and i think the general public is frustrated because we don't know who jeffrey epstein was tied to him were and this would be the best chance get, but you're right. that is not what is best for the law. that's the best for the press, not the law. we obviously want this to be legally bass, so it won't get thrown out. so when it comes down to it though, what it does lanes at best defense as to why she was involved in the different actions that she was a part of we're seeing right now by virtue of this very aggressive look at wanting to cross examine the victims prior confidentiality agreement, settlement agreement, and now we learn later on today that the court has allowed her to call a false memory witness. so what it seems to me is that she glaze maxwell and her defense counsel planned to go full, bore full frontal, wrong turn, perhaps, but full attack on the victims on the people. now this can be catastrophic because if she tries this, if she dares to say and how much did they buy, and what did you do? all this does is allow of potential the jury actually to hear how this woman is bro