tv Documentary RT July 8, 2021 4:30pm-5:01pm EDT
we live in a world where the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put their products on the market the, we need a regulation, so we don't do create the things because maybe sometimes we do credit things, i don't know, but, except that we have regulation, we want to regulation of industry. and if you don't behave then yes,
penalty that's fine. ah, i always have the, the industry makes money. of course it does. if the industry did not make money, how many people will be out of work? i more sort of the last answer in the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent. corporate interest, corporate profits have been getting priority with a regulator, so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just require trans fancy. oh we, we love transparency. we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed. and we cannot say, we don't care. there's intellectual property rights, but we are, if we publish everything it will just be breaking the law. ah, they prefer intellectual property to the health of children.
i. if you make money out of selling pesticide, how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get a pesticide will they make sure that we get to use less specified or will they make sure that we use always more pay today, industry pieces spend millions of euros in lobbying to delay regulations instead of researching, substitute, and how to make these things differently quite frankly, i've been in the industry for a long time. i have never seen the brown in to know if that's where you're leading to. absolutely never. at the end it's in the industries interest
to bring food to the table that is safe. that it's high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working on foot and tray can also sit and eat good nutrition food every day. as i progress in goals risk, you are referring to to accidents, industrial incident. so i see there are people who are injured to people who die every time this happens. industry in general, ah, ah. however, as, as incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. ah, what is progress? progress moving forward, whatever. and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but because we know
how to do something, it's useful and it's good for the people. we can, we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is i don't think that progress is ruining the future generation by using tons of chemicals that, that can, that can create deeds and use cancer to, to someone who's 20 years old. oh, i
like if we were today with a profession or principal problem, you will not have airplanes. empties will not exist because an airplane sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk we will of automobiles because every year in europe, how many 506-0000 people die with automobile accident. so precautionary principle i think, is a disaster. ready and yet, what we are now more and more advocating and you apply these to other culture. we are farming in europe with less substances than north americans or south america . with less tools, you know, a heat because we don't use g m o 's. we don't use technology, i mean,
it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe, we have this romantic idea of follows. that business people would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need their business people and we should get them to the business. and we can't expect them to in any other way, except the only way that would change is if there is
a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business. and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world. because as long as we treat like a global commodity, we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is the food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bidder. maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food, i guess.
is all about making money. profit. it's a monthly corporation. it's about formative. make uniform lans with one group maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also, economically it's about international markets. import export control about companies consoling in far away places lance to export commodities. not about food. production is not about feeding people. industrial agriculture is a form of mining me and it produces raw
materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and most of the use go into animal food and textiles. fiber, fuel, whatever. you have the, the rest of it can be so more expensive to some other use it will go into processed in food processing. so is food and necessity or food and business. transaction food is both. yeah. so we all need to eat that for sure. but in europe, we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in europe hundreds of years, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one tomato a new month. but we have tend to want, doesn't really matter to us if we have a gym or tomato and i think we are unaware of the impact or
decisions here have on countries where there is no food. no, a date is a big confusion between what is the general interest and the interest of industry. because the priority is jobs and growth and it's like growth and jobs are more important than people like the food industry is successful, it will create more jobs. it will create more value added, it will create more growth. so i don't see why. we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry, but this should be a communal fight. modern agriculture read eyes on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all of the
tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because of an overly conservative restrictive regulation and the tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what understood in your ah yes, i think you are a peasant isn't best potential to be leading agriculture all region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs and the most invest in hybridization genetics, betty sites gimme calls machinery. we shouldn't be because we have everything we
need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using these potential to its machines. so enable all farmers to me competitive the better the trades relations with all these countries, the better it is. i mean, otherwise we stay like a fortress and we don't let anything in that doesn't let something out. and you know, this is not the world is not like that. everything is connected. now everything is global. so what we want to see is something very different is a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is, you know, different crops planted together, crop rotations. ah, while the make know, you know, borders and my teeth and
you as emerge. we don't have authority, we go to the back seen the whole world, leads to take action and be ready. people judge, governors crisis. we can do better, we should be better. everyone is contributing each in their own way. but we also know that this crisis will not go on forever. the challenge is paid for to response has been massive. so many good people are helping us. it makes it feel very proud that we need together in as part of the international mega science with that project. neither is being built into its goal is to allow the scientists to study matter. i believe that this is
just the big bang, good form. ah, she's more flu shane and we're just for the delivery authority at the 113 deal. it's great to teach as a country montage moment summer. glad to check that negro evolution. here we go, that i don't want to even move this. we just press credit. that is ah the do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure rate together? how we operate on this planet? we will make ourselves obsolete.
that's defining when we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now . we are now defining future visions through technology lenses. but i want to turn it around, i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates within the planetary boundaries. as scientists have been defined, where i'd respect the rules of the planet and vice versa that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms.
for me proven as continuous improvement of existing things. because i've the impression that, let's call it the old continent, the europe is slowing down a little bit in making progress. if decisions are taking only emotions one day left the other day, right. this is not the basis of the sustainable farming. what progress do we want? are we willing to trade of some of the benefits for some of the risk? because we're facing a world which is more and more globalized. so we are up against other parts of the
world which do not always play with the same rules. me. we're living in a very strange place today because we have on the one hand, challenges of obesity and overweight and on the other hand, re challenges of under nutrition, malnutrition, starvation. there are geopolitical issues and part of the world where there is less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world, either through aid or through producing themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we can't use more land, we can't use more resources for and for
ah, the momentum command for much time, really sick. you let me come into a scene new to the militia. they don't allow us to plug. if you know your mom, we will be and you made eco do you imagine the number of the diseases that are in every me today it is no due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer phones. that's not true. so it is due to environment and to chronic poisons
that are in the environment. what are the chronic poisons designed to be top thick initially and spreads all over the place specified content yesterday hid it will come to the moment. i don't know what i'm shipping. you're trying, you're continuing enough by now mama can senior, also medical know what i said, a marla p o s credited to your community for the mama. inflammatory and just tossing my toes for my vehicle to kinda but to understand either i in deficit, they basically got young so dr. gosh cell or pulling up a maybe
a little down i don't know. commit them was there been usually induced you have part of my game based figure. so were less government but i never usually get it out of the natal. i think it's heather guns. the other stuff just kept pulling the, there's a co pay, do menial located gone. they are very speed baby. don't this check wish the total of municipal travel more? yes, my son, lost control is decision toxic us, but a lot of brutal fionn by the system or mona can city finance,
i stuck in on peace having such pictures. east of several of them by subject us from the know the say no, i cannot. she don't know, she put on. you leave it. there must be murder. she'll. she'll deal if you will give him a note to answer, but i'm not going on. you wouldn't be out for we are no more to the lot as you know, the computer chemicals, not bidding. i get your new model. this is rita l m. air i can see though getting here. ok. thompson. mc loading unit by see really sallow. it 30, i will look at them as the total weight, then it will, montage will or creamy me all get tickle, not to loop, a brutal seem to be on it. he can to marketing as you did for me into he moved to
the she a scene for him. does he does? she will, she did it, but she had to get into the kitchen, the team go, he put him into the computer, make him a kimono, mac, can everybody know me more or less? however, if you need to model it, you can only imagine milton when you can me tentative later lunch hour p document tomorrow. no, i bought a conflict of cds on it for colonial or it was already a gated trust in limited. she's in the real world, but our competitors seem to be well it, he love to see. these are the producer noise, plus the media. know what he'll do, the portable shows she lost my daughter. she's a little black eagle. my lot to see though,
the law and i want to see only not have to in the conflict oper, florals canoe not say that the while he will model. see if you know, i don't remember either. yes. so all his chemical compounds out made out of petroleum, petroleum is of fossil fuel, very sticky. and it is bio cumulative because it's before time compound which last long i this is why it gives proxy city leavers and in kidneys and cancer because it gave of the disease that of the disruption of communication in the cancer. and the 1st reason you have concern is because your cell cannot communicate each other anymore with the rest of
the body. and homo diseases, it's the same problem, never diseases like packing, so, or, or even depression. it's the same problem. also immune disease or other malformations in the baby's. it's also a thing. problems are cell cannot communicate, but this happens on a long term. so that means several years, several dozens of years. so you cannot see because you drink a glass of wine with pesticides or a piece of red with 50. so you can see this effect immediately. many of the opponents to modern agriculture have understood that it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to, to use fear as a strong, emotional driver for a change in policy and for influencing policy. but sometimes it's in the interests
of the anti industry groups to do that, of course, because it keeps them at work and brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes i visit from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and through menu or, and threatening letters and stuff. but okay, that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have both in arrows and they have atom bombs. as soon as there's an n geo, or group of people who are against something, maybe, maybe they balance, maybe they stop using it, maybe of importing. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth. we know what's in our product, for example like that. if i, if i make a product,
i mean you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen and you know what's in. ringback there and you write it down, that is the truth. sorry, but you know, we are an industry, we know what we pushing our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in our product. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about not talking by philosophically the truth, i'm talking about what we do, we know what we do and we can talk about it. although no comp don't cover you don't domain delivery assume because if it's are less than the 50 seed this is. yeah. they put it out and they have the book her please underscore. i don't want him to see a pattern on mon baker elisa house for
a demo. the value show me and leave a little shit isn't here. her know, by example of had you can see fall 50, sin dumont, on our way down on a glass. well, now we don't need to know why don't you go under the bow say most i think if it does hear me lack hope was shown you plenty early. coffee don't yet knew that worry, don't put in some all me the said cache, the president type of seat. the last in the there is a bit hard to the part of the clarity it is said to be for miss and the park. her degree for that section, for the d. yes. used to be for the don't care was issue 30 . this is kelly reported to take your own declaring the interval on the evaluate council. no. be for that. it shows if you want to seek your conduct
a done that they lift those up and others may confuse often the listen, i need the sound is anymore. so coffee, dr. local. now i'm poetry, coffee down here. it is official. i something coffee darcia'll put our community a chance if he poor look them up for a consummate that to sofe to cook in comparison, i live saw one of the, our physicians on those hardly done these as a school of fish on me. so i did have a family ma santo paper. ah, what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy foundation, let it be an arms race is on often very dramatic development. only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful,
very critical of time. time to sit down and talk. the headlines are not national us president joe biden admit that taliban is stronger than it's been in 20 years, but insist that doesn't mean don will fall to mila. the claims america's mission in the country has been a competition. it's time to go. the powers is refusing to reveal to algiers, the locations of radioactive waste dump 6 decades on the problem colonial fraud, conducting nuclear test, and fox news host and talk a call and claims. the n. s. a spied on its communications and leaking private emails to journalists, alleging that it's all because he tried to get an interview with a russian president. ah.