s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created the crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already. and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and had been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about, and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws, and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though? is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do. they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive to drive by comments and accusations. because there you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. your just seem to be reacting to russian aggression. so i think this is a really important point, you know, a document set out for present in each co

so this is difficult for the u. s. and there, i think there's a little bit of panic setting in, in recent years, is finding a way to stay relevant, finding way to stay in there. no charge if, if washington and its allies reject these 2 documents. so, where do we go from there? because it seems to me that they are not taking this seriously. i think they're blinded by their own ideology. i think they're blinded by the sense of them being morally superior, which has nothing to do with international relations or international law. i mean, we're really in a quandary right now, but i don't think they understand the, the unstable situation that they have created. because russia is not going to surrender it's, it's national security full stop. yes, yes, i think so. and i think the, this goes together with the crisis in ukraine, which is what we were talking about the beginning. but the rest of the very comes with nato converging ukraine into just one giant aircraft carrier with dumping this huge amount of military hardware tra

but the u. s. i think it's, they're really interested in making it work because it's because international law may make russia right on some issues may make china right. and somebody here and i don't think the u. s. is likes to be told that it's not right. or some of the issues and a couple of words about democracy. sure, it's not as powerful as it was before, but no actually has any alternative. china, but not constant tucker system in russia does not have done. i don't know traditional value summit. so that's where the us actually seems to have the upper hand. i need to have something to show for it for a while while we don't. and i think that international law is something that may help us driving forward, but i don't think until the us is taken off. it's purch asked a so super power or, or and until it realizes it is no longer a sell super power. we cannot have a functioning international law unfortunately when, when they have a countries, as far as the united states, which is not real, like to

so what i think the u. s. trying to do is using these stitch phrases to actually try to rearrange the world order that we have since the end of their world war 2 national security adviser of the 9 states. jake solomon recently told us that, you know, this, this don't seem to work. so he may be right, because because we see a green lock in the united nations security council and we don't see that any, any actual diplomacy being done. so i think that the u. s. a trying to catch the last moment. it has to actually rearrange the world order in it's in his favor and it thinks that it can succeed. it mobilizes everything as it mobilizes its army to mobilize. its diplomatic mobilizes its ideology, even if we say that the democratic ideology of united states is a husk of its former self, and it still has some power. so be united states is trying basically very hard to rearrange the world order. and russia is not as powerful as it was in the soviet time. so that is why i think russia tries to preserve the order was cre

i mean, the, like i mentioned before, the u. s. will have to adopt from this unit color arrow to, to the multiple are order, which is already here, which is having immense difficulties in terms of doing. and furthermore, the u. s. appears how much greater and challenges in terms of financial and economic crisis, the countries moving into. so the u. s. needs a lot of the hassle of painful reforms. it needs to carry through to restore fiscal responsibility. however, it do with us less room for maneuver because it also has this global empire it's carrying on his shoulder. so it has less sir ability to maneuver who to, to restore a lot of this. so fix a lot of this week. so i think you're failing, subdomain has been a more you had better mental while the failing. so am i, well, will the feelings all the worse? johnson has less impact the guess. and furthermore, one could also point out what he does discuss that you society so profoundly divided in by them. you can also see that he would, are he failed of the fast, i mean the router or

and furthermore, the u. s. a pierce has been a much greater challenges in terms of financial and economic crisis. the country nice moving him to so the us needs a lot of the hassle of painful reforms. it needs to carry through to restore fiscal responsibility. however, it do with a less room for maneuver because it also has this global empire it's carrying on his shoulder. so it has less sir ability to maneuver who to, to restore a lot of this. so fix a lot of the sweetest. so i think a failing subdivide has been more, you had better mental while the feelings and i, well, well, the feelings all the bush johnson has less impact the guess. and furthermore, one could also point out what we just discussed, that you society so profoundly divided again by them. you can also see that he, i would, are he failed of this aspect. i mean the router are assuming unity. from the beginning it became obvious that unity would require the other side. so the republicans to repentance align themselves behind this device policies.

so nuclear states, see the u. s. s put in germany and you can reference and belgium italy, netherlands, turkey and, but it says that they don't nuclear sharing. so it's okay. makes nato role military law. same treaty was supposed to prevent 1st strikes. you will find the 972, all the or p in the post, the americans withdrawing from intervals. who wants to meet the natal asset that they're being federal. we have to have the natal solidarity. 6 so now the world for it, and now we just talk about how paranoid rush heaping exactly the same argument arguments, but there being only a few years earlier and he's the same with the, i'm afraid it's america. you know, luckily, withdrawal. well, when you maybe some of that, right, so we all have to repeat the monitor that done. actually it was the russia who was been violating let me ask you a quick question here of all the treaties that you just mentioned, russia initially, the withdrawal of any of those. no, no rush, i follow the a, b, m i. and so it's, it's but again, if we w

and name, or even, you know, u. s. troops starting to moving to ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have many clear. i'm not gonna respond and intervene on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. that being said, there's always this risk of my miscalculation so i can promise it wrong, runs to have a peace agreement, but they did this. it doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence on disagreement, the parents who are my become the only alternative imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right. i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians that have said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing, i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's where it's as importantly, talk as talk, but we want it in writing and we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very strong diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned well k

see the u. s. has put in germany and ribbons in belgium, italy, netherlands, turkey and but it says that this made nuclear sharing. so it's okay. that makes nato a role military, same or treaty was supposed to prevent 1st strikes. it will find the 19th and due to all the pm's, a post, the americans withdrawing from infantry wants to meet the nato asset that they're being federal. we have to have the natal solidarity. so now the world for it. and now we just talk about how paranoid rush heaping exactly the same argument arguments, but there being only a few years earlier. and it's the same with the trade in america, unilaterally withdrawal as well. we need maple some of that, right? so we will have to repeat the montero that actually was russia who was being violated. right, let me ask you a quick question. what are we in here? of all the treaties that you just mentioned? russia initially the withdrawal of any of those? no, no rush, all the grid a baby am i and so it's, it's but again, if we went bu

a coaster, clear vision, how the u. s. whole can regain its relevance in the world. so for example, of not seeing any great ideas or at least a great and is able to push forward in terms of establishing greater technological sovereignty and competitiveness within the you are also the foreign policy. i mean, he's been making suggestions. perhaps the you should start to push things up with russia about it is never able to move anywhere. and again, i think this is the maimed. difficult it. i mean, probably mostly some able to give any clear benefits for, for the you only the last case. now with this more than a, with north stream to for example, it's a the allowing well, do you assess sol as your pm's tooth to, to obstruct that is pipeline, simply convincing the russian stuff issue chief, the gas to asia. so as a consequence, your industry will not be competitive against stations at the future, so you don't, you don't have any, i don't see him being able to make the relevant. and by doing what's needed to be done. so i don't, i don't see handbook. and again, there's a l

the country is moving into so the u. s. needs a lot of the hassle of painful reforms. it needs to carry through to restore fiscal responsibility. however, it do with a less room for maneuver because it also has this global empire it's carrying on his shoulder. so a sort of less see or ability to maneuver who to, to restore a lot of this. so thanks a lot of this week. so i think you're failing subdomain has been a more yet they had better mental while the feelings and well will the feelings all the burst johnson house las vegas. and furthermore, one could also point out what we just discussed, that you society so profoundly divided again by them. you can also see that he, i would, are he failed of his ass. i mean the router are assuming unity. from the beginning it became obvious that unity would require the other side. so the republicans to repentance align themselves behind is divisive policies. so again, this is the problem with the political position is deemed to be an emmy, a soccer lane, more room for compromised. and so i think that these are all key problems and

good. much made this argument several times as well, but if the u. s. and the soviet union would end this confrontation, they would have to recognize that will come at the cost of power as well. that is because the whole system which gave no so much power was structured according to this mutual confrontation. and this is one of the reasons why i was so doing the collapse the us did not have to do so it's secure and architecture instead as to point out to have an incentive and who use a nato as a hedge, a monic tool, which means to keep your divided because because in a year divided and you have the russians which become personalized and less of a role, and then you have the rest of the europeans who become dependent on the united states for security. so for again, i think that's where we also the, the interest between the u. s. changes at some point because for the year that the recognized that by keeping the content divided in this way and not having any pioneer being secure. 6 secured architecture, the continental be divided, we can become less and le

now with this northern a, with north stream to, for example, it is allowing l d u. s. s, sol as your pm's tooth to obstruct that is pipeline. simply convincing your direction that they should shift the gas to asia. so as a consequence, your industry will not be competitive against stations at the future. so you don't, you don't have any. i don't see him being able to make the relevant and by doing what's needed to be done. so i don't, i don't see her. and again, there's a lack of alternatives at this point. yeah, that's a they a you did. does that all the time? no alternative and i think that's my design on. fortunately, patrick, your thoughts here because mac round is actually, and i've never been a big fan of the, the french president he has matured in office. he is, he's a lot more articulate and, and willing to take some chances here and place these up for reelection in the spring here. so, i mean, maybe it's not the right question. is france able to do it instead of micro? i don't know, what are your thoughts a just looking at the internal domestic political situa

so nuclear, the states, but this is the u. s. put in germany and you can reference and belgium italy, netherlands, turkey and, but it says, all this is made nuclear sharing. so it's okay. that makes nato a role military block, say, most of the treaty was supposed to prevent 1st strikes. you will find the 972, all the or p and a post, the americans withdrawing from 2002 but wants to meet natal asset that they're being federal. we have to have the natal solidarity. 6 so now the world for it, and now we just talk about how paranoid rush heaping with faculty, the same argument arguments, but there being only a few years earlier and he's the same with the i'm f treated america, luckily, withdrawal as well when he's maple solidarity. so we all have to repeat the montrose. no, actually it was the russia who was being the mileage right. let me ask you a quick question. what are we in here? of all the treaties that you just mentioned? russia initially the withdrawal of any of the no, no rush, so follow the grid a, a, b, m i. and so it's,

according to this confidential report from the u. s. embassy in madrid, he investigated everything. all this gave him a reputation as ambitious wanting to be in the spotlight. i know the truth is that gotham soon understood bet in a globalized world. justice cannot be limited by national borders. from madrid. he prosecuted the leaders of the dictatorships in argentina and she left her he couldn't do the same at whom his attempts to investigate crimes committed on the franco were blocked by the spanish judiciary. his unorthodox interpretation of the law earned him many enemies in 2012, while julianna's son's room ins under house arrest. judge bust assad got on sits in the dock before the spanish supreme court deal with gun was investigating the country's largest political corruption network at the time, which also involved the ruling spanish, conservative party peace accused of misconduct. and the supreme court delivers its verdict in an unanimous ruling has been bought from practicing for 11 years. the court said he could not appeal against the decision. ah, shortly after gotham ope

and the meaning only the u. s. has read lines. no one else does. the arrogance and the, and the danger that presents here. and also your give me the kremlin, has been telegraphing this for a while now. i mean, it seems like washington and nato is of their sleep walking into a catastrophe for ukraine. not for them. go ahead. yes, that's exactly right. i mean, the russians have sent this over and over and over again, is that the expansion of nato, and the installation of nature infrastructure in ukraine. and you know, nato military operations in the black sea within the vicinity of russian territory, our existential red, russia, and your native continues to do with blinking yesterday on saturday, he was talking about a defensive alliance in russia. nothing whatsoever to worry about anything. and then we sold and book it says the same thing over and over again. but they don't seem to appreciate that for russia, if you keep expanding, you know, inch by inch roches, borders and you keep installing your infrastructure in violation of the nato. russia of

i mean, when the soonest place missiles in cuba, in 962, the u. s. did not suggest this amount of his business. now, instead, it was prepared to start nuclear war. executives prevent you from exercising this, you know, sovereign, right? so this whole idea states should be free to join in the military alliances. this is the source of peace, i think is wrong. i think it's the source of money because it made always monopolizing security in europe, which is why they are p and some americans have changed to retro completely. so what they're saying, the state should be free to join nato ahead because it never goes all the way. is happy to try to undermine this rational and c s d or duration economic union. however, made the, with the basic principle being allowed to join it or should be this fundamental principle in international security. so i just, i think is very wrong. and i think we will see more of this in the future. congress, i guess china rises. i mean, if china has stomach a partnership with latin american so, and so let me go to a molecule. our

the, on the mental absurdity, i think the u. s. edition, and what the united states and allies are complaining about a russian meant, in spite of russia, russia, in russia. i mean, that's where they're supposed to be the, it's on the other hand, it's sending their soldiers out all the way across the ocean, thousands of miles and when are there another m a here and you know, projecting is our course globally as well. yeah, but yeah, i mean it's, it's, it's a complete upstream. yeah. think about it that i ever, walter, i had the jump in here. we have to go to a hard break that for that hard break. we'll continue our discussion on ukraine. stay with our team. ah, ah 100 mic no, no borders and just like to tease and you as a merge we don't have with the we don't on the back seat. the whole world needs to take action and be ready. people are judgment. 2 common crisis with we can do better, we should be better. everyone is contributing each in their own way, but we also know that this crisis will not go on forever. the challenge is gr

at a meeting with the u. s. secretary of state warnings are exchanged over ukraine, and laska was threatening with new sanctions. and the c i a's embroiled in the child sex abuse scandal that involves children as young as 2 years old will but one alleged offender going unpunished. according to declassify document.

and the u. s. are leading the charge and their desire to take back control of all the places in the world that had in some way resisted them. their domination and their total exploitation. and subjugation. and the defeat in afghanistan is, is huge. you know, 20 years of money material and resources failed to subdue the afghan people. and it's interesting that he talked about, you know, china colluding with the us because really we're seeing the exact opposite that primary targets of their iowa and the, and the aggression oddly usa and the imperialist, are russia and china precisely because they don't submit. they stand up for themselves and for their people and for their own independence and for their own right to sovereignty and, and to, and to run their countries in the way that their people see fit. and um, china and russia and china in particular when it comes to afghanistan. oh furring many countries and it's one of the reasons they, they come in for so much higher from the usa. they're offeri

they have the u. s. dollars, no monetary premium whatsoever. it's literally worthless, so it is jamie diamond is a guy who's a bureaucrat.

it's now a self fulfilling extinction event for the u. s. economy, sorry, america, but it's over because the ability to do what paul walker did raise rates is no longer on the table because the duration rest, the fundamental underpinning of the us kind of the by market is so far out in the elk or that any little bit move up, we'll crash it anyway. so it's either crash or one way or crash in another way, but you're not going to avoid the crash. a wrong one on just a sheep out the theme because of the african and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. ah, yes, certainly an insidious legal. last thought it was not on lady william splitting it into his glass. i chose some substance that the medium of machine you seen on the substitute bruster. i'm going to change you.

s. won't commit troops. the u. k. will commit troops. ok. but if, if there's, if there's military action on the part of the russians, which is a reaction to what nato is doing, they will be sanctioned here. i mean i, if i were in the criminal just enough of this, ok, there is a clear, a threat to our national security is existential. and we will address it. ok, whatever the cost, maybe. what i, what bothers me is that i think that the west is just sleep walking. is it, you know, they don't take it seriously. somehow, nato was a virtuous organization, which is really strange, made some military block. ok. you know what it was it on twitter, you know, don't out the, the, your belief belief in the nato. that's bizarre. it's a military alliance here. there is just plenty of people in the west. the done do want to see some kind of conflict here. and because nato was painted itself into a, into a, into a corner here, it must succeed in nato in ukraine or cease to exist. it always creates these, the 0 some binary decisions george? yeah, i agree. i

so i believe that any countries, including a huge or not support the u. s. u. k, los treated and less off belong to support and the politics to politics. i thought at wang when the executive director of the chung young institute for financial studies, thank you very much for joining us. you're a naughty international. we really appreciate your insight. thank you. you. thank you. so now a half off 6 in the evening here at moscow. thanks for joining us. we're naughty international. it's been a busy day so far the evening is no going to slow down. we can guarantee you that we are back soon with more of your world wide headlines. ah hello and welcome to cross stock were all things we considered? i'm peter lavelle. what is the national mood? i suppose it depends on what kind of media you consume to say the nation is divided in highly partisan is an understatement. this is certainly what the national media wants us to think. but are we really so divided on what really matters cross sucking the public mood. i'm joined by my guess, martha bonita in palm beach. she is p

s. finished. it's pull out from afghanistan. vladimir putin calls for immediate talks to stop further nato expansion towards russia's borders and a telephone conversation with british prime minister boers. johnson that's made ongoing speculation over the situation in ukraine and accusations towards russia and the sudanese who say they've been betrayed and had their dreams destroyed. we've got a special report about a 1000 strong protests gripping the capital since their october scoop. ah.

s. and raises further concerns over the.