gingrich. >> he wins control of congress with the message of rage and resentment and culture war and betrayal. >> we're going to change their world. they will do anything to stop us. >> gingrich pioneers the fight club mentality that would eventually consume the gop. >> gingrich understood that his voters didn't care about winning. they didn't care about winning policy fights. what they cared about was fighting. >> mr. gingrich will whisper in your right ear and i will whisper in your left ear. >> he kept coming close to doing deals with bill clinton and then he realized at the end no, no, care about the fight. >> boosting gingrich was powerful new allies. >> fair and balanced, the fox news channel. >> the rise of the fox new channels in the middle of the 1990s really fed the sense of conservative grievance. >> if you broadcast any chances these days and most are very politically correct. well, we're going to try to be different. >> the way we report. the way we cover it. >> if we couldn't make the voters believe anymore that we could limit the size of government, then we had to figh

i wrote about it n the 2012 campaign with newt gingrich and herman cain. donald trump took it to levels we have never seen, calling for a ban of muslims, saying islam hates us. we saw more hate crimes in the 2016 campaign against muslims than we did against muslims after 9/11, and that was the words of donald trump. so look, this anti muslim bigotry is part and parcel of the gop. i don't know what caused her to apologize. she might flip-flop on the apology, we'll see how it works out because she has an incendiary track record. she wants press, she doesn't care about policy. she wants attention. that's all she's about. >> marjorie taylor greene also wants attention, and that's all she's about based upon her policy background, which is undetectable. i'm reluctant to play these things, but because you brought it up, i feel we should play it because it does affect kevin mccarthy's future. listen to the thanks he gets for trying to protect her or not punishing her. listen to this. >> we know that kevin mccarthy has a problem in our conference. he doesn't have t

. >> actually former house speaker newt gingrich was won. youngkin won by 2.2 points, just under 70,000 votes. that's a smaller margin of victory than joe biden's win over donald trump. and we all saw what happened in january at the capitol in washington. but it wasn't just newt sounding the stop steal alarm bells. tucker carlson was also suggesting that the fix was in. >> there has been a hitch in the highly anticipated count in the virginia governor's race. fairfax county, which is the biggest and most democratic county in the state of virginia will not be supplying its vote results on time. we're supposed to have early vote shortly after 7:00 eastern. but an hour ago a fairfax county official said there is a delay and they need to rescale -- rescan the ballots. trying to figure out how many votes they need apparently, just kidding. >> tucker's always just kidding or asking questions. if you adjust your tinfoil hat just right, he sounds very sincere. but they were amplifying the far more volatile rhetoric in days leading up to the election

you were in the clinton white house and the first mid-term election, wham, newt gingrich becomes speaker, obama was president, wiped out. nancy pelosi became speaker. this is not unique to joe biden that the party in power has trouble out of the box. the suburbs were gold during the trump age. i think democrats should be more worried about the blue collar counties in southern new jersey that flipped. what is wrong? where is the disconnect that joe biden won them so easily one year ago, paul? >> right. the first thing is do we have a problem? right. there are still democrats in the denialist. no, it's not heartburn. it's a heart attack and they better take it very bloody seriously. voters picked joe biden and to an extent the rest democrats because they wanted progress, getting things done and unity. what have we seen from capitol hill? you cover it every single day. we see stalemate and division, right, and so it's been a perfect storm. the left on the hill tells voters we're not delivering for you. we're not getting your child care. okay. the moderates, we just saw joe manchin do it. th

one of the investigations we had was of then speaker newt gingrich. speaker newt gingrich. the punishment was reprimand and a fine of $300,000. the speaker of the house. the vote was 29 -- 395 bipartisan vote charging the speaker of the house, 395-28. yesterday, two republicans would agree that it's not appropriate to have violence against women, workplace harassment. bad example for the rest of the country. dishonor to the house of representatives which you serve. two versus -- democrats and republicans, 395 versus 28 no republicans against the speaker of the house at the time. so it was most unfortunate, but nonetheless, i want to say i am proud of the committees. the rules committee went into action. jim mcgovern, as usual, and the rules committee prepared us to come to the floor. we met with the leadership and the members to see what the approach should be. and it was overwhelming that we would -- we could not let this stand. we had to go for the maximum penalty that we could achieve. anything more than that would have required 2/3 vote of the congress. you know that wa

he writes many people saw time of deep division and chaos -- that's newt gingrich from foxnews.com, his piece there. crystal, philadelphia. good morning. you're next. caller: oh, good morning, america. good morning, c-span. bipartisanship, i'm 63 years old. and i remember when even with differences and stuff, you could work together. the work -- to work stuff out. you meet up and they used to talk about going to having a beer and stuff together. but in this day and age? i just -- it is horrible. there's no common courtesy. a trouble -- troublemakers. instead of being lawmakers. they're working hard to make stuff work with helping common people. they gum up the system. they don't follow the rules on the floor. and they're just plain bullies. i don't know how you work with people like this. it makes no sense. and there is no -- doesn't seem to be any consequences. they threaten each other. and just act like it's high school instead of congress of the united states and they just block any and everything. whether it's good. if it's bad, point out what's bad. work out stuff and get stuff don

when newt gingrich became the speaker of the house way back when in 1995, he pursued and major transformation of power away from the committees into leadership. the staff associated with leadership essentially doubled, the staff associate with the committee was cut in half, or nearly in half. i think if you have more professional staff on committees , you might have more policy continuity, more of a commitment to the committee jurisdiction. another possible reformed that at the margins might be helpful, i don't think any of these are solutions in a permanent way. just at the margins, things that might be helpful is to maybe allow committee chairs to serve multiple terms. serve longer terms. there are restrictions on how long committee chairs can serve in the senate, for example. i think maybe if you have more of a stakeholder through the committee chair, that might get congress more engaged in that committee chair would have more incentive both as an expert given his or her reputation associated with the committee jurisdiction, more of a commitment to work with the minority to get the committ

and we jump ahead to newt gingrich's contract with -- but was on -- america. that giant sucking sound we were told about. now 20 years later we are worried about taiwan. why don't we just bring all of those companies back to the u.s. that is in taiwan and make america great that way? how do you feel about this discussion? thank you and have a good day. guest: i think the caller touches on a very important point. we are concerned about china and competition from china on many fronts and with very good reason . he referred to american scores in stem and math. a big part of the issue has not to do with china, but with american performance and with american strength. many americans think we have seen a fraying of our democratic institutions. we have not invested enough in infrastructure, in research and development, in education. the way to compete with china is to be more competitive. there has to be a real effort at self-strengthening. this is what the biden administration has begun with this, with making america more competitive and trying to reinvest. it is no

newt gingrich said that was the second american revolution. the way to do away with programs like social security and child labor laws is to bankrupt the system. their strategy is to privatize profit and publicized the debt. why do you think we are trillions of dollars in debt? do you see any republicans say let's put half $1 billion directly to the debt? no because they do not care. just like cheney said the debt does not matter when the money is running in the old pocket. thank you so much. host: doug is next in virginia cannot republican line. as a republican, did the election turn out the way you wanted tuesday? caller: absolutely. virginians always rally when virginians have to rally. i am retired military. if everybody think this country sucks so bad, leave. i have been in communist countries. if people want us to be like that, leave. we will pay you to leave. all these people in congress need time limits so they cannot make a lifetime commitment of being corrupt. host: that is doug in virginia. mark is calling in from ohio on our democr

and we jump ahead to newt gingrich's contract with -- but was on -- america. that giant sucking sound we were told about. now 20 years later we are worried about taiwan. why don't we just bring all of those companies back to the u.s. that is in taiwan and make america great that way? how do you feel about this discussion? thank you and have a good day. guest: i think the caller touches on a very important point. we are concerned about china and competition from china on many fronts and with very good reason . he referred to american scores in stem and math. a big part of the issue has not to do with china, but with american performance and with american strength. many americans think we have seen a fraying of our democratic institutions. we have not invested enough in infrastructure, in research and development, in education. the way to compete with china is to be more competitive. there has to be a real effort at self-strengthening. this is what the biden administration has begun with this, with making america more competitive and trying to reinvest. it is no

i remember when they elected newt gingrich and all you heard was, give them a chance. give kamala harris a chance. give the first woman vice president -- someday she might be the president and i think that is awesome. i think she would be a great president. i think she would be one of the best if not the best. can't be any worse than what we had the previous four years with trump. she is doing great and i don't understand what the controversy is all about. host: to our republican and ray in webster, new york. caller: yes, about kamala harris, i think she is doing a terrible job. when she went to the border all she did was laugh and the border issue is a serious issue. the next time people come over i think there should be no people allowed for so many years. too many people coming over and we are paying taxes where they live, go to school and everything. this is a bunch of bunk about labor. it is not going to fix everything in america. nancy is going to siphon a lot of money for her personal use. so, kamala harris is not doing a good job. host: ray talked about the vic

i remember when they elected newt gingrich and all you heard was, give them a chance. give kamala harris a chance. give the first woman vice president -- someday she might be the president and i think that is awesome. i think she would be a great president. i think she would be one of the best if not the best. can't be any worse than what we had the previous four years with trump. she is doing great and i don't understand what the controversy is all about. host: to our republican and ray in webster, new york. caller: yes, about kamala harris, i think she is doing a terrible job. when she went to the border all she did was laugh and the border issue is a serious issue. the next time people come over i think there should be no people allowed for so many years. too many people coming over and we are paying taxes where they live, go to school and everything. this is a bunch of bunk about labor. it is not going to fix everything in america. nancy is going to siphon a lot of money for her personal use. so, kamala harris is not doing a good job. host: ray talked about the vic

when newt gingrich came into power, he changed. he moved from people becoming political opponents to political enemies and talked like people were enemies of the state. and then fox news arrived, and the other cousin to them, newsmax, all of them, and they are just feeding everybody every day all this mccarthyism that will become socialists, communists, carrying on, and you beat this and heads long enough, you get people stirred up with a toxic elixir of enthusiasm and rage and give them the targets. it must be those liberal people everyday out there, and all of a sudden people of targets on their back. host: this is dug out of florida. republican -- this is doug out of florida. republican. go ahead. caller: yes. i think it is bad on both sides. like the other day i was watching c-span, and obama was telling that cop-26 to fight and stay angry -- telling at cop-26 to fight and stay angry. i get is that on both sides. host: robert, lynchburg, virginia. independent. caller: good morning. good morning, america. i am an independent. i

we are working on speaker newt gingrich and so most of the author events will be politics and history, current affairs and bestsellers infection and all the other categories that make a small independent bookstore work. >> you have to go back and talk about why you invited newt gingrich to do an offer event. >> we are a relentlessly bipartisan. we are in business to satisfy. to give perspective on the issues that interest them and have something in the store that will offend everybody so we had nelson a couple of days ago, just a prolific and wonderful author, and he's fairly conservative and while he was in the store, congressman shift was shopping because he had just done a bookstore and somebody said to me you've done a very good job of having books that will offend just about everybody. there's something i like about that. i am in business to satisfy people's curiosities so it's wing to be broad, deep and balanced. >> the global war on morris and the big government. >> you are talking about two books that i wrote. originally my intention was to sell those two books but the publish

gingrich argues anti-american beliefs are gaining traction within the united states. his latest book is called "beyond biden." and in the broken constitution, harvard professor describes how abraham lincoln viewed the constitution and fox news brian kelly looks at the relationship between lincoln and frederick douglass and the president and the freedom fighter. those are some of the new books being published this week. you will see them on booktv. each week booktv produces a program called "after words." and on this week's episode of the author interview program, entrepreneur argues that corporate america is signing onto, quote, the culture only to increase profit. he discussed his book with harvard university economics professor and former george w. bush economics advisor greg. here is a little bit of that conversation. >> i think that there is something to be said for exploring the way in which may be it can stand on its own 2 feet. a big part of what i take aim at in the book isn't just the ideology in and of its own right but it's merged with capitalism which actu

that includes davidd limbaugh, newt gingrich, dennis prager, michelle malcolm, laura ingraham, margaret hemingway, david horwich, mark live-in, the list is long. and it was an amazing opportunity for some interesting provocative authors per. >> one of the authors publisher did not mention was donald trump. [laughter] >> we did publish donald trump. published a book on times to get tough which really set the stage for presidential run. we publish that back in 2011, i think, he kinda flirted with the idea of running and then decided not too. that was the beginning of him speaking out for national and international political issues. >> now margie ross in a previous conversation you and i had, you mentioned once he declared in 2016 that he was running for president you went back and read his old stuff and you saw no discrepancies. >> that is such an interestingt thing. the reason i went back, honestly, it read his old stuff and he declared he was going to rent we thought we publish this great book maybe we should publish the paperback edition that seems like a good marketing decision at thi

gingrich argues anti-american beliefs are gaining traction within the united states. his latest book is called "beyond biden." and in the broken constitution, harvard professor describes how abraham lincoln viewed the constitution and fox news brian kelly looks at the relationship between lincoln and frederick douglass and the president and the freedom fighter. those are some of the new books being published this week. you will see them on booktv. each week booktv produces a program called "after words." and on this week's episode of the author interview program, entrepreneur argues that corporate america is signing onto, quote, the culture only to increase profit. he discussed his book with harvard university economics professor and former george w. bush economics advisor greg. here is a little bit of that conversation. >> i think that there is something to be said for exploring the way in which may be it can stand on its own 2 feet. a big part of what i take aim at in the book isn't just the ideology in and of its own right but it's merged with capitalism which actu

newt gingrich said we don't need technical expertise in congress, people can get technical expertise in the market. so we have made a systematic tedivisions in the federal government over time to erode the technical expertise and knowledge. that means we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of company so while lots of us are focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling in the future of work, i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task that we have, which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil service. it means thinking about what expertise we recruit for and it means thinking about the creation and support of independent institutions that represent a public-interest and in our complex system which as we said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge consensus or agreement

newt gingrich says we don't need technical expertise. people can just get technical expertise in the market so we've made systematic decisions in the federal government to erode the expertise and knowledge and what that means is we put the politicians in a position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies so why go lots of us were focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai or upscaling in the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task of building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil servant and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that trepresent a public interest rather than a private or commercial interest and in our complex system, which we have said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge a consensus or ag

newt gingrich on china. i don't think war with china brings any benefits i can imagine. >> i agree with you on that. that could be less productive. if our viewers want information about the conference, where should they go, george? >> calls him .-dot technology. cause him .-dot technology. cause him cosm .-dot technology. cosm .-dot technology november 12. >> in the meanwhile you are releasing a brand-new book, i think the publication date is officially october 15 if i'm not mistaken, but the title-- is the cover of it. "gaming ai" very nice and compelling cover. i also noticed if you want to go to amazon you can order it already. they have some in stock, it seems like. >> it's been out for a while. >> that's why they have some in stock. let's talk about the book, i mean, i got a copy of it and i was utterly fascinated by the way you take up the standard challenge and kind of turn it in a direction that people don't expect them in the standard challenge, i mean, you mentioned in the book that some people thi

we're going to have an exciting time and i'm going to debate newt gingrich on china. i don't think war with china brings any benefits that i can imagine. >> i agree with you on that. what could be less productive in a war with china? good grief. if our viewers when information about the conference which should they go, george? >> cause him .txt technology so technology is the suffix. >> cosm.technology. >> is it next month did you say on november? >> november. november 102 the 12th. >> okay. in the meantime you also releasing a brand-new book, i think the publication date is officially october 15 if i'm not mistaken but here's the cover of it, "gaming ai: why ai can't think but can transform jobs." very nice and compelling coverage. yet some good artist working with you, george. i also noticed if you want to go to amazon you can order it already. partly this got some in stock it seems like. >> it's been out for a while. >> so that's what you got some in stock. let's talk about that book. i got a copy of it and i was utterly fascinated by the way that you take up the s

the seeds of ross perot came from newt gingrich if you will. it was frustrating he remembered the challenges in new hampshire where the president was challenged within his own party. that gave oxygen to ross perot. it was a frustrating thing. if ross perot had not run i do think george h.w. bush would have won reelection. i'm not sure the united states would be as unified as we think it would be. i think it's the divisiveness were actually sewn and kind of upset the apple cart. i do not think catchment there very few people at george h.w. bush did not really call friends. and ross perot would be one. he did not remember most people were his enemies, or his enemies. i'll tell you one story i remember right after the top vote we just barely won in the senate and the president invited senators to come down and watch a movie at the white house. people are in line, coming into the white house the president is greeting everyone as they commit to see the movie. he just really against on the bill for the senate pretty looks and says really? think of th

the seeds of ross perot came from newt gingrich if you will. it was frustrating he remembered the challenges in new hampshire where the president was challenged within his own party. that gave oxygen to ross perot. it was a frustrating thing. if ross perot had not run i do think george h.w. bush would have won reelection. i'm not sure the united states would be as unified as we think it would be. i think it's the divisiveness were actually sewn and kind of upset the apple cart. i do not think catchment there very few people at george h.w. bush did not really call friends. and ross perot would be one. he did not remember most people were his enemies, or his enemies. i'll tell you one story i remember right after the top vote we just barely won in the senate and the president invited senators to come down and watch a movie at the white house. people are in line, coming into the white house the president is greeting everyone as they commit to see the movie. he just really against on the bill for the senate pretty looks and says really? think of th

when newt gingrich became the speaker of the house way back when in 1995 he pursued a major transformation of power away from the committees into leadership. the staff associated with leadership, essentially was cut nearly in half and i think if you have more professional staff on committees you might have more policy continuity, more of a commitment to the committee's jurisdiction. another possible reform that at the margins might be helpful, i don't think any of these are solutions in a permanent way the things that might be marginally helpful, maybe allow committee chairs to serve multiple terms, serve longer terms. there are restrictions how long committee chairs conserve in the senate and if you have more of a stakeholder through the committee chair that might get congress more engaged, the committee chair would have more incentive as an expert so given his for her reputation, more of a commitment to work with the minority to get the committee to accomplish something. don't know if those reforms will accomplish much but they were considering at least. >> want to speak in defense? >> s

gingrich's revolution, the contract with america. he said we don't need technical expertise in congress. people can just get technical expertise on the market, so we made systematic decisions in the federal government over time for the technical expertise and knowledge. what that means is we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies. while lots of us are focused on the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology and that means thinking about the future of the service and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that represent the public interest rather than private or commercial interest and in our complex system that is the best technology we've come up with to deal with in a way to forge consensus or agreement among the conv

i'm going to debate newt gingrich on china. >> oh, ho, ho. >> i don't think war with china brings any benefits that i can imagine. >> i agree with you on that. what could be less productive than a war with china? good grief. if our viewers want information about that conference, where should they go? >> cosm.technology. >> go there to find out about this conference that's going on. next month did you say or november? >> november. november 10 to 12. >> in the meanwhile, you are releasing a new book. i think the publication date is officially october 15th, if i'm not mistaken. here is the cover of it. >> let's talk about the book. i got a copy of it. i was fascinated by the way that you take up the standard challenge and turn it in a direction that people don't expect. the standard challenge -- you mentioned early in the book that some people think that ai is going to be for sure a demotion of the human race. i think on page 20 of the book -- it's a very arresting quote. caught my eye where you quoted the late steven hawking who pronounced the development of full artificial intelligence

newt gingrich on china, oh, oh, oh. that's, you know, i don't think war with china will do so well, and i can't imagine. >> i agree with you on that. that could be less productive than good grief. so if our viewers want information about that conference, where should they go, george? >> technology. >> that's the suffix? >> yeah. chosm.technology. >> you can go there to find out about the conference going on next month did you say? november? >> november 10th to 12th. >> great. well, okay. so in the meanwhile, you're also releaing a brand-new book. i think the publication date is officially october 15th in i'm in the mistaken. here's the cover of it. "can't think, but can transform jobs" very nice and compelling cover. you have some good artist work. >> thank you. >> i also noticed that if you want to go to amazon, you can order it already. apparently they're in stock it seems like. >> it's been up for a little while. >> oh, okay. >> that's why they've got some in stock. >> let's talk about that book. i got a copy of it,

the seeds of ross perot came from newt gingrich if you will. it was frustrating he remembered the challenges in new hampshire where the president was challenged within his own party. that gave oxygen to ross perot. it was a frustrating thing. if ross perot had not run i do think george h.w. bush would have won reelection. i'm not sure the united states would be as unified as we think it would be. i think it's the divisiveness were actually sewn and kind of upset the apple cart. i do not think catchment there very few people at george h.w. bush did not really call friends. and ross perot would be one. he did not remember most people were his enemies, or his enemies. i'll tell you one story i remember right after the top vote we just barely won in the senate and the president invited senators to come down and watch a movie at the white house. people are in line, coming into the white house the president is greeting everyone as they commit to see the movie. he just really against on the bill for the senate pretty looks and says really? think of th

he took on newt gingrich. he threw a party when he got into trouble for getting the italian salute on the house floor. my dad was very bipartisan. he believed very much in the institution as opposed the political party. a lot of the memories i have of my dad were teaching me the lesson up he worked very closely within congressman chuck schumer. he saved the hospital that was about to close. a public health hospital on staten island as a freshman member because he did not know any better that he was not supposed to be able to have that kind of clout and figure things out. most of the memories i have of my dad. he saw walls but he did not walk around them he took him down and he still does. : : : in the carryall they said that is going to nominate guy to the state assembly. i said i got her so speaking publicly, i thought i would be afraid of it. and so because i was always active and from a very young age to running for office and then it open up the near city council and working in washington dc, back in new y