie which is protecting a tribal strong man in a changing america. >> both of the gentlemen are going to stay with us. we are going to fit in a break. coming up, the uphill battle that democrats face within their own party when it comes to expanding voting rights. we will talk about the debate between reaching for the stars and just reaching for consensus. s and just reaching for consensus. . this couple was on a camping trip... ...when their windshield got a chip. they drove to safelite for a same-day rep