newt gingrich on china. i don't think war with china brings any benefits i can imagine. >> i agree with you on that. that could be less productive. if our viewers want information about the conference, where should they go, george? >> calls him .-dot technology. cause him .-dot technology. cause him cosm .-dot technology. cosm .-dot technology november 12. >> in the meanwhile you are releasing a brand-new book, i think the publication date is officially october 15 if i'm not mistaken, but the title-- is the cover of it. "gaming ai" very nice and compelling cover. i also noticed if you want to go to amazon you can order it already. they have some in stock, it seems like. >> it's been out for a while. >> that's why they have some in stock. let's talk about the book, i mean, i got a copy of it and i was utterly fascinated by the way you take up the standard challenge and kind of turn it in a direction that people don't expect them in the standard challenge, i mean, you mentioned in the book that some people thi

newt gingrich said we don't need technical expertise in congress, people can get technical expertise in the market. so we have made a systematic tedivisions in the federal government over time to erode the technical expertise and knowledge. that means we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of company so while lots of us are focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling in the future of work, i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task that we have, which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil service. it means thinking about what expertise we recruit for and it means thinking about the creation and support of independent institutions that represent a public-interest and in our complex system which as we said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge consensus or agreement

newt gingrich says we don't need technical expertise. people can just get technical expertise in the market so we've made systematic decisions in the federal government to erode the expertise and knowledge and what that means is we put the politicians in a position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies so why go lots of us were focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai or upscaling in the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task of building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil servant and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that trepresent a public interest rather than a private or commercial interest and in our complex system, which we have said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge a consensus or ag

we're going to have an exciting time and i'm going to debate newt gingrich on china. i don't think war with china brings any benefits that i can imagine. >> i agree with you on that. what could be less productive in a war with china? good grief. if our viewers when information about the conference which should they go, george? >> cause him .txt technology so technology is the suffix. >> cosm.technology. >> is it next month did you say on november? >> november. november 102 the 12th. >> okay. in the meantime you also releasing a brand-new book, i think the publication date is officially october 15 if i'm not mistaken but here's the cover of it, "gaming ai: why ai can't think but can transform jobs." very nice and compelling coverage. yet some good artist working with you, george. i also noticed if you want to go to amazon you can order it already. partly this got some in stock it seems like. >> it's been out for a while. >> so that's what you got some in stock. let's talk about that book. i got a copy of it and i was utterly fascinated by the way that you take up the s

gingrich's revolution, the contract with america. he said we don't need technical expertise in congress. people can just get technical expertise on the market, so we made systematic decisions in the federal government over time for the technical expertise and knowledge. what that means is we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies. while lots of us are focused on the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology and that means thinking about the future of the service and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that represent the public interest rather than private or commercial interest and in our complex system that is the best technology we've come up with to deal with in a way to forge consensus or agreement among the conv