Skip to main content

tv   Cross Talk  RT  November 19, 2021 11:00pm-11:31pm EST

11:00 pm
ah ah, with the streets are ablaze, and please have fired warning shots in rotterdam as the dutch government most tightening coldly to pass criteria elsewhere. austria takes things further with a full lockdown on the way, becoming the 1st european nation to impose vaccinations for everyone. also this out as to the information gauge price we the jury find the defendant, kyle, a written kyle, aged read. how not guilty in the u. s. teenager col rittenhouse, who's the case has divided the u. s. i made a massive media coverage is found not guilty on all charges over
11:01 pm
a shooting that killed 2 people at a racial justice protest. last year the ruling was received with emotional reaction . here with one of the most wanted who allegedly took part in january capital right. turns up in delaware where you seeking asylum as newman, as old r t that charges against him are false. it was brought to my attention that i might be on that list. and i looked, and it appeared to be me and it said a sofa, a federal officer, and i knew that i had not assaulted a federal officer because your headlines, my colleague under farmer will be here in about 15 minutes with another full and fresh look to stay with us as our international
11:02 pm
ah ah hello and welcome to cross stock where all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle . there is no shortage of growing tensions in eastern europe. there is a growing e. u. bear who stands off over illegal migration. there are western reports, russia is amassing troops within its own borders. and of course, there is the self inflicted crisis of european energy supplies. it is no coincidence, some recalling this hybrid war, but who's hybrid war against whom? i crossed, sucking, rising tensions. i'm joined by my guess, peter cosmic in washington. he's professor of history and director of the nucular studies institute at american university as well as co author with oliver stone of
11:03 pm
the untold history of the united states. also in washing. we have role west mason. he's executive vice president of the ration center and in lake jackson, we cross to daniel mcadams. he is the executive director of the ron paul institute for peace and prosperity. hi gentlemen, cross hock rules that affect, that means you can jump anytime you want. i always appreciate when you do, danny, let me go to you 1st here. i mean, as i said in my introduction is a lot of things going on right now. we have this growing tension with a poland and berries over immigration, lot of finger pointing. i might say a lot of a very exaggerated name calling out there doesn't help us understand what's going on. also we seem to have kind of a revisiting of what happened with what was going on in ukraine and spring of this year. this year. there's encouragement of the care of government. there are, there's caution, there's my arms coming in. there's back slapping, i and we have, we had a germany and the you, a in, in france,
11:04 pm
come out recently upholding the new, the, the borders and security in the sanctity of ukraine. again, k, i change of, of tone from the spring. we also we have the energy situation, the nor to stream to pipeline has been put on praise again. here. i mean are all these things connected or just chaos theory out there. go ahead, daniel. well, you know peter, i'm into tory's conspiracy theorists. of course, it all seems connected to me, obviously, obviously turning up the dial in ukraine, which is a very convenient thing for the west to do now. especially with zelinski and surprise, surprise still more trouble. he lost control of the night in their parliament. he's desperate to stay relevant. of course, the western countries are desperate to keep things going. we saw in the garage of rockets into dawn bass yesterday. i think it was recently, of course, and we see of we see the migrant ward, which i think is certainly
11:05 pm
a hybrid war in on the border of polen bells entirely. the fault indirectly certainly of the e u and you have the u. s. of course the mount whitney in the black sea. so this is sort of an encircling hybrid war against russia and it just goes to show the blinking is no better than previous secretaries of state the by the administration is asleep at the wheel. okay, well peters, and then let's agree. these are all connected here and i think they are. that's why i posted here. i mean, what does washington hoped to achieve? what is brussels hoped to achieve by this? because this is really upping the spanks on the stakes on a variety of issues here. and none of them good. i mean they can be resolved, but i don't see that there's any interest in resolving them. actually just the reverse rising tension serves their purposes. go ahead, peter. a peter, i'd actually like to broaden it a little bit because the other crisis that's developing is one over taiwan. so
11:06 pm
we've got the potential for the, for i outbreak of violence both in ukraine and in taiwan. so they're very, very dangerous moment, right? now, in the aftermath of the bungled pull out from afghanistan, camp biden has been desperate compounded by this little plummeting approval ratings in the united states is really been looking for foreign policy when and he's gotten himself involved in 2 situations that could both backfire and, and are, are both very, very dangerous right now. in the, i'm approaching it less for the standpoint of where the blame lies. and from the standpoint of what we have to do to diffuse these crises, both of which can unravel very quickly, people draw the analogy to world war one, where we managed to get involved in war that nobody wanted. because of the various
11:07 pm
alliances and various things that happened that were out of people's control. but i see the same thing happening in this situation. so yes, as a lensky is in a weakened position. yes, the right wingers in ukraine. i have been much more aggressive. and now with the bay back tar drones, from a turkey that was so effective in as a by john's defeat of armenia and using them now in ukraine. they feel like they're in a bolster position, and they seem to be much more aggressively going after the don bass. and so how does putin respond to that? and to other provocations, like the black see, i'm putting more troops at the border. nobody really wants to war there. and if there is a war, much like with taiwan, with taiwan, the pentagon has run 18 war games. if the united states and china go to war over
11:08 pm
taiwan and china as one all 18 similarly with the situation ukraine, russia is much more powerful. i don't think there's any chance that ukraine is going to withstand a military confrontation with russia. so, but these situations have got to be diffused before they get to that point. so i think we're playing a very dangerous game in the united states in heightening intensifying and upping the stakes there. and the tension pressure in both of those situations. and i'm really glad peter, i'm really glad that you brought it out. i'm glad you mentioned taiwan here. earl, let me go to you. i mean, this is high risk. this is high stake stuff here because you know, this is not a rock. this is not afghanistan. not even syria, because since peter brought in china and, and let's included here, china and russia can fight back, and they've made it very clear their red lines here. this is very different than fighting these ridiculous wars in the middle east here. russia, china have red lines, they've made them very clear and public here. nonetheless,
11:09 pm
we get all of these provocations. i mean, i, there's, there's no rational explanation, ford, other than what peter said. the biden ministration is desperate for apollo foreign policy. when i mean how you define winning here i, i mean that's a scary thought. go ahead, earl. no, peter, you're, i mean everyone. you're exactly right. and so, so hearing and daniel on their perspectives on the me, what state the, the domestic agenda, the complete nightmare here. and they need the popularity rating for or binder or, or down considerably popularity rating for the vice president. tamala, harris is historically low. it's the lowest rated by further ever. they need some wins and era. you know, i mean, you've got, you've got your order challenge from mexico, with almost 200000 illegal aliens crossing
11:10 pm
a month. not 2 to 5000. i wonder if, when it will start to point the finger at that for or collaborating with the next bill or something, but yes, they need to do. they need to divert attention away. so they're looking for foreign policy one. but if you look at it, every foreign policy approach they've done, everything has been a failure with china, with russia, relations, or even the office deal has irritated france, one of our historically longest allies in the u. and it's just, they're looking for something and actually i think in away part of this is to contain russia and china. i do think they're all interconnected real. if you look at the root cause of every one of the issues, the energy crisis, the don bath issues in ukraine, the migrants in the, in bell root,
11:11 pm
they all go back to foreign policy failures for mistakes or missteps. whether that's invading the middle east, whether that's changing how, you know, spot market energy contracts, whether that supporting my don, all be back in some mistakes that were the root cause from from western western countries, mainly led by the us. yeah. they're absolutely trying to look for something, even if, even if russia comes in and, and or, or china takes taiwan rush, it comes in and crushes ukraine. then they can point, oh, you know, they'll look for a political women. ok, that does, that's exactly where i want to go. because daniel went, what do we mean by a win here? because it might be a quote unquote diplomatic political wind. but i mean, it depends. you know, what, the situation is a wind over ukraine scenes. ukraine crushed and thousands and thousands of people.
11:12 pm
that is, that's a win. i mean, if that is a win that then, then, you know, then we live in a very pathetic world here because that would, the way i look at is all these things. is the u. s looks added to buying ministration. looks at it is low cost. ok, but the outcomes could be catastrophic. go ahead, daniel. you know, i've always, i've often thought about the irrationality of us one policy. and i've also often thought of it in terms of mistakes, but i really no longer think that way. i think these mistakes are all very well plans, and i think it has to do with very, very powerful vested interest in the united states that depend on continuing conflict in the rest of the world to justify massive, massive military budgets to justify the us military industrial complex, think tank complex media complex. all of these things are built on a house of sand. they rely on con, look in for about 20 years. it was the war on terror and that sustained. what i
11:13 pm
think that was more of a bridging maneuver. and now we're back into territory where they feel more comfortable cold war 2 point. oh, and this time we have a new a costar, which is china with the old bad boy, russia. so i think i'm beginning to think these things are all very well planned to keep these people working. whereas we would probably say they deserve to be out of work. but i think these mistakes are well planned. i think the us once a conflict, but not necessarily a war, and that's why it is so dangerous. they want to see how far they can push the conflict. and assume that russia and china won't go all in when you assume in that situation, that's not a lot of room for maneuver. i don't think you have a leader that's like putting it's like bedding your entire fortune on a day trader. that's an american cor policy. that day trader daniel just explained it. okay, i'll get you a bus 230 seconds before we go to the ready. go ahead peter. we can comment on that danny's right. as the united states is pushing these confrontations and conflicts
11:14 pm
up to a point and thinks it could control. busy them, what i'd like to talk about when we come back is how the abide is foreign policy has really been a continuation of trumps foreign policy for the most part. and that this is creating these stabilizing situations in much of the world right now. okay, but i'm going to go to a break here. i mean, peter is just teased us with a overarching theory and it has all connected with donald trump and we're going to explore that after a break. so we'll continue our discussion on rising tension state with with and he really is so thing they can't ride on police reports in all caps in december
11:15 pm
2020 a group of anti finishes. sell out a film crew access for 3 months. so like if people organization, if an idea that it must be opposed that channel out the gate while they may kill their faces. but they can say what they believe in. we believe in helping our community. we believe that fascism is one of the major threats to the united states has gotten proven. this is a chance to see who and teeth are really are. in order for me to extract my 1st amendment right and say that my life matters have to be on to the t for that. that's how america we can't trust the police. we can't trust the government. we can't trust anyone except ourselves to protect ourselves in. oh, is your media reflection of reality?
11:16 pm
in the world transformed? what will make you feel safe? isolation for community. are you going the right way or are you being led somewhere? direct. what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend a join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah, welcome back to cross stock where all things are considered. i'm peter level to remind you, we're discussing rising tensions. ah okay, let's go back to peter in washington. i mean, considering the biden ministration bends over backwards to do the very opposite of
11:17 pm
donald trump on almost everything except for foreign policy. you teased it in the end of the 1st block there. tell us what you think. go ahead. peter. foreign policy in the united states has been frustrating, elite bipartisan for a long time, and bite and ran as the anti trump, in terms of competence. care as a compassion in terms of being a peacemaker rather than a war maker. but the reality has been very, very frustrating. in many ways, what biden represents toward trump is what obama represented to our. busy bush, a more sophisticated approach that legitimized be confrontational policies of the previous administration. and so when ari fleischer said that, well, bomb is 2nd term is really george bush's 4th term. he was on to something there. and in many ways, biden is doubling down on trump's foreign policy,
11:18 pm
especially visa v china. but also visa v. russia and, and iran as well. so what we've gotten out with we saw with the bush administration and they brought in all the people from the project for a new american century. and how they were the neocons and they were the hawks. and they brought us afghanistan that brought us iraq and, and libya and then our, when we give biden's obama some credit for olivia to and sit and syria. now what you see with the biden administration is they brought in 16 top people from the center for new american security. and these are the hawks who are doubling down on so many of trumps policies at this point. and so instead of peeling back what you know, there was the june summit in geneva between potent and biden. and then there was some easing of tensions after that. the problem in the united states is that you've got a bipartisan right wing pressure on biden,
11:19 pm
to be hawkish toward china, to be hawkish toward russia. and so now with this situation developing in ukraine, it is not a lot of room for maneuver for biden. so and, and the situation as, as danny was saying, is really, we were pushing these, these crises because we need to support a frightened population to support vast expenditure on arm cells, which is the heart of the military industrial complex and has been for decades. but this is creating a very dangerous conflict that can easily spiral out of control in both the pacific and in ukraine. right now. yeah, been earl, i mean, if we, if we look at i'm, and i'm a completely agreeing with peter. but i mean, if we're, we're looking just at the law in this century, the last 20 years, i mean the road record of quote unquote success. and they're applying their expertise. now the difference is, like i said, in the 1st part of the program,
11:20 pm
we're not dealing with afghanistan and iraq. we're dealing with russia and china. ok. and by definition, these 2 countries have the ability to say, no, i mean, that's not a very interesting negotiating pattern here. and i would, i look at it this way, is it washington? and it's always do not want to negotiate. they want surrender, which is not going to happen. and that's why we're making this program here. go ahead. earl. now, peter, you're absolutely right. the, what we've got in a way, it's a policy of containment. they think they can push, push right up to the edge. and ideally, they would like to be a reading change in china, and russia is not going to the also, they're kind of kind of thinking that china and russia are bluffing, but, but try to rush, you're been very clear on the red line. and they, i do not think they're bluffing. and so they kind of the conflicts that the us
11:21 pm
think they can maneuver, manage multiple things. i'm going to say the high grid. you've got the energy and i'm excited you got the conflict naval present long, the ukraine as well. it's all wrapped together, but it's so easy, so easy to explode and get out of hand. and then also it's dangerous. as you, as of now, is open at least 2 discussions of the use of tactical nuclear weapons. right. keep going. i'm sorry, you're not going to container. use that for me. it's going to blow up. strategic. yeah. and either way, ukraine, ah, the region around taiwan, ukraine and euro will be the ones that will pay the most i, and no matter how the, how the 6 weeks, by, by definition i meant i was aghast. that you know, for
11:22 pm
a tactical nuclear weapons, 1st you saw what i thought we, we retired these things, but apparently not here. daniel, just as a geography questionnaire and united states has not border the black sea, but it acts like it's a black sea power. i mean, it, can, you, can you explain that to our viewers because you know that the, the, of the amount of interests into interest that's being expressed by the u. s. navy, in the black sea. obviously the can in this cannot be any more than a provocation. rush is shown known aggression to romania bulgaria at all. okay, but not all of a sudden it said tension point here is that's it. that's intentional. go ahead, daniel. well, how about this? oh, my gosh, russian troops are massing in russia. this is what we get in what passes for a free press in the united states. and you know, that is key. the other key we've talking a little bit about china and taiwan. the other key is when the u. s. continuously
11:23 pm
runs warships through the south china sea, key word being china. you know, the u. s. is still fighting world war 2, a world war one. this idea of territorial warfare is gone. nobody has it. china isn't taking over places. russia isn't taking over places. they're actually doing business overseas, especially the chinese in africa and elsewhere in latin america and elsewhere. he was still obsessed with this idea of taking territory. it's so antiquated, nobody does it any war any more. and again, you have to look back to why it's what we call the deep state is what we call washington. i mean, as much as i'd hate and who here war will be nice to see washington media relevant again and revert to the swamp from whence it came. well, a men on that. peter, you mentioned august 1914 and a perfect historical parallel. but i think as we look at ukraine right now, august of 2008 seems very appropriate given the, you know,
11:24 pm
you have this demetrius yarborough's, a fanatic nazi like figure. all he wants is a conflict in the dom that he wants to kill people. he's recently been brought back into the highest levels of the cleaning. that cannot be an accident here. ok. i worry that we have a wag the dog situation here and all of the ingredients are being set up for that happening. go ahead peter. a zalinski is in a weakened position there. they haven't been able to deal with the corruption. the economy is very, very shaky. politically, the right wing in ukraine has been gaining more power. although the more pro russian faction had been sent than for a while. but they're trying to at tamped down on that and so, and they've gotten more, they're encouraged by the use of these drones. so. busy effectively, a lot of things have happened to change the situation the last couple of years. so
11:25 pm
landscape, i had come to power in part of overwhelmingly of when the victory, based on say he was gonna bring peace with russia, has now gone the opposite direction. and the talks have broken down, we know what the solution is. there is some version of the minsk to agreement. we can solve that problem. but soleski has backed off of that, and the united states is not putting any pressure on him to come to the table. that was an agreement that was signed between ukraine, russia, france, and germany. and this can be resolved that situation. the situation in taiwan also has been heated up unnecessarily that with the status quo there was very, very calm for a long time till the united states began meddling there as well. so we're, we're in a precarious situation. you, you talked about august of 1914, and i are always talking about red lines where you have to remember that william
11:26 pm
burns to you. now c, i, a director, was the former us ambassador to russia. and in 2008, when the united states started talking about george bush talking about ukraine and georgia, joining nato. it was burns, they sent back the memo to washington titled me yet means in the yet, don't their cross rushes red lines when it comes to ukraine. joining. busy nato, and that now he recently went over to moscow to try to talk to them as has other top officials from this administration. and we're getting nowhere in terms of actually resolving these things to those united states. want to resolve them. is part of the question, while we're, as we were saying, is in, i say, simply want russia and china to accept you as a gemini, u. s. domination, you asked you to polarity and come in as junior partners and help us solve climate crisis. and other things like that. well, china and russia are not willing to play that role any more. as
11:27 pm
a chinese foreign minister and the top foreign policy official made clear to blanket and sullivan in anchorage, you can't talk to us for a position of strength anymore. and russia is showing the same thing. and so we're, it's, that's why we're at this attention point. now we're, we're all worried that it's good to unravel with these entangling alliances. u. s. is not officially have responsibility to come to ukraine's military defense. they're not part of nato. united states is not have responsibility to come to tie one's military defense. we are position is strategic ambiguity, yet we're saying bite is making statements on both fronts, to indicate that we will. and that's even more provocative and more dangerous in our all i, me at the end of the day it's very, very simple as a biden ministration, like the previous administrations days, demanding that the world accept american hegemony. and that is eroding very, very quickly on all across the world. we saw it happen in the middle east. we
11:28 pm
thought with afghanistan, and now we're seeing it now here. and there countries like russia, tyner saying, no, that is the dilemma. here it is, the us that has to accept it's new strategic position, not russia and china last 30 seconds. go to you, are url, go ahead. i think you're right in a way we're, we're definitely we're still thinking of what was doctrine as far as us supremacy and do whatever it but i think there's conflicting things going on within the administration as well. you recently heard, i think the defense department mentioned that there's try try great power competition going on and we're moving to multiple or war world. that's where we're moving to in the us needs to, if they don't accept that, if they try to fight like a like a rabid dog to maintain their superiority, the world is going to be in a very critical, dangerous situation. well, we're adding on a very depressing no, but like i like how we started here,
11:29 pm
but that's all the time we have. i want to thank my guests in washington and, and like jackson, and i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at our t. see you next time. and remember across titles. ah ah, ah, we're seeing high levels one to keep creeping in. take economic life and i think with all the way of the disruption of global supply chains spike in the cost of energy. we're seeing a li, appearance of inflation. i think all of these constitute economies cool down the sign risks which could mean it is still ahead of us despite the moderation of the severity of the timing
11:30 pm
for empowering our cells to be more efficient, quicker with our transactions. but with that comes a trade off, every device is a potential entry point for security machine. as an extension of traditional time, the defenders have always been and one step behind the attackers both for the women was one girl disruption in law. so it's not a matter of if it happens it's a matter of went oh.


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on