garland, the attorney general has in the last hour said that they will study the evidence and study the case before making a final decision as thirsty bannon, he said this was a question of executive privilege that he'd been speaking to donald trump. and that it really should be that the court to decide whether or not he was protected under donald trump exercising that executive privilege. but there were those who made speeches including liz cheney, who said, hold on a 2nd on january the 5th, the day before what happened at the capital? steve bannon, on his own podcast, said that they were going to be outrageous things happening. and capitol hill, and for that reason, he was a key witness. mister baron's own public statements make clear, he knew what was going to happen before it did. and thus, he must have been aware of. and may well have been involved in the planning of everything that played out on that day. the american people deserve to know what he knew and what he did. so he might be sitting there thinking while this sort of thing has never happened before. let me throw a nam

garland, the attorney general has in the last hour said that they will study the evidence and study the case before making a final decision as such, the ban and he said this was a question of executive privilege that he'd been speaking to donald trump. and that it really should be that the court to decide whether or not he was protected under donald trump exercising that executive privilege. you have been leaders have been pushing for dialogue with poland. as an increasingly bitter feud overshadows a summit in brussels that was supposed to focus on the energy crisis. several member state say that you should not release $42000000000.00 in pandemic recovery fans until the issue is resolved. approx, concerned its foundations are being threatened out. opponents constitutional court rule that in you law only applies in specific areas. parents prime minister has remained defiant, saying his government won't respond to blackmail erasure merger. we will not act under the pressure of blackmail. we are ready for the dialogue. should we do not agree to constantly expanding the scope of compete

garland. and then they'll have to convey to grand georgia jury according to the statute. if the grand jury says there's enough evidence to go ahead and proceed with this criminal trial, then that would happen. so. and then if he's found guilty of $200000.00 fine up to a year in prison, and but the problem that the democrats have here is court proceedings take times, take time, lawyers can really gum it up. they can make sure there's long delays every indication savannah's gonna want to do that. no indication is going to be a jail whitley weights trial. and if it comes to that, and their concern is that the democrats have such a narrow majority in the house in history, tends to say the parent, the president's party, in power loses in the next mid term elections. their concern as he delays, is long enough that they don't ever get those answers were taught. republicans take back charge and basically bury the inquiry. so there is some time pressure here. but the other factor here is there, dissipa