Skip to main content

tv   The 11th Hour With Brian Williams  MSNBC  October 14, 2021 8:00pm-9:00pm PDT

8:00 pm
this lawsuit because the protesters who were hurt by the trump security people were protesting his position on exactly these issues. tim o'brien, thank you very much for joining us. really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. >> "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. well, good evening once again. day 268 of the biden administration. and we begin tonight with the breaking news we've been covering this evening on former president bill clinton. he is hospitalized tonight in california at the university of california irvine medical center. a spokesman for the former president released this statement tonight. it reads, "on tuesday evening president clinton was admitted to uci medical center to receive treatment for a non-covid-related infection. he is on the mend, in good spirits, and is incredibly thankful to the doctors, nurses and staff providing him with excellent care. clinton's doctor says he's being
8:01 pm
continuously monitored and is responding well to antibiotics. the california-based medical team has been in constant communication of course with the new york team including his cardiologist. president clinton a long-time heart patient of course is 75 years old. we'll have more later on what's known about the former president's condition. in the meantime some of the news of this day includes the bipartisan house committee investigating the january 6th attack on the capitol, escalating their effort to enforce a subpoena issued to trump lieutenant steve bannon. trump has urged his allies not to cooperate with lawmakers. bannon has fallen in line, refusing to submit requested documents. and today he was a no-show for a scheduled deposition before the house select committee. today the panel app nounsed it will move to hold bannon in criminal contempt for not cooperating. more on that later. the committee chairman, democratic congressman bennie thompson of mississippi, today warned that witnesses who try to
8:02 pm
stonewall the committee will not succeed. >> we think steve bannon has information that's germane to what happened on january 6th. and if he refuses the subpoena, like we expect him to continue to do, then we're left with no other choice. there are other things available to us, but we think the criminal gets us to where we need to be in the shortest period of of time. >> thompson says the committee will vote to approve the contempt charge on tuesday. then comes a vote by the full house. if that passes, it goes to the justice department. it will be up to the attorney general merrick garland to decide on prosecution. those are broad strokes of the process, of course. it could be drawn out by legal challenges or other actions. could go to a full trial. appeals could draw it out for years. and steve bannon knows that.
8:03 pm
house members have also subpoenaed other former trump officials for depositions. ex-pentagon official kash patel, former chief of staff mark meadows, his deputy dan scavino, they were set to appear today and tomorrow. they've all been given short postponements by the committee. former president has weighed in, referring to what he called the unselect committee and said, "they should hold themselves in criminal contempt." tonight committee chairman thompson said this about whether donald trump would be subpoenaed. >> if former president trump thinks he can get away with what happened on january 6th by being cute with his press releases, then he has another thing coming. nobody's off limits to a subpoena from this committee. >> trump is facing a more immediate legal issue, however, in his home state. monday he'll be giving a videotaped deposition at trump tower in a new york court case,
8:04 pm
a lawsuit stemming from a september 2015 incident. the suit was filed by demonstrators who say they were roughed up by his security guards outside of trump tower. a lawyer for trump did not respond to a request for comment from nbc news. the suit is one of at least ten civil cases pending against the former president. meanwhile, democrats are planning to make another effort to try to break the gop filibuster on voting rights legislation. senate majority leader chuck schumer has set a test vote for wednesday to open debate. this puts pressure on, wait for it, senator joe manchin, who had helped write a version of the bill he had hoped would win over the ten republicans it would need to stay alive. >> i hope that joe manchin had done what he said he would do and that's bring along ten republicans who will vote to allow the debate to go forward.
8:05 pm
if he doesn't, we're going to have to gather around this filibuster. >> also tonight there are major developments on the vaccine booster front. as you may have heard, an fda advisory panel has recommended emergency use authorization of a third dose of moderna's vaccine for folks over 65 and people younger who are at high risk. there is more breaking news as well involving the texas law that essentially bans all abortions after six weeks. tonight the fifth circuit court of appeals, most conservative in the country, had another chance to hold it off and they did not by a 2 to 1 ruling. they have let it stand. meaning the most restrictive abortion law in the land remains in the state of texas. with all that it's time to bring in our starting line for this thursday. eugene daniels, white house correspondent for political oef, co-author of each day's edition of "politico playbook."
8:06 pm
kimberly atkins store, previously wbur and the boston herald now a member of the "boston globe" editorial board. and barbara mcquade, veteran former prosecutor, former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan who worked with the doj during the biden transition. she is a professor at her alma mater, university of michigan law school. she and kimberly, by the way, make up 50% of the podcast "sisters in law," along with joyce vance and jill wine-banks. good evening and welcome to you all. and counselor, indeed i'd like to begin with you. barb, i didn't bring a bucket of cold water to this conversation intentionally. but i heard this business of a criminal contempt complaint explained today. last time it happened in the house was in 1983. it's got to be voted on by the house. then goes to doj, meaning the u.s. attorney in the district of columbia. then maybe to a grand jury. then maybe to a jury trial. the house would select a trial
8:07 pm
lawyer to represent them at trial. then maybe to a series of appeals. and barb, it sure sounds like we're talking about years and not months. are we close to right on that? >> i agree with you, brian. in fact, it seems to me that strategically if what the committee really wanted here was compliance with the subpoena the better course may be to go the civil route, get a judge to order compliance, and then bannon could be held in contempt of the court's order and jailed civilly as a method of enticing his compliance for up to 18 months. that can happen pretty quickly. instead, by going the criminal route, it seems to me that they may be saying we're willing to sacrifice the testimony of steve bannon because we want to make a statement here and take a stand. we hope that the deterrent effect of his criminal prosecution and perhaps imprisonment will cause all of these other witnesses to comply. so that might be the strategy that they're employing here. >> perhaps we'll get an explanation from someone close to the committee.
8:08 pm
kimberly, you are a storyteller by trade and a lawyer in your spare time. so i want to ask you about this 1-6 committee. they have the burden of storytelling on their side. they have the burden of reminding americans just how critical a day this was, just what an assault our democracy was under. will things like this bannon matter trip them up, slow them up, sully that kind of clear storytelling? >> well, it doesn't have to. i mean, i think that barbara's absolutely right, that clearly other people who they are seeking cooperation from are at least talking with the committee, moving forward, and they're getting a little extra time to decide to come in and how exactly they will do that. and i do think that steve bannon is being used as an example here. but i think the committee very much, just as much as it is
8:09 pm
tasked to get to the bottom and compel the testimony of the relative witnesses, it is compelled to -- the reason that it is there is to paint picture for the american public about just what happened, what all the causes that led up to january 6th were, and what actions should happen as a result. and they have to be storytellers in that sense in order to paint that very, very clear picture. on the other hand, steve bannon may very well use this as an opportunity to paint himself as some sort of political victim, that this is just a quote unquote witch hunt going after former president trump and his allies and use that as some sort of political fuel for whatever endeavor he or the former president has next, whether it's 2024 or something else. so i think both sides here think that this could be an advantage in messaging in one form or another.
8:10 pm
the difference is this comes with real criminal penalties. it may take a long time, but they're serious. so if steve bannon is willing to put that risk on the line in service to the former president, that's his choice to make. >> okay, eugene, over to your beat, and it seems to me from our perch that the biden white house is kind of methodically approving all these requests for documents. when the former trump white house comes back and says oh, no, no, that's privileged, they're saying what i think our two lawyers in this segment would agree with, and that is that's not a thing absent national security grounds if you're a former president. do you have the feig their goal is to get as much sunlight on what was taking place in the trump white house 1-6 before and after as possible? >> no, i think that's right. i mean, one thing that this white house is making very clear to donald trump and anyone who
8:11 pm
worked for donald trump and r is that the privilege, executive privilege doesn't continue with you when you walk out the door. it is with the office and not with the human being. and that's something that he's learning. and jen psaki, the press secretary, has said over and over and over to us in the press briefing room that they want to find out what happened on january 6th not just because, you know, they are the other campaign that was a part of this election but more importantly because it's about the democracy. and when you talk to them behind the scenes, they feel that exact same way. even more strongly. that this was a scary day, a dark day for democracy is what we keep hearing from folks in the white house. and that they want to make sure that this january 6th committee has as much information as possible. now, it could be -- there is a possibility that at some point they do -- they don't wave the executive privilege. right? they have said that they kind of are doing this by a case by case basis. it's hard to see what they would
8:12 pm
be trying to protect. but i think most of the things that they're going to start doing is continuing this process, letting things out as much as they possibly can, especially around january 6th. after other investigations about the trump white house they will then make the decision there. but i think on january 6th committee they are probably most likely going to allow most if not all of the requests go right on through. >> barbara mcquade, back over to you and the subject is now abortion. the most conservative of the regional federal courts in our country has ignored the last missive from the doj, meaning the texas law stands. barb, did this change anything materially beyond of course the immediate needs of women in the state of texas? did this materially put this on an even faster track for the full supreme court? >> well, this was kind of a necessary next step. i don't think it's surprising to
8:13 pm
anybody in light of the fact that this same court ruled administratively about a week ago that said that they were going to stop the order by the district court that was putting an injunction on the enforcement of the abortion ban in texas. and this is the same circuit court that back in september swooped in to that district court case and said we are going to enforce this law and let it stay on the books while this gets litigated. so no surprise. but keep in mind, brian, how extraordinary it is that we are in this posture. we have got standing precedent, roe versus wade, on the books almost 50 years. if the u.s. supreme court wants to overrule that, it has the power to do that. but a court of appeals, the fifth circuit, one of those intermediate court of appeals, does not have authority to overrule supreme court precedent. so these stays they are invoking to allow the law to stay in effect and those constitutional rights to be violated while this
8:14 pm
litigation is pending is really quite extraordinary. >> and kim, on a huge level what does this mean for not just the women in texas but the women in similarly minded states? are we looking at what is in effect two nations where choice is concerned? >> we are. and we have been for some time. i mean, keep in mind that we've been paying a lot of attention to this texas law because it is so restrictive, the most restrictive in the country. the supreme court is taking up a law in mississippi which is nearly as restrictive. but there have been bans in place in states, restrictive abortion laws for the past several years that have been imposed by republican-led legislatures that have been slowly creating this two-tier system where people with means, people who are privileged, still have access to safe abortions and people who are poorer, people who tend to be black or
8:15 pm
brown, who disproportionately get more abortions for a host of reasons, from economic reasons to just lack of adequate health care and higher precedence of pregnancy-related complications, have less access to it. if you look at a place like missouri, the only place where abortions have been carried out for years is in st. louis. if you live outside of that area, you have to travel to get it. and so we have been seeing this creeping up for a long time, this two-tier system that is only getting worse. and certainly, even if the supreme court overrules and strikes down roe v. wade, we'll still have that two-tier system. for some folks it will remain inaccessible. and for others it will be out of reach and perhaps with deadly consequences. >> eugene, i saved the toughest question for you only because there may not be any solid reporting available on it, and that has to do with this test vote six days from now that
8:16 pm
schumer has called on voting rights. is there a plan b in the biden white house if they put something up and it fails? >> no. there doesn't seem to be a plan b. and the reason is because there's only plan a, right? there is nothing -- if there's something that this white house, that this president could do, that he could sign to put federal voting rights legislation back on the map to put some more teeth into the civil rights legislation, they would have already done it. they know they can't even though vice president kamala harris has been working on this issue. a lot of what the white house knows its ability -- the ability it has is to pressure. right? outside pressure. use other groups to then do pressure on the senate because something that president biden has not said is that he is open to getting rid of the filibuster, even just for voting rights. you heard that over and over from civil rights leaders that that is what they want to see. the president has not said that
8:17 pm
he's open to that. so until he does that, pressures senator manchin, senator sinema to get on board and whatever other moderates that might not also agree to get rid of the filibuster at this point, then there's almost nothing that can be done. and i think that is what is frustrating. voting rights advocates. because they see the president having all of these meetings go all over the country, twist arms for infrastructure, for the care economy, and not doing the exact same thing for voting rights even though he calls it -- says there's an existential threat to the country if there's not better federal voting rights legislation. you have the president saying one thing and then seemingly not doing another to actually shore that up. so there's not a lot of hope that this test vote is going to doing in, and more importantly that it's going to lead the administration to do anything because there's not much that they can do. >> eugene daniels, kimberly atkins stohr, barbara mcquade,
8:18 pm
our thanks to our starting line for taking all of our questions on a thursday night. coming up for us a consequential off-year election that's being closely wafrpd. and while trump isn't on the ballot he of course is a factor. our political experts here to talk about what's at stake in the race that so many view as an important test for democrats and republicans. and later, dr. vin gupta here to break down everything we need to know about today's recommendation from the fda on boosters and the latest information on former president clinton hospitalized in california tonight. all of it as "the 11th hour" is just getting under way on this thursday evening overlooking the u.s. capitol. ol from fidelity. ben isn't worried about retirement because his plan is backed by the team at fidelity. a group of investment professionals manages ben's ira for him, analyzing market conditions and helping him stay on target.
8:19 pm
he gets one-on-one coaching when he wants some advice, and can adjust his plan whenever he needs to. and now he's so prepared for retirement, ben is feeling totally zen. that's the planning effect from fidelity. fine, no one leaves the table until your finished. ben is feeling totally zen. fine, we'll sleep here.
8:20 pm
♪♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win. that was quick. and rewarding. i earn 3% cash back at drugstores with chase freedom unlimited. that means i earn on my bug spray and my sunscreen. you ready to go fishing? i got the bait. i also earn 5% on travel purchased through chase on this rental car. that lake is calling my name! don't you get seasick? we'll find out! come on. and i earn 3% on dining including takeout. so much for catching our dinner. some people are hunters. some are gatherers. i'm a diner. pow! earn big time with chase freedom unlimited with no annual fee. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours.
8:21 pm
michael myers is the essence of evil. the boogeyman... needs to die. if you track michael's victims, it's a straight line to michael's childhood home. [ screaming ] tonight my family will kill him. [ gasps ]
8:22 pm
[ screaming ] i see it as a sign of extraordinary insecurity and weakness. any one of these people shouldn't need a subpoena at all. as an american, as a patriot, as a citizen who suffered the insurrection that was not an attack on democrats in congress, it was an attack on the entire government, including the republican sitting vice president. >> congresswoman madeleine dean, democrat of pennsylvania, the refusal of trump allies to comply with the january 6th committee subpoenas raises an obvious question. what do they have to hide? back with us tonight, don callaway, democratic strategist, founder of the national voter protection action fund. and mark mckinnon, former adviser to both jornl w. bush and john mccain. he is among the co-hosts of "the circus" on showtime.
8:23 pm
gentlemen, good evening to you both. mr. mckinnon, just to show you that i am never above a shameless plug, we're going to preview sunday night's episode of "the circus" by running a snippet of a conversation mr. heilemann had with mr. schiff of california. we'll discuss on the other side. >> we need to get answers to how this attack on the capitol took place, why it took place, what we need to do to protect the country going forward. and frankly, what was the president's role? before, during, and after that insurrection. do we need to use every tool to get answers? and i think the answer is yes. >> of course because it's "the circus," the interview had to be shot in a restaurant or bar. but i digress. mark, what do you make of what schiff just said there? and where are we going to see consequences? >> well, i think it's pretty clear now that the committee intends to not only issue subpoenas but enforce subpoenas. and the question, it's also
8:24 pm
clear that any of trump's allies including especially bannon are going to defy them. they see it as a badge of honor. they also recognize there's not much teeth in the current subpoenas as drawn up by congress. and i think that's got to change, by the way, in the future. i mean, bannon's obviously going to draw this out over months and months. and the criminal penalties i think are only up to a year which are not particularly consequential and unlikely to be imposed. i think bannon and company are just going to flout this. again, the more they do this the stronger they are in trump's eyes. so they kind of love it. i expect that steve bannon is proud to have a subpoena and is bragging about it. but i do think that the democrats finally are dropping the hammer and are going to lay out the subpoenas and then they're going to push it to the wall, which they need to do. >> don, what does the committee need to do? this is a two-prong question. really to be legit in the eyes of americans and legit in the
8:25 pm
eyes of worried democrats. >> that's a great question, brian. a great two questions, if you will. i think the first thing they need to do is my man chairman bennie thompson has to be ready to use the authority that he has in the form of subpoenas and civil and potentially even criminal penalties. i know he's strong enough of a leader to be willing to do that but he's got to be willing to communicate to the american people that yes, he's willing to do that. last week you had me on and i got beat up for your twitter followers for saying we shouldn't do that. i wasn't saying democrats shouldn't enforce it. i was saying we should understand that that probably comes with serious political consequences. then again, i have to remind myself that the political consequences would be suffered by that middle-aged white man voter who has long since left the dominican -- excuse me, not the dominican. the democratic party. and therefore we shouldn't be chasing this unicorn of a voter that we haven't had since 1960. so bennie thompson has got be to be strong and be prepared to enforce because these congressional subpoenas like
8:26 pm
mark said are only as strong as the teeth that they have and democrats have got to make it very clear that we're willing to go strong. i think that answered both prongs of your question, brian. >> yes. by the way, in a twitter fight my money's on you, don, any day. mark, let's make a transition in topic over to this development tonight. the last hurdle has been taken down, meaning in texas the most restrictive law of the land is in force in that state. do you have any read on where texas voters, male and female, both parties, are on this? >> well, brian, texas is the tip of the spear on all republican legislation that is going as far right as possible. we see it on voting rights. we see it on abortion. we see it on guns. we see it with what's happening on the border. the question is when does the pendulum swing too far? and when you talk about vigilante justice when a woman's dealing with one of the toughest decisions in her life, i think
8:27 pm
that that's way over the line for a lot of people including and especially women in texas. that is just way beyond what anybody anticipated i think. i think it's been a convenient talking point for republicans in primaries. i don't think anybody expected this sort of -- this sort of law to be put in place that would be so restrictive and have people -- vigilante justice on the part of citizens taking people to court. so i think there's going to be repercussions for this, brian. and look, you even look at ron desantis in florida, who looked at the texas law and said whoa, that may be a bridge too far. and if desantis is saying it's a bridge too far, it's probably a bridge too far. >> both of these gentlemen are sticking with us. we're going to take a break. coming up, when we continue our conversation, we'll talk about the effect of trump and trumpism on this widely watched virginia governor's race and how it just might backfire for the party
8:28 pm
that trump personally controls. ♪ ♪ ♪ hey google. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪darling, i, i can't get enough of your love babe♪ ♪girl, i don't know, i don't know,♪ ♪i don't know why i can't get enough of your love babe♪
8:29 pm
♪oh no, babe girl, if i could only make you see♪ ♪and make you understand♪ get a dozen double crunch shrimp for $1 with any steak entrée. only at applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. ♪ ♪ dry eye symptoms keep driving you crazy? inflammation in your eye might be to blame. [inflammation] let's kick ken's ache and burn into gear! over the counter eye drops typically work by lubricating your eyes and may provide temporary relief. those drops will probably pass right by me. xiidra works differently, targeting inflammation that can cause dry eye disease. [inflammation] what's that? [inflammation] xiidra? no! it can provide lasting relief. xiidra is the only fda-approved non-steroid treatment specifically for the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. one drop in each eye, twice a day. don't use if you're allergic to xiidra. common side effects include eye irritation, discomfort or blurred vision when applied to the eye, and unusual taste sensation.
8:30 pm
don't touch container tip to your eye or any surface. after using xiidra, wait fifteen minutes before reinserting contacts. [inflammation] got any room in your eye? be proactive about managing your symptoms by talking to your doctor about twice-daily xiidra. like i did. [inflammation] i prefer you didn't! xiidra. not today, dry eye. what do we want for dinner? xiidra. burger... i want a sugar cookie... wait... i want a bucket of chicken... i want... ♪♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win.
8:31 pm
last night was a total game changer. it was one of the saddest things i've ever seen. at a youngkin rally hosted as you said there by steve bannon they started off by doing pledge of allegiance to a flag that was up here on january 6th for the insurrection. that alone is disqualifying.
8:32 pm
>> so that happened last night. supporters of paren glenn youngkin also called the insurrection a peaceful protest. that's what we remember from 1-6, correct? a reminder that american flags were used as weapons on january 6th to assault police officers. for his part the republican candidate for governor in the commonwealth of virginia issued a statement calling it "weird and wrong to pledge allegiance to a flag connected with january 6th." still with us are don calloway and mark mckinnon. hey, mark, i want to get your reaction. the candidates stayed away from this rally for the republican ticket in virginia. donald trump calls in to the rally and they pull the stunt with the flag, and we all remember what flags and flagpoles were used for on this day. does this go into the unforced error category? >> sure, it does, brian.
8:33 pm
and this just testifies to the problem republicans really have with trump still on the radar screen. youngkin in this race absent trump and given biden's standings would actually probably be doing pretty well. this whole campaign has been youngkin trying to avoid any attachment to trump. and mcauliffe has done a pretty good job of hanging trump around his neck. so this race is a really good example of how trump is problematic for the future of the party. because absent trump youngkin maybe would be running away with this race. but given trump's baggage and the anchors he puts on the candidates it's a problem and it's going to continue to be until trump's out of the picture. >> as you well know, the new polling out of fox news today has mcauliffe at 51, youngkin 46. the democrats are bringing in the big artillery. they're not fooling around here. they're flying in obama, pelosi,
8:34 pm
abrams out of georgia, dr. jill biden will be there, joe biden has already visited. keisha lance bottoms, the mayor of atlanta. mark, explain to folks why a gubernatorial off-year election in the commonwealth of virginia is a high-stakes affair. >> well, this is going to make huge news, brian. whichever way it goes. people are going to say this is a harbinger of what's going to be for 2022. and it's interesting to see that mcauliffe is pulling in all the democrats and youngkin is running away from trump. and one of the things that poll shows which i think is interesting is that democrats despite difficulty right now in congress with the president and with the congress are still ten points more popular than republicans are in virginia. so it's a democratic-leaning state right now. and if mcauliffe can take advantage of that, bring in the troops, galvanize the democrats in the state, who are still fairly pretty positive about biden, so that's the game for
8:35 pm
mcauliffe. but at the end of the day it doesn't matter what -- the only thing that's going to matter is who wins because if mcauliffe wins it's going to be a big win for biden. and if youngkin wins it's going to be a big win for trump. >> by the way, to our viewers who might wonder if don calloway has entered the witness protection program, he's having some wi-fi issues and we're trying to get a stronger signal out of him so he can hear us and vice versa. oh, don, there you are. thank goodness. we were worried about you. i want to play for you an exchange between our friend andrea mitchell and terry mcauliffe. we're going to talk about its significance on the other side. >> now, if i were running the show here, i'd get everybody in a room -- >> what do you want joe biden to do? >> let's get everybody in a room. lock the door. what do you need? what do you need? and let's get this thing done. >> so don, explain to folks watching who might wonder, okay, so you're running for governor of virginia, why so much talk
8:36 pm
about the president, congressional democrats, filibuster? why talk about the process inside congress? >> because you want to show expertise. in a post-trump world where people are trying to get back to some normalized version of american leadership you want to elect people that can demonstrate some knowledge of what's going on. unfortunately, those issues on some macro level are probably germane to virginia, but unfortunately the average person watching t-mac perform right there doesn't know that these aren't virginia issues and probably doesn't make the distinction between virginia political problems and washington, d.c. political problems even though the towns are just 90 minutes apart. what they're looking for is expertise. and t-mac is a pro. he knows how to sound smart and that's because he is a smart guy, but he knows how to sound competent but still somehow relatable. and i know that was a weird moment to get his expertise on, whatever's happening with the biden administration. but we also have to remember that t-mac is the consummate democratic insider. so these conversations that are happening on capitol hill, these conversations that are happening
8:37 pm
within the administration are certainly coming across him because he's a very substantial democratic fund-raiser in addition to being a democratic elected official. t-mac is a unique dude. by just think it's incumbent upon me to say that youngkin is a republican. his sxheshlz, if you're here in the dmv area, clearly never say that word, as well as the young man running for a.g. but i believe in transparency in politics. so i figured i'd put it out there. >> there you have it. that's why we're so happy to have you back. don calloway, mark mckinnon, you're both friends of this broadcast. thank you for staying up with us. coming up, a rare unanimous decision about a booster shot. and another big decision is on the way from the feds. dr. vin gupta is taking our questions. he's standing by. we'll be right back with him. 'lm ♪ ♪
8:38 pm
just two pills for all day pain relief. aleve it, and see what's possible.
8:39 pm
♪ it's grilled cheese time. ♪ ♪ yeah, it's time for grilled cheese. ♪ ♪ after we make grilled cheese, ♪ ♪ then we're eating grilled cheese. ♪ ♪ because it's time. ♪ ♪ yeah. ♪ ♪ time for grilled cheese. ♪ ♪♪ your new pharmacy is here. to help you compare prices, and save on your medication. amazon prime members get select meds as low as $1 a month. who knew it could be this easy? your new pharmacy is amazon pharmacy. with relapsing forms of ms... there's a lot to deal with. not just unpredictable relapses. all these other things too. it can all add up.
8:40 pm
kesimpta is a once-monthly at-home injection... that may help you put these rms challenges in their place. kesimpta was proven superior at reducing the rate of relapses, active lesions, and slowing disability progression vs aubagio. don't take kesimpta if you have hepatitis b, and tell your doctor if you have had it, as it could come back. kesimpta can cause serious side effects, including infections. while no cases of pml were reported in rms clinical trials, it could happen. tell your doctor if you had or plan to have vaccines, or if you are or plan to become pregnant. kesimpta may cause a decrease in some types of antibodies. the most common side effects are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and injection reactions. ready for an at-home treatment with dramatic results? it's time to ask your doctor about kesimpta. the fda is reviewing data on
8:41 pm
moderna and johnson & johnson boosters. we expect the final decision from the fda and the centers for disease control and prevention, the cdc, in the next couple of weeks. already more than one out of three eligible seniors have gotten their third shot. they're free, available, and convenient to get. >> so an fda panel has approved moderna's booster shot for those who qualify. tomorrow they move on to consider j&j. a larger question remains about whether boosters are needed for all americans over 18. important. back with us tonight dr. vain gupta, a critical care pulmonologist in seattle who has advised us on public health throughout this pandemic. he also happens to be on the faculty at the university of washington institute for health metrics and evaluation. doctor, i promised our audience at the top of the hour that we would talk to you about the condition of former president
8:42 pm
clinton, and we will do that right before we move on to thighs vaccines. based on what is out there and available, based on your knowledge and expertise, what do you think happened here? >> well, brian, just looking at reporting, it looks like the former president had a urinary tract infection, meaning however it was caused there was an infection in his bladder or potentially in his kidneys. and his body responded and that response, brian, is called senseis. there's inflammation. maybe his heartrate was elevated. it sounds like some of his labs were elevated, suggesting he had this infection. often for your viewers out there, any of your viewers that have been impacted by senseis or app infection, they have low blood pressure. they have a high fever. so that's exactly what it looks like the president experienced. critically, brian, early intervention is vital. so recognition of this critical syndrome, senseis early so we
8:43 pm
can get antibiotics into people early. the fact the president is alert, awake, talking. is he on medications to support his blood pressure or is he off of those types of medications? was he ever on them? that's going to dictate how quickly he gets out of the hospital and ultimately back home. >> all good questions. as we noted, he's been a heart patient for almost two decades. he is 75 years old. and also the folks around him tonight made known that he was walking around joking with the staff, complaining about hospital food. so all good indicators there. doc, let's pivot now to the moderna booster. this still has to be cdc approved before people can line up and get it. but on the moderna they've decided just a half dose is good enough because of the potency of the first two shots? >> that's exactly right, brian. you know, frankly, and this is
8:44 pm
what vac scene experts on these panels were already noting to media, is that two doses of moderna even if you're high risk seem to be pretty darn good many months out, six months out. so that's why they're saying there's some question do we actually need that booster? but they have decided to greenlight a half dose booster, i think in part for consistency purposes. my mother, for example, got two doses of moderna, wondering when she's going to get the booster. i've heard something similar. so avoid confusion to remain consistent. recognizing we need to be humble about the uncertainty that lies ahead. i think it was the right move. but that is the reason why that half dose was indicated because those first two doses of moderna were a higher concentration than the first two doses of pfizer. >> i want to play you something that came out of the fda panel meeting today. this is a pediatrician and noted vaccine expert dr. paul offit. and doc, i'll ask you to interpret what he's saying here on the other side. >> i just think that we continue
8:45 pm
to send wrong messages out there by using terms like -- by making people feel that they're not protected unless they've gotten a third dose. the problem is this country is vaccinating the unvaccinated. i just worry that we haven't clearly defined what the goal of this vaccine is because if the goal of this vaccine is to prevent asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infection, that is a goal for which we have set no other vaccine. >> so doctor, as i hear that, all i'm hearing is it's so clear we need to prioritize vaccinating the unvaccinated and breakthrough is scarier to some people than the reality of it? is that about right? >> that's right. and paul offit, dr. offit is exactly correct here. i say this as a lung doctor. no vaccine that was ever made in history was ever intended to prevent somebody from testing positive from a contagious airborne virus. that's just not the way these vaccines protect you against
8:46 pm
those types of pathogens. we cannot now redefine what it means to be vaccinated and the goal here. he's exactly correct. the purpose of vaccination is to prevent serious disease to keep you out of the hospital. if we were trying to redefine the outcome as we want the vaccine to protect you from mild illness or testing positive, we are never going to achieve that goal at scale. we're setting ourselves up for failure. and by the way, all we're doing is creating a situation where the unvaccinated, and i've heard this directly, think the vaccines don't work while terrifying those who've gotten two doses of the shot and are otherwise protected. >> we have about 45 seconds left. can you give us a quick update on virus levels, case numbers, death toll where you are, pacific northwest? >> well, seattle is a hub for a five-state region, brian. alaska, wyoming, montana, idaho, you name it. so what we see here in the pacific northwest and seattle is indicative of the stress across the region.
8:47 pm
i'll say the stress across the region is what we're seeing across the country. 1500 to 1800 americans dying day over day. over 10,000 americans still dying weekly. we're not through this pandemic quite yet. cold and flu's around the corner. i urge all your viewers to please stay vigilant. end of the winter is when we can really emerge from this safely. >> thank you for taking our questions tonight. our guest again this evening has been our friend dr. vin gupta. coming up for us, an attempt to ease the trauma that is still so raw for those who were defending our capitol on 1-6. mission control, we are go for launch. um, she's eating the rocket. ♪♪ lunchables! built to be eaten. discover card i just got my cashback match is this for real? yup! we match all the cash back new card members earn at the end of their first year automatically woo! i got my mo-ney!
8:48 pm
it's hard to contain yourself isn't it? uh- huh! well let it go! woooo! get a dollar for dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover.
8:49 pm
8:50 pm
8:51 pm
it was over this past summer when the select committee investigating the january 6th insurrection held their first hearing. during that hearing you'll recall some of the officers who responded to the riot at the capitol explain the lasting toll the attack had on their physical but mostly mental health. and now there is a new therapy program available for capitol hill police officers, and it's a welcome sight. we'll put it that way. nbc news correspondent garrett haake has the story tonight from washington. >> reporter: on capitol hill in washington there are new officers in town. younger, furrier, and more easily distracted by squirrels than your typical police. meet 3-year-old lila, the capitol police department's first ever full-time emotional support dog. 4-year-old leo joined the force this fall too. >> dogs come up to you and they're all happy. police officers don't get a lot of people who come up to them who are happy to see them.
8:52 pm
>> good girl. >> i think it makes a world of difference. it does for me. >> reporter: for capitol police officers caroline edwards and jeff albanese the sights and sounds of january 6th are still vivid today. >> those images, the smells, the yelling, the -- you know, the chaos. that day was a war zone. >> just hearing the calls for help, hearing the locations that people needed help. >> reporter: the two officers are among many battling anxiety, depression, and lingering injuries from the attack. four responding officers from that day have also since died by suicide. capitol police now working to prioritize the mental health of officers with tools like peer to peer counseling, helping cops talk to other cops about what they've experienced. >> over time all agencies have recognized that it takes a lot more than just physical wellness to have a well officer. >> petting a dog can make your whole day better. >> you're like five times as happy talking about it. >> hey. >> reporter: a new best friend for the men and women in capitol
8:53 pm
police blue. garrett haake, nbc news, the capitol. >> who's a good dog? coming up for us, an incident from a school district in texas that should put all school districts, all teachers, all librarians on alert. (man 1) oh, this looks like we're in a screen saver. (man 2) yeah, but we need to go higher. (man 1) higher. (man 2) definitely higher. (man 1) we're like yodeling high. [yodeling] yo-de-le-he...
8:54 pm
(man 2) hey, no. uh-uh, don't do that. (man 1) we should go even higher! (man 2) yeah, let's do it. (both) woah! (man 2) i'm good. (man 1) me, too. (man 2) mm-hm. (vo) adventure has a new look. (man 1) let's go lower. (man 2) lower, that sounds good. (vo) discover more in the all-new subaru outback wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. ♪ well the sun is shining and the grass is green ♪ ♪ i'm way ahead of schedule with my trusty team ♪ ♪ there's heather on the hedges ♪ ♪ and kenny on the koi ♪ ♪ and your truck's been demolished by the peterson boy ♪ ♪ yes -- ♪ wait, what was that? timber... [ sighs heavily ] when owning a small business gets real, progressive helps protect what you've built with affordable coverage. ♪darling, i, i can't get enough of your love babe♪ ♪girl, i don't know, i don't know,♪ ♪i don't know why i can't get enough of your love babe♪
8:55 pm
♪oh no, babe girl, if i could only make you see♪ ♪and make you understand♪ get a dozen double crunch shrimp for $1 with any steak entrée. only at applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. people with moderate to severe psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make like the splash they create the entrance they make, the surprises they initiate. otezla. it's a choice you can make. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines, and if you're pregnant or planning to be.
8:56 pm
otezla. show more of you. as it is time for the last thing before we go tonight, let
8:57 pm
us set the scene for what you're about to hear. this happened in texas, which will sadly make sense in a perverse kind of way once you've heard it. you're about to hear a recording from the southlake texas school district where they're under pressure to police the books in the school libraries. a fourth-grade teacher there was reprimanded for having a book about anti-racism, for example. the district sent down an order to vet all books and avoid anything with a singular narrative that could be considered offensive. the voice you'll here was recorded during a training session with teachers. the speaker you're going to hear is gina petty, the director of curriculum, talking about the effect of this new texas law. >> we are in the middle of a political mess, and you are in the middle of a political mess. and so we just have to do the best that we can, and so we're
8:58 pm
going to go and we're going to do, you're going to do what you do best, and that's to teach kids. >> i think we're all just really terrified. >> i think you are terrified, and i wish i could take that away. i do. i can't. i can't do that. you are professionals. we hired you as professionals. we trust you with our children. so if you think the book is okay, then let's go with it, and whatever happens we will fight it together. we will. there's a lot of districts that are in the exact same spot we're in, and no one knows how to navigate these waters. i mean, no one. >> as you go through, just try to remember the concepts of 3979 and make sure that if you have a book on the holocaust that you have one that has opposing -- that has other perspectives. >> how do you oppose the
8:59 pm
holocaust? what? >> believe me, that's come up. >> so "number the stars." >> that's powerful stuff there. gina pedy did not respond to a request for comment from nbc news. just for the record here, because these are serious times and this kind of talk is pernicious and dangerous, there's no other perspective on the holocaust. 6 million jews were rounded up, in some cases worked to death, starved to death, shot, gassed. they were exterminated. any book saying otherwise, any other perspective on the holocaust has no place in our schools. it's anti-history. then again, there's been a lot of that going on these days.
9:00 pm
that's going to do it for our thursday evening broadcast. with our thanks for being here with us, on behalf of all our colleagues at the networks of nbc news, good night. after all, this billboard has just gone up in times square, in new york city. as you can see there, it says trump lost. no more quote, audits. this was put up by a republican group, a group called the republican accountability project, we've talked about them a few times here on the show. they're basically a group of anti trump republicans, including people who served in the trump administration, who are now anti trump republicans. basically trying to save their party from the direction it has taken unde


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on