Skip to main content

tv   President Biden Delivers Remarks on Afghanistan Strategy  CSPAN  April 14, 2021 2:29pm-2:47pm EDT

2:29 pm
he serves as the chair of the election transparency initiative. and we appreciate your time with us today. >> my pleasure. great to be with you. next up we're joined by congressman french hill which represents little rock, arkansas. >> bill, it's great to be with you this morning. thanks for the invitation. >> before we dive into some other topics, we want to get your thoughts on some of the things we've been talking about earlier this morning. one, the president's reported decision on withdrawal of u.s. troops from afghanistan, and yesterday's decision by the fda, we've been talking with our viewers about on pausing the use of the johnson & johnson vaccine. >> we'll leave this program. you can see it in its entirety if you go to our website live now from president biden on his strategy for u.s. policy and presence in afghanistan. you're watching c-span3. >> terrorist attack on our nation that killed 2,977
2:30 pm
innocent souls that turned lower manhattan into a disaster area, destroyed parts of the pentagon and made hallowed ground on a field in shanksville, pennsylvania, and sparked an american promise that we would never forget. we went to afghanistan in 2001 to root out al qaeda, to prevent future terrorist attacks against the united states planned from afghanistan. our objective was clear. the cause was just, our nato allies and partners rallied beside us. and i supported that military action along with overwhelming majority of the members of congress. more than seven years later in 2008, weeks before we swore the oath of office, president obama and i were about to swear. president obama asked me to travel to afghan start and report back on the state of the war in afghanistan. i flew to afghanistan to the
2:31 pm
kunar valley, a rugged, mountainous region on the border with pakistan. what i saw in that trip reinforced my conviction, that only the afghans have the right and responsibility to lead their country, and that more and endless american military force could not create or sustain a durable afghan government. i believed that our presence in afghanistan should be focused on the reason we went in the first place, to ensure afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again. we did that. we accomplished that objective. i said, among with others, we'd follow osama bin laden to the gates of hell if need be. that's exactly what we did, and we got him. it took us close to ten years to put president obama's commitment into form. and that's exactly what happened. osama bin laden was gone.
2:32 pm
that was ten years ago. think about that. we delivered justice to bin laden a decade ago. and we've stayed in afghanistan for a decade since. since then, our reasons for remaining in afghanistan become increasingly unclear, even as the terrorist threat that we went to fight evolved. over the past 20 years the threat has become more dispersed, metastasizing around the globe. el shabab in somalia, al qaeda in the arabian peninsula, isis is attempting to create a caliphate in multiple countries in africa and asia. with the terror threat now in many places, keeping thousands of troops grounded and concentrated in just one country at a cost of billions each year makes little sense to me and/or
2:33 pm
leaders. we cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our military presence in afghanistan hoping to create ideal conditions for the withdrawal and expecting a different result. i'm now the fourth united states president to preside over american troop presence in afghanistan, two republicans, two democrats. i will not pass this responsibility onto a fifth. after consulting closely with our allies and partners, with our military leaders and intelligence personnel, with our diplomats and our development experts, with a congress and the vice president as well as with mr. gani and many others around the world, i've concluded that it's time to end american's longest war. it's time for american troops to come home. when i came to office, i inherited a diplomatic agreement
2:34 pm
duly negotiated between the government of the united states and the taliban that all u.s. forces would be out of afghanistan by may 1, 2021. just three months after my inauguration, that's when we inherited that commitment. it's perhaps not what i would have negotiated myself, but it was an agreement made by the united states government. and that means something. so in keeping with that agreement and with our national interest, the united states began our final withdrawal on may 1 of this year, will not conduct a hasty rush to the exit. we'll do it responsibly, deliberately, and safely. and we will do it in full coordination with our allies and partners who now have more forces in afghanistan than we do. and the taliban should know that if they attack us as we draw down, we will defend ourselves
2:35 pm
and our partners with all the tools at our disposal. our allies and partners have stood beside us shoulder to shoulder in afghanistan for almost 20 years. and we're deeply grateful for the contributions they have made to our shared mission and for the sacrifices they've borne. the plan has long been in together, out together. u.s. troops as well as forces deployed by our nato allies and operational partners will be out of afghanistan before we mark the 20th anniversary of that heinous attack on september 11th. but we'll not take our eye off the terrorist threat. we'll reorganize our counterterrorism capabilities and the substantial assets in the region to prevent re-emergence of terrorists with the threat to our homeland from over the horizon. we'll hold the taliban accountable for its commitment not to allow any terrorist to
2:36 pm
threaten the united states or its allies from afghan soil. the afghan government has made that commitment to us as well. and we'll focus our full attention on the threat we face today. in my direction, my team is refining our national strategy to monitor and disrupt significant terrorist threats not only in afghanistan but anywhere they may arise, and they're in africa, europe, the middle east and elsewhere. i spoke yesterday with president bush to inform him of my decision. while he and i have had many disagreements over policies throughout the years, we're absolutely united in our respect and support for the valor, courage, and integrity of the women and men of the united states armed forces who served. i'm immensely grateful for the brave young backbone that they have shown through nearly two decades of combat deployments.
2:37 pm
we are forever indebted to them and their families. you all know that less than 1% of americans served in armed forces. the remaining 99%, we owe them. they have never backed down from a single mission that we've asked of them. i've witnessed their bravery first hand during my visits to afghanistan. they have never waivered in their resolve. they've paid a tremendous price on our behalf. and they have the thanks of a grateful nation. while we'll not stay involved in afghanistan militarily, our diplomatic and humanitarian work will continue. we'll continue to support the government of afghanistan. we will keep providing assistance to the afghan national defenses and security forces. and along with our partners -- the thousands over the past two
2:38 pm
decades. they'll continue to fight valently on behalf of the afghans at great cost. they'll support peace talks, as we will, support peace talks between the government of afghanistan and the taliban facilitated by the united nations. and we'll continue to support the rights of afghan women and girls by maintaining significant humanitarian and development assistance. and we'll ask other countries in the region to do more to support afghanistan, especially pakistan, as well as russia, china, india, and turkey. they all have a significant stake in the stable future for afghanistan. and over the next few months, we will also determine what a continued u.s. diplomatic presence in afghanistan will look like, including how it will ensure the security of our diplomats. look, i know there are many who will loudly insist that diplomacy cannot succeed with
2:39 pm
our robust u.s. military presence to stand as leverage. we gave that argument a decade. it's never proved effective. not when we had 98,000 troops in afghanistan. and not when we were down to a few thousand. our diplomacy does not hinge on having boots in harm's way, u.s. boots on the ground. we have to change that thinking. american troops shouldn't be used as a bargaining ship between warring parties in other countries. you know, that's nothing more than a recipe for keeping american troops in afghanistan indefinitely. i also know there are many who will argue that we should stay fighting afghanistan because withdrawal would damage america's credibility and weaken america's influence in the world. i believe the exact opposite is true. we went to afghanistan because of a horrific attack that happened 20 years ago.
2:40 pm
that cannot explain why we should remain there in 2021. rather than return to war with the taliban, we have to focus on the challenges that are in front of us. we have to track and disrupt terrorist networks and operations that spread far beyond afghanistan since 9/11. we have to shore up american competitiveness to meet the stiff competition we're facing from an increasingly assertive china. we have to strengthen our alliances and work with like-minded partners to ensure that the roles of international norms that govern cyber threats and emerging technologies that will shape our future are grounded in our democratic values, not those of the autocrats. we have to defeat this pandemic and strengthen global health systems to prepare for the next one because there will be another pandemic. we'll be much more formidable to our adversaries and competitors over the long term if we fight the battles for the next 20
2:41 pm
years, not the last 20. and, finally, the main argument for staying longer is what each of my three predecessors have grappled with. no one wants to say that we should be in afghanistan forever. but they insist now is not the right moment to leave. in 2014, nato issued a declaration affirming that afghan security forces would from that point on have full responsibility for this country's security by the end of that year. that was seven years ago. so, when will it be the right moment to leave? one more year? two more years? ten more years? ten, 20, 30, billion dollars more than the trillion we've already spent? not now, that's how we got here. and in this moment there is a significant downside risk to staying beyond may 1st without a clear timetable for departure.
2:42 pm
if we instead pursue the approach where america u.s. exit is tied to conditions on the ground, we have to have clear answers to the following questions. just what conditions will be required to allow us to depart? by what means and how long would it take to achieve them if they could be achieved at all? and at what additional cost in lives and treasure? i've not heard any good answers to these questions. and if you can't answer them, in my view, we should not stay. the fact is that later today, i'm going to visit arlington national cemetery section 60 and that sacred memorial to american sacrifice section 60 is where our recent war dead are buried, including many of the women and men who died fighting in afghanistan and iraq.
2:43 pm
there is no comforting distance in history in section 60. the grief is raw. it's a visceral reminder of the living cost of war. for the past 12 years ever since i became vice president, i've carried with me a card that reminds me the exact number of american troops killed in iraq and afghanistan. that exact number not an approximation or a rounded off number, because every one of those dead are sacred human beings who left behind entire families. an exact accounting of every single solitary one needs to be had. as of today, there are 242,488 u.s. troops and personnel who have died in operation enduring freedom and operation freedoms
2:44 pm
sentinel, our afghanistan conflicts. 20,722 have been wounded. i'm the first president in 40 years to have a child serving in a war zone. throughout this process my north star has been remembering what it was like when my late son beau was deployed to iraq, how proud he was to serve his country, how insistent he was to deploy with his unit. and the impact it had on him and all of us at home. we already have service members doing their duty in afghanistan today whose parents served in the same war. we have servicemembers who are not yet born when our nation was attacked in 9/11. war in afghanistan was never meant to be a multigenerational undertaking. we were attacked, we went to war with clear goals.
2:45 pm
we achieved those objectives. bin laden is dead, and al qaeda is degraded in afghanistan. and it's time to end the forever war. thank you all for listening. may god protect our troops, may god bless all those families who lost someone in this endeavor. go to for the federal response to the coronavirus pandemic. if you miss our live coverage, it's easy to quickly find the latest briefings and the biden administration's response. use the interactive gallery of maps. go to
2:46 pm
♪♪ c-span3 is your unfiltered view of government, created by america's cable television companies. today we're brought to you by these television companies who provide c-span3 to viewers as a public service. ♪♪ weeknights this month, we're featuring american history tv programs as a preview of what's available every weekend on c-span3. tonight, we look at asian-american history, declared a national historic landmark district, little tokyo near downtown los angeles has been the center of japanese-american culture since the early 1900s. we went on a tour with a dosient. he was born in little tokyo in 1930 and during world war ii was incarcerated by government order at wyoming's


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on