tv Documentary RT July 11, 2021 11:30am-12:00pm EDT
the we live in a world where the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put their products on the market the we need a regulation, so we don't do great things because maybe sometimes who do great things. i don't know, but i'd expect that we have regulation. we want regulation of industry and if you don't have then yes, penalty that's fine. ah, obviously the, the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be out of work? i, we're sort of the last answer and the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking president corporate interest. corporate profit have been
getting priority with the regulators, so that needs to change in one of the big ways to do that is just require trans fancy. ah, we, we love transparency. we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed. and we cannot say we don't care, there's intellectual property rights, but we are, if we publish everything it will just be breaking belong. ah, they prefer intellectual property to the health of children. i. if you make money out of selling pesticide, how much incentive does these companies do these companies have to get a pesticide? will they make sure that we get use less specified or will they make sure that we use always more?
the more today, industry pieces spend millions of euros in being to delay regulations instead of researching, substitute, and how to make this thing differently. quite frankly, i've been in the industry for a long time. i have never seen a brown envelope. if that's where you're leading to absolutely never at the end, it's in the industry's interest to bring food to the table that it's safe, that it's high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in foot and tray can also sit and eat good nutrition, food every day. as i progress goals risk you are referring to to accidents,
industrial incident. so i see there are people who are injured to people who die every time this happens for industry in general. it would defeat who's however, as those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefit. ah, what is progress? the progress of moving forward, whatever. and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but because we know how to do something useful and it's good for the people, we can, we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is. i don't think that progress is ruining the future generation by using tons of chemical that that can, that can create deeds and nice cancer to,
you will not have airplanes. empties will not exist because the airplane sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 506-0000 people die with automobile accident. so precautionary principle i think is a disaster. ready and yet, what we are now more and more advocating and you apply these to culture. we are farming in europe with less substances than north americans or south america . with less tools, you know, a heat because we don't use g m o, 's. we don't use technology, i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe, we have this romantic idea of follows. that business people they
would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need their just business people and we should get them to the business. and we can't expect them to in any other way, except the only way that would change is if there is a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business. and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world. because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is the food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest
bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bidder. maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food. i guess i would be nice about making money profit. it's a big corporation. it's about an informative make uniform lens with one group, maximum. it's about corporate control and it's mostly also economically,
it's about international markets import export. it's all about companies controlling in far away places. lance, to export commodities is not about food production is not about feeding people the industrial agriculture is a form of mining me and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and most of the use go into animal food and textiles. fiber fuel, whatever you have the, the rest of it can be so more expensive to some other use will go into processed in food processing.
so it's food necessity. always food, a business transaction, food have both. yeah. so we all need to eat that for sure. but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in europe hundreds of years, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one tomato and we have tend to want doesn't really matter to us. if we have a gym or tomato and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food, no a days. this is a big confusion between what is the general interest and the interest of industry. because the priority is job and growth and he likes growth and trust are more important than people like ah,
if this food industry is successful, it will create more jobs, it will create more value added, it will create more growth. so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry, but this should be a communal fight. modern agriculture read eyes on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between satellites, digital machinery and all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation and the tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what understood in europe.
ah yes, i think europe as a base potential to be the leading agriculture all region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs and the most invest in hybridization genetics, 50 sites, gimme calls machinery. we should be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to its machines. so enable all farmers to me competitive the better the trades relations with all the country, the better it is. i mean, otherwise we stay like a fortress and we don't let anything in that doesn't let something out. and you know, this is not the way does not like that. everything is connected. now everything is
global. so what we want to see is something very different is a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations. ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, no. as part of the international mega science research project night is being built into its goal is to allow the scientists to study matter. they
believe it existed just after the big bang, good form. ah, you were more flu shane, and that was it for the children authority at 1913, deal it create teach as a country a month with summer. go out and we just go play that niga. evolution zillow here. some go that i don't watch the movies. we just place, could you spell that? ah, ah, join me every thursday on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guess in the world, the politic sport business. i'm show business. i'll see you then. in
the do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure rate together? how we operate on this planet? we will make ourselves obsolete the that's funny when we have to put the technologies in place where they belong, they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our
environment on our foot system that operates within the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been defining where i'd respect the rules of the planet and vice versa that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. for me, progress is continuous improvement of existing things because of the impression that let's call it the old continent. europe is slowing down a little bit in making progress if decisions of taking only emotion one day left the other day,
right. this is not the basis of the sustainable farming what progress do we want? are we willing to trade off some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world which is more and more mobilized. so we are up against other parts of the world which do not always play with the same rules. we're living in a very strange place today because we have on the one hand, challenges of obesity and overweight and the other hand re challenges of under nutrition, malnutrition, starvation. there are geopolitical issues and part of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world, either through aid or through producing themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we can't use more land. we can't use more resources
do you imagine the number of the diseases that are in every family today? it's, you know, due to new viruses or new microbes that have been in all breast cancer funds. that's not true. so it is due to environment and to chronic poisons that are in the environment. what the crummy poisons designed to be initially and spread all over the place. yes. yes it did. it will cause my mom donna leigh. i'm could a dish it into your trying your continuum, not for mama can live in a senior medical know what i said a mother he yoda, it's
a tiny community the mama. inflammatory only just as equal number totals for my vehicle to kinda better understand either me ah, i deficit. they basically got ya. so it, dr. gosh, so maybe a little down i i don't know. commit them was in there. are there been usually induced to have for my game best figure? so we're less government in the book and i never usually get it out of the natal. ah, if you will not do that other guy, this will still just skip within here. there's
a chop, it doesn't mean you're located, gone. they are very speed, baby check. wish the total of municipal more focus and stuff. yes, loss control is decision toxic us, but a lot of paper, a little fionn, just a modem on our local city finance. i stuck in on piss. i've had such pictures east of saturday when by subject us from the know the thing, you know, i cannot. she know, she put on the limit. there must be murder she'll. she'll deal if you will give him a note to answer. but i'm not going on. you will be out for we are no more to the lot as you know, the computer chemicals, not bidding. i get your new model. this is rita ella. man, i can see though, let me see. okay, thompson, is he looking, you know, by see really sallow. it today i will get him out the door then it will, montage will will be up, creamy me
all get taken rather than a brutal seem to be on it. he came to marketing, as you did from in to he moved to the see a scene for him to see it, but she will, she did it, but she had to get into the cache on the team go, he can put him in the computer, make him a kimono, mac, can everybody know me more or less holler if you need to model it and audio must milton, when you can allow me and be tentative later lunch hour p document tomorrow. no. i bought
a conflict of cindy on it for colonial or it was already arcadia trust in the me. she's in the world, but our competitors individually. he left us equally. indeed what the producer noise plot to the media know what he'll do? the portable receiver, my daughter, she's a little black eagle. my lot to see though the law in what i see only not how to in the conflict oper, float animals canoe not law say that the body will model see if you know, don't me either. yeah. so all these chemical compounds out made out of petroleum, petroleum is of fossil fuel, very sticky. and it is by accumulative because it's the fertile compound which last long
this is why it gives oxy city leavers and in kidneys and cancer because it gave disease that of the disruption of communication in cancer. and the 1st reason you have concern is because your cell cannot communicate each other anymore with the rest of the body. and homo diseases, it's the same problem, never diseases, guy fucking funnel or even depression. it's the same problem. also immune disease or other malformations in the babies. it's also the same problems are cell cannot communicate, but this happens on the long term. so that means several years, several dozens of years. so you cannot see because you drink a glass of wine with pesticides or a piece of red with 50. so you can see this effect immediately. many of your
opponents to modern agriculture have understood that it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to, to use fear as a strong, emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. but sometimes it's in the interests of the anti industry groups to do that, of course, because it keeps them at work and brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes i visit from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and through menu or, and threatening letters and stuff access. but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have both and arrows and they
have atom bombs. as soon as there's an n geo, or group of people who are against something, maybe, maybe the advantage, maybe they stop using it, maybe they self importing. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth. we know what's in our product, for example like that. if i, if i make a product, i mean, you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen. and you know what's in there and you write it down. that is the truth. sorry, but you know, we are an industry. we know what we're pushing products, we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in our products. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about not talking about philosophically the truth. i'm talking about what we do. we know what we do and we can talk about it.
no comp don't cover you don't domain delivery. assume there's if it's or less than the 50 seed this is. yeah. they put it in the in the book please. under ski eldon, it was one of those he battled on mon baker elisa house for a demo. the show me and leave a little shit is under her new buying sample of cad. you principal 50 seed, dumont on our way down on a glass. well, now we don't need and that was why don't you go under the bow say most i think you should or those hear me luck. hope was shown. do plenty. eli coffee don't yet knew that worry don't for doing some on the me the said cache. the present type of the last in the there is a bit hard to the probably it is said rufus,
i miss the back. her degree for that section, for the car. yes, just because i don't get home for this. you said 30, this is kelly and put me to click on the car and the interval on the value consol louis for that is which was he wanted chic. you're under a done that the hollow leaf was out on on those are me countries infinity isn't that he's the song is anymore. so coffee, dr. local. now i put a coffee down here. it is. if it's something coffee, das here for a community chance, if he poor look them up for a consummate that will not solve who can bear sudden leaf south of the out of his hands on those tale. don't show a decision on me. so i did have a family ma santo paper ah,
summer solutions where we focus on the solutions. not so much. the problem, stacy, right. we are joined by jeff booth author of the price of tomorrow. the the people with diabetes to number raises whether it's not adequately managed or that they have some immune problem. then their risk of infections and something like the coven 19 pandemic, was very bad news. the people diabetes. and we consider it as one of the very high risk situations in terms of people being infected, ah, ah, you know,
you don't do it. you know, it, uncle, nice to number. nobody want, you know, cuz i don't, i don't, i don't know that i'll use enough 40 on it for them, but i guess it's like i yeah. maybe there is that i think for the online for me to be the most senior from your home job and really nice with those who are new to prolong deployment. people sold initials for the peculiar
ah, the tell about makes, sweeping days and i've got to stop by in the midst of the group is the strongest in decades. us still taking american boots off the ground by the end of next mission to the competition that we get to scott, a suburb and logging in terrorism is not emanating from that part of the service seem to self harm in belgium, migrants go to extremes in the 5 for saw them all the authorities and says they want to be black. and the u. s. is granted the rights to appeal against prisons refusal to extradite julian his sons, but one of the was the blow. his oldest friends believed washington, the 10th will ultimately fail.