Skip to main content

tv   Hannity  FOX News  July 27, 2021 11:00pm-12:00am PDT

11:00 pm
also, a brand-new show of tucker carlson originals out on thursday, we think it's worth watching. you can find it on fox nation on that note we head over to our on sean hannity standing by to take over the 19 program. >> sean: hello tucker and thank you. tonight the cdc's credibility is in the toilet and now circling the drain with the american people and what is now yet another policy reversal. the cdc is now recommending that unvaccinated and vaccinated americans wear masks indefinitely and they are also demanding that children of all ages wear masks in schools indefinitely. and biden meanwhile is floating vaccine mandates and a new lockdowns for federal employees. it will explain all this coming
11:01 pm
up. now you see they don't seem as site interested in the sciencep. much anymore, we will explain this and also the charade on capitol hill. literally it is one mission and one mission only. it's a if we can impeach in smear and slander and donald trump one more time and of course the g.o.p. one more time on national television. to that end, the likes of adam schiff the congenital liar and a liz cheney which is now hard at work and all of this points to a biased, one-sided investigation with the predetermined outcome. congressman jim jordan and congressman jim banks who were barred from the committee and to
11:02 pm
be clear, very clear, they always condemned the unlawful riot when that happened on january 6th. what happened on that day can never ever happen again.hy why? that's a people's? house. the institutions and every lawmaker, doesn't matter what your politics are, they must be protected. they never should be acceptable ever, not of the capital and not anywhere. it has rocked almost every major american city and even the white house was besieged. i got so bad there that the secret service was forced to evacuate the president and his family. next are the historic st. john's church, that was lit on fire. hundreds of other buildings throughout the country were being targeted by these radical arsonists. a federal courthouse in portland was vandalized and lit on fire on multiple occasions, a police precinct in minneapolis, that was burned to the ground in case
11:03 pm
you forgot. nearly 100 police cars were torched in over 2,000 plus police officers were injured. rioters pelting bricks and rocks and frozen water bottles and molotov cocktails. 25 americans were killed during these riots last summer. david doran was murdered by looters in st. louis while working security at a local store. remember teenager lawrence lorenzo jr.? just chop it, summer of love,pa spaghetti potluck dinners done right a police precinct that the city surrendered and they appeared on the show. joe biden made no mention of last summer's 574 violent riots
11:04 pm
and not only did she not condemn them but she was busy permitting a bail fund to help rioters get out of jail quicker. other democrats either said nothing or downplayed that violence and in some cases even actively supporting the violence. where is this commission as you watchhi this? >> was this done by the city? >> that is the myth between spread only in washington, d.c. >> you are not going to stop before election day in november and they are not going to stop after election day and that should be, everyone should take note of that on both levels. >> it is not generally speaking
11:05 pm
unruly, but fires have been started. >> there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives and unfortunately there's plenty to go around. >> they are not going to stop, not going toop let up and needls to say there was no congressional commission on last summer's 574 officially declared riots all around the country's and the democrats were almost completely silent or even complicit and supportive. dozens were killed, thousands were injured, hundreds of businesses were burned to the ground. widespread looting and widespread vandalism but democrats didn't care one bit. it's not politically expedient for them so it's not a priority for them. if you are injured or you lost a loved one or you watched your business get looted or burned to the ground you are not a priority, no need for a commission and a nancy pelosi were her democratic colleagues
11:06 pm
in congress for this? this is the house in washington in the swamp, their house is much more important than your house, or your business or youat are relative as a police officer or you that are working in police work. still, january 6th committee, it's now raising several important questions like, for example, where were the reinforcements? why on six separate occasions, six separate requests from the capitol, police chief for additional security, why were they ignored it, why were they soep unprepared for these massie riots? they knew there was going to be a match on the capital, this was a huge day at the capitol. they knew in advance, they knew the night before and everyone knew that thousands of demonstrators were descending on washington. they knew that mike pence was attending the capitol inth front of a joint session of congress so, what happened? who is ultimately in charge of
11:07 pm
capital security in that plan and what role is a commission going to have looking into this? what should her role have been and by the way those that do trespass and riot at the capital, they are now being held accountable by the fbi. on the other hand, 574 riots last summer, we are now hearing from prosecutors even though we have overwhelming incontrovertible evidence, video evidence of the crimes they are committing in the vast majority of those that rioted last summew that we could identify, we are now told they will not be charged at all. is that a dual system of justice? where is the commission on all the riots, all 574 from last summer? why no commission? the democrats silence at the time and now is deafening. violence in these major cities is on the rise this weekend alone. 12 were murdered and 70 plus shot in chicago and sadly, do
11:08 pm
you know the names of anybody? that's just a typical weekend in the windy city. we've been scrolling these names since joe biden was vice president and obama was president and this was his hometown. democrats don't seem to care, they don't seem to care about the names of the, what, 140 law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty so far thise year and apparently it's not politically advantageous for them t so they just ignore it. it's the same massive double standard that that we always see on the left. they will say, we can't have russia collusion, prussia, russia, thomas hunter biden is taking millions from a russian oligarch and the former first lady ofnd moscow, they didn't seem to care about russia collusion, when hillary got the dirty russian misinformation dossier that was used to than spy on a presidential candidate, they staged an impeachment over a fake ukrainian quid pro quo that never happened and ignored
11:09 pm
the real quid pro quo which would be joe biden's quid pro quo that he bragged aboute on tape, demanding leveraging of a billion taxpayer dollars, making millions for nothing. and that will now weaponized the doj. they are ignoring delaware's restricted voting laws, but going after georgia a instead. they use the filibuster over two more times over donald trump's presidency but now with biden they call the filibuster racist. and there are illegal immigrants in this country, just processing them.
11:10 pm
we condemn violent riots and what happened on generally six, what happened last summer. whenever it happens it must be condemned by people of goodwill, it shouldn't be political. we spoke out against the brutal murder of george floyd and of course o david doran and horace lorenzo anderson jr.. unfortunately democrats, their friends in the media and big tech media mob, they don't seem to care about truth, fairness, logic, science, justice. in general, that's all that seems to matter. here is the author of the "do what you said you would do." it was supposed to be on the january 6th committee but is not any longer along with a new york congresswoman elyse. elise stefanik. they took you off this
11:11 pm
assignment to replace you with, let's see. they both hate donald trump and that will come to the predetermined collision that nancy pelosi wants. >> that's all political and a great monologue. you've been consistent last summer and on january 6th, republicans have done the same thing but because democrats haven't and as you pointed out, they actually normalize anarchy and said it was okay for rioters itand looters to attack the police, defund the police and because of all that they are afraid, they are afraid to ask thee fundamental question which is, why wasn't there a proper security posture that day? my hunch is because if you do all that to police and take the positions they did last summer it's kind of hard to say, we need protection on january 6th for us politicians. we didn't have the proper security posture that day and that's the fundamental question.
11:12 pm
that's why jim banks and myself are not on the committee because we have been consistent and they haven't and they couldn't have the right security position on that important day. >> sean: we discovered video that this was preplanned. how do we know it was preplanned? because people were placing items in certain locations and now we have that evidence. we now know that the police chief, the capitol police chief requested and was denied on six separate occasions the reinforcements and the guard that he was asking for and we know from our mutual friend mark meadows that the white house had suggested that they have reinforcements and the guard brought up even before the event happened >> according to press reports, it looked like according to press reports on generally six she hesitated before she called up the national guard. now, why was that? that's a fundamental question
11:13 pm
that we need answered andhe everything else is on the table inhe said but that's the one question that most need to be answered that i don't think they are going to address. >> let me ask you congresswoman stefanik. i know liz cheney took a shot at you today and now she's clearly sided with people and the ones that said that bush and cheney lied to" suggesting he was corrupt with his previous work with halliburton. you said that the american people deserve to know the truth, that nancy pelosi bears responsibility and there is a specific reason, isn't there, that you make the statement? can you explain it to people? >> absolutely. we know as early as december there was information and intelligence that there were a prevent potential security threats and that the capital is not going to be secure on
11:14 pm
january 6. nancy pelosi refused to act. we also know on january 6th nancy pelosi was passed a note by the sergeant at arms, her political appointee, asking for her permission to bring in the national guard. she has stated that jim was exactly right in these important questions deserve to be answered, the american people deserve to know what the speaker's office knew and when and why the capital wasn't secured. she is a policy republican, a policy upon at this point and she does not represent the republican conference or republican voters or the american people. republicans are focused on the fact, they are not focused on protecting the speaker of the house who is a lame duck speaker. we want truth and accountability and want to make sure the u.s. capital is secure at the people's house. >> where is the commission by the way on all the writing that took place last summer? where is that commission?
11:15 pm
have you guys heard of any movement to get that commission started, i haven't. >> we need a broad scope commission is focused on political violence and with the pelosi sham commission is focused on is only january 6th, trying to shame 70 million americans who were standing up for constitution intentional integrity issues. we need to look at the political violence that occurred all this past year and going to look at the targeting of steve scalise and republicans on the baseball field. we need to look at the tragic loss of the u.s. capitol police officer on good friday. nancy pelosi and the democrats do not want to investigate that, i want to make this political and partisan. >> last word, jim jordan? >> they can't talk about the 12 murders as you brought up in the normal lag in chicago, they can't talk about the crisis in the border and certainly can't talk abouty inflation. so that's just who the democrats
11:16 pm
are. >> sean: thank you all for being with us, it's a predetermined outcome, trust me. joining us with reaction is a host "unfiltered" dan bonds you know right on fox news center. geraldo, if they want commission, i would like questions answered. we now have videotape showingpe that people repositioned weapons around washington, d.c., evidence that this had been planned by some people. will they get that question answered? can they answer the question, being a why was the police chief, the capitol police chief denied six times when he asked for assistance both before the stephen biegun and as it was happening? can they explain why they didn't anticipate potential problems and what role would nancy pelosi, the sergeant-at-arms have been preparing for such moments?
11:17 pm
>> first of all let me say how nice it is to be back with you and my friend dan, i'm sure we will have a very good discussion etonight. i also can't hesitate to say with all due respect, and i love you, gaslighting and changing the subject. the subject is generally six then what happened to the united states capitol and why it happened. those two things, the fact that the capital was targeted in the prime instigator, the one who unleashed the mob was the president of the united states? for god's sakes, sean. >> sean: we've been friends a long time. wait a minute, you just told man gaslighting something? >> no no. the president said that day -- many of you -- let me quote him.
11:18 pm
he said many of you will now peacefully and patriotically marched to the capital so your voices will be heard. now you say i'm changing the subject, but i will say a riot is a riot and if it's wrong on january 6th as i believe it is, then the 574 riots that took place the democrats were silent about, why isn't there a commission on that. we lost 25 people, thousands of cops were injured. police stations burned to the ground, businesses looted and burned to the ground and we've barely heard peep out of them. i think a riot is a riot, geraldo. they are comparable to me. >> you and i stood shoulder to shoulder through that entire period of condemning the rioters and condemning the looting or ignoring it. but the president bears
11:19 pm
responsibility for wednesday's attack on congress by mob rioters and he should have immediately denounced the raw comic mob when he saw what was unfolding. that was kevin mccarthy on january 13th. >> sean: i understand your position. but he tried to use fear and violence to stop which they did not like. >> sean: are riots always wrong? how come i'm consistent and i will condemn riots in whatever form they take and how come the democrats were silent? and assisting the bail money raising. i supported president trump until the period following the election and leading up to the despicable events of january 6th. on january 6th, the american
11:20 pm
people, the world and the history and apology. >> sean: we need answers on all of it. >> geraldo is wrong on both fronts, profoundly wrong. i have his transcript and what he said, we go march to the capital peacefully and patriotically and it's quite confusing. i don't know if we need a thesaurus or dictionary, i don't get why you are just making that up. the narrative goes back and forth between, this is a planned insurrection to then, trump incited an insurrection and despite the fact that trump said go march peacefully and patriotically. i don't know why you are making thatat w up. and i was a friend to president trump but with friends like you, who needs enemies? this comment you made it, this is about january 6th.i now i have been like sean and everyone else, let me say it again for the record, any
11:21 pm
violence like law enforcement, i can absolutely and unequivocally condemning, no excuses. but democrats don't seem remotely interested in the insurrection that happens in the white house during the blm riots when my secret service friends were texting me saying you have no idea about it's getting here. you seriously disagree -- let me just finish, just let me finish my point. i'm just suggesting to you that these things matter, too. sean's point is not to diminish the violence on the sixth but his point is to say if we are going to discuss political violence is a problem in this country, as a principle of j issue, the let's discuss it all. not just the ones that you think benefit you politically. i'm done. >> but how do you explain kevin mccarthy days after saying the president bears responsibility for wednesday's attack onr congress by mob rioters?
11:22 pm
that's kevin mccarthy saying that, that's not me. the mob was fed lies and mitch mcconnell set the majority lead the united states senate at a time. these were leading republicans that chickened out. the republican party wrapped itself around president trump. >> but geraldo, you didn't get to my point? do you deflected to kevin mccarthy and mitch mcconnell without addressing the core of the issue. how does telling people to march peacefully and patriotically, how is that inciting a riot? you understand that makes no all? at >> i believe in the bottom of my heart that the depths of my sincerity, that the president knew what was going to happen. i believe the president >> sean: you are saying the
11:23 pm
president was saying peacefullyd and patriotically, so your voices will be heard. you're just going to ignore that and say i don't believe them? that's yourr argument? >> did you see what happened, did you see who was in that crowd? >> i didn't ask you, peacefully and patriotically, which part of that is confusing? because it doesn't make sense. >> shawna, you have kevin mccarthy on the show and a regular basis. the one that is confusing toio you. >> this was a shame. >> this will live in history. what happened on generally six? >> i absolutely believe -- i agree with that 100% and the fact that the liberalsls are allowing all of these minorities
11:24 pm
in this ghetto silver were with violence, every monday i announce the body count in chicago, philadelphia and new york. >> sean: i've got to go, guys. after the break, the cdc's foot flat at benguet again and re-imposing mask guidance and now, joe wants, yes, mandates on vaccines. our medical team is next in the great one, mark levine.
11:25 pm
11:26 pm
11:27 pm
[swords clashing] - had enough? - no... arthritis. here. new aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme.
11:28 pm
♪ ♪ >> sean: all right, now they completely discredited by it and cdc is retreating yet again tonight, more mixed messages because just two months after joe biden called it a "great day for america" when the cdc eased their mask guidance in may, the
11:29 pm
cdc is now re-imposing that mask may date even for vaccinated americans in areas with "substantial and high transmission." they also my kids messed up in every school. the cdc director said that vaccinated americans can transmit the virus after theyy were saying just the opposite just a couple of months ago. so i will ask it again, why more flips and flops and flailing and ups and downs? why all of the misdirection? why all of the inconsistencies? these ever-changing standards have created great uncertainty. they are creating confusion among the american people but there ever-changing standards and also they talk a lot about for example vaccine hesitancy. they like to blame conservatives for that when in fact they are the ones responsible. remember in fact biden quoted
11:30 pm
may 13, "the rule is simple, wear a mask or get vaccinated. and frankly i will ask a very blunt question, why is the so-called expert so awful at their jobs and why did they get everything seemingly wrong on every aspect of this, changing the message, why did they keep changing the standards? we'll all tell us one thing and it always becomes something else. all you have done here is create confusion and mess it up. your projections. one mask, two masks, no mask indoors, now mess everywhere. his team biden so concerned about transmission? if they are, then why at our southern border, why is it wide open? why isn't every illegal immigrant that they are just processing into the country as they don't enforce the laws, why are they being checked for the vaccination status and why aren't they all being tested?
11:31 pm
because they are b not. why is there one set of laws for law-abiding citizens and another for illegal immigrants that they are letting in by not enforcing laws that are border? and once biden signals, it's okay for corporations andit schools and universities to mandate vaccination, i told you it's now a matter of time and it would spread. a new report is saying, "the washington post" would require vaccination by mid-september and just like clockwork we are also learning that biden is expected to require all federal employees to get vaccinated against covid-19 or undergo regular testing. here is what he said earlier today which is different than what he was saying just weeks and months ago. >> will you require all federal employees to get vaccinated? >> that's under consideration rightte now. if you are not vaccinated you are not in support of that.
11:32 pm
the >> sean: that's what i've said to come up millions of americans deserve the choice, doing their own research, their current medical condition that dr. joe and dr. media mob people know nothing about. you're with your action,it fox news medical contributor dr. nicole safire, and it dr. marty may carry with us. dr. nicole, i want to start with, because we are getting these mixed messages on all fronts. the cdc is revising their guidance yet again, number one. now they started with universities and businesses and now it looks like the federal government is going to require vaccinations. does that include people that already had a covid or does that include people with rare medical conditions that this vaccine might not be right for them? does not take away freedom of americans for whatever reason, their doctor, the decision, the
11:33 pm
research tells them that they don't trust the science yet, do we still have freedom in the country? >> sean, that's a lot to unpack and a very short segment but first of all but stuck with the fact that the cdc updated their guidance today and the reason they did that is because the now prevalent delta variance. the motivation behind the updates as it pertains to the delta variant, as that's a goodi idea. unfortunately the messaging was completely lost on their messaging should've been been insisting that adults increase the vaccination rates to help lower the transmission and unfortunately that got muddied into the fact that they are think vaccinated individuals now if you are in high transmission areas have to go back to wearing masks. they did this because they are stating some preprint data showing that of those very rareg breakthrough cases of people that have been vaccinated, the delta fire variant is causing such a high viral load in them that it's possible they can transmit to someone else.
11:34 pm
but here's the problem. we have lots of possibilities and very poor data collection so we don't actually have a lot of facts. with the message should have been was encouraging people to go out and get vaccinated. if you are not vaccinated especially if you are vulnerable you should consider wearing a high-grade medical mask, but that unfortunately got a little muddied. when it comes to vaccine mandates, it still astonishes me that the cdc has notst acknowledged the robust protection that comes following natural immunity. we have more and more data that show is that natural immunity from prior infection likely will be just as long-lasting if not more than the vaccine-inducedac immunity so i think a first step forward is to acknowledge those who have already recovered from covid-19 to add them to the production pool just like francis doing and many other countries are doing but the united states isn't therere yet. i'm also concerned with vaccine mandates outside of health care scenarios, especially under the emergency use authorization.
11:35 pm
i think they need to really push forward and get that full fda approval and then you may see more of the hesitant going out and getting vaccinated. >> sean: dr. mike carey, i noticed that even the cleveland clinic said that if you've already had covid, you don't have to get the vaccination. will theye, too, or will they follow the science? the confusion in the ever-changing messages, it's created a lot of anger and confusion for the american people. why can't they get this straight? >> you know, they chose a certain agenda to get every human being vaccinated and what they ended up doing was ignoring natural immunity. and i agree with dr. safire. if you look at the date on natural immunity, not only is it going strong a year and a half but there is no signs of letting up. so the out of israel recently showed that it may be better
11:36 pm
than vaccinated immunity, we don't know. but for now those who have natural immunity have a very reasonable proposition to not get the vaccine based on that natural immunity. if the government wants to get more people vaccinated, which is what all of us want to, we those who arewh not immune to get vaccinated and in the interim wear a mask in indoor public gatherings, this consensus there. but if the government wants to get more people vaccinated, stop sending a mixed message by having an emergency use authorization, and at the same time telling people it's safe. they need full approval right now and it's being held up for political reasons. >> sean: all right, thank you both. we appreciate it. when we come back a "new york times" reporting wanting to categorize trump supporters of the enemies the state. we have a message for that reporter and for democrats. and please stay us. ♪ ♪
11:37 pm
11:38 pm
11:39 pm
do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a
11:40 pm
term policy, for an immediate cash payment. call coventry direct to learn more. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. our friends sold their policy to help pay for their medical bills and that got me thinking. maybe selling our policy cpolicy cop with our retirement. i'm skeptical, so i did some research and called coventry direct. they explained life insurance is a valuable asset that can be sold. we learned that we can sell all of our policy or keep part of it with no future payments, who knew? we sold our policy. now we can relax and enjoy our retirement as we had planned. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit to find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance.
11:41 pm
♪ ♪ >> sean: all right, now we've had a more disturbing than biden's nonstop blunders, as the democrats and their media mob's in their push to use the tools for targets for political opponents. now look at one "new york times" reporter, today's january 6 select committee underscores the americas current essential national security dilemma. work to combat legitimate national security threats now entails calling a politician supporters enemies of the state. calling trump supporters enemies of thell state. they are not even trying to hide it there anymore. he has just recently apparently to deleted that tweet. here with reaction of
11:42 pm
"new york times" number one best seller american marxism, the book has been out two weeks and already over half a million copies sold. more than the 15 highest next best-selling books combined and that's why we call them the w great one, mark levine. welcome back. you are an enemy of the state, by the way. >> yeah, well, you know. look who's talking. if they are. that's the same newspaper that promoted stalin, promoted the third reich and promoted castro. what happened on generally six was the worst attacks since 9/11 and liz cheney agrees with him. i want to get a little bit of history to the historically illiterate. in 1979, jimmy carter released from prison three puerto rican terrorists who shot at members of congress from the house gallery in 1954 wounding, in some cases seriously, five members of the house of representatives.
11:43 pm
but there's more. in the last day of his presidency bill clinton granted a full pardon for the presidency. a member of the weather underground and numerous of its succeeding splinter groups, she allegedly participated in the 1983 of the u.s. capitol. that explosion blew off robert byrd's door and ripped through a painting of dana webster and damage the senate coat room. but there's more. a year after bill ayers, his girlfriend and two of his friends blew themselves up in greenwich village townhouse turned a bomb factory, he took part in the 1971 bombing of the u.s. capital and he wrote, we already bombed the capital and cased the white house, the pentagon was like two of the trifecta. you can see, he helped launch
11:44 pm
barack obama's career. so let's stop lying about the history of this capital, lots of horrible things that have happened to the people in the capital. that's number one. number two, this is nothing like 9/11. joe biden even in his good day when he had with was an idiot. and now it's a liz cheney saying the same thing. there were no weapons fired in the capital by protesters but, at one police officer randomly killed a protester. we don't defend what happened in the capitol building, unlike our opponents on the capital side to come up but define violence. they defended violence in portland, how come we don't have any of the federal law enforcement from portland testifying when nancy pelosi called them stormtroopers? or when jim quadrant called them stormtroopers? ofd course, if liz cheney isn't such a hate mode, she will never bring it up either. there's a lot that can be brought up about this as a
11:45 pm
matter of fact and as you all pointed out, what did nancy pelosi do? she was in charge of the security of that building and she was told about potential problems of that building. f what did the fbi do, they had information of the nypd and the norfolk office but she doesn't want to know about that now. got to move fast, i have 3 minutes left. covid, i've got a question for the cdc. we areng busy answering all kins of orders to the american citizens. vaccinated citizens are supposed to wear masks? don't understand when youou tell people that they are not going to get vaccinated? on one hand they say you don't have to get vaccinated, and that's not science, that's stupidity. you had a lot of deity over federal scientists and medical directors over the course of the next 18 months but you want to know big stupidity? we have an open southern border. covid cases among the rio grande
11:46 pm
sector searched 9%. we don't know how many illegal aliens have it, we know they are not tested and we know they are coming from poor countries and they don't have access to vaccines, but may be because our southern border is opened by design and people are coming across the border, we don't know the healthe situation. the southeastern united states is getting hit hardest, southern california is getting hit hardest. how come they are not getting hit in north dakota? how come they are not getting hit on the northern border of the way they are on the southern border? we have some ideas about this. cdc is so out-of-control that control that it ordered not long ago for landlords not to raise rates or to remove tenants. the federal court said it, you are the cdc, you don't have the power to do that. hey cdc, joe biden, i have a question for you for health
11:47 pm
purposes. cdc, why don't you issue orders to secret southern border so we don't have people coming and spreading it in the united states? that would be more substantive. now everybody should get a vaccine? i've been vaccinated and i think more people should but what about somebody who has a condition where the vaccine becomes deadly or what about people who've already had the virus and now they are immune? why wouldn't they get vaccinated? and of course you have the health passe for people. again, if you are an illegal alien, and of course if you are a riot or, one of these marxist numbers, you get a health care pass, too. so they don't mean that everybody should be vaccinated, they just mean that law-abiding american citizens but i do what they tell us to do or you will be cut off from the rest of society. and that's it. >> sean: mark's book, number
11:48 pm
one "new york times" best seller, american marxism. it's the number one selling book by far in the country. don't forget his show, and when we come back, more bad news for gavin newsom. poll numbers show the recall effortsrs are gaining traction. larry elder and his number one supporter, leo 2.0 terrel, straight ahead.
11:49 pm
11:50 pm
11:51 pm
11:52 pm
team usa is ready for the olympic games... ...and so is sharon! she got xfinity internet and mobile together... so she has fast and reliable wifi at home... wow! ...and nationwide 5g on the most reliable wireless network... oh my gosh! up to 400 dollars off her wireless bill! wow! cheer on team usa with xfinity internet. and ask how to save up to $400 a year on your wireless bill when you add xfinity mobile. get started today. ♪ >> sean: we have some polls now showing california governor gavin newsom's and the danger zone that he can in fact be recalled. a new poll out of berkeley finds that likely recallik voters are nearly split even on whether to recall new some but who is the best candidate than to replace him? so h far it looks like voters ae
11:53 pm
turning towards our friend at larry elder who is now leading the recall challenger by a whopping ten points. he's here with reaction and is now officially a gubernatorial candidate, actually on the ballot, they tried to give them up for some reason. larry elder and his number one fan and supporter, leo 2.0 terrel. i always thought from the beginning that question one was going to be the hard question. will the people vote to recall gavin newsom? we need 50% plus one. this now looks like a possibility. >> that's right, it's on the margin of error and that's a dramatic increase from just a couple of weeks ago. people have had it with these ridiculous mandates that they've been talking about and recently got gavin newsom said if you are a state worker and you haven't been vaccinated you will be tested once a week and wear a mask. now you are telling people who
11:54 pm
haven't been vaccinated who have assumed the risk, they will wear masks to protect other on vaccinated people who have also assumed the risk. it doesn't make any sense and that's why 2.2 million californians have signed this petition and about a quarter of them are democrats and independents who voted for this guy about two years earlier. they talked about the crime and the rising cost-of-living and the outrageous homelessness while the sky has his own kid enjoying private education and he pushes this down the throats of californians. that's why i'm saying throw something in the tip jar because i have expenditure limitations. he can raise and spend as much as he w wants. >> this guy goes to restaurants when he tells everyone else not to. his kids have in person learning in a private school. at draconian shutdowns, the t highest taxes in the country, can this be real?
11:55 pm
>> it is a real and let me tell you why. leo has theh ability to resonae with the american people. last week he lied to me, people in california and such crime was in the decline. i don't think barbara boxer and people living in california believed that crime was in the decline. then he had the audacity to compare people who had a medical reason to not get vaccinated to drunk driving. that analogy doesn't make sense. he's an elitist. and as we mentioned his son doesn't follow the rules about wearing a mask. he lied on television again about this kid having online training. but the guy is an elitist and larry resonates with the everyday voter. >> sean: this would be -- this would be a political earthquake. more "hannity" after the break.
11:56 pm
11:57 pm
11:58 pm
do you struggle to fall asleep and stay asleep?
11:59 pm
qunol sleep formula combines 5 key nutrients that can help you fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer, and wake up refreshed. the brand i trust is qunol.
12:00 am
unfortunately, that is all the time we have left this evening carried we hope you'll set your dvr. it simple to dewberry never missed an episode. we will always be independent and we will never be that media mob radio get news here you won't get anywhere elsberry did in the meantime, i have good news because let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham is standing by to take over right now, laura ingraham. >>laura: thank you, sean. we have an awesome show tonight and we will see you tomorrow. >> have a great show. >> an awesome show tonight and we will see you tomorrow. there is a lot of talk about the olympics but we are having other awards tonight that we will get to later in the show but first, the day fauci became president is the focus of tonight's angle.