Skip to main content

tv   The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell  MSNBC  January 19, 2022 7:00pm-8:00pm PST

7:00 pm
not because he could fly, but because superman stood up for people. maybe it's because of our family's own immigrant story, or he's just that nerdy. throughout his career in the obama administration and the private sector, bilal has never stopped helping others. we don't need a superhero to solve san francisco's biggest problems like crime and homelessness, just the innovation and courage to lead. join me. all right. that's going to do it for us tonight, for this show that we have unexpectedly had to shoot from my house because we had -- again, we had technical gremlins. nothing weirder than that is going on. this is always the backup plan if something goes weird at the studio. something went weird. we just had technical trouble. so this is where i've been. any rumor that susanne craig was in a different room in my house is totally not at all true.
7:01 pm
i know it looked like we were in adjoining cabins. it just happens to be a similar aesthetic, and that was weird. so, enough. that's going to do it for me for now. i will see you again tomorrow with what will probably look like a more normal backdrop. now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening, lawrence. >> good evening, rachel. and you know -- >> -- rumor. you didn't have to deny the rumor that wasn't there -- >> it's just weird to have two people who look like they're in the same weird place in split screen. like it looked like it was a fake thing. it's not a fake thing. it's a real thing. >> i believe you. we've got a live situation on the senate floor now, rachel, that we might be cutting to during our hour. i have one ear on the senate floor during your hour, and you missed because you were working and i recommend it to you, the
7:02 pm
speech of jeff merkley's lifetime. and he's not, you know, stylistically the most compelling speaker on the senate floor. but he delivered the single most thorough historical analysis of the 60-vote threshold rule, the cloture vote so-called, in the senate that has ever been delivered on that floor. and there were some great speeches today with a lot of important historical references including from angus king pointing out that hamilton and madison warned us against any kind of supermajority voting. but boy, jeff merkley, who is the authority on this, the democrats have deferred to him on it all the way through, he was really -- it's a masterful, i don't know, 15 minutes or so that takes you through everything you'd ever want to know about it. and really compelling style. >> you should just do late-night coverage. you can have my re-air hour and you should just play it. i hereby give you the baton. go on.
7:03 pm
>> so let me get this straight. so then i would have to come back to work at midnight to -- yeah. okay. i'm going to think about that. and i don't want anyone to worry. the re-air's going to be there. don't worry. the rachel re-air. >> when you address the rumors it's just like you're confirming them. >> yeah p. okay. good point. thank you, rachel. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you. denied. that is the last word in the first sentence of today's supreme court decision, and it is the last word on donald trump's unprecedented -- the court called it unprecedented attempt to overrule the current president of the united states, joe biden, and block the national archives from handing over all of the records and documents of the trump presidency that the january 6th committee has demanded. donald trump and his lawyers did not have to read beyond the first sentence of the supreme
7:04 pm
court's very short decision today to know that the trump dream of a total cover-up has died. the unsigned order by the court notes that only justice clarence thomas disagrees with the court's decision. all three of the judges appointed to the court by donald trump joined in crushing the trump cover-up dream today. the first sentence says, "the application for stay of mandate and injunction pending review presented to the chief justice and by him referred to the court is denied." the supreme court said that donald trump's assertion of executive privilege was unprecedented coming from a former president in a case like this, but the court said that trump's request would have been denied even if he were still president. "because the court of appeals concluded that president trump's claims would have failed even if
7:05 pm
he were the incumbent, his status as a former president necessarily made no difference to the court's decision." harvard's constitutional law professor laurence tribe offered his scholarly opinion of the court's decision today saying, "this is huge." tonight the january 6th committee released this statement. "the supreme court's action tonight is a victory for the rule of law and american democracy. the select committee has already begun to receive records that the former president had hoped to keep hidden, and we look forward to additional productions regarding this important information. our work goes forward to uncover all the facts about the violence of january 6th and its causes. we will not be deterred in our effort to get answers for the american people, make legislative recommendations to strengthen our democracy, and help ensure nothing like that day ever happens again." and leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, law
7:06 pm
professor at georgetown university and most importantly a former acting u.s. solicitor general who has practiced before the united states supreme court repeatedly. he is an msnbc legal analyst. neal, i give you the floor in your reaction to the court. >> well, lawrence, i don't think i've seen this much excitement about a late-night literary release since the final "harry potter" book came out. and why is everyone so excited? because it's a dark time in our country. people are worried about voting being under assault and rules and laws more generally, and here we've got at least for this moment the rule of law coming back and in a really profound way. you know, i was on your show last night. i told you to predict this result, that the supreme court wasn't going to hear this executive privilege case. and lo and behold, that's exactly what happened. they denied donald trump's claim 8-1. so what's the case about? executive privilege is this idea -- it's a good idea. it's the idea that presidents need a zone of secrecy around
7:07 pm
their decision making like foreign affairs or things like that. you don't want treaty negotiations to spill out into open court. what it's not about is plotting a coup and overthrow of american democracy. trump tried to invoke it for that reason, and his claim was a loser from the start. the trial court rejected it right away. the circuit court, our nation's second highest court, took nine days to write a 68-page opinion blowing it out of the water. and now today the u.s. supreme court, which is a quite conservative supreme court to put it mildly, but totally threw out trump's claims. >> certainly the judiciary at the supreme court level has become overpoliticized in many people's minds, but one thing worth noting here is that the appeals court opinion that the supreme court accepted today in full was written by three judges who were appointed by democratic presidents. two were appointed by president obama. one was appointed by president
7:08 pm
biden. and this supreme court with three trump appointees on it, six appointees from republican presidents, they accepted with only the exception of clarence thomas, they accepted all of the reasoning of those three judges appointed by democratic presidents. >> exactly, lawrence. and that's the rule of law. it's not supposed to be the way donald trump thought about it, trump judges and obama judges. they're just federal judges. and i want to commend here the judges but also the lawyers involved in this for the january 6th committee because everyone in this case understood that donald trump has one signature move, which is delay. and they litigated this thing and decided this thing in the opposite of the way all the other trump stuff has been done. i mean, this case was actually filed on my mom's birthday, october 18th, three months and one day ago. and they went through all three layers of our court system. and the judges all ruled really
7:09 pm
quickly because they understand there's a need to finally get at the truth and trump's been evading that for so, so long. >> what does it mean for steve bannon, mark meadows, and everyone else in the trump team who are trying to evade the committee's subpoenas? >> i think the technical legal term is deep doo-doo, lawrence. it's a real problem for them. so remember that steve bannon has been indicted already for contempt for not giving these answers to congress. so he's facing criminal charges. mark meadows is on his way for the same thing. both of their defenses to contempt is executive privilege. and the supreme court today blew that out of the water. so that means that these two individuals really do have to talk to the investigators in congress. but also it more significantly means that trump's signature move, which is not just to hide these documents but all these
7:10 pm
people from testifying on live televised hearings in congress, he was going to invoke executive privilege for all that. that's now decimated by the supreme court's ruling. so it's going to be very hard for all these folks, not just bannon and meadows but giuliani and eastman and the whole cast of characters to avoid having to testify. they can try other arguments like fifth amendment and so on. but today is a real nail in the coffin for that. >> and so we also now know for a fact with the committee staff already tonight in possession of some of these documents, more of them coming tomorrow, and they will be coming by the barrelful constantly now from the archives, that when these hearings do go public on television, when the committee goes public on television with hearings we will be hearing readings from these documents, from memos, from e-mails, from possible texts from government phones.
7:11 pm
all sorts of information that that committee does not yet know but will be discovering over the next several days and weeks. >> yes, lawrence. i agree with you. but there's one asterisk. so remember, trump's move is delay. and what i think he and his minions will do is file further lawsuits invoking executive privilege once again saying, well, these documents rp different, this testimony is different and the like. all of that's going to fail because the supreme court today was resounding. and just to give our viewers some sense of this, i mean, if you're a former president, to have your case not heard by the supreme court on an executive power issue, it's virtually unthinkable. it's almost automatic the supreme court's going to hear your case and likely rule for you. so it's kind of like you've got to try really hard. it's kind of like if you're a democratic candidate in chicago running for mayor and you lose to a republican. it's possible to lose, but you've really got to work at it. here donald trump worked at it. he made such bogus claims about
7:12 pm
executive privilege it led the supreme court to do what it did. and that's going to make it virtually impossible for donald trump and his team of insurrectionists to try and block the testimony and documents from coming out in live televised hearings. >> neal katyal, thank you very much for joining us on this historic night in this case. thank you very much. and coming up, more defendant trump news. the new york attorney general in a court filing says that donald trump has engaged in fraudulent or misleading practices. tim o'brien and daniel goldman will be joining us next, and we're keeping an eye on the senate floor for you on what's happening there tonight on voting rights. we'll be right back. vongti rights. we'll be right back. including nasal congestion, so you can breathe better. claritin-d. breathe better. as a professional bull-rider i'm used to taking chances. but when it comes to my insurance i don't.
7:13 pm
i use liberty mutual, they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wooo, yeaa, woooooo and, by switching you could even save 665 dollars. hey tex, can someone else get a turn? yeah, hang on, i'm about to break my own record. yeah. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. ♪ with my hectic life you'd think retirement would be the last thing on my mind. thankfully, voya provides comprehensive solutions and shows me how to get the most out of my workplace benefits. voya helps me feel like i've got it all under control. voya. well planned. well invested. well protected.
7:14 pm
my hygienist cleans voya. well planned. with a round head. so does my oral-b my hygienist personalizes my cleaning. so does my oral-b oral-b delivers the wow of a professional clean feel every day. - your mom's got to go! - she's family. she's using my old spice moisturize with shea butter and she's wearing my robe. mom: ahem ahem ahem we're out.
7:15 pm
the pandemic made teaching and learning really hard. but instead of working to help students safely return to the classroom, the san francisco school board focused on renaming schools and playing politics. and they've even saddled our district with a $125 million deficit. our children can't wait for new leadership. here's our chance for a fresh start. on february 15th, please recall school board members collins, lópez and moliga before our kids fall even further behind.
7:16 pm
the most fundamental wellspring of this democracy, more important than a rule in this chamber. let me -- >> that is a live shot of the
7:17 pm
senate floor. majority leader chuck schumer is going to move any moment now for a vote on changing the rules in the senate to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for holding a vote on voting rights legislation. this would be a one-time change of the senate rules just for this one piece of legislation. we're going to monitor that situation on the senate floor as it develops. especially when it gets to that dramatic moment of calling for that vote. we will be keeping an eye on the senate floor. also today, in a 115-page legal brief filed in court in response to donald trump's attempt to evade a subpoena, a civil subpoena for his testimony in a civil fraud investigation, new york state attorney general letitia james said that the trump company has engaged in "fraudulent or misleading," those were her words, practices in their business. the attorney general's filing
7:18 pm
says, "in light of the pervasive and repeated nature of the misstatements and omissions it appears that the valuations in the statements were generally inflated as part of a pattern to suggest that mr. trump's net worth was higher than it would otherwise -- would have appeared." the attorney general is synging to enforce subpoenas against donald trump, donald trump jr. and ivanka trump for their testimony. eric trump has already given an under oath deposition in the case in which he refused to answer questions, citing his fifth amendment rights, over 500 times. in the filing released close to midnight last night the attorney general says, "since 2017 donald trump jr. has had authority over numerous financial statements containing misleading asset valuations. donald trump jr. should be compelled to testify before the office of the attorney general. until january 2017 ms. ivanka trump was a primary contact for the trump organization's largest
7:19 pm
lender, deutsche bank, in connection with this work ms. trump caused misleading financial statements to be submitted to deutsche bank and the federal government. ivanka trump should be compelled to testify before the office of the attorney general." in a press release the attorney general's office noted that they have "not yet reached a final decision regarding whether this evidence merits legal action." the trump organization, which is currently under indictment in new york city because of its practices, released a statement in response to the attorney general's filing saying in part, "her allegations are baseless and will be vigorously defended." joining us now, daniel goldman, former house majority counsel during the first impeachment trial of donald trump. he's also a former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york and an msnbc legal contributor. also with us tim o'brien, senior columnist for bloomberg opinion. he is the author of the book "trump nation." daniel goldman, let me begin
7:20 pm
with you and what you read in this -- the attorney general's filing. >> well, it's quite a filing, lawrence. somewhat unexpected i think at this stage of the civil investigation in particular because of the parallel criminal investigation that is going on. incredible details about all the various ways that the attorney general's office has uncovered that donald trump, the trump organization and then his children after he took over as president misstated, overinflated values of their properties in order to get financial benefits in the way of loans, insurance and tax deductions. it is quite an extraordinary recitation of those facts, some of which are pretty alarming, some of which are somewhat humorous including the fact that donald trump represented that his apartment in new york is worth $327 million, which i
7:21 pm
believe would be the most expensive residence in the world. allen weisselberg of course said that is an overstatement by about 200 million. but putting aside some of the humor in some of these overstatements, it's serious allegations of misstatements. there are a number of questions here. and you know, they run the gamut. including whether this was wise to do in light of a criminal investigation that is ongoing. whether it actually responds to donald trump's allegations of sort of political motivations by the attorney general. whether these depositions should go forward in light of the ongoing criminal investigation. and then also what impact that will have on the criminal investigation when they are in front of an active grand jury for much of the same conduct and
7:22 pm
whether this will allow witnesses to sort of -- to better prepare themselves because they know a lot of the facts. so there's some inside baseball here, lawrence, but i think the top line is that donald trump and the trump organization grossly misstated the valuations of numerous properties for their financial benefit. >> and tim o'brien, you have been studying and writing about trump businesses for years. you wrote the book that donald trump sued you for. where you basically said a version of what the attorney general is now saying, that donald trump was wildly overstating his wealth. you of course won that lawsuit against donald trump. this reading for you of the attorney general's 115 pages today had to be quite an experience after the book pages you've produced on the same subject. >> it was groundhog day, lawrence, as it always is with
7:23 pm
donald trump. it's just a new version of the same old grift. his children are doing what he did. he was doing what his father did. this kind of behavior is almost in the trump family genes. the issue is whether or not the new york attorney general can prove intent to commit a fraud here and that they knew what they were doing was wrong and they went ahead and did it anyway. that's a high bar. there's no doubt i think that there was a grift going on here. there is no doubt that the trumps routinely inflated and deflated the value of their assets to court the media, to appease trump's own ego, to get bank loans and to run circles around tax collectors. i think there's ample basis in the evidence they've already collected in the new york attorney general's office to proceed with this. i think as dan has pointed out i think there's a number of strategic issues that get raised
7:24 pm
by why they've handled it this way. undoubtedly i think letitia james, the new york state attorney general, is frustrated with the trumps thumbing their nose at her subpoenas and requests for depositions. there's a lot of bad blood among all the parties in here. but the fact is she has started to line her ducks up. i think some of the things in this case or in this filing that were overlooked or got less scrutiny was the fact that trump himself, there's evidence in that filing of trump himself signing off on some of the paperwork that involved assets with inflated valuations. in other words, trump was a participant. and he signed off on some of the things they're investigating. so he has direct -- he's got a direct connection here. in theory, this can go directly to donald trump. but they've got a lot more evidence to collect and a lot more proof they have to put on the table.
7:25 pm
a lot of things this this document that i think are important is they seem to believe the trump organization has not been forthcoming with all the evidentiary requests they've made about records pertaining to trump himself and they want more. so i think it's a robust, damning document, but we still have to see whether or not it rises to the level of fraud charges that they can prosecute successfully in a courtroom. >> tim o'brien and daniel goldman, thank you for joining us on these important developments tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> thank you, lawrence. >> and when we come back, we'll be covering the breaking news on the senate floor tonight in the voting rights crusade there and the upcoming vote on changing the senate rule. that vote might occur within this hour. we'll be right back. this hour. we'll be right back. from football games to work and trying to balance it all. so, what do you see when you look at yourself? i see a person that's caring.
7:26 pm
sometimes i care too much, and that's when i had to learn to put myself first, because i would care about everyone all the time but i'm just as important as they are. botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown line, crow's feet and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping, and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects see for yourself at
7:27 pm
with downy infusions, let the scent set the mood. ♪ feel the difference with downy. with relapsing forms of ms... there's a lot to deal with. not just unpredictable relapses. all these other things too. it can all add up. kesimpta is a once-monthly at-home injection... that may help you put these rms challenges in their place. kesimpta was proven superior at reducing the rate of relapses, active lesions, and slowing disability progression vs aubagio. don't take kesimpta if you have hepatitis b, and tell your doctor if you have had it, as it could come back.
7:28 pm
kesimpta can cause serious side effects, including infections. while no cases of pml were reported in rms clinical trials, it could happen. tell your doctor if you had or plan to have vaccines, or if you are or plan to become pregnant. kesimpta may cause a decrease in some types of antibodies. the most common side effects are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and injection reactions. ready for an at-home treatment with dramatic results? it's time to ask your doctor about kesimpta. you could wait... all night... for an email response from steve, who will sign back in at 9 am tomorrow morning. orrrr... you could find the answer right now in slack. and give steve a break. slack. where the future works.
7:29 pm
7:30 pm
♪ ♪making your way in the world today♪ ♪takes everything you've got♪ -- that for this message
7:31 pm
from the house with respect to hr 5746 the only debate in order during consideration of the message beyond the question of adoption of the motion to concur in the amendment of the house. further, that no amendments, motions or points of order be in order and that any appeals be determined without debate. >> following the rules of the senate, the point of order is not sustained as it is a compound motion that would require consent. >> mr. president, i appeal the ruling of the chair. >> the question is, so the ruling on the chair stands, is the decision of the senate. >> i ask for the yeas and nays. >> is there a sufficient second? there appears to be. and there is. clerk will call the roll. >> ms. baldwin. mr. barrasso. mr. bennett. mrs. blackburn. >> aye.
7:32 pm
>> that was moments ago on the senate floor when majority leader chuck schumer asked for a vote to overrule the parliamentary ruling that was -- that did not allow him to impose a special rule for voting rights. on the senate. and so what they are now voting for is the question of overruling the chair in such a way that will allow the democrats to have finally a vote on voting rights on the senate floor. technically, a yes vote affirms the ruling of the chair, and a no vote is a vote for senator schumer's proposition to move on in a different direction from the way the parliamentary rules normally require, which would require a 60-vote threshold. they are calling the vote now. there it is. >> there will be no further roll
7:33 pm
call votes tonight -- >> as expected, 52-48, which is to say 48 democrats voted to change the rules of the senate tonight in this one instance for this one piece of legislation on voting rights. only 48 democrats voted to do that. 52 votes in favor of preserving the rules. those two democratic votes in favor of preserving the rules came from joe manchin and kyrsten sinema. joining us now, e.j. dionne, columnist for the "washington post" and senior fellow with the brookings inside stoougs. norm orenstein, scholar at the american enterprise institute. norm orenstein, chuck schumer brought up a version of a senate rule that you have been arguing for now for years. >> they've gone through multiple iterations here in an attempt to get manchin and sinema on board. this was in many ways a stripped-down and simplified
7:34 pm
one. only for this package of voting rights bills and it would have -- basically, if it had been enacted, been implemented, every senator could have spoken twice. that's actually in the senate rules, rule 19. at length. and then there would have been an up or down vote. that, which was a pretty simple way of doing this, and really would have allowed ample time for the minority to make its case, still was a bridge too far for both manchin and sinema. so once again voting rights has died basically on the sword of the filibuster. as a long history, something that jeff merkley talked about eloquently at length as you had mentioned at the beginning of the show. and maybe that will come back. but this is a dark day i think for the senate and for our
7:35 pm
democracy. >> yes. and e.j., what chuck schumer was proposing would, as norm just said, would have allowed each of the 100 senators two unlimited speaking slots. you could speak for 24 hours if you wanted to. or you could speak for two hours. just on the assumption that each senator spoke for one hour twice, that would be 200 hours of debate on this bill. and 52 senators stood up tonight and said no, 200 hours of debate on voting rights legislation would not be enough time. >> you know, first of all, it is a tragic night for democracy, although i don't think it's the final chapter. i think this fight's going to continue. i think they're going to try to break the bill up into sections. i certainly hope that by then the democrats including chuck schumer don't stop here.
7:36 pm
and i don't think they will. i think my favorite line in the debate in the course of the day was from senator tester of montana, who said that the senate had been -- gotten lazy. you could just stop legislation by doing nothing because you didn't have to produce anybody on the senate floor. if the other side couldn't produce 60 votes, that was it. so i like to think of it as work requirements for obstructionists. if you were really going to try to stop a bill, you were going to have to work at it. i think it's a really sad night because democrats did everything they could to try to construct a way in which senators manchin and sinema could support something that wasn't getting rid of the filibuster altogether, that would allow, as norm said, ample debate, and they came pretty close, it sounded like with manchin. people like senators kaine and king and tester, really moderate
7:37 pm
middle of the road senators, almost got him there. and it's very sad. but let's not forget that there were 16 republicans who had in the past voted for voting rights. not one of those republicans was willing to stand up for voting rights in 2022. so yes, it's on manchin and sinema, but it's also on all of those republicans. >> and norm, angus king spoke tonight, independent senator from maine, for the senators who have changed their minds about this just in the last year. joe manchin frequently points out that in the years past many of these democratic senators have said we shouldn't change this rule in any way. they've all changed their minds. that's kind of the point, is that they changed their minds, that they once thought this was a reasonable way for the senate to proceed but through the
7:38 pm
day-to-day experience of the senate dysfunction they have changed their minds. what's very clear is you wouldn't have had 48 votes for chuck schumer's position on this a year ago or even possibly six months ago. >> and we've seen a lot of people, mostly republicans and conservatives, who have been saying, you know, there were a lot of other senators who liked the cover that manchin and sinema were giving them, they didn't really want this, and once it was clear it was going to go down others would vote no to protect themselves is. none of them did. i thought angus king's speech, which was not as eloquent quite as the one he gave a few weeks ago on voting rights but was the best speech today along with merkley, was extraordinarily powerful. and i think your point is a really important one, lawrence. this is not a change that people made easily or made just because hey, now we've got the power, we want to roll over the senate.
7:39 pm
it was a long and painful change based on experience, based on the reality that this is not the senate the way it used to operate. it is the filibuster used as a weapon of mass obstruction. and it's time to bring about a change. and for senator king especially it was because he believes, as so many other of his colleagues do, that we face an existential threat to our democracy. to hear mitch mcconnell basically say there's nothing going on out there, the states aren't doing anything unusual, was another part of the disingenuousness that we've come to expect from the minority leader. >> joe manchin today did make a speech. it was not a careful speech. he was using a lot of the material he's used before. it's as if it was a speech that had nothing to do with the vote that was going to happen tonight on this rule. he said we're debating a fundamental change to the senate rules that will forever after -- forever alter the way this body
7:40 pm
functions. it was going to alter the way the body functions for exactly one vote. and the minute after that the body would return to all previous practices. joe manchin also said today the senate will be a body without rules, there won't be no rules. again, it was a one-time change that the senate was voting on tonight. e.j. and senator manchin has also expressed what norm was just talking about that mitch mcconnell expressed. senator manchin has said there really isn't a problem out there and that mark elias and the voters who are fighting these things in court, these republican -- actions by republican legislators they can just fight it in court and of course they will win and there won't be any problems. manchin is insisting that no voters, no voters are going to be harmed in any way by what's happening out there now. >> the most inconvenient thing about that is that marc elias, who is fating all these cases,
7:41 pm
does not agree with that. marc elias was one of the strongest supporters of this bill because he knew all this work couldn't be done in court. merrick garland, the attorney general, got up before the country a few days ago and said that congress needed to act to give the justice department the power it needed to go to court to fight some of these voter suppression measures. and what's really disturbing about these arguments is that the filibuster, as amy klobuchar pointed out, has been changed again and again and again. mitch mcconnell changed the filibuster to help put three republican appointees on the supreme court with just 51 votes. so it's absolute nonsense to treat the filibuster rules as some sacred writ, especially sacred writ that came from the founders because the filibuster didn't even exist for the first 17 years of the congress and arguably came into effect kind
7:42 pm
of by accident in rules rewrite by aaron burr of all people. so it's really such a shame that history has been so distorted in this debate. >> we're going to squeeze in a commercial break here in our live coverage of this situation. and when we come back, we're going to come back to that point that president biden made today in his press conference that this is not over. in the president's televised press conference today he said they will come back at the voting rights issue after this vote tonight. we'll be right back. e after this vote tonight we'll be right back. ♪ ♪taking a break from all your worries ♪ ♪sure would help a lot ♪ ♪wouldn't you like to get away? ♪ ♪ ♪ sometimes you want to go ♪ ♪where everybody knows your name ♪ ♪
7:43 pm
♪and they're always glad you came ♪ [bacon sizzles] [bacon sizzles] ♪ [electronic music plays] ♪ [bacon sizzles] ♪ [electronic music plays] ♪ woo! who's on it with jardiance? we're 25 million prescriptions strong. ♪ [electronic music plays] ♪ we're managing type 2 diabetes... ...and heart risk. we're working up a sweat before coffee. and saying, “no thanks...” a boston cream. jardiance is a once-daily pill that can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. so, it could help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. and jardiance lowers a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including... ...dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away...
7:44 pm
...if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection, ...ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction, ...and don't take it if you're on dialysis. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. lower a1c and lower risk of a fatal heart attack? we're on it. we're on it. with jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance. ♪♪ things you start when you're 45. coaching. new workouts. and screening for colon cancer. yep. the american cancer society recommends screening starting at age 45, instead of 50,
7:45 pm
since colon cancer is increasing in younger adults. i'm cologuard®. i'm convenient and find 92% of colon cancers... ...even in early stages. i'm for people 45 plus at average risk for colon cancer, not high risk. false positive and negative results may occur. ask your provider if cologuard is right for you. for people living with h-i-v, keep being you. and ask your doctor about biktarvy. biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for h-i-v in certain adults. it's not a cure, but with one small pill, biktarvy fights h-i-v to help you get to and stay undetectable. that's when the amount of virus is so low it cannot be measured by a lab test. research shows people who take h-i-v treatment every day and get to and stay undetectable can no longer transmit h-i-v through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin.
7:46 pm
tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your doctor. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. if you're living with hiv, keep loving who you are. and ask your doctor if biktarvy is right for you. i brought in ensure max protein, with thirty grams of protein. those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks! (sighs wearily) here i'll take that! (excited yell) woo-hoo! ensure max protein. with thirty grams of protein, one gram of sugar, and nutrients to support immune health. here's what president biden said today about republican senators and voting rights legislation. >> there's 16 members of the present united states senate who voted to extend the voting rights act. it's not an accusation. i'm stating a fact.
7:47 pm
what has changed? what happened? what happened? >> president biden today delivered the longest televised presidential press conference on record. he answered every question fully and directly. there were repeated questions on the situation in ukraine. and after the president made the distinction between a major and minor possible russian incursion in ukraine reporters pressed the president on what would be minor. the president then said that cyberattacks by russia, for example, which have been under way for some time, would not be considered a major change in the situation whereas invasion of ukraine by russian troops would be. throughout the press conference the president was trying to achieve something that the white house press corps has never been good at understanding. >> let's put it in perspective. >> that was the president talking about school closings as a result of the pandemic to a press corps that seems to believe that the president of
7:48 pm
the united states has some control over school closings. of course, the president of the united states has no control over any school closings in america. the president pointed out that 95% of american schools are not closed. much of the instant analysis of the press conference criticized the president's use of the word "minor" in relation to possible russian involvement in ukraine without acknowledging that he then clarified in a completely rational way what that meant in this context. the president said that he doesn't think vladimir putin has made up his mind about what to do in ukraine and that putin has to ask himself how long he wants to suffer the economic consequences of new biden sanctions that russia would face including that russian banks would not be allowed to deal in dollars. >> how long? you can go in and over time at great loss, economic loss, go in
7:49 pm
and occupy ukraine. but how many years? one? three? five? ten? >> and to put presidential ukraine policy into perspective, there is this. >> the people of crimea, from what i've heard, would rather be with russia than where they were. >> in prepared remarks at the beginning of the press conference the president concentrated on the successes of the biden administration in passing a massive infrastructure bill, for example, that the previous administration never even proposed. the president also described inflation as a supply chain issue, pointing out that one third of our cost of living increase this year, one third of it comes from car prices, which have increased because of a dramatic shortage of computer chips during the pandemic. as usual, some white house reporters framed their questions using talking points from the
7:50 pm
opposition party, to which the president said this. >> think about this. what are republicans for? what are they for? name me one thing they're for. >> back with us, for. >> back with us ej deon and norm orrinstein. the president also said in this press conference that the build back better legislation could be broken up into bits that might be managed through the senate so they can get some of that legislation. same thing with voting rights. he indicated there are ways to pass some elements of what's in the various voting rights piece of legislation with some republican cooperation. so in both of those instances but in especially on voting rights today the president was clear it's not over. norm, what are the prospects as you see it going forward legislatively for joe biden and the democrats?
7:51 pm
>> you know, i'm glad that they've taken this tact, and i think it's really important and e.j. had a great column out now where we are going forward. maybe you can reframe this in terms of the substance because of the way the press covered this we saw this again in the press conference today, lawrence, is not about what's in these bills. it's all about whether you're going to have a certain dollar amount, who's going to come along, in effect the same kind of horse race elements that we see in election campaigns. reframing it may give you an opportunity to get something done. i don't think build back better is dead at all. and with voting rights, if you can move this back to component parts, there's a chance we may get somewhere before the year is out. of course the problem with voting rights is that the longer
7:52 pm
we wait, the less impact it'll have on the 2022 elections, which are absolutely crucial for the future of the biden presidency and the country. >> e.j., i've never seen a presidential press conference like this. no one has because joe biden was willing to stay there in front of the camera longer than any other president who's had the tv cameras on him. and because he did that, it opened up questioning to people who will not normally be called on including a reporter from news max who deep into this very long press conference asked a very personal question about joe biden. let's watch the way he handled this. >> why do you suppose such large segments of the american electorate have come to harbor such profound concerns about your cognitive fitness? thank you. >> i have no idea.
7:53 pm
yes, sir? >> and e.j., i show it because two things. one, it is an absolutely disgraceful question. but the proof of the answer was in the longest press conference ever given on television by a president in which the president demonstrated cognitive abilities that were superior to most of the questions. >> i had exactly the same thought that anybody who can stand up there for that period of time and answer that many questions was disproving that -- by the way and i love the deep seriousness which the questioner asked the question. i think the president did some important work today. it was really good to hear him ask that question what are they for? i think that's a line they're going to hear again and again you can imagine as a campaign rallying cry. and it really marked joe biden
7:54 pm
crossing the rubicon in a way because for too long in my point of view he really had so much faith somehow this republican party in the trump era could somehow behave like the republican party of old that had real progressives in it like jacob javits and matt muthis. this ain't that republican party. and joe biden got up there and basically said he's disappointed, and now he's ready to draw some lines. and i hope he draws some lines very aggressively about democracy, which is why the voting rights fight cannot be given up. these problems in state after state limiting the capacity of people to vote cannot be brushed aside. and to go back to your earlier question, i think breaking up build back better creates the opportunity to raise that what are you for question. yes or no on child care, yes or no on health care expansions,
7:55 pm
yes or no on the voting rights bill, on election day as a national holiday. there were a lot of good arguments to be had that can be forced by breaking up both of these bills. >> i wish we had more time to show more of this press conference because there were some really great moments on it all the way through. e.j. dion, norm ornstein, thank you both very much for joining us tonight. >> good to be with you, lawrence. >> we'll be right back. d to be lawrence ♪ limu emu and doug.♪ >> we'll be right back and it's easy to customize your insurance at so you only pay for what you need. isn't that right limu? limu? limu? sorry, one sec. doug blows several different whistles. doug blows several different whistles.
7:56 pm
[a vulture squawks.] there he is. only pay for what you need. ♪liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty♪ >> woman: what's my safelite story? only pay for what you need. >> vo: my car is more than four wheels. it's my after-work decompression zone. so when my windshield broke... >> woman: what?! >> vo: ...i searched for someone who really knew my car. i found the experts at safelite autoglass. with their exclusive technology, they fixed my windshield... then recalibrated the camera attached to my glass so my safety systems still work. who knew that was a thing?! >> woman: safelite has service i can trust. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪
7:57 pm
looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? once-weekly ozempic® can help. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ ♪ oh, oh, oh ♪ ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck,
7:58 pm
severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ you may pay as little as $25 for a 3-month prescription. when you're born and raised in san francisco, you grow up wanting to make a difference. that's why, at recology, we're proud to be 100% employee owned with local workers as diverse as san francisco. we built the city's recycling system from the ground up, helping to make san francisco the greenest big city in america but we couldn't do it without you. thank you, san francisco. gracias, san francisco. -thank you. -[ speaks native language ] let's keep making a difference together. and there you have it.
7:59 pm
woah. wireless on the most reliable network nationwide. wow. big deal. we get unlimited for just 30 bucks. sweet, but mine has 5g included. relax people. my wireless is crushing it. that's because you all have xfinity mobile with your internet. it's wireless so good, it keeps one-upping itself. take the savings challenge at or visit an xfinity store to learn how our switch squad makes it easy to switch and save hundreds. time for tonight's "last word." >> you put vice president harris in charge of voting rights. are you satisfied with her work on this issue, and can you guarantee -- do you commit that she will be your running mate in 2024 provided that you run again? >> yes and yes. >> nothing throws off that room more than a one-word answer.
8:00 pm
tonight's "last word" is yes. "the 11th hour" starts now. good evening once again. i'm ali velshi. it's day 365 of the biden administration. just moments ago an attempt by democrats to change filibuster rules to pass voting rights legislation failed in the united states senate. both senators joe manchin and kyrsten sinema joined all 50 republicans to block the move, and we will have much more on that in just a moment. but first with the president's first year in office at an end, he heads into year two highlighting his successes with an eye toward turning his outstanding goals into successes. this afternoon joe biden held his second solo news conference of his presidency in the east room of the white house taking questions from reporters for nearly two hours. he defended his handling of the pandemic and the economy while


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on