Skip to main content

tv   Conflict Zone - Guest Regina Ip  Deutsche Welle  January 28, 2022 12:30am-12:57am CET

12:30 am
oh, thank you, soccer is a sport of colors and the children in this mountain village. can everyone be a dog with them regardless of gender? wears blue, the color of her favorite sexes. traditions prevent her from going to games and play with an insurmountable obstacle. little girl football of the peak that starts february, 4th on d, w. ah, the streets of hong kong a quiet these days, the huge demonstrations of recent times long gone. the pro democracy movements have been tamed and bathing patriots of fully in power was one pro china politician put
12:31 am
it, the traitors have been excluded. this week. we talk for a 2nd time to regina if a long time law maker in hong kong legislative council, and head of the pro beijing new people party, hong kong re unified with china, under the kind of repressive rule, but tolerates no descent. you happy now with that there is no back, i'll feed them. i'll feed them are well protected under our basic level, the biggest symbols of resistance in hong kong have been the june. the 4th vigils recalling was gentlemen square massacre in 1989. but last year bay junior had enough hong kong police shut down, the organizers froze their assets and the rested. their leaders. the past is once again being buried and rewritten. what kind of future for hong kong? now
12:32 am
regina ep. welcome to come pick. so welcome back to come pick up. thank you for having be again kim. when we last spoke to you in june 2020, you were full of comforting assurances about the one country to systems arrangements and how it would allow hong kong to preserve its 997 lifestyle. do you think that disqualifying opposition politicians arresting, independent journalists, closing down critical media outlets, sacking teachers censoring school books? do you think that's preserving the pre 997 lifestyle and hong kong? actually in the 198 who's when this the thumbs hoping. talk about conserving the lifestyle he referred to continuing the racist and the dancing and racing and dancing are still going on in hong kong. and that's about it, isn't there is going on? no, no, no, no. we continue to a very lively media. very vigorous scrutiny of government performance by
12:33 am
legislators under the new electro arrangements. new members are falling over each other to question the government on its performance. show the same vibrant hong kong spirit as so their human rights organizations, western governments, un experts, all see it rather differently done by the beijing and hong kong or thirties have moved aggressively to ro back right to hong kong. that's the view of human rights watch. certainly the view of all those other organizations and that's exactly what you wanted, isn't it? hong kong re, unified hong kong re unified with china under the kind of repressive rule that tolerates no descent. do you happy? now with that that's extremely unfair and biased view. you know, there's no rollback or freedoms. all freedoms are well, take on the basic law,
12:34 am
which has incorporated the international covenant on civil and political rights on electro rights. we even allow foreign nation knows to vote, you know, and you know, vo, electro rights are subject to restrictions all over the world. so our civil and political rights are alive and well, you know, there has been no delegation whatsoever. doesn't look like it the, the big clamp down on political opposition began in november 2020 didn't. it paging imposed a new law allowing the disqualification of so called an patrick artic opposition members from the legislative council. you approved of that, didn't you for sitting members? were kicked out with immediate effect, you know, right, to respond. it's totally unfair to describe that as a clam down. what i was central authorities is to make a decision, requiring old people taking up public offers, including electric offers to abide by their oath,
12:35 am
to uphold the basic law and to bear allegiance to the hong kong special administrative region. that's not too unreasonable to ask. that's thought too much to ask all parliament, all cost was off their legislators public servers to taken over loyalty. i think jerry adams was not able to take up his seat in westminster because he refused to take an oath of loyalty to the queen. but we're not talking about jerry adams or the british problem when talking about the legislative council in hong kong for sitting members kicked out with immediate effect. and as the hong kong bar association put it at the time, a violation of the principles of fairness in the rule of law. let's be honest. this was a shoddy under hand move taken simply to please your bosses in beijing, wasn't it? the, the 4 members, they who are disqualified in november to 20. they were already disqualified by the
12:36 am
returning officers when their rental let co office because they failed to abide by their legislative oath. we are talking about form members who consistently resist the china sovereignty and did everything to oppose our integration with the nation or complying, were prohibitions of the basic law, the saw essentially and to china activists. you know, they have no place in the legislature. i'm to china, china, there's a difference, isn't that you put a different spin on it? being critical of china is one thing and why, why shouldn't they object? that's what they're there to do. they can object to anything. while they have not, they have objected to everything to do with china, national security, national education, high speed rail, connecting hong kong to try not they even object to n t a p t. then like fun, fun thing to help people effect apply the pandemic. they objected to everything,
12:37 am
the saw just rejection. this, you know, was who has come home, call with them mindless opposition. my, you say home town, kong major and couldn't wait to celebrate hong kong liaison office even declared a new rule. didn't that the political rule that hong kong must be governed by patriots shall be firmly guarded. it said, governed by patriots. what happened to the high degree of autonomy promised to hong kong in the basic glow that you were just waving at me. the other moment that was what the day got trash. why the hong kong executive. what it the prince, objected beijing about anything. have you? i think i have voice my opinions very candidly and very forcefully on many metrics . you haven't answered my question. did you have a raise, an eyebrow about the human rights vacuum that exists on the mainland? we haven't talked about that. i don't think it's as white for me to judge of those
12:38 am
. the mainland has a different system. anyway, china also says hi, join my partner, china, you're part of china. i don't think people should judge without all effect before them. if people have not done for research and do not know what's really going on, they should not get on the high horse and points a finger at others. i don't believe in pointing fingers and so righteousness. well, you have answered my question, have you ever raised an eyebrow about the human rights vacuum that exists on the mainland? have you that's not my business to point a finger at the situation in the meantime. you know, my business as a hong kong legislator is. ringback to look after the human rights situation and the welfare of my people. and one of the most important rights of hong kong people is to write the rights to quit hosting. that's priority number one for me as while community at the moment. if you want to an example regina emp,
12:39 am
of rights being road back in hong kong look no further than last month, new style election to your legislative council, which was announced by china's parliament last march. china's parliament, not your hong kong, legislative council. out of a $153.00 candidates that were only about 12 who weren't aligned with the pro establishment or pro paging factions. no risk of any trouble, some opposition there then is that the, the new arrangements have enable us to make room for more a leads to join the legislative council. we are actually more broadly representative than before. and we manage to get with all of those who have hom, hong kong, through the extreme filibuster, and opposition to all, everything on the government's agenda. well, your chief secretary, john lee explained it in even clear terms. he said those who had been excluded were
12:40 am
traitors who had once the vote to fail. so always, well, the patriots are in charge the traitors in jail. the rest cowed into submission. but never mind about rights and freedoms. hong kong was stable again. that's just what you wanted, isn't it? hong kong, stable. that's an over simplification. you know, we have members in council who are, who are racing objections to a lot of government proposals. you know, we have a new culture which is full of new bright and fresh ideas about governance and how to improve the livelihood of the people. and i think there is no question the flights of freedoms being rope. but by the way, if i could remind you, our new structure was a 40 member election committee. that's an electro college and electro college arrangement. it's nothing new. it's was 1st introduced by the british, and we had that after $997.00. you know, the democratic arrangement in the past 24 years. it's an experiment.
12:41 am
it has not. so hong kong people well in the sense that it has not helped to solve our livelihood, economic development problems, housing problems, it ought to be reviewed and revised. and this is what we are doing now. when you talk about serving the hong kong people, hong kong public told you what they thought of your new election system by staying at home in huge numbers, despite your desperate campaign to get them out to vote, there was a record low turn out for hong kong 30.2 percent, a huge drop from the previous legislative election 5 years ago in which 58 percent voted. that didn't go well for you, did it you, you can compare the so do you present or not rate with the turnover rate for the previous election because we have a new electro system. yeah, one of the public doesn't like reco constituencies have been redrawn and new
12:42 am
structure you see when the british push them collectively form in the final days of the governance in hong kong in the 1980. the 1st round of elections under new rules . also only had 30 percent, i think 30 percent turned out. it's a very good performance very. that's one way of spinning it. i mean, why don't i look at the look at my bonus now at the new york? look at the new york mayo ro election. recently, the turn away was only 23 percent. we're not looking at new york, we're looking at calling and comparing to the the kind of buy in the public had for the election 5 years ago. and in any case, why bother to turn out? because out of the 90 seats in your expanded council, only 20 could be directly elected by the public good. and they said the result of dictatorships always prefer was a foregone conclusion. wasn't in. you cannot call
12:43 am
a system dictate horatio auto graphic just because a few a members were elected by direct elections. i think direct popular elections had their problems. the problems are all over the world. people could end up electing populist stick politicians. ah, who won by just stirring up emotions fool slogan, ewing who can not really get things done and who cannot solve governance problems. i think we are better off with our tripod tight structure. with those representing the districts, some representing functional constituencies and some like an upper house in the parliament repre, including elites and the diversity of representatives, including one woman representing the new churches indigenous residents. the elections with draconian regulations attached to them just in case anyone
12:44 am
recommended returning blank balance to protest that the changes your authorities have thought up a new crime to cover that incitement of others to cost blank balance. maximum sentence 3 is in jail, one more bonfire of political right? you can't even tell me, you know, that's not your kind in jail. right? to call it your call. you know, you can call a calling in if you in sight people to vote or not to vote to interfere with an outcome that is nothing shot or criminal are they that sort of conduct should, should not be, you know, should not be allowed. you know, one of the chief targets to the government and waging zango have been the independent journalists and hong kong june the 17th. last year. your police were in action for the 2nd time against apple daily. the only pro democracy print newspaper in hong kong. and you rated it, do you remember how many police your government sent in to the newspaper offices that day? june 17th. you remember at the, at pole daily,
12:45 am
it's not an independent newspaper. is a political platform for more realization against the government. well, yeah, that, that you mean you remember how many, many, many people like me declare, he is an agent of the you, as he said that he share the comma though use of the, of the us. and i makes him an a u. s. war on enemy ground, he said that them so. and he said he was at the for fun of the occupy central movement. you're, you're not, you're not going to answer my question, regina 500 police that's been, you know, it is relevant. a lot of evidence to call collect. you need to send a lot of 500 bodies. what did they think they were going to find that piles of sub machine guns, helicopter gunship on the roof? what would they, what would every, all police force they all they remove,
12:46 am
computer files and documents. the police have every way to collect the of the evidence they needed. if they have reasonable doubts that old fences had been committed. this paper has been publishing for 26 years and finally it was a threat to national security as your headline. but the code, the said using journalistic work to incite foreign forces to impose sanctions on the, the hong kong hong kong and china. was that the best charges could come up with good news, i recently lie at mixer than so he said that themselves, jimmy lied, said it himself publicly. he told c, n n otto calling on very senior us officials that he shared common values with the us. and he's a comma, who are the ones china? what he is regarding china as you, as, and the me ground, you know, you know,
12:47 am
if he's not a u. s. proxy or as u. s. h a, what is he by his own admission. this is public record. he said there to hear and, and he also said in tul, 14, that he is at the for funds i'll be occupied central by his own admission. why shouldn't he be? why shouldn't he have was opinions? if he works for you as interest, if he use has newspaper as a us papa ganga tool or platform for incisive one of succession. why should we charge him? why should we charge him? the question is, from the point of view, or po, texting our national security, why should we charge and why should we investigate? what's wrong with that? what's wrong with it? is it been widely condemned around the world? the british government put its latest report on hong kong mainland chinese and hong colo thirties, have used the law and related institutions. and i just can,
12:48 am
i just say this can i just say this mainland chinese and hong kong authorities have used the law and related institutions against all opposition, free press and civil society in hong kong. and you'll go on doing that until you've taught hong kong a lesson that the mainland instilled in many years ago. do, as paging says, or it will crush you, that's the lesson, isn't it? come, come, can i say not speak now please come of it. the british government has no credibility . they have been using this sort of methods to oppress po china organizations and po china activists all the time until they were prepared to withdraw and change our laws. so that we can not use the laws against people who are anti china and hominy . china's national security, the british. ready government has no credibility whatsoever. they have done a lot of harm to hong call in the last 10 years of the rule. in hong kong, you called one country to systems,
12:49 am
china's unification project. and it is unification, isn't it? but it's by threat. it's by detention, it's by imprisonment and laws that stifle all political and civil opposition just as it's done on the mainland. are you proud of that regina? while hong kong was brought back under the bought back to the motherland by negotiations with the agreement, britain. well, the sign opened his jaw negotiation, john declarations. china said i want to take resume exercise of bates on the state of freedoms in hong kong. if you have a position on the national security law, poor harris as poor harris and the he should be prepared to face rebuttals, it was more than rebuffed lloyd. well, it's forceful rebuttal. you know, we need to make our position clear to the bar association. you know, in fact, the bar sensation should stick to the law, not to politics,
12:50 am
and not to spear on national security law. regina it, with all its birthday celebrations, china's trying harder than ever to cover up its brutal past. isn't it at least 3 monuments to the 1989 gentlemen square massacre have now been removed from hong kong campuses. and police have tried to stop the june 4th candlelight vigils in victoria park marking the killings allegedly because of covert risks. in 2020, you told me you didn't think there be any difference to these commemorations after the security law came into force when you were dead wrong. want you fed wrong? well, the statutes were removed by the decisions of the university authorities . that's what they said. just an again, nobody believed that nobody believed that. i don't think you believe it. yes. well, i do. i think it's a, it's an autonomous decision made by the government,
12:51 am
nuns bodies of the universities point number one, as for june, 4th videos last year, definitely. they could not be help because of covert. now this year, you know, we are in the quip of our fist weighs, you know, and mosque gatherings must not be allowed. you know, i cannot predict what happens in, in june. but if the covert situation continues, there are legitimate health concerns on no view on june 4th, on the day of the vigil last year, the police arrested the vice chair of the organizing group for those vigils, hong kong lines and cordon off the pug. in september, they froze the lions, his assets, they closed its june, the 4th museum deleted its social media account and the rested, its for leaders, for inciting subversion. was all that due to covey as well that has nothing to door, june for victuals. that's because that organization has at its agenda on
12:52 am
over sewing one party rule, such as overthrowing china system. of course, that could amount to subversion that would go against the national security law. now that we have national security law enforce, we have to ensure that these activities do not violate national security laws. a symbol that though they're not coming back again, these visuals are they, they're never going to be allowed back. and just the motherland you said, but to do want whitewash embarrassing history. they're good at that on the rituals, if they become a tool, a political to, for, in fighting hatred or antipathy against the motherland that will do more much more harm to hong kong than we should allow, you know, it's as simple as regina, it's been good to have you back on conflict zone. thank you very much. indeed.
12:53 am
thank you for having the ok. ah. ah, with
12:54 am
to the point. strong opinions, clear positions, international perspectives. the dire warnings mountain russian forces dig in on ukraine's border and diplomatic talk. all calls for germany to play a more active role are also growing louder. isn't letting its allies down, join us on to the point to the point in 30 minutes on
12:55 am
d w. if we come up or the beautiful thing will be here by india, a city growing at breakneck speed at the expense with the younger bands when we got an eviction notice. this is where our family lives. this is our a laser megacity moon, by from the slums to skyscrapers in 75 minutes on d, w ah interest the global economy our portfolio d w business beyond. here's a closer look at the project. our mission. to analyze the
12:56 am
fight for market dominance, is this is wes, get us debit head with the w business beyond on you to one of main kinds, oldest ambitions could be within reach. oh, what is it really is possible to reverse aging researchers and scientists all over the world are in a race against time. ah ha monitors though, has 28000000 different power. they are peers and rivals with one daring goal to outsmart nature. ah, for a longer,
12:57 am
healthier and fuller life. one of the most insightful discoveries in the history of mankind down the hatch. more life starts february 16th on d, w ah .


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on