tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC June 30, 2021 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
the boss is back baby! the difference in try and triumph... is just a little umph! upsees, i need upsees. i'm sure this isn't something money can't solve? what the fudge? oh my gosh, oh my gosh, oh my gosh! today was the biggest news day we have had in a long time. just news coming of every stripe from every angle all day long and into the evening. tomorrow is likely to be a bigger news day than today was. make sure you get your beauty sleep tonight. make sure you eat your wheatties in the morning. i will see you again here
tomorrow evening. now it is time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. >> tomorrow afternoon we will of course be reading every word of these indictments, which should be made public some time in the mid-afternoon tomorrow. >> and you know me. i'll be acting them out on television. >> that's correct, yep. they will be up there on the screen. no one is going to miss anything important in those indictments. and it will be a big revelation about exactly where is this case legally as of tomorrow night. that's going to be a very, very important stage of this. and that question of what comes after this, as you were addressing with your guest earlier, is where there will be a lot of focus tomorrow night. but the question is what clues will we have? in those indictments will there be clues our experts can tell us point to something else in the future? >> and how serious the jeopardy is for the trump organization.
i mean, how -- the prospect that the president's business might face very serious charges, that those charges might be enough to effectively or directly drive the company out of business, i mean, that's an existentially challenging prospect for the former president. and that, of course, happens while potential superseding indictments are looming in this case, as you were just describing. there is also an i don't know going criminal investigation of which he is the center in georgia. i mean, like tomorrow is day one of a whole new saga in his life that i think is going to make him an unpredictable figure and i think is going to -- i think it's going to be something we all need to be very open minded about in terms of how it will change the news on a day-to-day basis. >> defendant trump officially begins tomorrow. it will be the company trump that becomes a criminal defendant, but, you know, that's what you get when you name the
company after yourself. so the question becomes any other uses of the word trump in future indictments, that will be the big question tomorrow night. >> exactly, exactly. thanks, lawrence. >> thank you, rachel. well, this is actually why i never thought he would run for president. what will happen at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow in manhattan is exactly why i thought he would never, ever run for president. based on the kind of businessman donald trump appeared to be, always appeared to be, described by marco rubio when he was running against donald trump as a con man, based on that con man character that he so clearly seemed to be, i believed donald trump's businesses and financial affairs could not survive the kind of scrutiny that a presidential campaign would have tracked. so based on no inside information, based solely on how thoroughly sleazy a human being
donald trump has always appeared to be, i thought he would never run for president because this would happen. and what will happen as a result of him launching a presidential campaign is now happening. nbc news reports the manhattan district attorney's office and the new york attorney general's office together have obtained indictments against the trump organization and its cfo allen weisselberg. the charges are expected to be unsealed in court tomorrow in manhattan. one trump representative told nbc news earlier today that the charges will be unsealed around 2:00 p.m. as nbc news reported last week, the charges center around the scheme to pay compensation to weisselberg and possibly others off the books by the trump organization. "the washington post" reports weisselberg is expected to surrender thursday morning at
the office of the manhattan district attorney. two people familiar with the plan said he is expected to be arraigned later in the day in front of the state court judge. the trump organization will also be arraigned, represented in court by one of its attorneys. this would not be happening if donald trump did not bring new scrutiny to his businesses by running for president. this is not a political prosecution. this is the kind of attention you get when you run for president and certainly the attention you get when you become president. this is the attention i always thought donald trump's financial affairs could not possibly endure. today the brookings institution released a report from four recognized legal experts in white collar crime including donald air which includes that
trump is at risk of eventual indictment even if he is not named in that initial filing. the authors wrote a 54-page analysis of the applicable new york state law that donald trump may have violated. we conclude based on the publically available information that trump is at serious risk of eventual criminal indictment in new york state. the report identifies five areas donald trump could be charged. one, allegations of falsifying business records, two alleged tax fraud, three, alleged influence fraud, scheme to defraud banks and, five, enterprise fraud allegations. donald trump went to the southern border today. it did not work. >> your response to the charges? can you respond to the charges?
>> today the lawyer for allen weisselberg's former daughter-in-law jennifer weisselberg told business insider, she is ready to testify against allen weisselberg at trial. we are very gratified to hear the reporting that the da's office is considering bringing criminal charges. we had been working with them and other investigators since late last year and have provided investigators with a mountain of evidence about not only fringe benefits but also other potential tax issues. we will discover in the indictments revealed tomorrow what other potential tax issues could be involved. and today in an interview with msnbc's hallie jackson, jennifer weisselberg said she believes there is legal jeopardy for allen weisselberg and for donald trump personally involving things that happened after donald trump became president. >> who do you think has leverage on him?
what do you think that leverage entails? >> i think it's donald. >> what is the leverage? >> it's with the presidential inaugural committee. >> can you tell us anything more about that? >> i mean, it seems like it bleeds into the trump organization, and there were some things going on after donald was already president where they were capitalizing on making money for themselves. and it looks like in depositions that allen weisselberg was involved along with the cfo in the white house to orchestrate that money. and one of the organizations that stole the money, let's say it was the trump org. >> do you believe that the former president himself holds any liability here? >> absolutely. absolutely. i believe he'll get the
indictment. >> against him? >> yes. yes. >> and leading us off tonight is adam kaufman, former executive assistant district attorney and former chief of the investigation division at the manhattan district attorney's office. he served as a prosecutor there for 18 years. and mr. kaufman, what will you be looking for in these indictments tomorrow? >> it's, you know, i feel like i'm here a day early, lawrence. i'm quite eager to see what the indictments reveal. sometimes prosecutors draft indictments that are sort of a bare bones recitation of just the minimal language to track the statute. so here you would have in all likelihood indictments that track the new york state tax statutes and set forth there was some type of tax fraud and that there was a certain amount of
money that the state was defrauded from. but other times prosecutors draft what we would call a speaking indictment where they give more information, where they sort of describe what a fraudulent scheme might have looked like. and it will be interesting in this case to see whether the district attorney has asked the grand jury to vote a bare bones indictment or speaking indictment that really says to the public what their case is about. >> and what you see that we now have confirmation that allen weisselberg will be indicted, not clear whether he will be the only person indicted tomorrow. what does that tell you about the focus of these indictments? >> so there is a few things that come to mind from those facts. and the first is that, look, it's been widely reported that prosecutors have been pressuring mr. weisselberg to cooperate
with the investigation. and thus far he has steadfastly refused to be a cooperative witness. and, so, one of the things that happens in an investigation like this is you're saying to the witness, look, if you don't cooperate, you are going to get indicted. you are going to get indicted. and it seems they reached a point where he wasn't going to cooperate. so the prosecutors are carrying through on their threat to lodge charges against him. the other thing that's really not clear at this point is whether mr. weisselberg is going to be charged for his role in receiving benefits that were undeclared or if he's also going to be charged for his role in possibly setting up those kinds of benefits for others where the trump organization was engaged in this type of tax fraud. you know, there is nothing so unusual about a tax fraud case involving off the books, off
the -- under the table money, you know, payroll tax scams are prosecuted all the time. and, so, mr. weisselberg in this sort of unusual circumstance of this case could be prosecuted both as someone who received a benefit but also as someone who set up the benefits and caused others to receive this type of under the table benefit type of income. >> so you raise such an important point about allen weisselberg being the person who would be arranging these benefits, both for himself and others. and donald trump, who doesn't leave written records of his communication with someone like allen weisselberg, in order to know for a jury's satisfaction that donald trump approved that or directed that, that's where you would have to get weisselberg's testimony saying donald trump told me to do this in the way that michael cohen testified in his own case that donald trump ordered him to
commit those campaign finance crimes. >> exactly right. you need someone who is in the room that said donald trump ordered this to happen. donald trump approved this. it was donald trump's decision. and without that evidence, you can't have criminal culpability. i think we also have to remember that, you know, in all likelihood, this is the first -- the first stage, the first round of what will be when the grand jury sits for another four, four and a half months, it's the prosecutors clearly are bringing a first round of charges against the trump organization, some corporate -- we don't know if it's the trump organization at the parent level or a subsidiary level. unknown until tomorrow. but they're bringing this first round of charges. but it's, from what i have been hearing, it sounds like this is not the end. this indictment is a first round and the investigation is
continuing and presumably will be looking at things like bank fraud, insurance fraud, falsification of books and records, perhaps the stormy daniels payment. there is a lot for them to still do. >> thank you very much for your guidance on this tonight. we really appreciate it. >> thank you, lawrence. nice to be here. joining us now is adam schiff of california. chairman schiff, as a former prosecutor yourself, you know that we don't know what we need to know until we can read those indictments. we now know we will be reading them some time after 2:00 p.m. tomorrow. what will you be looking for in these indictments? >> well, i will be looking for what kind of evidence is indicated in the indictments, how specific they are. but, look, i think this is not uncommon at all. it may be a very narrow indictment. it may be just the opening salvo
in terms of the prosecution. it's not uncommon to start out with a certain baseline charge and then you build a case more and you go back with a superseding indictment. but the particular charges against the cfo will be significant. what kind of exposure does he have? because that will determine how much incentive he has to cooperate. and from what employees of trump organization say, he was a very detailed person, just like donald trump. and in order to make a case, if there is going to be a case ultimately made against the former president, you are going to need someone who was close to the former president, had intimate conversations with him, knows where the bodies are buried, knows how the records are kept, knows where the documentation is. that certainly sounds like mr. weisselberg. so i will be particularly interested in the quality of the evidence and the nature of the charges against him. >> i want to read for you and the audience some new reporting
he must have thought that today was going to be the day. for days there have been indications that today would be the die the manhattan district attorney would reveal indicts against donald trump's company and allen weisselberg. his plan has been to create a diversion that competes with and he opens overwhelms the bad news story about donald trump. that is probably why donald trump went to the southern border today in an event carried live by exactly zero news networks. the fox propaganda channel which is no real sense a real network
covered the event for a total of seven minutes. so the most desperate for attention president in history failed in his mission today, and there will be absolutely no way he can distract attention from what the manhattan district attorney is going to do tomorrow at 2:00 p.m. joining us now zerlina maxwell and jonathan alter. and i signed up for peacock belatedly, i'm sorry to say just for you and have begun watching, so everyone should be doing that. zerlina, the master of diversionary tactics of publicity, donald trump, seems to have run out of tactics. he's not president anymore. he can't launch any missiles tomorrow. looks like there is no way he can change the subject tomorrow. >> well, thank god he can't launch any missiles, lawrence. i think we're all sleeping a little bit better in the
post-trump era. but in all seriousness, i think tomorrow it feels like the start of the accountability chapter. if i were to title this book, this would be "the end of the grift." everything about donald trump from the very beginning of his public persona has been fake. it has been fantasy. and there has not been a lot of real underneath the reality star sort of persona as this businessman going back to the very beginning. so i think finally we're coming around to a place where he can be held accountable. but we're only at this place, lawrence, because others have failed to hold him accountable in the past. and, so, i think it is a lesson for all of us that, you know, accountability needs to come a bit sooner because it can become very dangerous if you allow somebody who thinks laws are suggestions and you give them
the nuclear launch codes. >> jonathan, donald trump once again creates history. we have never seen anything like this in history, a former president involved in indictments like this. >> yes. he's breaking a new ground in this. what's interesting to me in the last couple of days is what it looks like his defense is going to be. you know, of course, he predictability is attacking the new york prosecutor as practically a marxist, you know, radical democrat. cy vance isn't even running for re-election, so the political motive here i don't think is going to carry through. the other thing he said is new york will be devastated, exclamation point, in his statement a couple of days ago in anticipation of this. you know, as if like nobody will ever want to do business in new york again because donald
trump's company was indicted. that doesn't really make a lot of sense. and i thought the phrase sounded a little familiar. new york will be devastated. and two years ago, various jurisdictions were raising property taxes on golf courses in new york state. and then president trump issued a statement saying, new york will be devastated if taxes go up on golf courses. so he's kind of flailing here a little bit in the way he's going to handle it. having said that, i think his critics need to keep their expectations in check because the fact that weisselberg hasn't flipped yet and he knew he was very likely going to be indicted suggests it might be pretty hard to flip in. i don't know anything nobody else knows, but, you know, we need to take a real wait and see
attitude here and not assume that true accountability has fully begun. >> yeah. we'll know at 3:00 tomorrow what the potential penalties allen weisselberg is actually facing. and that, zerlina, will tell us how much pressure he's feeling. he's old enough that, you know, a year would be a very difficult stretch to have to do behind bars for somebody like that. but this is the life. this is what happens in a life with donald trump, as michael cohen can tell everybody who still works there. >> that's the really confusing thing about it. and, so, i think there is a lot we still don't know. so jonathan is right to sort of have our expectations at sort of a measured level and that we will see the details tomorrow. but i think, to your point, allen weisselberg has been there for 50 years. and, so, he knows everything. so it's clear that if they had
evidence against him, which it appears they do, they would use that to get him to flip, but maybe he's like, look, i've been -- i'm safe. donald trump has my back. he's had it this whole time. i would like to introduce him to michael cohen and others who have gone to prison protecting donald trump and who now say that that was a mistake. and, so, i think, you know, he's -- i hope allen weisselberg is sleeping okay tonight. it is a good thing we don't have to wake up to a tweet. i thought about that and i was at least relieved about that. >> thank you very much for joining us on our final segment of speculation about what might be in the indictments that we're going to read tomorrow. thank you very much for joining us. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you, lawrence. coming up, congress is on the verge of doing something it has never done before, passing two budget reconciliation bills in the same year.
the chairman who has to get that done, the chairman of the house budget committee will join us next. committee will join us next f imagining the worst... ...especially when your easily distracted teenager has the car. at subaru, we're taking on distracted driving... ...with sensors that alert you when your eyes are off the road. the subaru forester. the safest forester ever. with relapsing forms of ms... there's a lot to deal with. not just unpredictable relapses. all these other things too. it can all add up.
kesimpta is a once-monthly at-home injection... that may help you put these rms challenges in their place. kesimpta was proven superior at reducing the rate of relapses, active lesions, and slowing disability progression vs aubagio. don't take kesimpta if you have hepatitis b, and tell your doctor if you have had it, as it could come back. kesimpta can cause serious side effects, including infections. while no cases of pml were reported in rms clinical trials, it could happen. tell your doctor if you had or plan to have vaccines, or if you are or plan to become pregnant. kesimpta may cause a decrease in some types of antibodies. the most common side effects are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and injection reactions. ready for an at-home treatment with dramatic results? it's time to ask your doctor about kesimpta. (customer) movie night. ready for an at-home treatment with dramatic results? (burke) should have been watching the stove instead. (customer) tell me something i don't know. (burke) with your farmers policy perk, guaranteed replacement cost, your home can be rebuilt, regardless of your limits. (customer) that's really something.
(burke) get a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ re-entering data that employees could enter themselves? that's why i get up in the morning! i have a secret method for remembering all my hr passwords. my boss doesn't remember approving my time off. let's just... find that email. the old way of doing business slows everyone down. with paycom, employees enter and manage their own hr data in one easy-to-use software. visit paycom.com for a free demo. we have to be able to repair the enamel on a daily basis. with pronamel repair toothpaste, we can help actively repair enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative.
our next guest has already made history in the house of representatives this year, and he is going to make history again. it is a bit of history that he shares with bernie sanders. the chair of the house budget committee. senator sanders is the chair of the senate committee. they passed the single biggest budget resolution in history, which became the legislative frame work for president biden's covid relief bill. and now they are going to do it again. they're going to pass another budget resolution which will be bigger than the first budget resolution that they passed this year. and, so, to add to the historic nature of the second budget resolution, it will be the first time in history that the house
and senate chairs of the budget committees will have passed more than one budget resolution in the same year. passing a budget resolution is the single most complex and difficult thing a chair of a budget committee has to do. other committees go to work on the specific legislative changes that are only outlined in the budget resolution. it normally takes a few months for the committees to finish that work, which they then send directly to the senate and house floors to be passed together in what is then called a budget reconciliation bill. the reconciliation bill in bookkeeping terms reconciles the numbers that were outlined in the budget resolution with real and specific legislative changes in taxes and spending that add up to those same numbers. today, speaker nancy pelosi said once again that she expects the partisan bill to first be passed
in the senate -- the bipartisan bill to first be passed to the senate, sent to the house where she will hold it until the budget resolution is ready to pass the house. >> when i said last week, and i reiterate now is that in the house of representatives that particular version as it is is something that we would take up once we see what the budget par rammers are of the budget that the senate will pass. >> the challenge faing them is that they have to write a budget resolution that will get almost all of the democratic votes in the house and has to get all of the democratic votes in the senate. and one of those democrat votes in the senate doesn't sound ready yet to give president biden everything he's asking for
in that bill. >> if they think in reconciliation i'm going to throw caution to the wind and go to $5 or $6 trillion when we can only afford one, one-and-a-half or maybe two, then i can't be there. >> joining us now is democratic congressman john yarmouth of kentucky. he is the chair of the budget committee, the history making chair of the budget committee. >> thank you, lawrence. >> you have that difficult position in the house. you could write a bill in the house, a budget resolution in the house that could easily pass the house. but you know that you have to have something identical to what the senate passes. and you just heard joe manchin say what he believes at this stage he's not willing to do. he's not willing to go above maybe $2 trillion, maybe $3 trillion. the president wants to go much higher than that. what do you say to senator
manchin? i say to him that by the way, senator manchin, there are 221 of us in the same position in the house and another 49 in the senate who are just like you. every one of us basically has the leverage to kill or succeed in passing a resolution. and, so, the attention that's paid to him, i understand. but every one of us is in the same position. and that makes, you know -- on an every day basis, getting democrats together is herding cats, and this is herding all the cats and making sure that everyone knows that we don't have right now each of us does not have the normal independence that we would have. we have to -- we have to basically say there is an ultimate goal. we all support the goal. we have to figure out how to get there. and that's -- you know, nancy
pelosi always says unity is our strength. i think in this case, unity is our only chance. >> let's try to take us through the timetable here for the audience so they know what to expect. it is not going to happen tomorrow. it seems to me what i'm hearing from the speaker is that she expects understandably the senate to pass their bipartisan agreement on infrastructure first. that bill when it passes the senate immediately gets sent to the house. speaker pelosi takes that bill says thank you, puts it over here and then waits for the other action to be done on what will probably be the democrats' only reconciliation version of the bill. and it sounds like chuck schumer is saying he expects your budget resolutions to be ready to be passed before the august recess, so by the end of july. does that sound right to you? >> that's what we're trying to accomplish because then, you
know, the legislation that actually implements, as you described so well in your intro, the legislation that actually accomplishes what we're trying to do through reconciliation will be drafted by the various committees of jurisdiction during the august recess and then we could take them up in the fall. >> then we could come back in september, early october and you would have that so-called early reconciliation bill, which would be the final piece of it that eventually gets passed at that point through the senate in the house. and you could theoretically pass at that point if the speaker is holding the bipartisan senate bill, theoretically you could pass them roughly on the same day. >> we could. but that doesn't matter. i mean, yeah, obviously the speaker is strategizing that because a lot of people say, well, there is a risk that we would pass a bipartisan bill and
then lose some votes on what ends up being probably a more expensive what we called the care economy provisions, child care, job training, senior care, early childhood education and some of the climate change legislation that is so important to many of our members. so that's the linkage. that's the reason for the linkage. but, you know, it's not going to be easy. i met with the progressive caucus today. i met with the blue dogs today. remember, what we're trying to do in the reconciliation process is so that we don't have a filibuster in the senate, we don't require 60 votes. so every one of the 50 votes in the senate is necessary. we can only lose four right now. it will be three. soon be three in the house. essentially every vote is critical. that's -- it's quite a task that we're facing.
>> i want to talk to you about one very important infrastructure project, which is the brent spens bridge, which of course as you know, the audience doesn't know, connects your state of kentucky across the ohio river with ohio. hugely important bridge. and it's an important bridge to senator mcconnell, who is working as hard as he can to kill both versions of this infrastructure bill. are we really going to be -- is kentucky really going to be watching mitch mcconnell take credit for improvements in a bridge after he fought against the legislation that got it done? >> i hope we get it done. but no doubt that mitch who i have known for many years will take credit whenever he can. but one of the things that's fascinating in the american jobs plan, the president's proposal, there is a $25 billion set aside that is designed to -- for the
ten most critical regional infrastructure projects. one of those, i think it usually ranks about second on the list, is this bridge. so this is a real opportunity for kentucky and not just kentucky and ohio but basically people all through the midwest to do something that is absolutely essential. because the bridge is probably not very far along than the bridge that we saw in memphis, tennessee. i mean, it is definitely in need of replacement. it's probably about a $2 billion project. we could fund it out of this set aside fund in the plan, which senator mcconnell will adamantly oppose. house budget chair, john yarmuth, thank you for joining us tonight. i know no president in history
has asked more than a house budget committee chair. he's lucky to have you. i know you have the skill to do it, but you will need some luck to do it. thank you, mr. chairman. >> thanks, lawrence. coming up, how many republicans support passing a democrats only reconciliation bill? this part of joe biden's infrastructure package? zero members of congress support it. but 36% of republican voters support it. the political power of the biden infrastructure plan is next. n i.
welcome to allstate. here, if you already pay for car insurance, you can take your home along for the ride. allstate. better protection costs a whole lot less. click or call to bundle today. i've never slept like this before. we gave new zzzquil pure zzzs restorative herbal sleep better protection costs a whole lot less. to people who were tired of being tired. what is even in this? clinically-studied plant based ingredients passion flower, valerian root, and hops. new zzzquil pure zzzs restorative herbal sleep.
life... doesn't stop for diabetes. be ready for every moment, with glucerna. it's the number one doctor recommended brand that is scientifically designed to help manage your blood sugar. live every moment. glucerna. open talenti and raise the jar. to gelato made from scratch. raise the jar to all five layers. raise the jar to the best gelato... you've ever tasted. talenti. raise the jar.
hi, i'm debra. i'm from colorado. you've ever tasted. i've been married to my high school sweetheart for 35 years. i'm a mother of four-- always busy. i was starting to feel a little foggy. just didn't feel like things were as sharp as i knew they once were. i heard about prevagen and then i started taking it about two years now. started noticing things a little sharper, a little clearer. i feel like it's kept me on my game. i'm able to remember things. i'd say give it a try. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. president biden doesn't yet have every senate democrat agreeing to everything he wants in the infrastructure bills, but the public agrees with the president, according to a new poll. 62% of likely voters support passing the bipartisan senate bill, which is based on the president's american jobs plan and the democrats only
reconciliation bill, which is based on the president's american families plan, compared to only 31% who oppose that. passing both bills has the support of 86% of democrats, 59% of independents and even 36% of republicans. joining us now is steven dennis, senator reporter for bloomberg news and jonathan alter is back with us. steven, those 36% of republicans out there who support both of these infrastructure bills do not seem to be very well represented in the united states senate. >> no, they don't. i mean, one thing that the democrats are really doing differently from 12 years ago is they're focussing a lot more on sugar. 12 years ago the democrats. >> reporter: nearly in charge of all three, you know, the house, the senate and the white house and they were pursuing very controversial republicans could easily call it the tax increase
on turning on the lights. this time around the democrats are talking about sugar. they're talking about tax cuts for evs. they're talking about upgrading the grid, roads and bridges, things that are a lot easier to sell and they're standing and they are standing faction on the biden pledge of not raising taxes directly on anybody making less than $400,000 a year. if you hear that, you know, i'm going to get roads and bridges and child care down the line, and things that poll very well, i'm not surprised you're seeing polling and not surprised you're seeing republicans dig in. the agenda is to cut tax rates, not raise them. those their allies, the business
community, et cetera. >> and, jonathan, i think the president believes the road to democratic success in the next congressional campaign and the presidential campaign, is paved, as they say, with this infrastructure legislation. >> he has to put points on the board. this is the most popular way to indict. and i think eat's on-track. i'm not sangin about it. the complexities, you can overcome them. we saw with john yarmouth, these are skillful, legislative operators. they don't have to deal with republicans on the reconciliation package. and you didn't see republicans headed for the exits on the infrastructure when they got mad about the process and mad at biden in his press conference because they know the constituents want this.
and it's hard to vote against something that people want. >> and the democrats are not running up to the microphones to say, here's my line and you can't cross this line. it's common to have three or four lines to have people or democrats in the house. maybe two lines in being drawn by democrats in the senate, saying i will not vote for it if "x." when you're not hearing that rhetoric, that's when, for the time being, it's going smoothly. i wouldn't call it smooth sailing. the bipartisan bill is being fleshed out. at any minute mitch mcconnell
can pull the rug out. he has a cbo score he can complain about and other things on process. just the first step is not guaranteed. that's the easy part, the budget resolution. it doesn't have the details in it. and the final reconciliation bill. if you think about it, democrats have 10, 12k years of pent-up things that much mcconnell has successfully blocked. every group out there that has something they want to do, on immigration, on the environment, on health care, on pre-k, all of these things, this is your one shot. the thing is, nobody really knows, including joe manchin, how much he will go through the
key hole. this could extend three, four months, before they get the final package through. >> that's the important scheduling thing we established with chairman yarmouth tonight. this is not happening before the august recess. there's so much to do. jonathan alter, steven dennis, thank you for being with us. >> thanks. we'll be right back. wright brothers? more like, yeah right, brothers! get outta here! it's not crazy. it's a scramble. just crack an egg. [swords clashing] - had enough? - no... arthritis. here. new aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme. liberty mutual customizes car insurance donso you only pay foroon. what you need. how much money can liberty mutual save you? one! two! three! four! five! 72,807!
i don't just play someone brainy on tv - i'm an actual neuroscientist. and i love the science behind neuriva plus. unlike ordinary memory supplements, neuriva plus fuels six key indicators of brain performance. more brain performance? yes, please! neuriva. think bigger. (vo) singing, or speaking. reason, or fun.
democrat senator kyrsten sinena wrot -- >> it has not been true in the 21st century. and he used to know that. he used to know that the senate rules could be used for evil. that was her word. evil, 11 years ago. in 2010, in the second year of the obama presidency, when she was a 33-year-old member of the
state legislature in arizona, she accurately described how dysfunctional the senate had become because of what she called the false pressure to get to 60 votes. >> the senate, we no longer have 60 votes. some would argue that we never had 60. one of those was joseph lieberman. whatever. and nelson, too. now, i think it's the president. on wednesday, none of this pressure, the false pressure to get to 60. what that means is that, the democrats can stop kowtowing to joe lieberman and seek other avenues to health reform. it's likely a process called reconciliation. and you may recall before the
democrats took the senate in 2008, that the republicans controlled the senate for quite some time, since around 1994. they never had 60 votes and they managed to do really bad things during that time. so, the reconciliation process is still quite available and we will use it for good, rather than for evil. >> arizona state representative sinema gets tonight's last word. maybe senator sinema might listen to her. the 11th hour with brian williams starts right now. >> and good evening once again. day 162 of the biden administration. and nbc news reporting tonight the manhattan d.a.'s office and the new york attorney general's office together have obtained indictments against the trump organization and its long-time cfo allen weisselberg. as expected, the