Skip to main content

tv   Inside Politics With Abby Phillip  CNN  December 26, 2021 5:00am-6:00am PST

5:00 am
♪ biden's first year. how he's struggling to overcome an unpredictable virus and an uneven economy. >> while covid has been a tough adversary, we've shown we're tougher. >> plus manchin in the middle. >> was a complete stunner. it's unfortunate it seems we can't trust senator manchin's word. >> but can democrats still change his mind on build back
5:01 am
better. and trump's big lie. it's transformed the republican party and now threatens democracy itself. >> the election was a fraud. we must pass a complete overhaul of our entire election system. "inside politics," the biggest stories sourced by the best reporters now. welcome to "inside politics" sunday, i'm manu raju in for abby. president biden headed into the christmas holiday focused on the two issues that defined his presidency. first a pandemic is still raging as he ends his first year in office. >> we should all be concerned about omicron, but not panicked. if you're fully vaccinated and especially if you have your booster shot, you are highly protected. and if you're unvaccinated, you're at a higher risk of getting severely ill from
5:02 am
covid-19, getting hospitalized and even dying. >> second, inflation and the broken supply chain. biden says his administration is attacking the problem head on and making major progress. >> earlier this fall we heard a lot of dire warnings about supply chain problems leading to a crisis around the holidays. so we acted. we brought together business and labor leaders to solve problems. and much -- you know, the much-predicted crisis didn't occur. packages are moving. gifts are being delivered. shelves are not empty. >> now, biden notched some big accomplishments in 2021. a bipartisan infrastructure law, a largely successful vaccine rollout and 6 million new jobs, but there's also an economic bill on the verge of collapse. thousands dying of covid every week, and stubbornly high inflation. he's headed into a midterm year with the lowest approval ratings of his presidency. now, joining us now with the
5:03 am
reporting and their insight, amy walter, astead wesley and phil mattingly. phil, according to a new poll, 42% of registered voters give the president a positive rating, but he has a dismal 29% approval among independents. this is a president who campaigned on getting ahold of the virus, but, phil, americans don't see him achieving that goal with the virus still dominating their lives. >> when you talk to white house officials, they're candid about the reality that everything they're seeing in their polling now is tied to the fact that the pandemic is still a real thing in everybody's lives. the fact the president is giving a major speech about the next rollout against efforts to defend against a new variant tells you everything you need to know about that first year. his first day in office, i remember talking to a senior administration official who told
5:04 am
me everything hinges on covid. if we handle the pandemic, everything else lines up. the economy tied to covid. the reality is -- there's a number of reasons, not all of them because of the white house and what they did or didn't do, covid is still here, americans are exhausted. covid has a direct impact on the economy and those supply chains and that's problematic. >> the question for voters is did he do what he promised? what he promised was to be a centrist president who ended the chaos of the trump years, to bring the country together, someone who knew how to work with congress. it hasn't always turned out that way. amy, is his brand of politics meeting the moment we're in? or how does he need to retool headed into year two? >> that's a really, really good point, this idea of not just ending the chaos but also lowering the temperature, bringing the country together. i went back and i read his inaugural address, the term
5:05 am
unity, bringing america together was in there a lot. that was the centerpiece of that inaugural address. and i sat in on a lot of focu groups. the thing i hear of and over again is the frustration americans have that it doesn't seem like things have gotten better on that front. we're divided as ever they say. they're frustrated about the fights they continue to get into with friends and family over facebook. it used to be over trump, now it's over vaccines. who's getting one, who is not, what information they're getting, what they're hearing from washington, so much of the rhetoric there has been incredibly antagonistic. of course we still have the ringing of january 6th in lawmakers ears and for many folks in and around washington. this idea that, you know -- i don't think anybody believed that the -- a new president would be able to come in and everybody would hold hands, it was going to be a kumbaya i'd
5:06 am
like to buy the world a coke sort of moment, but i think as one voter said early on this summer, i thought things would be better. i thought they would be better. there's a sense among voters -- and i think a lot of his approval rating dip is not so much of an anger or a frustration, but more of a disappointment. and for anyone who has been a kid, the worst thing a parent can say to you is i'm not angry, i'm just really disappointed in you. >> when of the things that biden campaigned on was competence, that is what he ran on. listen to some of the things that the president got wrong this year on what might have been the three biggest issues he faced. >> 245 years ago we declared our independence from a distant king. today we are closer than ever to declaring our independence from a deadly virus. talk of inflation.
5:07 am
the overwhelming consensus is it will pop up a bit and go down. the jury is still out, but the likelihood that there's going to be the taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely. >> covid, inflation and afghanistan. astead, how badly was he hurt by those predictions? >> i think he was. this was a white house that had trained its energy on getting the pandemic done first, would then move on to the other things. you can think of afghanistan on the foreign policy front as something they would think they would wrap up first, kind of notch an accomplishment, a thing that fits within biden's ideology and move on to the bigger challenges. the problem is on all of those fronts, the initial hurdle has been much larger than the white house has anticipated. i mean, i remember back on the campaign trail when the critique of joe biden, the candidate, particularly by other democrats running in that prooiimary was t he was offering himself as not
5:08 am
donald trump. he was pitching competence, calm, but not pitching progress. you saw biden the candidate react to that by embracing more progressive messages in the general election. things about how it would improve peoples lives, this is when we saw build back better overtake that unity rhetoric. but what we're seeing is not being donald trump is not enough for many people. they want to see movement on the economic front. they want to see movement in terms of racial justice, voting rights acts, things he promised and they're not delivering that so far which is why i think we're getting that disappointment. >> phil, covid in the center of all of this. this week the white house announced a plan to distribute 500 million at-home covid tests for free. a lot of doctors are saying it's too little too late. it shouldn't be this hard or expensive to find a test. phil, you asked the president about this last week. he was defensive in his response, but it feels like after a largely successful vaccination drive in the spring,
5:09 am
they just moved too slowly on a lot of other things. >> yeah. i think when it comes to testing in particular, they acknowledge it. they're not where they need to be. i think the reason for the question and -- the president's response to me was that omicron came on so fast, combined with the winter surge and the holidays that caused a rush and that put stress on the marketplace. the reality is 11 months in there was an expectation that rapid tests would be available wherever you wanted them and whenever you wanted them. there are regulatory hurdles here, manufacturing hurdles here, those are big and serious issues. the administration has done things to ramp up rapid testing. but as the administration clearly over the last six to eight weeks has tried to pivot to more of like we'll have to live with this. you're vaccinated, you're protected, live your lives. rapid testing is a huge component of that. the fact they weren't ready to roll that out to scale when they needed to, i think, is something when you get to the idea of competency or the idea of doing
5:10 am
what was pledged, they absolutely do it on the vaccine. they did it on vaccine distribution. on testing they just simply are not there. this is a moment where they needed to be there. >> amy, the biden administration wants us to focus more on the legislative successes. now the covid relief law, that was a big success earlier this year. the bipartisan infrastructure law another major accomplishment. record number of judicial confirmations, something that happened in the past several months. i want you to hear something from david frumm, an anti-trump republican who wrote this. relative to its strength in congress, the biden administration has proved outstandingly successful. in 11 months, biden has done more with 50 democratic senators than barack obama did with 57. perhaps it's not the nature of democrats to appreciate the glass half full, but half full it is. so, amy, is the problem that democrats just set expectations sky high given that they have such narrow majorities in congress? >> well, that's certainly one
5:11 am
piece of it, right? in a 50/50 senate, pushing something as big and bold as the build back better, you know, that was really taking a very, very big risk. at this point, it's not clear it's a risk that they will be able to overcome. on something like the bipartisan bill, absolutely. that was a very big accomplishment. manu, i keep going back to what hayley barber, the former governor of mississippi used to say about politics which is never forget to make the main thing the main thing. and it's about the main thing, right? which is the main thing for people right now is yes, they're anxious and frustrated that we're still in a pandemic but inflation is taking a bite out of their pocketbooks. you hear people saying over and over again, even though i've gotten a little bit of a raise,
5:12 am
we're doing okay, i didn't lose my job, i feel comfortable in that i have security, but it costs more to do everything i do. and there is a feeling that i hear over and over again from voters that the other shoe is going to drop at some point. so when you have a country that is feeling anxious about their day-to-day living, the idea that you can go and just pivot and say but wait, we have all these great things, we have an infrastructure bill and we have more judges, and we did, you know, x, y, and z other things on executive orders, it's just not meeting people where they are. and i think that has been really the biggest challenge for this administration because they recognize that with a 50/50 senate and a five-seat majority, that's going to be hard to hold on to in a midterm election. if they want anything done, they have to do it now. everything has to get on that train. it's a difficult thing to
5:13 am
convince a democratic base that that's a successful strategy when they want to see it done and want to see even more done given what was promised on the trail. >> and, things looking better, the economy is looking better. if people are not feeling it, that's a problem and that's something the administration will have to grapple with in the new year. up next for us, how joe manchin became washington's indispensable man. as we go to break, some of the iconic photos of 2021.
5:14 am
5:15 am
♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope. ♪ donate now at redcross.org get your personalpoints plan! i'm james corden and i'm here to tell people that ww is getting even more personal. keep on shopping. ignore us. i've lost, like, 28 pounds. you look great! wow.
5:16 am
i love that my clothes fit better. but i just love ice cream a little bit more than that. the new ww personalpoints program is particular to you. so what kind of foods do you like? avocado. ice cream. sandwiches. no food is off limits. when can i start? join today for 50% off at ww.com. hurry, offer ends december 27th. no one is more critical to
5:17 am
the biden agenda that senator joe manchin. he proved that again last week by torpedoing the build back better bill. top democrats say they were shocked by his decision to suddenly end negotiations. i spent a lot of time with manchin over the past few months, he's never been shy about where he stands. >> i've never been a liberal in any way, shape or form. there's no one that's ever thought i was. >> do your voters want this bill, this big massive big right now? >> i think my voters in west virginia -- i don't speak for the whole country, my voters are very much concerned. inflation hit them extremely hard. >> i'm more concerned about our nation and our country turning into more of an entitlement society versus a rewarding society. >> what if -- what if schumer takes his bill straight to the floor and says i'm going to dare joe manchin to vote? >> i wouldn't have any idea how i would vote until i vote in. no one pressures me.
5:18 am
i'm from west virginia. >> lauren fox joins the conversation. manchin has been negative on this bill all year, yet people will still say they're surprised that he officially came out against it. you talk to him regularly as well. are you surprised of the timing and his decision to say this bill is not the bill i could support? >> i'm not surprised that manchin got to this place. i'm a little surprised that he got to this place where he wanted to go on national television and make this announcement. that's because if you know senator manchin, you know that from talking to him that he often wants to continue the conversations with the president. he's close with the president. he wants to continue the conversations with his colleagues. he doesn't really like to disappoint members of the democratic caucus. that doesn't mean he'll get to the same place as them but he's been having one-on-one conversations with his colleagues for months about this piece of legislation. so i was a little shocked that he just drew a red line and said i'm not there. i don't think i'm going to get. there the fact that that second
5:19 am
piece of it, that he didn't think he was going to get there piece of it also was a part of that conversation last week, i think that is what was a little surprising to me and a lot of people who are watching in the democratic caucus. >> it's important to note, he said he will still continue to talk to his -- to democrats about this. we'll see if the talk leads anywhere. those discussions will continue into the new year. amy, manchin told me last week he's seriously considering running for re-election in 2024. how much of this do you think is about him trying to win another term in one of the reddest states in the nation that donald trump won by nearly 40 points? >> yeah. this is -- it is remarkable when you look at the state that joe manchin represents and the fact that he's there as a democrat who has voted pretty much down the line for president biden's agenda. it's quite remarkable a feat.
5:20 am
if you look at his last re-election, even in what was, you know, a pretty decent year for democrats in that very, very red state, he won with just over 50 -- it was like 49.whatever percent. so this is a very much of a tightrope that he's walking. i just also want to build on what lauren said about going on national television to make his case. i think if you are a moderate senator or senator who is up for re-election in 2022, that wasn't a particularly helpful thing for you. because he basically gave republicans great ammunition to use against them if, indeed, they do finally vote on a build back better bill and joe manchin does, indeed, vote against it. those words are going to come back and be shown in ads all across the country in those vulnerable races. they're certainly going to be
5:21 am
shown in the districts where house members sit who have voted on this legislation. so it was more than just drawing a line in the sand. what he did as well is really give some pretty good ammunition to republicans for going after democrats in the house and potentially the senate in the midterm. >> phil, amy makes a great point there. there are vulnerable democratic incumbents in states that are facing voters in less than a year here. but none of them, phil, are blocking biden's agenda or raising concerns. >> yeah. i think that's what's so jarring for people maybe, maybe not you, manu who based on the video you showed you spent more time with the senator than your twins over the course of the last few months, but this brings into the sharpest focus you can imagine what a 50/50 senate actually is you have 48 at least, maybe 49 depending on where senator sinema stands who made it clear
5:22 am
they were there, they would have been there for something bigger despite the fact they come from states that very real races coming up in 2022, but it only takes one. that's been the issue that kind of the white house has been trying to grapple with. you can go back through what happened over the course of the last 7, 10 days there's a lot of inside baseball stuff about why this happened, why stuff was drafted, but the difficulty of getting something that is transformative even if scaled back to where it was scaled back to, if you can't afford to lose a single member and you don't have members who all come from biden states or states where members are confident they can win backing a more progressive agenda, that's the reality of this moment. i think it was just put in such a very clear way. i don't think things are done. i think white house officials are going to engage and want to give it a go. but what it underscores perhaps more than anything else, senate majority leader chuck schumer,
5:23 am
is he going to put this bill on the floor knowing he doesn't have the votes and make his members vote on it and put them in the same place that house democrats have been put through in the moderate districts? >> they will votetor it sfor it have liability because that vote won't become launch. >> how to deal with manchin going forward. there's some disagreements on that. >> if we look to history and we don't have an agreement, i don't see how we can negotiate with somebody who is always changing their position all the time and whose word you cannot rely on. >> let's recognize what we need. we need him, plain and simple. we need his vote. the way my colleagues are approaching this is going to result in exactly what we don't want, which is nothing. >> do progressives understand that democrats need manchin more
5:24 am
than he needs them? >> i think they do understand that. they see themselves ass the defenders of bide nnbiden's age. they have forced manchin to come back to the table and used the tactics on the house side to hold up the agenda against senate attacks. but senators are uniquely p sticky. they want to deal with the house and they're not dictated to by the house and joe manchin has said to this point really pushed off all of the attempts from house members and from progressives to put pressure on him. the problem is the white house knows that the manchin excuse will not fly. it's a washington problem for them. they need his vote on these issues, but when they go out to make their pitch to the rest of the country, they cannot say this huge thing that we promised you fell because of this singular senator.
5:25 am
i don't think they think that is something that will excite the base. the question is where does the white house go from here? do they continue to work that inside game, trying to get manchin along to get whatever they can? or do they make a pitch to the american people saying we tried for this big stuff, we want to put public pressure on some of the democrats who are not supporting it. that's more of a risky strategy, that's more combative than we've seen from joe biden but there's increasing calls from the progressive side to do something like that to demonstrate to voters that democrats are trying to take this trifecta window with seriousness. the problem is they have no electoral leverage over the most critical senator in this moment. so he's really free to, you know, as much as the vice president does not want to say this, act as a president unto himself. >> that's right. president manchin is how people often call him. lauren, the focus on the new year is about a small bill, getting a scaled back version of this larger plan through. getting manchin and proglressivs
5:26 am
to sign off. is that really possible? >> this was part of the debate early on that we covered at len, a discussion about whether or not you do a few programs well, that was the hope of moderate members, or do you do several programs, many more programs for a shorter period of time? that was the progressive view. that view ultimately won out. but what manchin has been saying specifically on the tax credit is it's my belief even though this current vegsrsion of build back better only had with a one-year extension of the child credit, it was his concern that that would be renewed year after year. so is there a middle ground where democrats could come together and say, look, a ten-year child tax credit would be a huge accomplishment for the democratic party. perhaps that's something manchin could sign on to, but it's going to come with a lot of scaling back and potentially some kind of work requirement or other requirement surrounding that benefit that i'm not sure progressives will want to get to
5:27 am
that point. >> a lot of questions about what the agenda is, but this much is clear, if they get a deal, it's going to take a lot more time. so, we'll have to keep reporting that out. up next for us, more and more republicans are embracing the big lie. what does that mean for democracy? as we go to break, more of the iconic images that defined our year. i lost 26 pounds and i feel incredible. with the new personalpoints program, i answer questions about my goals and the foods i love. i like that the ww personalpoints plan is built just for me. join today for 50% off at ww.com. hurry, offer ends december 27th.
5:28 am
5:29 am
5:30 am
it didn't take long for many republicans to stop condemning the capitol insurrection and to start downplaying and denying
5:31 am
it. politifact calls it the 2021 lie of the year saying it wasn't that violent or that it wasas antifa and not trump supporters behind it. it comes with claims that the 2021 election was stolen. >> they rigged the election and now based on the rigged election they're stealing our country. those responsible for wrongdoing must be held accountable. it was a corrupt election. the 2020 presidential election was rigged. we won the election in a landslide. you know it, i know it. >> now, amy, would you have believed a year ago that a defeated trump who lost the house, the senate and the presidency is dominating the republican party the way he is today? >> in normal days, manu, i wouldn't believe that. you know, maybe in the era of pre-trump that would have never
5:32 am
happened a losing presidential -- well, not just a candidate, but a person who did not win re-election as president is pretty much persona non grata for the party. no one wants to talk about that person again. we saw that, say, with jimmy carter and democrats. the fact, though, is that the republican party feels incredibly emboldened in part because of just how tenuous the democrats' hold on both the house and the senate and the white house. that was a 40,000 vote margin in the electoral college that gave biden the presidency. so instead of looking at those narrow losses as a way to sort of reflect on, boy, how could we have won? instead it's, boy, we're so close to winning. however, i will say this, thus far, if you look at the candidates not named trump who have been successful since 2020 or maybe in the 2020 election
5:33 am
and now in the 2021 elections, they have all been candidates who don't act or sound a lot like donald trump. at least those candidates who are winning in battleground areas, virginia, glenn youngkin got -- did a very good job of while not alienating the president, while not running as an anti-trumper was still able to keep him at a distance and run as a more traditional conservative republican, not a trump republican. the successful candidates for the house in 2020. part of the reason that democrats are having such a difficult time, are going to have such a difficult time holding on to the house because they lost 12 seats in the last election, those republican candidates who were successful, they didn't run as trumpian candidates either. so this is really the challenge as we're going to see it coming to play in these primaries, especially in big senate races
5:34 am
in these battleground states. is the trumpian candidate or the one that trump has endorsed, is that person going to be the best kind of candidate to win there? if those candidates are unsuccessful, what that's going to say about the party and about trump's standing. >> a perfect example of that, phil, is ohio. the ohio -- your state. the ohio senate primary. it's becoming a litmus test about the big lie about whether they endorsed trump's idea that he won the election. take a listen. >> i believe this election was stolen from donald j. trump. >> what we saw in 2020, and it's important to have the courage to say it, it the technology industry working with democratic operatives in a few big battleground states rigged the 2020 election. >> phil, can you win a republican primary without talking like this? >> i mean, i think that's the biggest question right now heading into next year, particularly in statewide races
5:35 am
at this point in time. there's going to be another -- pennsylvania is going to be a fascinating microcosm of everything going on as well. i think house races -- i don't think you can, depending on where you are if you're in a red district, i think it's almost mandatory at this point in time. manu, i think one of the dynamics, if you would have asked me if trump would have been the dominant figure at this point, i would have said historic precedence says no. when you talk to meshemembers, they're getting this from their constituents. the reason they're doing this is because this is where they believe the base of their party is. you can't win a republican primary in just about every case without the party. josh mandel has shifted. others to some degree. i think this is the reality of the moment. you watch where these candidates are going, particularly candidates that have no baseline
5:36 am
in the maga movement or as a trump isolationist or america first type who embraced it because they feel it's the only way. we'll find out in a couple months whether that's the case. >> astead, how do you see it? >> i think that's a great point. these republican elected officials, the folks on the political class are not doing this trump song and dance because they want to or because they enjoy it. in a lot of cases -- i've had conversations, i'm sure you all have, most of that political class will say it's a challenge for them. you hurt republicans in places like the georgia senate races and this creates a barrier. the problem is it's the red meat of the base that's become a large enough faction that they cannot ignore them. these are elected officials who are taking cues from their town halls from their constituents, and from a party that really trump has circumvented the influencer class to get ahold on the folks themselves. so it's going to create a challenge for republicans, but
5:37 am
really one we have already seen them confront. it's less of an ongoing civil war and more of a skirmish that has already been won. you know, in washington, there's the liz cheneys versus kevin mccarthies, that's ongoing. as we look at state legislators, polls across the country and republicans who won election posts in statewide races, almost all of them come from that trumpy side of the party. almost all of them are mimics his rhetoric. that's where we've really seen the grassroots of republican party show its head. that might be coming to congress in 2022 and 2024, but it's already made inroads in the republican apparatus at the state level. >> lauren, this all comes as the state level, there are efforts to make it harder to vote. 19 states have done just that. some have limited early voting hours or imposed stricter voter i.d. requirements, others are putting in place rules and personnel to potentially overturn an election result.
5:38 am
there's even a bill in arizona that would allow the legislature to replace a voter's choice with its own. how worried should the public be about states subverting the will of voters in 2024 or even in 2022? >> democrats on capitol hill are deeply worried about it. they started to change their messaging towards the end of the year from a focus just on build back better to a focus on the immediacy and the need to pass voting rights legislation here in the senate. you know, democrats have been having a series of conversations, a series of phone calls, a series of meetings about what could happen, how they'll try to convince senator manchin, senator sinema to potentially change the filibuster rules to pass this importance piece of legislation because they're so deeply concerned about what states are doing to potentially limit the rights of americans to go to the polls and vote. or at least making it harder for those americans to vote. democrats view this as a deeply,
5:39 am
deeply important issue. i think a lot of democratic constituents view this as a deeply important issue. but whether or not, you know, republicans view it that way, i think so far we've seen on capitol hill at least there's little interest in doing anything at the federal level to rein in what states are doing on voting rights. >> republicans call it a federal takeover of elections. democrats just don't have the votes to get it done. they don't have manchin or sinema to change the filibuster rules, they'll keep talking but can they get a bill done seems highly unlikely at best. up next, animosity across the aisle. can congress lower the temperature in 2022?
5:40 am
♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope. ♪ donate now at redcross.org
5:41 am
when it comes to autism, finding the right words can be tough. finding understanding doesn't have to be. together, we can create a kinder, more inclusive world for the millions of people on the autism spectrum. go to autismspeaks.org
5:42 am
2021 began for congress with a deadly riot in its workplace. it went downhill from there. since january 6th, death threats and islamophobic comments directed at democrats, interparty squabbles, fights over masks and medatal detector.
5:43 am
here is speaker pelosi after minority leader mccarthy railed over new mask mandates in july. >> senator mccarthy says it is against the science. >> nonsense. >> here is mccarthy days later. >> i want nancy pelosi to hand me that gavel. it would be hard not to hit her with it. >> lauren, we're on capitol hill every day. i've never seen relations between the parties this bad, namely in the house. are we still feeling the after-shocks of january 6th or is it much more than that? >> i think this is part of the after shock of january 6th. there's been very little trust. i've been speaking to a lot of members leading up to the anniversary of january 6th about where this is coming from. so many democrats i talk to say that they have had such a hard
5:44 am
time trusting their republican colleagues after january 6th because in their mind the lies that were told leading up to that day inspired a crowd to come into the capitol and attack their workplace. i think everything that we've seen has really spurred from that crisis, from that dreadful day on capitol hill. i think it'spart of the reason because mccarthy in a sense has down played the attack at the capitol and rushed to be at trump's side, even though initially he pointed out that trump was responsible for the insurrection. that tune has changed and i think it has led to a crisis at the top between pelosi and mccarthy. all of that animosity has trickled down. >> phil, check this out. we found a house resolution from 1838 banning dueling between lawmakers after a congressman was actually killed by a colleague in a duel. so at least it's not that bad,
5:45 am
thankfully. is there anything that will bring down the temperature before it gets worse? >> i am sort of laughing because it seems like a long time ago, then i was like maybe don't laugh at this because it may be real. i think the answer is no. i think particularly in the house. the senate is a bit different from this, save for the members who were involved in the january 6th overturning of electoral votes. there's no political reason for republicans to change the direction they're headed right now. i think every republican believes that anything they've done over the course of the last year, which has only served to exacerbate the current dynamics are leading them closer to the house majority. so long as that's the case, then that's not going to change. i think, manu, as you and lauren know so well, the people who have the most prominent voices in that house conference right now are not the ones who do policy or the ones who are
5:46 am
political masterminds, they have more tweets and relikes that get us to this point. >> as mccarthy eyes the speaker gavel, he's struggling to control his caucus. moderates think mccarthy doesn't have their back. how hard will it be for him to navigate the factions of the party if they take the majority next year? >> it's going to be very difficult. i mean, i think what we see now is the steroids versions of the same type of schisms that hurt john boehner, challenged paul ryan. this will be something that kevin mccarthy has to experience in a greater facet. i don't want to be the bearer of bad news here, but i think the tenor of politics elsewhere is worse than it is in congress. congress might have -- congress should maybe be preparing for this stuff to get even more vitriolic. this is the place where politics is at right now. the question i often ask voters
5:47 am
when i'm at events, do you feel the country is at a cross roads? republicans and democrats feel a sense of urgency, that's something particularly on the republican side is played out through factions and it will be hard for them to navigate as a caucus. >> ammyy in the days after januy 6th, mccarthy and mitch mcconnell blame d trump for the insurrection. take a listen. >> the president bears responsibility for the attack on the capitol by mob rioters. he should have denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding. >> president trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day. no question about it. >> but, amy, they've taken very different stances since then. mccarthy aligning himself with trump. mcconnell doesn't even mention his name. what does this tell us about how they view their party's future?
5:48 am
>> yeah. we talked about this a little bit earlier, but it's the party -- the party is following the voters or where at least the activists are. you could see mccarthy and mcconnell sort of jumping to the beginning of the parade thinking they were going to lead the rest of the party, including the voters down that path, right? we cannot -- this is not acceptable. we cannot accept this from the president of the united states, even someone that we really like, like donald trump. they look backwards and they realize, wait, no one is behind us. guess this isn't going to work. everything has sort of gone from there. so, my expectation is -- or i think the expectation was that, one, that was going to happen. it didn't. before that, before january 6th, it was that trump was going to lose by a significant margin, that would help sort of break the spell as it were about donald trump. that didn't happen either. so now they see where their political fate is tied to,
5:49 am
that's what they're following. >> it's been a year almost since january 6th and we are still feeling the effects. next, in a year dominated by covid, our panelists share their pick for under-covered story of the year. and improved quality of life. ask your doctor about salonpas. it's good medicine.
5:50 am
5:51 am
5:52 am
now as 2021 comes to an end we asked our panelists to tell us about a story they think did not get the coverage it deserved this year. instead, let's start with you. >> student loans and in the news this week that administration saying they're going to delay payments again. i have been think being young voters. it's underreported story and we've seen approval ratings for democrats and joe biden really crater among young people, a key democratic constituency and one that they need to motivate come next year in 2024 because the administration refused to act on things like student loans, issues like climate change have been held up in the senate and
5:53 am
increasing less party affiliation among millenials. it could be a challenge for the future. >> big question, will they come out in the mid terms? will that help democrats keep control of the house and senate? if not, lead to a republican wave. amy, what about you? >> you know, a lot of money has gone out the door from washington to the states specifically i'm thinking about the stimulus money that went out early in the year almost $2 trillion. we don't really know where a lot of it is, where a lot of it is, where it's been spent. you know, there was a time not that long ago when we have robust local news outlets that would be able to report on this, and tell us what communities are doing or maybe not doing with that money. sadly, most of those local news outlets have gone under and now we're all sort of wondering what is actually happening with the money that's leaving washington? >> the committee for responsible
5:54 am
budget said under biden and trump $5.7 trillion in emergency aid has gone out. $4.9 trillion has been spent, but great question about what exactly how that's gone and if it's been effective. lauren? >> i think one of the undercovered stories was after the u.s. withdrawal in afghanistan, manu, there was a lot of coverage about the days surrounding the exit, but after that, there's been very little coverage of the economic fallout in that country, because a complicated geopolitical issues related to some members of the taliban obviously being under sanctions and how the afghan government actually accesses capital from the u.s. government, so that has been a complicated story and it potentially could lead to malnutrition of millions of children in afghanistan. i think it's just one of those stories where the u.s. left, but what is in its aftermath? we just don't have a great sense of it all the time. >> and the problem that continues to linger for this administration to have to deal with in the years ahead.
5:55 am
how about you, phil mattingly? >> a lot of people are talking about house retirements for good reason but i think one of the most interesting and underappreciated element are the senate republican retirements that we've seen, not because necessarily they're going to lose those seats, the electoral analysis i'll leave up to amy, she can tell me who about outxenophobe the other in my home state of ohio based on has messy primier you look at senate minority leading mitch mcconnell the people are key policy hands inside that conference and are considered i think really steady, level-headed individuals in the conference that helped mcconnell a lot. rob portman from ohio, pat toomey in pennsylvania, richard shelby is considered a deal maker, roy blount, not the most boisterous member but to some degree richard burr, ally of mcconnell's as well. this doesn't mean mcconnell is in any danger in leadership position, if you want to go after him, pack a lunch in that
5:56 am
regard. in terms of individuals in the conference, what it means for the conference going forward politically but perhaps more importantly from a policy perspective. i don't think people necessarily appreciate that as much as they will in 2023 and obviously waiting to hear from senator john thune is going to be, another big loss for mcconnell and the republican infrastructure. >> and the last congress, too, lamar alexander stepped aside, key ally to mitch mcconnell, pat roberts, another establishment type is gone. great point, phil. i was going to joke and say gaslight you all say joe manchin is the least covered story this year. instead, i will dig into something that amy does better than pretty much anybody, coverage of redistricting, the process that happens every ten years to redraw house lines, that is so significant, it's happening right now. it's going to have profound implications for the country, also for the makeup of congress, as well as the partisanship that we see in the house and will
5:57 am
have a major, major impact as well on the midterms in 2022. thank you all for joining us, and that's it for "inside politics sunday." join us every sunday at 8:00 a.m. eastern time and the weekday show as well at noon eastern. up next "state of the union" with jake tapper and dana bash. merry christmas to everyone, happy new year and see you back here on "inside politics sunday" in 2022. ahh! the new ww personalpoints program is particular to you. you can eat pizza. you can even eat this, if you want to. and these... in the same... i mean, not at the same time, i wouldn't do them at the same time. no two plans are the same. when can i start? join today for 50% off at ww.com. hurry, offer ends december 27th. in a recent clinical study, patients using salonpas patch reported reductions in pain severity, using less or a lot less oral pain medicines. and improved quality of life. ask your doctor about salonpas.
5:58 am
it's good medicine. ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope. ♪ donate now at redcross.org
5:59 am
6:00 am
toxic culture, as we approach the anniversary of january 6th, the atmosphere on capitol hill has gone from hostile to a breaking point. >> i've never seen anything like this before. >> reporter: two friends and colleagues trying to change things, democrat debbie din gel and fred uptop are here. and betrayal, she stood by her man time

78 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on