we expect a vote in the house this week. nancy pelosi speaking right now before the white house. she is expected to bring that larger bill to the floor this week assuming the congressional budget office comes back with an estimate that shows this bill is essentially fully paid for, which is what the moderates like sinema and manchin have called for and the house moderates have called for. expect that bill if it comes this week to pass narrowly, if the numbers come back, and then the focus will be on those moderates like sinema and manchin. sinema is expected according to her democratic colleagues to vote for the package. where will someone like joe manchin come down. he did not answer when i asked if this should be delayed until next year, only saying they should continue to discuss this amid his concerns about inflation, so while they're getting this big victory here, still big questions about the timing, the substance, and ultimately how that larger bill will come out. more negotiations to come, and joe biden's party fall in line, that's the big question going forward. >> we he

locked out of the white house. and when the president is unpopular, it just compounds the problem. so, if mcauliffe can win, he will be swimming against the tide and i think the message here to democrats is going to be very clear. win or lose, that job one for them is to rebuild as much of biden's popularity as they can between now and next november because if they don't, it's going to be a long night for them. >> yeah. ron brownstein, thank you so much for talking with us. appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> australia's prime minister says he has begun the process of trying to repair relations with france after scrapping a submarine deal worth billions of dollars. scott morrison told reporters on the sidelines at the g20 summit that he did not lie to the french president, but he admitted withholding information about the other submarine option offered to australia by the u.s. and uk before cancelling the agreement with france. earlier, french president emmanuel macron basically called mr. morrison a liar. here's what

does that apply to the white house? and is there some retooling that's needed over there at the white house much in the way you advised some >> well, if you recall, i said that about two weeks ago. and we have now passed this infrastructure bill that we were having some difficulty getting done. it required that all of us find common ground, give up some of our conflict. that's where the pride to develop will. are you willing to step outside of your comfort zone and accommodate others? we showed that willingness last week or week before last and passed the bill. we're going to sign it tomorrow. i think we'll continue to see that this coming week or next week when we pick up the build back better. so what i said a week and a half, two weeks ago will not apply today. >> you were so pivotal to then-candidate biden's race for the democratic nomination back in 2020. do you think he's going to run again in 2024? some of this speculation and consternation about whatever is going on behind the scenes at the white house seems to

the white house. arlette saenz, a big victory for the president, not to the finish line but he can see it now. >> after months of cajoling and negotiating this is a major breakthrough for president biden's economic agenda. president biden spoke by phone with house speaker nancy pelosi today to offer her congratulations, and they also released a statement, the white house released a statement from the president celebrating this win. that statement says today the united states house of representatives passed the build back better act to take another giant step forward in carrying out my economic plan to create jobs, reduce costs, make our country more competitive and give working people and the middle class a fight chance. the white house hopeful that this bill will make good on some of the campaign promises that biden made back in 2020, but they are also keenly aware of the steep climb that this bill will face in the senate as there are expected to be major changes made to the bill in order to win supp

the white house weary to jump into all of this. but is simply does not have a good look and we're seeing the effects in the country. >> it is having an impact. thank you very much. just ahead, democrats clearly clashing over president biden's spending bill as nancy pelosi urge entsly pushed for a vote. we'll get the latest on the state of play from the top house progressive, congresswoman pramila jayapal is standing by live. we'll discuss when we come back. everything you've seen me do was made possible by what you don't see. cause when you're not looking, i go to work. ♪ strength isn't a given. it's grown. it's earned and tested. ♪ we all have the strength to see what's possible. it's up to us to unlock it. tonal. be your strongest. step up. prep up. to help keep you free from the risk of hiv. descovy for prep. a once-daily prescription medicine... ...that helps lower the chances of getting hiv through sex. it's not for everyone. descovy for prep has not been studied in people assigned female at birth. talk to your doctor to f

a big step for the white house. we'll likely hear from the president this afternoon. >> democrats have not had a lot of good news this week or days before. jessica, a quick question. i hate to put you on the spot for time line questions because this is capitol hill tea leave reading, but do we know the time line for this getting through the senate, perhaps back to the house? or is that just, you know, we have to wait and see? >> reporter: right. it's everyone's best guess at this point. the old adage is take the over when it comes to these things. at this point, schumer aiming for by christmas, manchin at first was kind of opposed to that. he was, you know, hesitant to commit to that. now we talked to him more recently. he said he was open to that if they could get to where they wanted to be. so the question now is will they get there. and, again, they're out all next week for thanksgiving. that puts us into the first week of december where they'll come right up against the debt limit, you know, deadline and also go

voters think about what impacts them and the white house and the white house's emotion. number two, when the president, to your point, says things about afghanistan will not be xyz way or the economy will get better, or on july 4th, this is our independence day from the virus. voters can tell when it doesn't go that way. it's that simple. >> part of it is can you fix it? the silver lining is there are a lot of economists who think the economy is about to kick in. they've said that a lot, though, but there is the opportunity that republicans have a roaring economy next year. it is possible that covid starts to go down. but if you look at the numbers now of how midterm elections work, on this day in 2009, barack obama was 53%. at 53% he still lost virginia and he still lost new jersey. earlier in the year he was at 42% and he lost the house of representatives. he is where obama was on midterm election day in 2009. he needs to turn that around or the democrats are looking at a trap door. >> something he has never been is toxic. there is not very many he wants to campaign wi

and i'm told that they have told the white house about that. the optics are not on the side of kamala harris to stand in a stance of strength. >> i also feel like they hide her quite a bit. >> they do. >> why isn't she out doing interviews. she's just not -- for as much as kirsten said the spotlight's on her quite a bit. >> i don't think she is. she should be crisscrossing america right now helping the president educate people on the infrastructure bill. but what doesn't help is the president himself when he was talking about the passage of the infrastructure bill at the time that he was getting ready to sign, he says, this lady right here, she is the vice president of the united states, she's not just the lady. she is the second in command. when al gore used to say when he was vice president, she is your co-worker. so it's time for her to step up because the time is winding down. >> well, i think -- look, i hope that the white house is watching and that they're listening to what april is saying because it's something that they need to be conce

from both sides of the white house. she's not being used, right? that seems to be what the folks in her corner are saying. and then the folks from the west wing in your story seem to be saying her people aren't focused. there's no follow through. what do you think? about what their gripes are here. >> a lot of times when you see the vice president, you see her acting as a dutiful number two. it is something that sources told us from the beginning of her administration. even the transition that she was modeling her vice presidency after then vice president biden's relationship with obama. being the number two. we saw her often at the side of the president at these meetings and at these speeches really standing behind after introducing him. that playbook has changed. we have seen her shrink from the public eye. and i think that is one of the problems that a lot of folks in her camp are having. she is not being visible after having a couple different stumbles. she is not being supported by the would you say. on the other side, we have the west wing. >

guys. >> manu, thank you, let's go down to the white house. phil, what's the reaction from the white house to the demand for the cbr score vote. >> they have been similar to democratic leaders in the sense they have been scrambling throughout really the course of the last 24 hours, trying to address what those moderates, that group of five moderates is asking for here, in fact, guys, the white house economic team put together their own preliminary budget that they circulated to all house democrats last night. obviously it isn't a cbo score, but it was modeled in a way to make it as close to a cbo like score as possible, hoping that would be enough to perhaps check the box that the moderates have made clear they need checked in order to move forward. the president's top negotiators, on capitol hill throughout the morning meeting with these members, meeting with the speaker's team, trying to figure out a path forward, and i think it underscores the urgency after so many blown deadlines that today was supposed to be the day. today could have been

house, these groups that were working outside of the white house, the trump campaign, these other groups stopped steal, other organizations that could perhaps build this case of a coordinated effort to try to drum up all of this angst across the country related to the election that then served as the precursor to what p happened on january 6th. clark did show up to be interviewed by the january 6th select committee but once in the room he doesn't answer questions. he couldn't because of executive privilege and attorney client privilege, a lot of legal experts believe those claims probably don't have a lot of merit. the committee is taking the step and will move quickly with a business meeting. it could be voted on the house floor as soon as thursday and will be in the hands of the department of justice. >> i want to ask you moving this forward more because we're waiting to hear ryan from the national archives and have to turnover the records from the white house. tomorrow the appeals court will hear the former president's case so what do you expect there? >> yes, so this is a key step in

the white house sees a turning point and democrats, well, they better hope that's right. a cnn poll releasing right now finds a majority disapprove of the president's job performance and nearly six in ten americans say the president is not focusing enough on the country's biggest problem. plus, the biggest question in the world. are we close to the end of the covid pandemic? today word pfizer wants the okay to offer vaccine boosters to all adults. >>> and former president obama visits the global climate summit and throws some shade at donald trump. >> we've got our contentious battle. it's one of the things about democracy it turns out you don't always get your way. my successor maybe wasn't as interested in climate science as i was it turns out, but there are a lot of people in the u.s. government who care about this deeply and work really hard and are invested. >> we begin the hour though with the current president and the giant turnaround challenges he faces between now and the mid-term elections exactly one year from today. our brand new cnn poll releasing right now s

what can the white house do to fight inflation? cnn's chief business correspondent christine romans. >> you come to me with a diss of adele? >> no, all her songs are about splits. >>> presidential approval numbers are falling and prices for just about everything else rising the white house is now on inflation watch. >> inflation is high right now and it is affecting consumers in their pocketbook and also in their outlook for the economy but those concerns underscore why it's so important that we move forward on the build back better legislation, this legislation that the house is going to consider this week. this will go at the cost americans face. >> the idea there investments in working families would lower their housing, child care and health care bills insulating americans from inflation. the fed is the official inflation fighter but the white house does have a few other tools, too. they could cut tariffs on chinese imports imposed by the trump administration, they could cut more steel and aluminum tariffs and tap the strategic

it was a joke in the white house. and you know, the president used to say to us, you know who's in charge of the hatch act? it's me. go ahead, say whatever you want to say. i want to also say that i think this makes the 2022 elections more vital than ever because i have a feeling, knowing them like i do, he's going to tell everyone to stall and that if the house takes over with his rubber stamp candidates that he want to get in, the special committee will then go away. that's kind of what i foresee happening. but that's not to take away from what is, you know, what the select committee has done. i'm very, very glad that they've done that, and i'm glad the doj decided to do what they did with bannon. >> and stephanie, let's remind people again what steve bannon said just one day before the january 6th insurrection. let's talk about that. >> all hell is going to break loose tomorrow. just understand this. all hell is going to break loose tomorrow. it's not going to happen like you think it's going to happen, okay. it's

what's so disturbing about this is it was coming from inside the white house, from the white house chief of staff to mike pence's team, to his top aide. what do you make of the amount of pressure pence was under to overturn the election? >> well, no doubt he was under tremendous pressure to overturn this election, and i think, you know, incredible that he stood strong and did his duty and certified the election results as was the right thing to do. but knowing the dynamics here between the trump team and the mike pence office, this was something i've apparently seen firsthand before on how this sort of dynamic plays out. but i can imagine that the amount of bullying internally, the amount of intimidation, and when you're in a situation like this, it can be frightening, because you know that there can be consequences where people's lives potentially can be put at risk depending on the actions of these individuals. and we saw that play out before our very eyes on january 6. >> we did. a short time after president trump made his comments about the stop the steal rally, we saw rioters stormi

what are you hearing about that from the white house today? >> reporter: well, kate, no response from the white house tho to those comments from the chinese ministry of foreign affairs but senior officials saying they believe there was a healthy debate based on this long-standing relationship that president biden and xi jinping have had over more than a decade going back to president biden's time as vice president under president obama. we know that they discussed issues of disagreement such as trade issues, for example, human rights concerns that president biden raised as it relates to issues in hong kong and more. we also know that they discussed areas of potential cooperation like on the climate crisis, for example, facing the world, talking about the importance of collaboration on that front. but one thing that president biden made very clear, and this was during the beginning portion of this 3 1/2-hour meeting when reporters were allowed into the room here at the white house, president biden talking about the importance of making sure tha

he was working directly at the white house at the time of the insurrection. he seemingly is defying this subpoena from the house select committee. >> he should know, of all people, to comply. he was on the oversight committee. he has asked for subpoenas before there's no reason he should be claiming executive privilege to talk about the events of january 6th. there's nothing about national security there, and it certainly doesn't cover anything that would be illegal. >>> let me move on to another sensitive issue we are learning about. cnn, as you may know, has learned that you and other progressive democrats are working to try to de-escalate tension within your own party. how important is that, if you're going to have success much broader spending bill that's still out there on the table? >> wolf, it's very important. we have to come together as a party to deliver for the american people. the republicans talk about family values, the democrats actually value families. we'll have university preschool, child care, to do that we have to be a united democratic pa

they have to turn over the records from the white house. tomorrow the appeals court will hear the former president's case. so what do you expect there? >> yeah. so this is a key step in this collection of information that the january 6th committee is hoping to do. they're looking for hundreds, maybe thousands of pieces of documents from the trump white house in and around january 6th. and this is an appeal of a lower court ruling in which the court said that the national archives can hand that information over to the select committee. but trump and his legal team immediately appealed that decision. this will be a three-judge panel that will hear this case. two of these judges are obama appointees. the other one is a biden appointee, so it's not a very good draw in terms of the former president and his hopes. and one of these judges actually already ruled in a case relating to executive privilege in don mcgahn and wrote a very harsh opinion as it relates to executive privilege and what the trump white house believed it had at that time. and

and the white house has acknowledged that. so i think that is the challenge for the president and for these cabinet secretaries out on the road selling this bill as not just talking about the changes that it is going it have but the bigger issues of what is going to change immediately which is of course what so many voters would like to see. >> kaitlan collins and manu raju, thank you both. >>> now travis scott's attorney is speaking out about what rapper knew and didn't know as his astro world performance turned deadly. that is coming up. (vo) wildfires have reached historic levels. as fires keep raging, the need to replant trees keeps growing. so subaru is growing our commitment to protect the environment. in partnership with the naonal forest foundation, subaru and r retailers are proud to help replant 1 million trees to help restore our forests. subaru. more than a car company. sustainability is essential to creating a better tomorrow. that's why cisco is committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2040. and we believe ou

jasmine wright is live for us at the white house. the president held a strategy session with his cabinet. how is he planning to fix this? >> that's right, fred. inflation concerns continue to dog this white house into the weekend as americans are paying more for everyday goods and frankly they're not happy about it, and that unhappiness led to a messaging shift from the white house, instead of using terms like transitory or temporary they first used a few months ago, you are hearing everyone from the president to vice president to officials publicly and privately saying this is a big deal and that it is a top priority for the administration. no matter those messaging shifts or measures put in place to try to break apart the log jam of the supply chain, really officials have been starting to say look, it may extend, inflation prices may extend well into the next year, no doubt adding pressure to families as we head into the holidays when they continue to grocery shop, fill gas tanks and start present buying process. friday as you said

this is a statement just released by the white house. he said he ran on a promise to bring americans together because i believe that what unites us is far greater than what divides us. he said i know we're not going to heal our country's wounds overnight but i remain steadfast in my commitment to do everything to ensure that every american is treated equally with fairness and dignity under the law, and encouraged all of the protesters to quote express their views peacefully, and consistent with the rule of law. he says violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy. i want to quickly go back with response to that, listening to president biden's statement because it does seem as though people outside of the courthouse there are heeding that practice. we haven't seen violence. we have seen disappointment, but generally very peaceful. there has been anger, arguments, feathers ruffled, if you will, between those who stand with kyle rittenhouse, and those who stand against him. but all in all, there have been, you know, t

andy slavitt is joining us, the former senior adviser to the biden white house and the author of the new book entitled preventable. the inside story of how leadership failures, politics and selfishness doom the u.s. coronavirus response. andy, thanks very much for joining us. now that the cdc has authorized covid vaccines for kids 5 and older, nearly 95% of all americans are eligible to get a shot. how significant is this moment in this fight against covid? >> well, look, i think it means a lot to families and it means a lot to schools. it means a lot to kids and i know there will be a lot of people out there racing to get vaccinated and the big difference the way this is coming at us and the way vaccines for adults came at us is there will be 28,000 or so pediatricians that will be able to vaccinate kids and for parent, many who know they want to vaccinate kids and who want to have a conversation before they make a decision, they get to do that with their pediatrician which is wonderful news. >> which is so, so important. polls show that 27% of parents want to get their children vac

the white house covid response team says the u.s. has far more tools today to fight variants than this time last year and is urging everyone eligible to get a booster. >> so, when we say that although these mutations suggest a diminution of protection and a degree of immune evasion, you still, from experience that we have with delta, can make a reasonable conclusion that you would not eliminate all protection against this particular variant. and that's the reason why we don't know what that degree of diminution of protection is going to be, but we know that when you boost somebody, you elevate your level of protection very high, and we are hoping, and i think with good reason, to feel good that there will be some degree of protection. >> cnn international correspondent david mckenzie is tracking the many developments for us from south africa. what's happening there, david? >> reporter: alisyn, there is lots that is unknown about the virus, but here in south africa, they're very concerned about those many mutations and despite all the

so i think that's what the white house knows. that even though this vote is going to happen today, they know that there is still a very long road ahead to actually getting this part, this second part of the president's economic agenda passed. >> what you're seeing on your screen there is the ranking member of the house ways and means committee kevin brady. you saw richey neal from massachusetts, they're the ones dealing with procedural matters now on this vote. we do expect to see house speaker nancy pelosi deliver what will be the final speech in support of the build back better agenda and who knows what else she might say in regards to kevin mccarthy and what else we saw last night. stand by for that. in the meantime, also some news on the president getting his annual physical shortly, just a day before his birthday. >> reporter: yes, this is pretty routine for the president, of course, to get a physical, but he will be going to walter reed today, the white house has been talking about this for months saying he would get this d

would the white house view that as helpful? i get the frustration but the justice department is supposed to be independent. it's independent for everybody shepard yeah, look, i don't think the white house has a view on whether or not outside pressure helps or not or if it's okay. one thing that they are making clear is they themselves are not going to engoij in that and that's why the president has said i believe there should be charges, he's made it very clear he won't cookie about the issue at all. that's the reality of what the biden white house want. time is not our friend and the 911 investigation took years and can they get it done? >> if you look through the inventory, i would love to read the files. history would benefit. not a joke. history will benefit. join jake tapper for a new special report, "trumping democracy," which airs friday night here on cnn. when we come back today, the vaccine mandate for employees in new york city is in full effect but one critical department has a big warning. like you, my hands are eve

let's go to our chief white house correspondent. after a long, very hard fight, the president just delivered on a major campaign promise. update our viewers. >> yeah, wolf, it is a major campaign promise and not just to repair the nation's roads and bridges, which is at the heart of what this bill will do, but also to work with republicans to get his policies passed. that's what was so unusual about this signing ceremony you saw on the south lawn today just a few hours ago. there's president biden there. he was surrounded by democrats and some of the republicans who helped get this across the finish line and you heard from them at the beginning introducing the president, talking about why they voted to support this bill. it was a theme the president included in his remarks, even thanking senator mcconnell, who was not present there today, but did of course vote for this bill. and president biden thanked him. of course we know it's tens of billions of dollars for roads and bridges, for the nation's airports, for boosting internet acc

he was no longer a paid adviser to the white house. now, the former president, his legal team, are saying what they say is that it doesn't matter, that the president, former president, can make anyone his adviser, it doesn't have to be someone inside the government. i think that is one of the things that the lawyers in this building and other at the u.s. attorney's office down the street are looking at. trying to figure out, you know, if they are going to enforce the subpoena, that this referral from the committee, whether this is something that can stand up in court. i think that there is a lot of frustration, you can see it on twitter and some of the criticism that you hear of the attorney general and justice department, you can see that there is a lot of criticism from democrats about why it is taking so long. but, you know, people here tell me that part of the issue is that they want to make sure that when they bring this, if they bring this, that it is something that will stand the test of time. they know that it will be dissected

is this a messaging problem for the white house? >> yes, it is. even more worrisome, 70% of ind pen kedents, 70% of independent say he's done little or nothing. it goes to this issue set where they're trying to work on build back better, this massive reconciliation bill and the public generally sort of approves of a lot of the different proposals individually but in terms of the entire massive package, $2 trillion or so, the public isn't really paying attention to that because they're worried about inflation. they see it. a few months ago it was inflation stories about rental cars. now it is transitory. it has transitioned inflation into baking, a loaf of bread, milk, real life -- and gas prices pushing up near $4. so that's where the public is and so the public isn't really focused on their agenda right now, and that's where you see the poll results suggesting he's done little or nothing. >> and it's having a horrible effect on his approval rating. this new poll that says approval rating is 41%. his approval's 53%. this is the strong point coming

, senate, and white house. there were some differences at the end and we'll deal with those as we go forward. what will happen is the -- we have different committee system in the house than they do in the senate, so this bill will now be reshaped to their committees. and at that point, we'll see where we need to, shall we say, reconcile our differences. but at the end of the day, we will have a great bill. mr. pallone? >> yeah. i mean, look, the fact of the matter is that over the last few months, and particularly in the last few weeks, we have been working with the senators not only manchin and sinema but also with the chairs of the committees in the senate. so, you know, i'll use two examples. one is on the drug pricing, right. i mean, we've been basically drilling down and getting sinema's input, getting schumer's input, and so i do believe that the drug pricing provision that you see is it. i mean, i don't know. i guess there could be some changes, but i don't think they're significant. and the fact that we

cnn's arlette saenz joins us from the white house. what is the white house saying? >> reporter: the white house is confident that ultimately the vaccine rule for the larger employers will hold up in court. they are certainly preparing for possibly a long legal battle ahead. now this ruling from the fifth circuit court appeals does not appear to have any immediate impact. this rule is not set to go into effect until january 4th, though there are some other elements of the rule that will go into effect earlier, december 5th is when the larger companies will be required to provide paid time off in order for their employees to receive vaccinations and also require masks in the workplace for unvaccinated workers. the top legal officer at downof labor said yesterday that they believe that they have the emergency authority to institute such a vaccine requirement for these businesses, and the white house chief of staff ron klain this morning expressed confidence that it will hold up in court. take a listen. >> i'm quite confident that when this finally gets fully adjudicate

is the white house considering that? >> that is certainly not something i have any sort of a readout on at this point. the tool that we're talking about today is 50 million barrel release from the strategic reserve, it is already showing up and dampening oil prices. >> jared, i hear you on that. a ban on oil exports, do you have a concern that it would, you know, back fire, it could make oil cost more? is that a concern that you and the president have? >> i think when it comes to oil, you're generally really talking about a global market. so one country's actions like that may not affect the global price. i think when you get this many countries tapping their reserves, then you will see as i mentioned i think a bridge price coming down until the global market price normalizes and the supply demand mismatch eventually fades. >> all right, let's talk about inflation as you see it as the white house sees it, what is the role of corporate america in inflation as the president's currently seeing it? >> well, one of the things

let's get straight to the white house and our chief white house correspondent kaitlan clipsch we'll hear from the president any second. >> the white house gave a two-minute warning. he will provide an update after he got his own update from the covid-19 team this morning, the third up date he's gotten thon new omicron variant, of course, amend the concerns over it and exactly what you laid out there hand what they don't know. don't expect the president to come out and say a lot of specifics. you heard from dr. anthony fauci saying it's going to be a week at best, maybe two weeks before they know more about this, so what you'll likely see the president come out and do based on what we've heard from officials is come out and urge a sense of caution, a sense of awareness as we're waiting on the details and this also comes as the president is going to be speaking the day the new travel restrictions the u.s.cismenting for south africa and seven of its neighboring countries that's going to be going into effect. that's something that the president could also speak about, what was behind that de

phil mattingly at the white house. let's turn to the republicans and eye popping idea about who should be the next house speaker if the gop were to win back the majority next year. listen to what the former white house trump chief of staff mark meadows is now proposing. >> i would love to see the gavel go from nancy pelosi to donald trump as -- you talk about melting down. people would go crazy. as you know, you don't have to be an elected member of congress to be the speaker. wouldn't you see -- she would go from tearing up a speech to having to give the gavel to donald trump, oh, she would go crazy. >> let's discuss with cnn political commentator republican congressman charlie dent and cnn correspondent jamie gangel. so charlie, as a former house republican yourself, what is your reaction to this suggestion from mark meadows that former president trump should actually serve as the next house speaker if the republicans regain the majority next year? >> i think it is a terrible idea obviously. but i think this is reall

house to mark meadows to outside the white house, steve bannon. they're laying the groundwork and showing the ropes to others. it's not to say that some of them won't feel compelled to go, but most of them likely will follow the lead of the others. then there's also the possibility that they could follow the jeffrey clark example which is saying yes, i'll show up, but then show up and not say much. what they understand more than anything is the calendar. and the calendar right now is a year until election day, a year until the balance of power will once again be determined by the voters in what is already a very, very narrow margin by the democrats, and republicans are hoping and expecting that that goes away and they take control. as soon as that happens, this select committee, which is not a commission because republicans blocked that, will almost surely go away. >> asha, you have all the individual battles here over, for instance, the documents on friday, but you also have the broader war, if you want to call it that, to properly investigate ja

in addition to that signing ceremony at the white house on monday where the white house says it will be both republicans and democrats who helped craft this bill and voted for it, that will be invited to that where the president signs it into law, but, of course, next is the hard part which is implementing the plan, a billion dollars of the bipartisan infrastructure plan they have to put in place which is going to take quite some time and the president is predicting might be about two to three months before people start to see the effects of that, but selling this bill is going to be just as important as implementing it when it comes to the political aspect for this white house. because this is something they will hope bump up the president's poll numbers. you've seen those erode as there were these negotiations back and forth between democrats on capitol hill and in addition to some other factors, so they are counting on this. what you'll see after that signing ceremony happens on monday is the white house says they are going to be going out into the country and selling this bill, t

we begin with cnn's phil mattingly at the white house. the president said shut downs are off the table for now? >> for now. shut downs off the table. instead, the white house is focused on vaccinations and boosters. that will be the core along with testing. the president is supposed to lay out a plan about fighting the pandemic as the country moves into the winter months, and obviously that plan royaled by the discovery of this new variant. it's a variant that has caused serious concern inside the white house, and the president during the course of the day, remarks earlier and a moment ago, meeting executives on the supply chain saying this is about speed and science, not chaos and confusion, and that is the core of how the white house is trying to fight and address this new variant. when it comes to boosters and vaccinations, that is the primary focus of what white house officials are pressing on at this moment. they believe this moment in time that boosters will provide at least some protection to what they're seeing from this new varia

meanwhile, questions remain about former white house chief of staff mark meadows. the committee has threatened to seek criminal contempt charges against him as well but have yet to take that step. >> i think we will probably make a decision this week on our course of conduct with that particular witness. >> reporter: what that decision is remains an open question. but the committee has not ruled out any option. >> this was an assault on a peaceful transfer of power and we do need to hear from these individuals and we'll use every means necessary to compel them to speak to the committee. >> reporter: in this battle over the access of information there will be a key court hearing tomorrow. the committee going up against the former president donald trump and his lawyers at the appellate level as donald trump attempts to appeal a lower court ruling that would allow thousands of documents from the trump white house to go into the hands of the committee. trump and his legal team arguing it should be protected under executive privilege. the committee is arguing they need

. >> thank you so much, from the white house. a little quieter now. >> yes. >>> with me the democratic congresswoman sarah jacobs of california. so good to see you. so earlier in the evening last night you were a holdout for voting yes on the bill. what changed your mind? >> you know, i have long said that we should do both bills together and that they go together as a single package that is the president's full agenda. as it became clear that we had the agreement to be able to pass the second bill, just not yesterday, i took the president at his word and his masterful leadership in getting us to where we were and i had conversations with my colleagues from across the caucus, from every end of the idealogical spectrum, and i was confident that if we got the bipartisan infrastructure bill passed last night, that we would have the votes in place to pass the build back better act next week when we're back from recess. >> i'm curious to know what was in those conversations, because while you're a member of the progressive caucus whic

meanwhile, the white house, the current white house, president biden's white house said today that mark meadows does not have a legitimate claim to privilege and he should go ahead. so look, i think if you see bannon charged i think you will probably see meadows charged. i wouldn't assume that silence from the doj means nothing is happening. but i think again, until that happens you're going to see people doing things like this. >> jeff, what do you make of the silence from the department of justice on bannon? >> i find it baffling and it looks like dithering to me, frankly. this is a reasonable legally complicated question about whether this should be a criminal contempt case. but it's been almost a month now. it's been more than a month that it's been clear that this issue was coming down the line. they have a lot of smart lawyers at the justice department. the idea that it takes them this long is really pretty shocking to me and it is having a real material impact, as maggie points out. all of these witnesses are yanking the chain of the judiciary -- of the january 6th committee beca

the white house did later issue a written statement. while the verdict will leave many americans feeling angry and confused, myself included, we have to acknowledge the jury has spoken. >> in the written statement particularly you see how carefully the white house is trying to appeal to everyone in this debate. you're trying to first of all and what you saw with his immediate reaction, he's acknowledging, look, we have a jury system in this country. we have to respect the outcome of the jury. he's tapping and sympathizing with the many people who are outraged by the verdict saying he is angry and concerned. do you see how careful he was trying to be with his rhetoric here because this white house, this president knows how much rhetoric matters. president trump inflamed so much of this through his tone and rhetoric. >> what are you hearing on the hill, heather? there were efforts that had a lot of momentum from democrats. that seems to have completely all but faded essentially. is this something that's breathing new life into that or wha

trump and also the former white house ethics czar. good you have to here. circling back to the documents and the hearing under way right now involving former president trump trying to shield certain documents from the january 6th committee, how do you read the judge's comments? she seemed to have criticism for both sides here. ana, thanks for having me back. thought she was far more skeptical and critical of president trump's claims of executive privilege. she did have some tough questions for the house of representatives but they had good answers, ana. on the -- on the challenge to president trump she made the point, look, you're no longer, sprump no longer the president. the current president says these documents should be released, isn't that it the end of the yaert. that's correct as a matter of law. that's the basis of her decision. she said she would be expedition and she brushed aside claims that there was kind of an injury that would justify the preliminary relief that the president wants. on the side of the house of represent

>> jeff zeleny live from the white house. appreciate you kicking us off. this is being described by the president as the biggest u.s. action ever to try to ease energy costs. let's bring in our cnn global economics analyst. the president wants to show the american people he's trying to do something. explain the significance here. what will the impact be? >> well, you know, the impact is a bit of a band-aid. it will have some impact at the pump, but it's really more a political move. you know, biden is trying to reassure american consumers, hey, before the big holiday travel season, we've got your back. we're going to do whatever we can to lower these oil prices. it's going to be good politics for him at home. it also makes him look good that he was able to build an international coalition around it, but i've got to say, john, i think that we're going to see higher prices for some time because there is a fundamental mismatch between what opec wants and what oil-consuming countries like the u.s. want. we need lower prize now. certainly before the holidays, y

bannon was out of the white house in 2017. i will be candid that mark meadows has a better case with both. the other person you identified there, jeffery clark came in and provided about an hour of answers but still complied with the subpoena. it will be very hard the law requires you to respond. meadows is a different case. the former president will have a stronger presidential claim. you need to come in and on the account of that fact. in open defiance of the subpoena for the call to have to make. >> democrats would be vocal in wanting to be proactive and make these subpoenas to carry weight. the sources didn't think that this was such a simple choice. what does the whole process tell you about garland and the way he's been running the justice department. that ought to carry weight and to step in to enforce them. it is just not going to be efficient to charge every single individual who violates a subpoena. in the jeffery clark example, sometimes people don't come in and answer a lot. sometimes they come in and give some doc

white house. phil? >> reporter: you noted you were watching this extremely closely. so is everybody here. the president and his top a advisers as well as vice president kamala harris have been watching and making calls over the course of the last several hours. it's been a lengthy day trying to figure out some kind of path forward and lay things out in terms of where the white house was on this. jess gave you the play-by-play on where the hill has been. you track back to 8:30 a.m. this morning, and the white house got the kind of news that you would think could turn this into a monumental day. jobs numbers that were better than expected. 531,000 jobs added. unemployment rate going from 4.8% to 4.6%. with the very clear goal to have both of the president's two-piece, $3 trillion domestic agenda through the u.s. house by tonight. of course, as the hours moved on, that started to fall apart. six moderates in particular making clear to nancy pelosi, to white house officials that were physically in the

the real rule the white house has had -- role the white house has had is through their counsel's office and as it relates to executive privilege. the president and his lawyers have made clear they're waiving executive privilege as it pertains to the specific issues that the january 6th committee is investigating related to the attack on the capitol and the lead up to that. it's not just speak to steve bannon, it's other officials, as well, including former chief of staff mark meadows. as it pertains to bannon, the counsel's office was clear the fact that bannon had no role in the white house at the time that this transpired, the idea that he would have any privileged claims weren't in existence based on what the counsel's office said. steve bannon in "peril" by bob woodward and robert costa said he wanted to strangle the biden presidency in his crib. at this point in time he will now have to face the justice department at some point in the weeks and months ahead. >> so what lies ahead for bannon after he turns himself in on monday? earlier, one legal expert explained the process step by

that's something the white house backtracked on. is it on the table, using the national guard. >> you know, i think everything is on the table. we are literally going through our entire toolbox to decide what steps would be helpful. you know, i don't think it's something that we are seriously evaluating right now. but, listen, we are in touch with governors every day asking them how can we help you. and, you know, the national guard is a tool that we would consider if we thought it would be helpful. >> so gas prices not exactly in your purview. but you are the former governor of rhode island, so home heating prices certainly are. in the northeast, they are expecting very high prices this winter. again, what can be done? what power does the government have to step in and try to help here? >> yeah. as you say, this is not in my area. the secretary of energy is working this issue and monitoring it constantly. and, again, as you say, this is in the private sector. but i will say we will take similar actions as necessary in terms of part

i was talking to a white house official last night. the phrase they kept using is we're not going to get caught flat footed. that's why you see fauci to say, this is probably going to get here. what's left unsaid is what some white house officials will privately concede and what democrats around the country will tell you was they did get caught flat footed in july by delta. they had an independence party on the lawn of the white house. what you are seeing now is you have to apply that lens to everything they're doing now. >> that 4th of july speech was seen as this success speech where we were. the other day for the macy's day parade, the president called in talking about how there's nothing the united states can't overcome. obviously, this is something that looms over that. how does he square the messaging with waiting to find out details but trying to prepare people for this? >> this is an area where the administration always projects a lot of confidence. many americans voted for president biden because they liked how seriously he ha

>> well, jake, it's certainly unfortunate timing for the white house. that's precisely the argument the president is trying to make here today. he was apologizing for steps that president trump took at the time he was in office when it came to withdrawing the u.s. from the paris climate accords and he was trying to make the argument the sus back at the table. they are going to lead when it comes to climate change. now they've gotten this statement from senator manchin saying, he's not ready yet to fully support president biden's agenda here. and the white house responded pretty quickly with jen psaki putting out a statement saying that senator manchin says he's prepared to support a plan that combats inflation, is fiscally responsible and will create jobs. 17 nobel prize-winning economists say this plan will reduce inflation and, jake, they say as a result we remain confident the plan will gain senator manchin's support. of course, the key phrase there is will gain. that means the white house realizes senator manchin has not yet expressed his support be

house. ♪ the new white house christmas tree, a tradition of the u.s. first ladies dating back to the 1960s. this year's tree is a frazier fir from north carolina. the theme for the decorations will be announced after thanksgiving. it is a long line of christmas trees, the fir making a debut in 1889. >>> still to come, growing fears of a russian invasion of ukraine. how the u.s. military is planning to counter that threat. and an horrific accident in bulgaria kills more than 40 people including a dozen children. details ahead. [♪] did you know, you no longer need to visit a dermatologist to get access to top skincare ingredients? introducing dermageek featuring top dermatologist recommended ingredients and 0% fillers. dermageek's new detoxifying facial serum contains twice the amount of beta hydroxy acid. it delivers two times more exfoliation for brighter skin, with dermatologist tested levels of hydration. get top derm-ingredients at a fraction of the price. try the new dermageek skincare lineup, with a money-back guarantee. >>> at least 45 people h

with the white house directly. did the white house at any point tell you it is time? it is time. >> the white house has been clear that they want both bills passed. and they would have loved to see whatever we could get passed passed as quickly as possible. my job is to represent 96 members of the progressive caucus. i made it clear to the white house that once we got both bills together, and ready to pass, and passed both bills, that our members would vote for the bipartisan infrastructure bill, which, by the way, nobody has covered this, that's kind of a huge thing, there are a lot of people who did not like the bipartisan infrastructure bill, but what we are saying is we're part of the democratic party, we will vote for the bipartisan infrastructure bill, and we expect that our colleagues across the democratic caucus will vote for and pass the build back better act. >> the reason i was asking about the white house relationship is one of the things i saw over the weekend was your colleague and member of the progressive caucus ro khanna went out and did the sunday sh