xi: let us take this moment to cherish the memory of comrades. and other revolutionaries who contributed greatly to china's revolution, construction and reform, and to the founding consolidation and development of the communist party of china. let us cherish the memory of the revolutionaries who laid down their lives to develop the people's republic. let us cherish the memory of those who dedicated their lives to reform, opening up, and socialist modernization. and let us cherish the memory of all the men and women who fought for national independence and liberation of people in modern times. their great contributions to our motherland and our nation will be immortalized in the annals of history, and their spirits will live on forever in the hearts of the chinese people. [applause] pres. xi: the people are true heroes, for it is they who create history. on behalf of the central committee, i would like to pay my highest respects to workers, farmers, and intellectuals across the country. two other political parties, public figures without party aff

the deck is stacked against us pretty good. but there is one thing that we have, than it is the same thing that sent our american ancestors across the plains to settle the west, to win victory in every great american battle, the same thing that inspired the law men on the frontier to establish law and order, it is the same thing that has willed our patriots to victory in every generation, and it is the spirit that lives inside your heart of patriotism. that's what we have. . if you seek guidance from god and strength and you call upon the american spirit, if you remember that you are a proud citizen in the greatest country that ever existed, and you call upon that force and act on it every day, than i promise you this, though times may seem bleak, we will prevail. we will take back this country. we will reclaim our borders. we will establish an immigration policy, a trade policy, and education policy that puts americans first. ladies and gentlemen, we will triumph. god bless you, god bless texas, and god bless the united states

i'll use one example. this is the work we did on enabling or pioneering for greater use of autonomous surface vessels within the navy. this has been a case where we develop a concept and turns it over to the navy at some point. we've worked hand-in-hand with the service throughout this process and ensuring that learning. this is what comes forward in the experimentation we talked about. this is a case where that happens almost naturally when you have an organization that is used to working with others within the services. we needed the ships from the gulf of mexico over to the west coast, the navy was involved every step of the way. this is what we talked about, some of those concepts early in the process and they've been great earners in this. >> that is really useful perspective. the effort it takes to do that kind of integration and outreach is important. it takes a lot of energy. it is really hard to get the joint outcomes without that kind of background work. >> absolutely. one of the things i set was

until take it serious -- they are laughing at us right now. they are laughing at us. we show weakness, that is when these leaders overseas, they fill up the vacuum. host: this is beverly on the democrats line. caller: hello. good morning. i do not appreciate you calling the president this man. have some respect. he is the president. do you understand? have some respect. just because you love trump, this man is the president. joe biden. do you know how to say joe biden? have some respect. that is all i have to say. guest: thank you, ma'am. to get respect, you need to gain it. we do not have any respect worldwide. our enemies no longer fear us and our friends are a little skeptical right now. we need to step up. i am afraid that president biden, i do not think he is well. if you watch any of the interviews. he is incoherent. the media has to have preapproved questions. in what world, any journalistic venue, is that acceptable host: host:? republican line -- acceptable. host: republican line, kelly. caller: i would like to ask about the 2030 agenda. i am curious -- what

they can be very good for us. the reality is all of us can agree, less pollution is better than more pollution. and we talk about it that way, it is a little easier to engage everyone, versus some of the divisive rhetoric that often comes into this debate. host: let's hear from ron new jersey on the democrats' line. good morning. caller: good morning. nobody is talking about fusion energy. we can burn our garbage and get back are natural resources. -- get back our natural resources. we can get the power we need without any pollution at all and without any leftover radiation. it seems to me to be a perfect solution. guest: good morning. let me echo the overall theme of what you are saying, there is some amazing innovation that we are on the cusp of. i will throw in hydrogen. there are a number of things u.s. innovation can lead out on. i do not understand the science of fusion myself, but i know there is a lot of innovation just waiting. we are at a crossroads. as the united states, we can be the one who leads out

i think it is very useful for him. >> margaret? >> i agree with john, i don't think the case is going to go a wear, but i don't think it is about the legal issues, necessarily. i think this is part of the broader republican message we are born here, which is these -- we are going to hear, which is these big tech companies are biased against conservatives. i think republicans see that is motivating to their base. even if the case does not go anywhere, it may still accomplish the former president's goals. >> do conservatives have a case that there has been some bias? >> i don't think there has been a solid evidence that shows these companies are biased against conservatives. i think the companies are trying to moderate content, hate speech, inciting violence. and where they draw the line is something i think both people -- people on both sides tend to question. >> i agree with what margaret just said. there have not been strong evidence that these companies are systematically biased against the republican party. the party sees this a

it uses

. >> and then to use that fiscal spending for racial gender equality. and then to allocate the money to achieve those goals. and then to see from house democrats appropriations committee. you can see those levels and to talk about all those levels trying to address the's issues but just to highlight a couple right now there is about 100 million with job schools and businesses and democrats would get million in additional funding with housing and urban development their housing programs. for what they have produced voting rights and gun violence through several policy initiatives and a couple of those democrats have 5 million for the misconduct registry. including white supremacist extremism. and then with that environment bill and the energy water appropriations bill. if it doesn't include a specific line item and then to address the climate as i was talking to my colleagues yesterday. is there were funding initiative in the energy water bill. and then we can have been there for hours and days. >> how much do the house bills track that proposal that pre

each of us has a responsibility to make sure our leaders prevent this from happening. it will create greater risk of crime and undermine the very communities that have made our nation so special. indeed, it made our union more perfect each and every year. two final thoughts. we need to renew our commitment to our communities. we need to work at this. you should know in spite of all the challenges i've spoken to you, i am long on america. i'm confident that this nation will awaken and there will be a revival in this nation will continue to those prosperous -- continued to be the most prosperous in the history of but none of that happens without keeping your faith. none of that happens without the hard work that goes alongside that and, through the grace of god, i know you will engage in that. i had a norma's opportunities. i was a young cadet at west point to had frankly been taken to church when i was a young man by my parents but, i was going to be the next great nba power forward. i was focused on other things. but i had two young men who were just one year ahead of

a fight people want us to take on. so many people have said "please sir, do something about big tech. sue them, sir." they have been saying it to me for a long time. but there has never been a better time to do it. polling released by scott rasputin shows nearly two thirds of americans believe big tech companies should be required to abide by the first amendment guarantee of free speech. and i think those numbers are very low. 68 percent of americans believe social media companies should prioritize their fair treatment of every citizen over protecting themselves. they want people protected. they want people to have their voice. an overwhelming majority believe tech giants have become too powerful. they have crossed the line many times, and by far, too much. the american people's birthright of freedom must prevail against big tech and other forces that seek to destroy it. through this lawsuit, we are standing up for american democracy by standing up for free speech rights of every american, democrat, republican, indepen

back, to prevent us from using our power to stop an invasion of taiwan or russian invasion of the balkans. host: two that -- to that end, they use " unidentified aerial phenomena" versus ufo. guest: there is a very real concern. we do not want to delegitimize this putting this in the realm of the extraordinary. it is extraordinary but not in a science-fiction way. certainly until we know for sure what this is, and we have to know soon, we will have to determine this, but until we do, there is always the possibility that it is something extraordinary like a -- lie ke aliens, but we have to figure out whether or not the terrestrial explanations are what is going on. i want to go first, is it the terrestrial before we start leaping into extraterrestrial. host: just for clarification, the report does not mention the term alien or extra traditional -- extra terrestrial as all. guest: the pentagon is trying to ratchet down the height that the media has piled on this. like i said, maybe ultimately it is something extraordinary. until we know for sure we have to keep our sites, the military train

you can see the numbers you can use to call us or send us a text message or mms message. if you want to talk to the president directly, you can use the mobile app. there's going to be a video call. maybe you will be the want to get an answer from the president. -- the want to get an answer from the president. -- the one to get an answer from the president. our operators are working very hard. we have already 2 million questions, and they keep coming. people prefer phone calls, and of course messages, but many people are also using the mobile app. it was downloaded over 650 times. -- 650,000 times. some questions have already been addressed. as you know, vladimir putin usually can answer from 70 to 80 questions, so what happens to the other questions? pres. putin: that is exactly what i would like to start with today. so, in 2019, when we had one of the direct lines, it was a full-blown event like this one. we received one million inquiries and questions. when we combined the direct line event with the conference of the year, we had, well, more millions of questions. here'

us to reemerge in the world. all of the things manufacturing enabled, everything we use every day, the technology is inherent in enabling those products. if you want to make an impact, this is the sector. when you look at what technology is doing, it is enabling employees. how do we deploy it together to get there faster to make sure that -- that workers are in the safest conditions, it is a top priority for every manufacturer. if you're able to use sensors not only to make sure that you are not in a place you would rather not be, but also to get ahead of maintenance and to be able to have real-time estimates of what is happening to him that is going and will make us more productive and it will make manufacturing continue to be competitive in the u.s. ina: to be clear, jobs are changing. it is not so much necessarily -- a lot of the debate is our job going away, our jobs being created. my sense is that the answer is yes automation is changing the jobs and what once existed won't exist. my sense is that the key to

it is a tool that we use to push out our own story -- stories. it has completely transformed the media landscape. i mostly work for traditional newspapers. so much of our thinking has shifted digitally to rather than planning for the paper for the next day, it is thinking about how quickly we can get the news online. social media plays a big role in that. it intensifies the competition. more journalists have the power to get information out quickly via facebook and twitter. peter: you agree with what you have heard from john and margaret regarding section 230 and potential legislation? cat: i do not see there being meaningful action on section 230 in the coming months because the motivations for changing the law are so different among the parties. we have not seen alignment within the democratic already or -- democratic or republican party on how the law should change. it speaks to the broader debate about power and responsibility. whether we are talking about section 230 or anti-stressed -- antitrust. there is a greater issue after the filing of

and he is with us now. please give a warm eye welcome to secretary mike pompeo -- a warm iowa welcome to secretary pompeo. mr. pompeo: thank you. there was a great introduction. thank you. [applause] thank you all. thank you, everybody. thank you all. it is great to see you all, it is great to be back in big rooms together, lots of energy. i'm excited about that. it is also great because i an am unemployed former diplomat, so thanks for having me here today. [laughter] craig, thanks for that very kind introduction. i had this incredible privilege these past four years and it means so much to me to be back with you at this annual summit. to make it a habit. i love coming back to this place, to you as a group, and i, of course, love being back in my neck of the woods, the midwest. you know, flyover country. my wife, susan, was born in iowa city. although she was raised in wichita, she spent her summers at coralville and strawberry point. that's why i am back. i watched the northern iowa panthers destroy wichi

host: because you use the word rapid response, can you walk us through this rapid response? guest: you have consultations, and if that doesn't work, you have an arbitral panel that is put together very clear by arbitral standards. sometimes they take months or years. chosen by the parties together. you have essentially an independent fact-finding and legal analysis process that goes forward. they make a decision. if mexico doesn't follow it, than there could be trade sanctions. my guess is most of these cases will be resolved in the confrontation -- the consultation phase. the mexican government really seems sincerely committed to making this work, even though everybody knows it is going to be a long and difficult process. host: when it comes to the actual deal, usmca, what does the united states gained from this, as well as mexico and canada? guest: i think the biggest gain was the integrated economic relationship among the three countries continues, with virtually no major interruption. i think for the stakeholders, and those are not just investors and companies but also w

they give for joining us. >>

they keep us safe. so, just like extra pieces and parts on an airplane, we don't want a galatians we don't need. but when it comes to addressing climate change, regulations are essential. having healthy neighborhoods where things don't stop working is a way to people healthy and working. it's why we have infrastructure like smoke detectors and fire hydrants and all that plumbing. so that firefighters can keep us and the environment we rely on safe. this is where you all come in. members of the subcommittee. we want all the rules we need to create all the systems we need to address climate change. host: that was bill knight, -- bill nye, the science guy, testified before congress. from utah, the congressman who started the conservative climate conference. here's what he had to say on the effort. >> the first tenant is that the climate is changing and that years of the industrial revolution clearly have had an impact and we want to do something about it. i know that people are not used to republicans talk

europe was really going after us. frankly, the europeans have not been innovators, they cannot compete. we are trying to break out of it, especially in the netherlands, and president macron in france have pushed innovation. but taxing american companies is not the solution. if there is a tax on companies that is reasonable around the world, it allocates money, i think they could deliver an approach that affects companies around the world equally. i understand the frustration of companies shifting with tax policy, but we see the same thing with americans. we have to be sensitive to that. companies are moving around for various policy reasons, whether taxation or right to work. that is the reality. >> one of the debates picking up steam is antitrust. you recently tweeted the package of antitrust bills passed to the house judiciary would be a disaster for american innovators and consumers. we have heard since a judge dismissed the ftc lawsuits against facebook, this underscores the need to modernize competition and polic

the sooner we can put this problem behind us, the better. the relations between london and dublin underlying this issue are fantastic. the relations we have both with -- martin, as we had with his predecessor, are very progressive. there are things we want to do. we want to get on and do them. there are things where the u.k. and ireland can work on together. when talking about connectivity, what we can do east-west, what we can do over the border, working together in londonderry, there is a huge amount we can get on and do together to strengthen our friendship and partnership. don't forget, the u.k.'s economic relations with ireland are colossal. there remain one of our biggest export markets and trading partners and friends. >> thank you for your patience, but you are going over time. this is the final set of questions from civil cash. p.m. johnson: i am sure our viewers are switching over to the football. [laughter]>> do you agree that one of the primary reasons for us signing the northern ireland protocol was to the -- agreement and that

it is a part us to call out the behavior. i don't think mr. putin is harboring any illusions about what the u.s. government is capable of doing. the question becomes, geopolitically, what is the bet he makes? we will have to wait and see. peter: sujit raman, given your time and the trump administration department of justice and president joe biden's improving the nation's cybersecurity executive order, is there a difference in policy? sujit: it is a progression. president biden issued a pretty ambitious cybersecurity executive order a couple weeks ago. it is a step in the right direction. it only applies to u.s. government, government agencies. it raises standards, which is important. it also requires private sector entities that interact with the government, that contract with the government, that provide i.t. services to the government, to raise their game and notify the government if there are cyber breaches. it is a progression, but a very important progression to make sure the federal government as the threat information it needs. so much

there are restrictions on how it can be use and implement it. we also take waste, fraud, and abuse seriously. it is something we watch. it might be constructive for you to talk to them directly. >> rates are going up in five states. what does the white house think is driving that? jen: i know this was announced on the covid briefing. in the past week, the five states with the highest case rates, arkansas, florida, missouri, nevada, had a significantly higher rate of newly vaccinated compared to the rest of the state. in the last 10 days, 5 million shot have been administrated. it is hard to pinpoint on particular piece, but what i would say is that we are continuing to work to apply the lessons we've learned over the last few months. the biggest issue far and away is access. that means something different in different communities heard in some communities it is ensuring that people know they can take time off of work because of the kind of jobs they are working. in some communities, it is meeting people where they are, in places of work, local c

can you give us clarification? >> i don't think he has made that proposal in any recent time but he is looking forward to the prime minister. >> a question on guantanamo bay. last week, the goal was to close the facility there. i guess 39 detainees remain. one of the next steps the administration is taking to close guantanamo bay? jen: i would point you to the leadership in this effort. there are 39 detainees who remain in guantanamo bay. 10 are eligible for transfer. 17 are eligible for a review board. i would point you to the prime minister and outlined more specifically. i have to go because we have to see the president. thank you, everybody. we are here. >> the health committee investigating the -- the house committee investigating the attack on the u.s. capital holds its first hearing tuesday. officers will tell members what they experienced and saw that day. watch it tuesday, 9:30 a.m. on c-span three. or listen with the free c-span radio app. host: with us to talk about the new report on the high cost of hou

, the african would refer to work with us. -- prefer to work with us. i always say we need to step up, i agree with the problems of china. we all know that in terms of the quality of work, the corruption, the workforce, bringing labor over, i remember being at the drc and saying -- saying nobody employed around except for chinese workers that were there building roads instead of the african workers building roads. that is something that happens in inner-city america, where people are upset that you see work going on all around you, but the people that live in the community don't have access to those jobs. i can only imagine what the africans feel when somebody comes from another part of the world and they are unemployed. so i think there is a lot that we can look at the relationship of china and africa that is problematic. we need to be there. i think our problem is we are not there. granted, the circumstances are different with state-sponsored industries, we don't have that year, we can step up our game. and ben, you illustrated exactly what i was sayi

those are relationships double be useful to us---that will be useful to us, as we think through resiliency for our nation going forward. vaccinating our own populations is not the end of it. this is a global phenomenon. we have a joint commitment to work to eradicate covid around the world, and canada is making its contribution to that. we have initial commitment of 13 million doses to covax earlier this year, and very recently the government of canada announced it would donate another 17.7 million doses. we are also launching a program to match dollar for dollar donations that canadians make the individual canadians, make it to unicef, towards the covid-19 vaccination fundraising , up to a maximum of $10 million. we are trying to make sure canadians also realize that as we start to feel better about the situation we are in mystically, this is a global issue and we need to play our part on the global stage to bring this pandemic to a better place. we are also working harder to revitalize our pandemic system in north america, and we have systems in place, but we have a lot of lessons to lea

i do not think having that over to private companies to get us -- is going to get us to where we need to be and it could feel some backlash because of people -- they see a wind developer coming in, making a huge profit off of something that they were not informed about, maybe they are not seeing dollars returned to them in a real way, seeing jobs go to their neighbors or the people around them. why would they support that? that speaks to the needs of structure and infrastructure package that shares those benefits widely. that will get people essay -- a say. over where the job go for these projects. host: let's go to york, pennsylvania on the democratic line. good morning. caller: good morning. i want to say thank you for having this platform. i just drove from the houston, texas area to pennsylvania. about two weeks ago. our infrastructure needs help and credibly and i fear almost that unless there is incredible loss of life like a bridge collapses, that our politicians will take heat -- he dealt these important counties. you will see a difference from the west of one state to another

they can't fool us. they want americans to believe that the conservative movement is fractured, that we are divided. they want america to believe that this movement is dead. but we are alive and kicking! [applause] and news flash all those haters social communists out there, marxist to fill it -- fill it all in, we are here to save america! and it is the group of patriots here today and the millions across the incredible brave country who are not going to be silenced, and we definitely are not going to seed this fight to the socialists who want to set our nation afire and see it burn. we will stand in this movement along with the brave individuals here in cpac, the brave men and women across this country and with brave leaders and fighters like president trump. he will never give up on this movement that he created across the country of the forgotten men and women, forgotten no more. no president has stood more for the conservative values in america-first policies that we cherish, that our children deser

we need you guys in that right with us. ok. -- that might with us. and save -- and so they do not say that i am antagonizing, the fight against our values and marxist ideals. we can watch a year of rioting, looting, arson, murder, and that is a peaceful protest, but that only goes one way. we understand that. all the more reason why we need you guys. they cannot cancel all of us. [applause] now if 1, 2, 3 people are the guys that have the guts to run out there and take the arrows, they can try to cancel them, but if we get together and we are all in this, that game is over, folks. right? and that is why it is so awesome to be in some thing like this, thank you for putting this together, it is awesome to have that. it is great to see it. texas is -- has always led the charge. [applause] well, tell about a couple of months ago and then austin took over. i do not know, texas was leading the charge, you are still top 25. we have to work on that because those people have lost their minds. right? the people's republic of california is wonderful, when i go

for us in europe, this is a great challenge. we're very grateful to the united states for their mission in order to contain and push back against these terrorists advances. we also have drawn up -- we've also agreed on a german/american dialogue between our business communities, because we have considerable trade links and we wish to build on this. and obviously economies' ties are very important. i would like this to remain even after i've left office. and we've probably paved the way to make it possible to also create format where we can exchange, because the world will continue to be a place that is full of challenges. so thank you very much for making it possible for us to tackle them together. pres. biden: thank you very much. we are each going to take two questions, and i am going to begin by recognizing steve portnoy, and congratulate you on your new role as president of the white house correspondents association. my sympathies. no, but thank you. reporter: we're looking forward to the day when we can have even more repor

josh, kick us off. reporter: first, the president's remarks on why china for cyber attacks, can you clarify -- along the same lines, the u.s. imports about $430 billion of goods from china. jen: first let me say that today an unprecedented group of allies and partners, including the european union, the united kingdom, australia, canada new zealand, japan, and nato are joining the united states in exposing and criticizing the p.r.c.'s administrative state security and malicious cyber activities. this is the first time nato has condemned p.r.c. cyber activities. i would note that we are actually elevating and taking teps to not only speak out publicly, but certainly take action as it relates to problematic cyber activities from china. in a different way. as we have from russia as well. we are not differentiating. one is out of the realm of condemnation or out of the realm of consequence from the united states. in terms of the economic pieces, i think you are asking me -- give me more on your question. rep

they don't need us. all of these big bills dealing with international affairs, transportation, they have not negotiated one bit. we were not involved in any of the formation of it. i would suggest to you that it will begin with the majority. the minority is waiting. host: a couple of nominees on the senate side, article -- democrats are calling out senator ted cruz. senator murphy said this about it -- ted cruz is making it very hard on the president. he is holding up every single state department nominee right now. the republican strategy is to try to make it as hard as possible for president biden to manage crises around the world. guest: that is a bogus argument. ted cruz has a philosophical problem. you have people who will be heading up these organizations. one was involved in environmental terrorism thing. you have to dig deeper into who these people are. you have a lot of problems in the state department. that is one of the areas that should've been cleaned up before. they are what is running this

you may use the chat function to send a request. you may send an e-mail to the majority staff, or you may unmute your mic to seek recognition. obviously, you do not want people talking over each other. so my preference is that members use the chat function or e-mail to facilitate formal verbal recognition. committee staff will ensure that i am made aware of the request and i will recognize you. as members of the committee are likely aware, we expect votes shortly. out of respect for members and witnesses, and their time, and because of the longer duration of each member vote during this public health emergency, i do not plan to recess the hearing at any time. though a short recess may be necessary. committee members, including those who are recognized for questions while a vote is ongoing should have sufficient time to step out of the hearing, cast their votes, and return to the hearing. i plan to participate in much of the hearing remotely from my capitol office in order to minimize my absence, if that becomes necessary. now, at th

and when it comes to use of force, we are trying to build out a use of force didn't that involves use of force by police departments, law enforcement agents around the country. it's voluntary. we can't mandate all of these local police departments to provide the information. but we're doing a lot to encourage them to submit their data and my pitch to them has been, we're going to be talking about these issues no matter what and we should all want the conversations to be based on the actual facts and data as opposed to what some random person thinks the facts or data are. and so we're out now reached one of the thresholds where we can start doing some of the reporting related to this effort. we need to get to a certain threshold assistically, i think it's 80% or something of police departments before the data is considered statistically reliable. investigations, training and outreach, more complete statistical reporting on use of force. >> i know the committee is considering legislation to make that data more available to you from local agencies. will you provide to the committee and t

to fight each other using other people's blood. here we are, 10 years later and i think that promise is still there. it still an important country we invested a lot into endo a lot to given the role we played in those years. i do think there's an opportunity right now to get those foreign forces out. ideally simultaneously. it's probably necessary. the turks probably saved tripoli but they shouldn't be there. they are kind of an occupying force in the eyes of a lot of libyans. certainly the russians and it ships shins and amber rudd he's that have been supporting the forces need to get the hell out. with that and a lot of support from the international community diplomatic and otherwise, there is a chance to start rebuilding a functioning political system in the country. the thing that people so overwhelmingly fought for and voted for in 2011 and 2012. i am more optimistic. i think the administration is doing all it could do and i'm not alone on my committee and house following this and being interested and consistently we hope we

he is using chemical weapons. has hundreds of thousands of -- he has hundreds of thousands of people illegally imprisoned or disappeared. it goes on and on and on. this is the worst geostrategic and humanitarian crisis of the 21st century. we have not been successful dealing with this campaign. assad cannot take back his country. he cannot win. but right now we are in a , stalemate. there is very little fighting right now, which is good, but it is a volatile situation. it is something i urge our leaders to look more closely at and engage more in. now president biden seems to be , doing that and he raised it with putin. we will have follow-up conversations this coming week to see what we can do on initial steps with russia. russia is key to the whole thing. it was russian intervention in 2015 that saved assad bid as long as the russians and iranians are there, assad is not going to go away, and that was not the policy. what we are trying to convince everybody is to simply accept a compromise political solution the

with that, why don't you kick us off? reporter: [indiscernible] can you talk more about hong kong and the latest. also, there has been something, can you talk about the goal of the? jen: sure. first, as the president said yesterday, the situation in hong kong is continuing to deteriorate and we continue to see beijing assaulting hong kong's autonomy and democratic institutions and authorities using the national security law to make politically motivated arrests. we have seen a deterioration of fundamental freedom which were guaranteed by an international agreement. so that is why the united states announced steps we are taking to promote accountability and transparency. the state department announced earlier today seven officials who were sanctioned for their actions threatening the peace, stability, and autonomy of hong kong. on transparency, the u.s. government issued a business advisory, as you noted, i just want to give the full context, which is intended to inform businesses and highlight the growing risk for those o