who is the enemy, who is the united states, supposed to be direct its energies again? is it russia or china? so trump was say, was china. but basically the, the national security oper. i wasn't going to go along with it by the seems to be also thinking, well, we've got to think about china and the people he has some of the economics people who are working for him. also thing a chinese economic giant that we have to deal with that. but you have all of the blink kins and the middling bureaucracy that is still absolutely fixated on russia and clearly the europeans at bar is johnson and use the barrel and everybody else. all still in this mindset is the enemy. but it's really interesting, georgia for 5 years. this is their red ticket. and so we are there, you know, there's a new president and, and he wants to change why everything was going so well for careers were made. okay. you know, advancements, you know, cable news, the gigs and all of that. i mean they, they in an institutional way, i'm going to think collectively, really dishonest, but it's additionally this has be

yeah, and that's why the russians repeatedly emphasize the united nations charter and the united nations as a whole, as the very basis of the international system. and the reason they do is that we created this some of the security council in which the great powers are given a veto. in other words, we have a mechanism in place in which way where we get into issues in which great power interests are on the line, the great right to veto. and that created these, the stability that was absent in the league of nations because it was, you know, you could say ok, you know, no one can do anything that will threaten the interests of soviet union are russia when anything that will threaten the interest of china and so on. so that was the, that's why the united nations has worked where the league of nations failed. because the great power layer, there's nothing in it for me. i mean, i don't, i don't know and that's why what the west is talking about. the rules based all the is simply not arbitrary rules that the nato power just cobbled together at any particular moment to justify what they do and t

and actually europe into just a slave of the united states. okay. i guess i think that will be her legacy or german. that's all the time we have. want to take my guess here in moscow and in budapest, i don't want to think our viewers for watching us here in our tc. you next time. remember across the the me the imac kaiser or more of my guys do financial survival. this is a hedge fund, it's a device used by professional county lags to earn money. that's right. these hedge funds are completely not accountable, and we're just adding more more to them. totally, the stabilize the global economy. you need to protect yourself and get inform wildcard ah, the eastern half of the united states, we're going to have 1000000000 trillions of periodical cicada is interacting with tens of millions of human beings in their backyard. oh my god. obviously some of the cicadas do not have very high tolerance for alcohol because they are already passing out or 6 minutes or 400 i mean very satisfying the.

n a or the united states. so when we intervene, we intervene using a american centered template that is designed to play k domestic political factions here in the united states, not to solve problems overseas. we've seen this almost everywhere. united states intervenes afghanistan was doomed to fail from the start because we didn't respect your past. you and tribal sensitivities. wally, you know, and nothing. we didn't understand the area we came in. we impose our will and then we sought to build in, in, in our model, especially their military. i mean, when we try to do is, is build a, a miniature united states army of miniature united states, security services, trained equip, like u. s. military. and they can't function why? because you can't take it american style military templates and impose it on corruption. and that's what we have. we have generals who inflate their rank steel money to treat their soldiers poorly. there's no motivation at the end of the day of the soldiers, not willing to die for a cause

it's an existential threat to us in the united states. we really do feel that we, you know, after world war 2, we felt that we did not actively intercede become the policeman of the world and enforce kind of doctrine that we believed we would leave the peaceful coexistence only under one kind of cookie cutter idea that the world would have a 3rd world war. the irony is that we are now in a position where we're more ideological and then the chinese, it's $180.00 degrees during mouse time. it was worldwide revolution. today, it is american exceptionalism, their their opposite. they're the same side of the coin. this idea that you can impose your values on somebody else. now the reason i, sarah, the reason i was incense is because, you know, i live here in china. i've also lived in u. s. i was in the government, i was a college politician, lawyer, investment banker. i've seen what we've done. it's not all bad. we have tremendous resources. we should be doing better and i grew up in abroad. i have to jump in here. we have run out of time many

our movement in the united states. china is stress in respect to history and not only the clothing is period of history and also the preceded mark. this is very important and that makes china much less ideological state than i'm sorry, the united states and the european union member countries in their present condition . i mean, the worst thing about 30 days is, is this destruction or history child? yes, your history a when you know your view characters from the 19th or even the 18th century and by today's ice. and in that sense, china now is a much less idea what you call state than most of the west, georgia. wait, wait on that, because president she, when he was giving his speech on denman square, the symbolism was really quite obvious. he was what he appeared very much like, wow, i mean, in the car right there. but again, you know that there's that contrast. mean you've been, you have the symbolism, but the me, the cup of the, the words the and the ideas that he was trying to express was achievement. ok. and of course obviously this was a cheer leading for the communist party. we e

not allow china to undermine all been free society, which open free society did shine the destroy the united states. and you will buy subordinate, co in 2014 destroyed. and the open democratic society of ukraine, you know, it is no longer immigrated, suffered in a terrible these people never apologized for that course they never do in georgia. what i think is very interesting here is that let me approach with, with great detail and a lot of research in time. and i've been told we actually wrote it to but this is a intra family issue that is talking about here. when you look at, when you look at western policymakers, i think we from nato countries, there interesting you, crane or ukrainian is scant best because your brain is from, from the western perspective is a cudgel. and for the russians, i mean, i've always told this people, for many russians, ukraine is not a foreign policy issue. it's a domestic policy issue because of the familial relations they have people's relationship to the dom bout and even further into the a hander land of ukraine. and that's why it is so very important to rus

because sensibly nato's controlled by the united states in the, in the u. k. effectively, in terms of the bulk of its forces and it's strategic direction. so for, i guess it's a big, it's a big problem. you know, is not an easy solution to it. you know, there's never been an easy solution for western powers or, or even your asian powers in balancing the situation of gas down for centuries. so, right back to alexander the great, so running into the same similar situations in terms of geography. but you know, the u. s. grant strategy. generally, if you look at the arc of the strategy over the last couple of administrations, it's to slowly pull out their hard assets out of places in the middle east, and then rely on what they call local enforcers in order to prosecute western us or largely corporate policy direction and so who is that local enforcer for afghanistan is certainly can't be the afghan government in cobol or the afghan army because they'll fold like deck chairs on the titanic. you know, so it's pakistan would be that local enforcer. but that hasn't

you can look at the united van lines, the moving company survey to see where everybody's moving to and from. and i think that's the way forward. i'm a big believer in separation over persuasion. at this point, we're still having the same old conversations we have had for decades and decades and especially about the role the state about socialism versus capitalism. you know, we still have this ugly, left right divide. we still enrich a political class. i think i agree as they, they make money and they benefit from this political divide for us to start organizing ourselves geographically. you know, we just heard the word session and i think that weight, what, what is happening here is that there is a secession of the mind. people are going into their safe places and there and there, and anything that they, that is brought to them that they disagree with. they just have to reject it. they secede from their, from the, from public discourse. and you know, that leaves the worst possible characters out there. the political lead may make the decisions what we talk about. and i refuse to bow do

what you're getting at is that the united states does want to have a dialogue with russia. they are 2 nuclear powers. and president biden did want to reset in some manner of the relationship with russia to deal with the issues that do concern the 2 countries together. this is something that goes back to the cold war after all the united states and the soviet union dealt with each other and in those circumstances as well. so that, that is there. now what complicates matters is that president biden, and i think for reasons of trying to regain support from the american people from europeans, has characterized issues with russia and china as democracy use against the authoritarian states. and so for that reason, the united states is going to continue to be concerned about human rights treatments and human rights behavior of the president regime in russia. and this is going to be a continuing irritant. i think just as in the cold war, you can still make agreements. but what the invasion of cry me yet in russian aggression in ukraine has indicated is that they're going to be cont

i mean, when we tried to do is, is build a miniature united states army of miniature united states, security services, trained equip, like u. s. military. and they can't function why? because you can't take it american style, military templates and impose on corruption. and that's what we have. we have generals who inflate their rank still money to treat their soldiers poorly. there's no motivation at the end of the day of the soldier is not willing to die for a cause. then the army that she's part of isn't going to fight, and that's where we see the united states without a touch. we've had military leaders who have deceived themselves and deceive their civilian leadership and saying that they have a solution. and yet every year, every 2 years, we rotate these military years out defeated. we rotate a new series of military leaders. we say the same thing. time with us become obvious, we were going to when we weren't going to prevail, and it's time to leave and it's going to be ugly. going to be very ugly. your way to get out of my stock and let me go to and you and couple, i mean we all we, t

and actually europe into just a slave of the united states. okay. i guess i think that will be her legacy. all right, jim, and that's all the time we have. want to take my guess here in moscow and in budapest, i don't want to think our viewers for watching us here at ortiz, the next time, remember across buckles, ah ah, join me every thursday on the alex salmon show. and i'll be speaking to guess in the world, the politics sport business. i'm show business. i'll see you then me a. ready ready launch crunch class in the person i knew christabel often the song said it was just the culture blue box truly you for once more the the because it's always more you to meet the teacher could contribute that usually. so would you practice and gone? yeah. because really knew from the moment that shamika is humbled. none of my mental charges on the news, the people you can see working around me, year old volunteers, he's coming here to try and do whatever they can. those who have seen that live swept away by the devastating floods in germany, tongue on politician

so we should see the united states government for delegating their authority well in these companies. and congress is abigail, its responsibilities. i'll give you the last minute here. they're letting these big companies actually become the government itself. they don't need the 1st amendment, they don't need the constitution. it's really quite terrifying and it's happening very, very quickly. 40 seconds news act. so we can finish up. yeah, this was a state actor saying that it tech is becoming, is a very big problem. you know, there, there's the court way of dealing with it, which hasn't really gone anywhere with lawsuits have come out. i don't think one has one. and then there's the judicial system or the legislature assistance to create new laws which is happening now. and actually they've got a pretty good laws coming out. and then the 3rd one is we just gotta make them irrelevant. make them be like by space in the fact that, hey, do you want to go on the sensor? the sensor platform or do you want to go this platform where people have the freedom of speech and really people are fl

and the thing about the petting, political arguments we're having in the united states media. we're talking about the genocide of the waco genet. my m r. let's estimations in haiti, america, we're talking about c r t, and whether or not patriotic to say that war song or not though they make their money by keeping up the strength to keeping divide, it keep concentrating on the trivialities of life and ignore what's going on. in the macro sphere of the world, and the longer they can keep us ignorant people's lost, the more they can fill us, the sugar water and hamburger if they're trying to push down our throat. because that's what american media american media is, has nothing to be true. a reality is about making money. ok, daniel, last minute before we go to the break go. well, interestingly enough, that segment you mentioned about woolsey on the lower income show. i remember that very well, because the last thing that was said she asked woolsey, well, we don't interfere in elections overseas. we don't over term governments overseas, do we? and he laughed and smiled and said,

it's the united states, trying to hold china backward. be like building a chain link fence to whole back as soon army that's coming upon your shores. we need to find ways, there's tension, clearly in this relationship and that's never look, i'm in a box. when i got in the ring, i even with my best friend, i was there to win. right? and so it would come as no surprise to anybody that the china wants to regain its wealth and power of regain what it lost in the century of humiliation. what we need to do is find ways to try to guarantee mutual success versus victory. for one side have diplomacy. it's like an old playground piece of equipment. cecil, where one nation has to be up for the other one to be down or vice versa is not going to be productive. what we need, i believe, is a focus taking something from the china history of 6 seeds, communication cooperation, collaboration, coordination, competition. absolutely. while we try to find ways to avoid confrontations, that would hurt not only as people have tried other people to us, but all of

and the reason is, as i mentioned in my introduction, the president of the united states has this tendency to keep invoking the civil war . does he believe one is coming on or is he hoping one will go ahead, lionel? neither he is reading a script. you read something that's on a card in his pocket and it could be shy, is $42.00 long. it doesn't matter. the idea that he is trying to make a parallel between the civil war. i think about this for 750000 americans were killed in 4 years, 2 and a half percent of the population that will be between 7 and 8000000 dead today. just the fact that he's doing that, i'm going to probably you didn't go for godwin and bring in hitler. well, he is a murmur done. he is. he is pinocchio to the shadow government. your pedo. we have to forget what he's doing. we also have to stop calling this a civil war or some kind of a cultural war. this is just, this is cultural, social engineering gone nuts. this is a huge intellectual bar fight with no beginning and no end. it's a malay with, i don't think any. and in, in, in fight, co. ok, let me go to jeffrey. i mean i,

it makes us feel very proud that we are together now the, the eastern half of the united states were going to have billions, if not trillions of periodical cicada is interacting with tens of millions of human beings in their backyard. oh my god. obviously some of the cicadas do not have very high tolerance for alcohol because they are already passing out for 6 minutes. 400. i mean that's very satisfying the i want you to know in the headlines this morning co good cases, spike and past 100. as tokyo tooth up fritz delayed olympic aid. so much for rule for tanya. u. k. minutes says lament the line of what was $11.00 of the most powerful navies in the wild as it turns out, only one naval operational device . oh no. that in jerry's ice cream goes frozen out, it is well off to the company stop sales and occupied.

part of the program, you're talking about dictatorships and totalitarianism and all of that, well, the united states has relationships with china. for example, in, with saudi arabia, for example, and there are people that claim that israel is a part time state. we have relations with israel. i don't know. that's the kind of going back to my original question here. kind of parsing everything through all of these rigidity terms. you know, it's all or nothing here. cuba has its kind of government that it has. it's not one that i would prefer to live in. actually, there are people that don't like living there too, but it gets down to, you know, if you say it's a dictatorship and it's so tele, terry. and well, don't you have to have it, you know, have much more. but a clear approach in policy. i mean, we like some dictatorships that we like some totalitarianism. you know what i'm getting at the hypocrisy of it. i'll go ahead. your government being hypocritical. oh, hypocritical. i mean peter, there's a bombshell. i have to laugh with you on that because i agree with you. china should not be on our

for those of you in the united states, what service will you take? it's news views, shoes, you don't any will be here in what times are. good morning global news headline. we will see you back then and what else? ah, ah, ah ah, ah ah. hello and welcome to cross talk. we're all things considered. i'm peter labelle. we're used to hearing you will, leads messaging about the importance of values. not everyone in the block agrees. in fact, a growing number of conservative and populous forces are speaking out against what some call brussels colonial outlook, conservative and populous talk. the language of family and culture in leaps, talked of values to create a european superstate. the the the cross walk in the e. u in crisis. i'm joined by my guess. i'm scared in london. he's america's professor of international history and former convener of european studies at london school of economics. also in london, we have donald, so as soon he has ameritas professor of comparative european history at queen mary university of london and in syracuse, we cross glenn

while the president of the united states does not have complete power, the mickey mad does. the deep state is a major part of the mickey met. one of the ways that the media, which is the cornerstone, the fulcrum of the deep state. the way it works is by suppressing information you may change, julian assigns before you know, peter, but the whole case, surely. it's called park. it's collapsed all. but people who read the new york times don't know it because it's been deliberately suppressed. the guy who gave the information to the f. b, i recanted his testimony, but no american mainstream press knows about it. nor do they know that the charge of russian hacking into the 2016 election has been completely rebuffed by the guy by the horse's mouth, the cyber security chief of crowd strike. we testified 3 and a half years ago that there was no evidence that anybody hacked into the d and c. not the rushes at anybody else. nobody knows that either. nobody knew before the 2004 reelection of bush that they say it was, it was tapping into or telephone calls and all our emails because th

i'll continue our discussion on january 16 with our ah, ah, me, eastern half of the united states. we're going to have billions, if not trillions of periodical cicada is interacting with tens of millions of human beings in their back yard. oh my god. obviously some of the cicadas do not have very high tolerance for alcohol because they are already passing out for 6 minutes or 400. i mean that's very satisfying the welcome back to cross talk. we're all things are considered. i'm peter labelle, remind you we're discussing january 6th in before we continue our, our 3rd guest. the program has left. he had a very big problem with my questions and ended up personally insulting me. so i found no other reason to have him continue on the program. ari has a right to his opinion and he'll continue to express them. and i respect that. i wish i would have respected other people's opinion. debbie, let me go back to you and let's get back to the facts here because the 1st part of the program was this very turned in the wrong direction. i want to talk about january 6th. you know, one of the proble