tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC September 30, 2021 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
we are still waiting to see what's going to happen on capitol hill tonight. nancy pelosi has just sent a dear democratic colleague letter. she does say the substance of it is the work is being done, discussions continue with the house, senate and white house to reach a bicameral -- meaning house and senate -- framework agreement to build back bet through a reconciliation bill. many thanks to members of our caucus for your participation and patience. the bipartisan infrastructure bill has already had its rule passed and its debate has concluded. all of this momentum brings us closer to shaping the reconciliation bill in a manner
that will pass the house and the senate. she then concludes with thank you all for your constant, informative and occasionally humorous messages and always for your leadership for the people. discussions continue i think is the money quote there. but we're still waiting to see if it's going to happen tonight. that's going to do it for us at least for now. we'll see you again some other time. now it's time for the "last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening, lawrence. >> good evening, rachel. i was flipping flow a script i wrote about about an hour ago to see if i want to use any of it. so the pelosi letter is interesting because it doesn't say anything as these letters normally do. and so here's what we're going to do and here's -- and you can go home now and sleep-in a real bed or you can fall asleep-in your office and come back at 2:00 a.m. so luckily we have house budget committee chairman john yarmouth to start us off tonight, and he'll know as much as anybody does what's going to
happen the rest of the night. we did see a comment from joe manchin who says he does not see a deal tonight, so this may be something that, you know, we'll go about tomorrow. >> that said nobody's waiting ophim, like, to do something. nobody expects joe manchin is going to try to bring this to a conclusion. do they? >> but in his way he actually is. so the conclusion you'll get to must include joe manchin and senator sinema. no one's going to say, okay, we've got it all done and it doesn't include them because that's the roadblock as everyone knows. and actually senator manchin has been pretty -- as these things go -- pretty open about where he is and what he's trying to accomplish. senator sinema silence and actually public contempt here about what she's doing. so it seems to be moving in a way that we can sort of recognize as getting somewhere. >> the -- none of this is
operative language but the part where nancy pelosi's dear colleague letter tonight where she says discussions continue with the house, senate and white house to reach a bicameral framework agreement to build back better through a reconciliation bill, all this momentum brings us closer to shaping the reconciliation bill in a manner that will pass both the house and the senate. she wants a bicameral framework agreement. >> yeah. that means 50 senators agreeing to it not 49. 50. and so this is the night where they're going to try to make it happen. and the longer you keep them in, the more pressure builds. and that's why she doesn't say in there, okay, you can all go home. >> that's right. >> she needs this pressure because she's trying to convince some people in the house at the same time that the stuff's going on in the senate. and so, you know, look, here's the striking think about it.
joe manchin made it very clear today, the memo came out that, you know, he signed with chuck schumer. and chuck schumer has the cutest little signature i've ever seen. underneath he says he's going to try to dissuade joe for most of it things he says back in july. so he's made it very clear, $1.5 trillion. he's in favor of some version of most of the things that are in the bill smaller scale. and so $1.5 trillion is being received as some kind of loss for democrats when it's a huge piece of legislation. it's not 3.5 and it's not the 6 that bernie sanders originally was hoping for. >> or 10. >> right, but in this legislative arena $1.5 trillion is the largest amount ever contemplated or written into law. not contemplated because
obviously they contemplated more, but written into law by anyone ever, ever. so the democrats managed to they've got the win on the bipartisan infrastructure bill. they've got to win on this other one. it's just a question of how many points do they score in the win? how big is the win? >> let it also be noted even on his own terms speaking with his own joe manchin-verse, he has never said that his $1.5 trillion idea about what this should be is meaningfully mapped to the things he says he wants in it. he just likes the sound of that number even though a lot of the things he says he wants and indeed he says are priorities for him add up to a number that is larger than $1.5 trillion. it's also the fact he's never said that's his bottom line. he's said that his idea, that's from the place in which he starts negotiating. so if he started at 1.5 and the rest of the democrats are at 3.5
one might guess one man might negotiate if he is in fact negotiating in good faith and not just enjoying the suntan he's getting from the tv lights. >> yeah, this is a document unlike anything i've ever seen. i've never seen this kind of agreement not only put in -- it's not an agreement. this kind of proposal put in writing -- that does happen. they exchange writing. but signing it? i've never seen a chairman sign one of these with a member like, okay, this is your position. it's like chuck schumer's giving him a receipt saying, yeah, i got it. i understand this is what you want, i'm going to try to talk you out of it. but the things he's in favor of, increasing the top income tax rate, getting rid of the carried interest provision in the tax code that allows rich investment bankers to not have regular income, regular income taxes, increasing the corporate tax rate. he said today for consumption in
west virginia, of course, i'm not a liberal. and i think that's taken for granted in washington, but that's a liberal tax bill that he is in favor of in this memo. and so the idea that joe manchin is not being serious at least from his perspective about how to do this i think is now clear that he is -- at you might not like what he wants, and bernie sanders hates what he wants. but i don't think bernie sanders would say joe manchin has been irresponsible in his approach to this. he hasn't been open enough with us. >> see, i think the reason i put a darker cast on this is i don't think the words he's talking about and the numbers he's talking about have ever met. i think it is an enumerate proposal and therefore it is cynical and false to say my proposal is a number. when the number actually isn't constitutive of his ideas. >> see, that, when i was working in the senate finance committee
i actually liked these kind of proposals because if you say i want this, this and this and i want this low spending number, that for me was great. i'd just concentrate on so you want this, this and this. and it's kind of like selling a house. you kind of go, well, but see this is how much it costs. so i can take encouragement from those things that are -- that you see as cynical. >> you've seen the sausage made before, and i'm right there being like sausage, that's terrible. >> and i'm not saying -- i'm not saying that it's not cynical. what i'm saying is it looks flexible to me. like if i just look for flexibility when they're saying these things. and the things that make it really difficult is when someone says i'm absolutely opposed to "x" and there's no room, there's like no movement at all on absolute no. well, then, you're not going to be able to have that provision if you need that vote from that person. >> the question is whether or
not overall joe manchin is absolute lay opposed to the democrats passing president biden's budget. now, it is about the definition of the budget or is he actually opposed to them passing a big reconciliation bill that includes most of the president's economic priorities? >> he actually said today -- he said toot that he was, meaning that he started off saying i didn't think we needed this at all, zero. >> yes, exactly. >> i thought we needed zero. so from the perspective of thinking we needed zero and all we needed was the bipartisan infrastructure bill, he sat down with chuck schumer and he said, okay, i think we need zero but this is what i'm willing to do if you guys actually do it this way. i will go from zero to 1.5. so he would argue i went from zero to 1.5. burn awe sanders arguing i went from 6 to 3.5, so here we are tonight. >> i will say at some point you
and are going to sell each other a car to see who can come out with the better deal. and we're going to see who ends up getting the better deal. >> do you really want that sound system in your car? okay, okay. >> i can get you a used one. >> sure. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you, rachel. thank you. well, we are starting off tonight. we're junking the script. we're starting off with congressman john yarmouth, the chair of the house budget committee. this is where it all began. he is the author of the $3.5 trillion framework of the house budget resolution that the house and the senate are now try to reconcile in now what they then call a reconciliation bill. chairman of the house budget committee chair yarmouth, thank you very much for joining us tonight. look, we always feel lucky to get you, but as the night wore on we felt luckier and luckier and then we get this mysterious
letter from the speaker who doesn't say whether you can go home tonight or not. can you tell us -- let's just start with this. when are you going home tonight? >> i'm not going home at all. but i just want to say that i hope that the last eight or nine minutes or whatever of you and rachel talking are immortalized because that was one of the most incredible discussions of sausage making that i've ever heard. and so relevant to tonight. nobody knows where we are. the speaker is trying to honor her obligation -- her commitment to having a vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill. i plan to vote for that bill if we ever have a vote on it. but right now i was just involved in a call of the progressive caucus, and if
anything there was increased resolve among the progressive caucus members to -- to oppose the infrastructure bill. again, i'm not in that position. i think it's a good bill. i'm going to vote for it if it comes to the floor. but this is a bizarre world if there ever were one. >> what is -- for you as you sit there tonight, what is the most mysterious element of what you're facing tonight? if you could get one question answered whether it be from a senator or from anyone in this, what would that question be? >> the question would be why does anyone think that the top line number is significant in any way? and what we're talking about is an analysis by the president of the united states, by most members of the democratic caucus in both the house and senate of
what the federal government needs to do to support the american people at this point in history. it's a pivotal point in history. the biden administration has basically proposed an outline of things we can do to make sure that a generation from now, two generations from now that we have a kind of country and society that most of us will disparage it. and what we're seeing now, unfortunately, is a debate about a top line number, which is not even a net number. and something that we shouldn't focus on. we should focus on what this bipartisan and then the build better act provisions would do in terms of providing child care and early childhood education and senior care and common
change policy and paid family medical leave. all these things which are essential to guaranteeing a better future for all of us. and that's my frustration is all this -- all this obsession with a top line number when, by the way, the united states government has the capacity to spend whatever we need to spend as long as it's a smart investment in our people and our economy. and, unfortunately, we're dealing with numbers that really don't make any difference. we're talking about -- we're talking about 1.5 trillion, 3.5 trillion, 6 trillion. we're talking about what does that relate to. over the next ten years the gdp of the country is going to be something like close to $300 trillion, so we're talking about 1%, a little over 1%. let's focus on what we're trying to do and how we're trying to
improve society. >> is this negotiation at this point basically virtually all the democrats in the house and 48 democrats in the senate and one democratic president, one democratic vice president all negotiating in effect across a table from two democrats senators, sinema and manchin? >> well, of course, that's right. and we are where we are. you were in the senate. you understand that the rules of the senate which are bizarre, but they are what they are. and that's what we're doing. and the fact that one or two member of the senate could basically determine or hold hostage the policies that can benefit the country, pretty astounding. but we can talk about the
philosophical issues of where we are with the senate procedures and so forth and the filibuster and those types of things, but we -- there are things we need to do, the challenges we need to meet. only the federal government can deal with many of these problems. we're trying desperately to do that. and to his credit the president of the united states has taken a position which no president i can remember has taken. says what do we need to do for the american people? once we answer those questions how do we resource that? and that's -- that's a wonderful change in mind-set that we've not seen in a long time. >> mr. chairman, before you go i just want to imagine a conversation -- i'm sure you've had this conversation with possibly a junior member of your committee or a freshman member of the house who's trying to
decide -- whose sympathies are very strongly with the progressive caucus, maybe even a member of the progressive caucus. and is thinking about this possible vote on the senate bipartisan bill. you've said that you will vote for it even though it breaks that pledge that these would be voted on together, something you considered important. you're making a compromise of your own in being willing to vote for that bill. what would you say to that new member who's asking you about -- for advice on that vote? >> well, i'm humble enough to not tell people how to vote or advise people. but i would say to them, look, we can make a lot of progress for the american people in voting for this infrastructure bill, but more importantly this is not some kind of hard and fast deadline like the debt ceiling or shutting down the government tonight.
we'll have ample opportunity to continue these discussions about making progress for the american people. we will have next year another opportunity to have a reconciliation bill for fiscal '23 where we may do some things we may not get done this year. and i'll also say -- this is not to them, but we're facing an opposition party which has no interest whatsoever in having the federal government having approach child care and senior care and paid family medical leave and climate change and early childhood education and all the things we're trying to do. that's the only reason why we're involved in this convoluted process called reconciliation. we have no partners in doing this. we have no republican party that is interested in solving many of the challenges of the american economy and culture.
so we are where we are. it's sad. but let's get done what we can do under the, again, convoluted process we're in. >> mr. chairman, always lucky to have you and especially tonight. chairman john yarmuth, thank you for joining us. tell us how you've worked your way through this legislative procedure so far and where you are tonight on the two tracks of the legislation. >> right. well, i feel confident that we will have an agreement either tonight or tomorrow morning to be able to vote on this bipartisan infrastructure bill that i think is going to be transformative. a bill that every single member of congress gets to take about $1.2 billion to their district. that is going to be
transformative in terms of our roads, deteriorating roads and bridges and drainage and infrastructure just across the country, things that we know have been crumbling for a generation. i think it's a very tough decision to vote no on this bill. and my position has always been that we should not hold this proposal hostage or link it in any way to reconciliation. and the speaker committed that she was going to put this on the floor today, and maybe she'll do it in the morning, but i feel quite certain we'll be voting on this bill and that it'll successfully pass the house. and then we need to look at reconciliation separately. and clearly it's a huge investment in the american people. but earlier i heard you say something very interesting. why are we talking about a dollar amount? we should be talking about the programs we're interested in and making this massive investment then american people that hasn't been done in generation.
for the first time college graduates to be able to go to community college tuition-free. for the first time seniors will receive vision and dental and hearing under medicare -- for the first time medicare will be negotiating pharmaceutical prices with pharmaceutical companies to ensure our seniors have low pharmaceutical prices. so this will be transformative in so many ways, but we shouldn't be caught up in a number. i think we should talk about what we need, what we want and then figure out what it costs. much like you said earlier, we can't get caught up on $3.5 trillion. maybe everything we need costs half of that or it costs $2 trillion, but i think we need to have a thoughtful conversation in getting to that number, and i'm confident that, hey, nancy pelosi is a master negotiator and i'm confident she'll get this done. >> but in your own case if the menu of everything you wanted in
this bill, if you sat there and worked out all the provisions you wanted in the bill and then you looked over at the cost and you saw $3.5 trillion, would that be something you could vote for? >> i would have to look at the pay-fors, right? how are we going to pay for it? as congressman yarmouth said, this is 1% of our gdp over a ten-year period. it's a drop in the bucket and for the first time a massive investment in the american people. now, i don't like to see any industry targeted unjustifiably or in a punitive way like texas energy or any kind of energy or a section of our economy. we need to be fair and balanced and thoughtful, but i think this is something that we're working through. >> congressman gonzalez, thank you very much for joining us tonight. we really appreciate it. >> thank you. and we're going to stay with the house representatives.
after this break we'll be right back with congressman collin allred. n collin allred ...hearing about it 24/s painful enough... i don't want to catch it. well, you can't catch shingles, but the virus that causes it may already be inside you. does that mean bill might have company? - stop. you know shingles can be prevented. shingles can be whaaaaat? yeah prevented. you can get vaccinated. oh, so... i guess it's just you, me and bill then. i'm making my appointment. bill's all yours... 50 years or older? get vaccinated for shingles today. tonight, i'll be eating a buffalo chicken panini with extra hot sauce. tonight, i'll be eating salmon sushi with a japanese jiggly cheesecake. (doorbell rings) jolly good. fire. (horse neighing) elton: nas? yeah? spare a pound? what? you know, bones, shillings, lolly? lolly? bangers and mash? i'm... i'm sorry? i don't have any money. you don't look broke. elton: my rocket is skint!
bipolar depression. it made me feel like i was trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. i just couldn't find my way out of it. the lows of bipolar depression can take you to a dark place... ...and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. this is where i want to be. latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life threatening... ...or uncontrollable muscle movements, as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. now i'm back where i belong. ask your doctor about latuda and pay as little as $0 for your first prescription.
working at recology is more than a job for jesus. it's a family tradition. and pay as little as $0 jesus took over his dad's roue when he retired after 47 year. now he's showing a new generation what recology is all about. as an employee-owned company, recology provides good-paying local jobs for san franciscans. we're proud to have built the city's recycling system from the ground up, helping to make san francisco the greenest big city in america. let's keep making a differene together. in business, it's never just another day. it's the big sale, or the big presentation. the day where everything goes right. or the one where nothing does. with comcast business you get the network that can deliver gig speeds to the most businesses and advanced cybersecurity to protect every device on it— all backed by a dedicated team, 24/7. every day in business is a big day. we'll keep you ready for what's next. comcast business powering possibilities.
let's listen to what senator bernie sanders just told reporters tonight. >> you can cannot in my view have an agreement at 2:00 in the morning that nobody has seen. so my hope, again, the strategy should be to defeat this infrastructure, which i would be happy to vote for again. it's good bill. but we've got to defeat it now, sit down with everybody and pass two good pieces of legislation. >> joining our discussion now congressman collin allred of texas. thank you very much for joining us tonight. what's your reaction to what you just heard senator sanders say? >> i wish senators would stop talking about the house and maybe we could stop talking about the senate. we have our own business to do here, and i think it's critical we do. i've told my caucus not only is this policy and these incredibly
important policies on the table, but really american democracy is on the table and that, you know, it shouldn't be we're the only party that is interested in protecting our democracy, but that's the situation we're in. and americans in the last election came out in record numbers in the middle of a pandemic to vote for a democratic majority that has to deliver baza thoritarians love it when democracy fail. they love it when democracies are stuck in gridlock. and we're dealing with an authoritarian who's a former president and still out there and actively working to try to undermine the next election. >> i've just been handed something senator manchin just said, and the control room is going to have to tell me if this is on video or i have to read this. if it's on video we can go to it. but i'm going to read it. we might get it on video later. senator manchin just said, we just need a little bit more time. we're getting that time in order to do it. we're going to come to an
agreement. i'm trying to make sure they understand that i'm at $1.5 trillion. i think $1.5 trillion does exactly the things necessary to take care of our children, take care of our people at the end of life, our seniors. we're working on that. i don't see a deal tonight. i really don't. and i'm hoping that everyone is sympathetic towards we're trying to all work. so senator manchin says he doesn't see a deal tonight. have you been given an indication, anymore than what the speaker said in her letter about when you might be able to go home tonight? >> no, i think we're not going to see anything more tonight. i think negotiations will probably carry on tonight, but then i think we'll be right back tomorrow and have more discussions and then i think the caucus will have to be briefed on what those discussions are. we have running out of time today, but i think it's important that we do try and
find at least a framework by the end of the day tomorrow. >> what is your reaction to what senator manchin is saying. he's saying that his top line, his absolute top line is $1.5 trillion, and that's he said to chuck schumer back july 28th in that memo we've now seen today. he's in favor of almost all of the tax provisions that have been discussed. in fact, he's in favor of the carried interests -- eliminating the carried interest piece which the house ways and means committee did not do. so he's in favor of a more liberal tax bill than the house ways and means committee has already delivered here. what is your reading of the manchin position as of tonight? >> well, i don't think the top line is as important as we've seen so many people discussing because it depends on what we're talking about here. are we talking about new spending or how much time are we talking? is it ten years, is it five years? are we talking about revenue
that's raised and then it's anything above that? so i think we should focus more as everyone has said and as you have said on the policies that are transformative. i mean i was the first member of congress to ever take paternity leave ever in 2019. and i want to make sure that every american can have access to paid family medical leave, something that too many of our fellow americans don't have right now and that we can do in this bill. we know we have the threat of climate change facing us or really with us already. we have to address that in this bill. we can do incredible things. in the city of texas we can give 1.5 million texans insurance expanding medicaid. even though our state won't do it, we can offer it to texans. those are the top line policies. and it's really less important than the policies -- i really wish everyone would stop talking about it because it really is a fungible number. >> thank you for joining us tonight. we really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence.
>> we're going to be back after this break. we'll have more analysis on what's happening on the house -- well, not on the house floor. it's actually in those closed rooms, in those conference rooms in the house. in those conference rooms in the senate. that's where the deal is getting done. in those rooms with the door closed. we'll be back right after this. closed we'll be back right after this oh! are you using liberty mutual's coverage customizer tool? sorry? well, since you asked. it finds discounts and policy recommendations, so you only pay for what you need. limu, you're an animal! who's got the bird legs now? only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
(man 1) oh, this looks like we're in a screen saver. (man 2) yeah, but we need to go higher. (man 1) higher. (man 2) definitely higher. (man 1) we're like yodeling high. [yodeling] yo-de-le-he... (man 2) hey, no. uh-uh, don't do that. (man 1) we should go even higher! (man 2) yeah, let's do it. (both) woah! (man 2) i'm good. (man 1) me, too. (man 2) mm-hm. (vo) adventure has a new look. (man 1) let's go lower. (man 2) lower, that sounds good. (vo) discover more in the all-new subaru outback wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. re-entering data that employees could enter themselves? that's why i get up in the morning! i have a secret method for remembering all my hr passwords. my boss doesn't remember approving my time off.
let's just... find that email. the old way of doing business slows everyone down. with paycom, employees enter and manage their own hr data in one easy-to-use software. visit paycom.com for a free demo. the new sensodyne repair and protect with deep repair has the science to show that the toothpaste goes deep inside the exposed dentin to help repair sensitive teeth. my patients are able to have that quality of life back. i recommend sensodyne repair and protect with deep repair.
(music) ♪ i think to myself ♪ ♪ what a wonderful world ♪ i was at that time asked to go to -- i was told to ask to go to a budget resolution. i didn't think any of this was needed at this time. i thought an infrastructure bill was really what was needed. but i said fine this is a condition i will get to, and that was a 1.5. >> joining us now john orrinstein at the enterprise institute, eugene robinson, pulitzer prizewinning columnmist for "the washington post." and jonathan capehart is with us, the host of sunday show with jonathan capehart, on msnbc. and we begin with jonathan
capehart, who coined the phrase for us to describe the situation as the storm before the calm. jonathan, how stormy is it tonight? >> lawrence, when i said that to you on monday, it was -- you know, it was stormy. but right now it's like hurricane. we are deep in the middle of all of this. so, yeah, it's pretty stormy out there. but i want to tell you something, lawrence, tonight i served as the mc of the march on washington film festival and getting the john lewis lifetime legacy award was none other than house majority whip james clyburn who was there in attendance the entire dinner. notably the dinner ended at 9:00 p.m., which is when the speaker said if this is going to be a vote it won't happen before 9:00 p.m. i talked to whip clyburn and i
asked him what's going to happen? what's going to happen? and here's what he shared with me because i asked him do you have the votes, like is this going to happen tonight? and he said that if anyone can bridge the divide it's nancy pelosi. and if she's able to -- if she's able to do it, and he thinks she will, that she will go down as one of the greatest speakers of all-time. but the best part he said was she has said the vote will be tonight. it could be 9:00 p.m. or 4:00 a.m., but it will be tonight. >> okay. so -- >> he told me that around a couple hours ago. >> so eugene, the sun won't be shining during the vote. that's all we know. and i've got to say, i mean, nothing says stalemate more than, you know, jim clyburn is
out at an event until 9:00 p.m. because he knows we're in a stalemate. nothing is happening. i can just stay here at this event with jonathan capehart. >> yeah, no, the march on washington film festival is a great event. but at a moment like this for jim clyburn to be sort of lolling around with jonathan and a bunch of nice people at the film festival does say something about how fast things are moving up the hill right now. if something's going to happen, he's got to be there. you know, he counts the votes. >> norm, you've been watching it closely. what do you think of the state of play as of this hour? >> so one of the things we know, lawrence, you and i have both seen a lot of these negotiations. they're going to drag on and ultimately we're going to reach a resolution. jim clyburn could go there because the house at some point
isn't going to do anything. there's no way you're going to be negotiating with the so-called moderates and so-called progressives until we have a framework. that's when nancy pelosi's magic will come into play because she's going to have to convince enough progressives that a framework is enough to vote for this bill. now, i don't know it might come tonight. manchin has left the capitol. now, maybe a lot of other key figures are going to be going to the house vote to negotiate with him. i'm still a little nervous that we haven't heard anything from sinema who's a key player. but also keep in mind that when manchin says 1.5 is my bottom line or top line, however you want to frame it, a while back he said we should have $4 trillion in infrastructure spending. then he said i'm comfortable with $2 trillion. when he says these things it shouldn't be taken too seriously and we know there are a lot of
ways to reach an agreement, including shortening the number of years in which you have these programs in place. so the bottom line is it's not a terribly significant figure. i'm still nervous at the tax numbers and the substance of the tax figures are going to be ones where manchin and sinema will take different points of view. and that's what concerns me more about reaching another stalemate here. >> yeah, such a good point because the old saying which is true, nothing is agreed to until everything is agreed to. so manchin and sinema could agree on 1.5 or some numbers and then disagree on the internals to it, and then you've got a real problem. jonathan capehart, it may come down to the most progressive speaker of the house in history who represents one of the most progressive districts in the congress, san francisco, negotiating with the progressive caucus to get them to come along
with her on a road that's basically being laid out for them by joe manchin and senator sinema. >> yeah. so what you have with speaker pelosi is, yes, she is a quintessential, quote-unquote, san francisco liberal. however, she is the speaker of the house. and she takes her role as leader of the democrats in the house very seriously. and she also takes very seriously protecting her caucus. and when she decoupled the reconciliation bill from the bipartisan bill earlier in the week, that was part of her role as, okay, if this isn't going to happen, i've got to get something for my members so that when they start running for re-election in 2022, they have something to run on. but it is also very important for a lot of -- a lot of her members in her caucus that a lot
of the things that were promised in the reconciliation bill, that they be seen as there's movement, that there's movement on this so that those members of congress can go out to their constituents and say this is what i'm working -- this is what i'm working on and this is what we're moving towards. and so what i've seen with nancy pelosi as we've seen the two times now she's had the gavel as speaker of the house is that she is a progressive, but she is pragmatic. and she will do whatever it takes to get a deal and to protect her caucus. >> well, jonathan, as you've been speaking i've been getting the news that -- and this is nbc news obtaining this at this stage from house staff, that there will be no votes tonight. that the leadership has decided -- the speaker has decided no votes tonight. that means they'll be coming back in the morning. eugene robinson, that is
sometimes -- it's sometimes when you're outside the room, it's sometimes a good sign because it means, oh, the negotiations are continuing and sometimes a bad sign because the longer it takes the more difficult it gets. >> right. it could be a really good sign or a really bad sign and it's hard to tell. you know, what's different this time, i think, is that progressives in the house have numbers. and they have power. and they know they have power. and i don't think they're going to vote for the -- for the hard infrastructure bill without a framework for the human infrastructure bill. and so there's going to have to be a framework, and it's going to be have to be something not just that pelosi can sell to pramila jypal but she can sell
to the progressive caucus. and it's probably going to be north of 1.5. >> this is the speaker -- and i'll never forget hearing the speaker say this when i was in the closed rooms and others -- they always say don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. and that's where we will probably be on this tomorrow morning with the progressive caucus. >> and remember that the speaker also has gotten the moderates who are promised to vote on monday to stay very quiet about the fact they're not going to get a vote until at least friday. she's managing to work both sides of this very well. now the question is whether chuck schumer, luisa terrell and steve prushetty can get the senate to go along with something she can sell to both sides. >> well, that is an a-team of legislative negotiators you just named. we'll see what they can do. thank you very much for joining us during this breaking news. really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. >> we'll be right back. e it >> thanks, lawrence.
we'll be right back centrum multigummies aren't just great tasting... they're power-packed vitamins... that help unleash your energy. loaded with b vitamins... ...and other key essential nutrients... ...it's a tasty way to conquer your day. try centrum multi gummies. now with a new look. did you know that your clothes can actually attract pet hair? with bounce pet hair & lint guard, your clothes can repel pet hair. look how the shirt on the left attracts pet hair like a magnet! pet hair is no match for bounce. with bounce, you can love your pets, and lint roll less.
my retirement plan with voya keeps me moving forward. they guide me with achievable steps that give me confidence. this is my granddaughter...she's cute like her grandpa. voya doesn't just help me get to retirement... ...they're with me all the way through it. voya. be confident to and through retirement. what do we want for dinner? burger... i want a sugar cookie... wait... i want a bucket of chicken... i want... ♪♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win.
wondering what actually goes into your multivitamin? at new chapter, its' innovation, organic ingredients, and fermentation. fermentation? yes. formulated to help you body really truly absorb the natural goodness. new chapter. wellness, well done. (vo) this is more than glass and steel... and stone. it's awe. beauty. the measure of progress. it's where people meet people. where cultures and bonds are made between us. where we create things together.
now that donald trump and his supporters in the republican party all over the country have launched on a continuing assault on democracy, the news media faces a challenge of how to report that story without appearing to simply be supporting one political party against another. marc jacob says the news media has been, quote, unintentionally complicit in the rise of fascism that threatens our democracy. those are his words. and he includes himself among those who have been complicit. marc jacob in a page one stories for the chicago tribune and he describes the challenge facing news media in a series of tweets. mainstream media have long tried to treat republicans and democrats equally. some like me thought that was the way to be fair. in fact, it was the way to be lazy and not have to sort out the facts. just quote a democrat and quote a republican and you're done. when i edited political stories
i went so far as to count the quotes from republicans and democrats thinking an equal number would make us fairer. i didn't think i was helping either party. i thought i was helping the readers. i was wrong. the republicans have overwhelmed the media with corruption. they'vefatigue, prompting journalists to do something i call ethics norming. that's when something that would have been a huge scandal in the recent past is considered normal now. some media have turned off their outrage impulse and decided that corruption is normal. what's needed is new framing. not party-oriented but democracy-oriented, truth-oriented. the media shouldn't elevate liars in the interest of fairness. yes, media should be fair. to the readers. to the facts. but not to the two-party system. to our democracy." joining us now are mark jacob, former metro editor of the "chicago tribune."
and jelani cobb. he is co-editor of the new book "the matter of black lives." mark jacob, what brought you to the point of going public with your thinking about this challenge now? >> well, being out of the news business makes it easier. i must admit. i was just -- you know, i watch the news every day and you see all of the dishonesty and you wonder why it isn't called out so much. i was editing stories for four decades. and you know, four decades ago i think there was some similarity in honesty and in corruption with the democratic and republican parties. they were close enough to where, again, as i said in the tweet, if you quoted a republican, quoted a democrat, that added up to somewhat -- to fairness. but you've seen a dramatic problem in my opinion with the republican party going very dishonest, just lies, lies, lies, corruption, corruption,
corruption, and the democrats in my opinion becoming -- thinking about what they were 30, 40 years ago. and so you have this gigantic imbalance in how these parties are behaving. in fact, one of the parties isn't really behaving like a party. it's behaving more like a criminal enterprise in my opinion. so what does the news media do? the news media, some of them don't do anything. they follow the same patterns they followed for 30, 40 years. and that's what i was calling out. >> professor cobb, is there a way to write a new set of rules that will work, or is this a dynamic challenge where the approach to it has to stay agile and change as the challenge changes? >> i mean, i think there's both. i think there are some rules and some guidelines that you can follow. the most fundamental of which is to not is treat unequal things equally, as mark said. but the other part of it, the
part of it that is dynamic i think is to be mindful of just how quickly our situation has changed. over the course of the past several years. we're actually having january 6th recede into the background. you know, so many outrageous things have happened, and we're seeing that people on the right, people in the republican party are talking about january 6th as if the people who stormed the building were the ones who were being wronged. and so you know, over the course of time unless that is called out, unless that is -- people are adamant about what the facts of the situation actually were, you do wind up normalizing something that's exceedingly dangerous. and i would add betraying the mission that is entrusted to media by the constitution. >> mark, i've always found the challenge once the trump era began of trying to describe the extraordinary thing that
happened that day as extraordinary and trying to make it sound different from the one that happened yesterday and trying to maintain the correct kind of shock or outrage level at what we were observing. it's a very -- it's just a constant challenge. >> well, that's the thing. news is supposed to be something unusual that didn't happen yesterday or the day before. yet this corruption that we're seeing, i mean, really big corruption and just outrageous comments like calling the january 6th rioters tourists. that kind of just crazy behavior. happens day after day after day. and there's just so much outrage you can do and it's what i call scandal fatigue. and that's been a real problem, especially i think in tv media. and you see that. and it's a real challenge. the thing about like the january 6th select committee is -- you
know, it's been formed. and i was watching a tv news report and at the end of it the reporter i think in an attempt to be fair said, well, the republicans say that this committee is just a partisan witch hunt. all right. so that was the republican view. but in my opinion, that reporter didn't need to say that because we know it's not true. we just know. we know that the republicans attempted and succeeded in blocking a bipartisan commission that would have been bipartisan, would have been fair. and so they didn't want any kind of investigation. so for them to now kind of dump on the idea that a select committee's been formed to try to find out why people tried to commit an insurrection against our democracy becomes -- what i'm saying is that that level of fairness is not fairness. it's actually helping the people who are trying to destroy our democracy. >> we're going to have to leave that challenge there for
tonight. mark jacob and professor jelani cobb, thank you very much for joining us. we will be right back. ing us we will be right back. it made me feel like i was trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. i just couldn't find my way out of it. the lows of bipolar depression can take you to a dark place... ...and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. this is where i want to be. latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life threatening... ...or uncontrollable muscle movements, as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. now i'm back where i belong. ask your doctor about latuda
and pay as little as $0 for your first prescription. it's a wishlist on wheels. and pay as little as $0 a choice that requires no explanation. it's where safe and daring seamlessly intersect. it's understated, yet over-delivers. it is truly the mercedes-benz of sports sedans. lease the 2021 c 300 sedan for just $449 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. shingles? camera man: yeah, 1 out of 3 people get shingles in their lifetime. well that leaves 2 out of 3 people who don't. i don't know anybody who's had it. your uncle had shingles. you mean that nasty red rash? and donna next door had it for weeks. yeah, but there's nothing you can do about it. camera man: actually, shingles can be prevented. shingles can be whaaaat? camera man: prevented. you can get vaccinated. baby, call the doctor. camera man: hey! you can also get it from your pharmacist! 50 years or older?
get vaccinated for shingles now. welcome to allstate. where you can pay a little less and enjoy the ride a little more. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ now, get new lower auto rates with allstate. because better protection costs a whole lot less. you're in good hands with allstate. click or call for a lower auto rate today. ray loves vacations. but his diabetes never seemed to take one. everything felt like a 'no.' everything. but then ray went from no to know. with freestyle libre 14 day, now he knows his glucose levels when he needs to... and...when he wants to. so ray...can be ray. take the mystery out of your glucose levels, and lower your a1c. now you know. try it for free.
the speaker has announced there will be no votes in the house tonight and the house will go back into session at some point after 9:00 a.m. tomorrow. that is tonight's "last word." "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. well, good evening once again. day 254 of the biden administration. and while one crisis was averted tonight, when the president signed that bill to keep the government from crashing at midnight eastern time, we have indeed witnessing the midst of another crisis for the democrats, and it should be noted a crisis entirely of their own making. and it has to do with infrastructure. what became a running joke during the trump presidency has become a huge running drama for the