tv CNN Newsroom With Jim Acosta CNN November 13, 2021 12:00pm-1:00pm PST
i'm fredricka whitfield. the "cnn newsroom" continues right now with jim acosta. you are live in the "cnn newsroom." i'm jim acosta in washington. we begin with major breaking news as the fate of the planet hangs in the balance. world leaders at the u.n. climate summit have just reached an agreement. this comes after a marathon of intense negotiations lasting after the summit ended. i want to go straight to cnn's phil black in scotland to bring us up to speed on just about what we know right now about this agreement. phil, this sounds like a major development. what can you tell us? >> reporter: jim, it was a hard-fought fiercely contested
agreement that ultimately at best represents incremental progress and ultimately falls short of what everyone would have ideally liked. but remember, this is a consensus process with almost 200 countries in the room pursuing their own national interests while supposedly trying to make progress on climate change. there is some key language here that's really important, and it's why countries including the united states wanted to support this agreement even though they believe it is not perfect. and that's because it speaks about the importance of limiting global average temperature increasing in very clear language based on the science to 1.5 degrees celsius. it also calls on countries to take dramatic action in order to achieve that this decade because that's what the science says is necessary, cutting global emissions by 45% by 2030, something we're nowhere near doing at that stage. the other key headline here is that for the first time after one of these climate conferences, there is language in the agreement that references
the importance of moving away from coal. there was some drama about this in the final moments, and it has only just been resolved. the original draft talked about accelerating the phaseout of coal-fired energy. what we ended up with as a result of an intervention by india was a subtle change in language but one that is very important and has ultimately disappointed a lot of people in the room. instead of phasing out coal, the agreement now talks about phasing down coal. as i say, just one word, but crucial in terms of the message that it has sent. and it is extraordinary to think that after some 26 of these conferences, never before has the importance of getting away from coal power, the dirtiest of all fuels, getting away from it has never been mentioned in a closing text before. it has now for the first time. that in itself is historic, but people will be leaving this conference disappointed that the language was qualified and softened and weakened to that
extent. ultimately, the key point when it comes to this agreement is that it does not solve climate change, but it does provide a way forward. it clarifies the language, the science, what the goal must be. it tells countries what to do as a next step, and that is come back next year with very clear targets on how to cut emissions that keeps it in line with the science. so what it means is the process is alive, and so are the hopes of the people in the room that ultimately temperature increase can be contained to 1.5 degrees celsius, and the world will then hopefully avoid the worst impacts of climate change. jim? >> and of course i mean the future of our children, our grandchildren, it's all at stake. i suppose a lot of folks will be digging into the final details of the agreement as you are doing for us right now. thank you so much. live from scotland for us. historic agreement reached at the u.n. climate summit after so many hours of discussion. so phil black, thank you so
much. now to a developing story back here in washington. the stakes have been raised for those who choose to ignore the january 6 committee. steve bannon is facing criminal charges for contempt of congress after his refusal to cooperate with the committee. if convicted, he could serve time in jail. so for others who dodged the committee, things, yes, just got real. trump's former white house chief of staff, mark meadows, skipped his deposition friday. now the committee is putting him on notice tweeting friday, we'll put this up, quote, mr. meadmea' action will result in contempt or proceedings to enforce the subpoena. they believe he has important infection about the insurrection that left more than -- insurrection about that left some dead. bannon's indictment could force meadows and others to ask themselves is it really worth all of those legal troubles, and the possibility of jail time. joining me now is stephanie
grisham who resigned her job as trump's white house press secretary and was part of the white house team back on january 6th. she was with the first lady's office at the time as trump supporters attacked the capitol. it's a day that you detail in your book, "i'll take your questions now." thank you so much for joining us. we appreciate it. >> thank you for having me. >> you've known steve bannon for a long timement i was on the campaign trail with you in 2016, steve bannon was a fixture back then, went into the white house, served as the chief strategist to donald trump in the white house and, you know, was unceremoniously booted out of the white house, as you know, in august of 2017, but remained in the picture. so you know him well. do you think he looks at this indictment as a badge of honor? >> absolutely. absolutely. you know, i want to start out by saying i'm very glad that this is happening, and i do hope that it will have, you know, many others who are getting subpoenaed like you said at the beginning, take a step back and
realize there's some consequences here. however, my prediction is that the former president is going to tell everybody to continue to stall, they're going to fund-raise off of this. bannon absolutely i think is going to wear this as a badge of honor and martyr himself almost. you know, this is a very small example compared to what's going on, but i recall in the white house when we would get hatch act violations, that was a badge of honor. it was a joke in the white house. and you know, the president used to say to us, you know who's in charge of the hatch act? it's me. go ahead, say whatever you want to say. i want to also say that i think this makes the 2022 elections more vital than ever because i have a feeling, knowing them like i do, he's going to tell everyone to stall and that if the house takes over with his rubber stamp candidates that he want to get in, the special committee will then go away. that's kind of what i foresee happening. but that's not to take away from what is, you know, what the select committee has done. i'm very, very glad that they've done that, and i'm glad the doj
decided to do what they did with bannon. >> and stephanie, let's remind people again what steve bannon said just one day before the january 6th insurrection. let's talk about that. >> all hell is going to break loose tomorrow. just understand this. all hell is going to break loose tomorrow. it's not going to happen like you think it's going to happen, okay. it's going to be quite extraordinarily different. and all i can say is strap in. the war room, a posse, you have made this happen, and tomorrow it's game day. so strap in. >> and we know there's been reporting that trump and bannon have been in touch with one another prior to the riot. they have been talking for weeks or months as far as i know from doing my reporting at the time when i was at the white house. i was wondering because you and i haven't talked about this, had you heard anything -- was it common knowledge inside the white house that bannon and trump were speaking again? and what did people think about that? i mean, obviously i'm sure there were folks who thought, well,
this can't be good. >> yeah. i mean, we often thought that. now i was in the east wing at that point in time, but it was definitely known that bannon was very much back in the picture. you know, i think that when things started to look dire, bannon, of course, swooped in and had these grand plans and grand schemes and promised that all these patriots would fight for the president. and of course that was something that trump at the time would have loved to hear. bannon was known for when he was in the white house having his big room with his white board and all these plans. so the things that we're hearing now about the willard hotel and this war room, that doesn't surprise me at all either. bannon was very, very good at telling the president what he wanted to hear. i've got to say listening to that, what you just played, it made me sick to my stomach. and you know, let's not forget the president that day during his rally said let's walk to the capitol, i'll walk with you. and honestly, i bet he would have. i bet he would have. the secret service probably told
him no. he encouraged people to walk there. and then i think it's important for people to remember he sat in the dining room and did nothing and said nothing and enjoyed watching these people fight for him. and then just other day, you know, audio was released of him defending people who wanted to -- who were running around the capitol saying they wanted to hang mike pence, his vice president. this is really important, and this really is an attack on our democracy. it's the day i resigned, it -- it made me sick then, it's making me sick now. and i just hope people will understand that how important this is and, you know, look forward, let's not look back, let's look ford how we can never let -- look forward to how we can never let this happen again. i think 2022 is key to that because they're going to try to stall until those votes happen. >> right. no question about it. but setting steve bannon aside for a moment, let's talk about the other big headline and that is the former white house chief of staff mark meadows is defying a subpoena. he failed to appear before the
january 6 committee yesterday. do you think bannon's indictment will have some kind of chilling effect on mark meadows, or is it the same thing, wears it as a badge of honor, it ready to martyr himself, so on and so forth? could this have a chilling affect on people like dan scovino? >> it's funny, i've thought about this a lot. talking about meadows i hope it has a chilling effect on any of them. but the core group, they're going to wear it as a badge of honor. the president's going to say we'll fund-raise off this, don't worry about i'm sure lawyers' fees, we're going to fund-raise off this, patriots are going to step up. this is going to make everybody excited for 2022, and then the committee will go away. the president was very good at calming you down and telling you everything's going to be okay, you just got to fight, fight, fight. and you know, meadows especially, it's very clear that he wants to stay on trump's good side. so i think that the people in the close circle, the people who
need to be spoken to the most are going to wear this as a badge of honor. again, that was the mentality in the white house when i was there. anything we did like that was a badge of honor. >> and trump is battling to keep hundreds of pages of documents out of the hands of the january 6 committee. you think that there are some off-the-book meetings, some in the residence of the white house that lawmakers may want to look into? i mean, you know that residence as well as most ex officials of that administration. what goes on behind closed doors there? >> absolutely. lots of meetings take place in the address where, you know, i'm hoping that they're looking at call logs. but i have a feeling even sometimes things weren't put into call logs. a lot of meetings took place because the president at the time was so paranoid of leaks that a lot of our meetings took place in the residence. number one so he could keep track of who was in there and if it leaked out, he would try to, you know, figure that out. but number two, so that it was
very much kept off the books and documents, anything that was written down, could probably be thrown in the trash where people can't, you know, come and retrieve them to put into the archives. so that happened quite a bit, and i'm sure the select committee is aware of that and is looking into that. mark meadows was one toward the end who was definitely helping to plan those meetings. so i think that mark meadows should be spoken to. i think he will stall. >> and you know, thinking back to what you were saying a little bit earlier, stephanie, about, you know, what trump was doing at the time, sitting and watching all of this unfold, the way he revved up that crowd, incited that crowd on january 6, it makes me wonder do you think donald trump should be indicted? >> you know, i think that the select committee needs to get all the facts out first. i don't want to have a big blanket thought there. i think the select committee needs to do their job. i think that a lot of things
will be uncovered that possibly, yeah, he should. i think -- >> you think he was responsible for what happened? >> i think he was partly responsible for what happened, absolutely. i think he absolutely knew what was going on. there is no way -- again, knowing what i know behind the scenes and how the logistics work and how he wants to know how many people are going to be in the crowd, what is the stage going to look like, who -- how are these people getting in, you know, what's the message, there's no way that he and mark meadows weren't involved every step of the way and weren't talking to bannon about, you know, all hell breaking loose, and they had to know. and so if that's the case and he said go to the capitol and let's fight and he then sat and did nothing to even try to calm his supporters down, then yes, i think something needs to happen to him. i think that our country is divided right now, and i think that we can't let this kind of violence be okay. you know, just this week with the video that gosar posted, it's -- boggles my mind that
republican leadership hasn't denounced this kind of violence. it boggles my mind that the recording with trump talking about or defending the people threatening pence, no one is denouncing this violence. that's part of what the problem is in our country right now. >> absolutely. and chris christie, he's a former trump ally. you know him all too well. >> yeah. >> he's been urging the republican party to move past 2020, he's basically urging the party to move past donald trump and the big lie. he's taken a few shots at trump. even talks about something that happened when he got covid after being at the white house. you probably saw this story in "the new york times." you know, chris christie has a book coming out and writes that his priest arrived at the hospital and rubbed oils on his forehead in the sign of the cross praying over him, and then christie got a call from a hospitalized mr. trump who had one main concern, according to chris christie, and it was, quote, are you going to say you got it from me? mr. trump asked him. that's according to an account in "the new york times." does that surprise you at all,
stephanie, that trump would be thinking about himself in that situation? >> no, it doesn't -- >> all of those people got sick at the white house, and here's chris christie, gravely ill, and trump wants to know if he's going to get blamed. >> absolutely. and you know, again, the story just came out about the disastrous tulsa rally. you know, our own staff got sick, a bunch of staff got sick. one person was hospitalized. he was angry that that leaked. he was not worried about his own staff. i remember when i was quarantined and very sick as his press secretary, coming back and him yelling at me and asking me where the hell i had been. so it doesn't surprise me at all. it's always about donald trump and how it will look for him and how it will affect him. and i just hope that with people like myself or chris christie and a lot of others hopefully coming out soon, we'll just be able to talk about what the playbook is and what people can anticipate. and hopefully as chris christie said look forward because, again, 2022 is so important.
i believe if the people he wants in get in, that will ensure he runs for president because then he's got all of his rubber stamp people in there to do whatever he wants. so there's -- there's a really big picture we need to be thinking about. and i hope i can get that message out to as many people as possible. >> all right. stephanie grisham, thanks for doing that. appreciate it. thanks for joining us this afternoon. we'll talk to you soon. thanks for your time. >> thank you, jim. thanks. >> all right. good talking to you. all right. if convicted of the charges he's facing, could steve bannon end up behind bars? more on that next.
(announcer) carvana's had a lot of firsts. 100% online car buying. car vending machines. and now, putting you in control of your financing. at carvana, get personalized terms, browse for cars that fit your budget, then customize your down payment and monthly payment. and these aren't made-up numbers. it's what you'll really pay, right down to the penny. whether you're shopping or just looking. it only takes a few seconds, and it won't affect your credit score. finally! a totally different way to finance your ride. only from carvana. the new way to buy a car. we're back with our developing story of former trump adviser steve bannon facing criminal charges for contempt of congress after his refusal to cooperate with the january 6 committee. joining me, cnn senior legal analyst and former federal and state prosecutor ellie hoenig. a source tells cnn bannon is
expected to turn himself in on monday. is that typical for the justice department to let someone who has been indicted wait three days to turn himself in? i mean, it's kind of remarkable considering he's run afoul of the law before. >> it is fairly typical when you keep in mind that this indictment came out at around 4:00 p.m. on a friday. they're having him come in to surrender on monday. now there's two ways to arrest somebody in the federal system. the hard way is where federal agents show up at your door unannounced at 6:00 a.m. and march you out in handcuffs. the easier way is you call the defendant or the defense lawyer and say, hey, we need you to surrender later today or tomorrow, and the factors you look at, one, is there violence involved, violence alleged, that does not apply to steve bannon. two, is there some reasonable expectation this person might take off, try to become a funeral -- a fugitive. i don't see that with steve bannon. you are right, he's been indicted federally before last year and pardoned on donald trump's way out the door. i think the monday surrender is what i would expect here.
>> he's familiar with the mechanics of all of this. >> right. >> bannon was charged with one count related to his refusal to appear for a deposition and another related to his refusal to produce documents. each count carries a minimum of 30 days in jail or maximum sentence of one year behind bars. couldn't steve bannon just appear before the committee and say he's not going to answer any questions? sort of the way that jeffrey clark did? why -- why go through all of this? it's for the show, isn't it? >> yeah. i think that's the only reasonable conclusion. if you look at the indictment, they use that against steve bannon. they say he made no good faith effort whatsoever. he straight up defied us. for that reason i think the prosecution has an exceptionally strong case here. look, there could be real consequences. as you said, one unusual feature of this law, if steve bannon ultimately is convicted by guilty plea by a jury, he will go to jail. he will physically be behind bars for at least one month. so it was interesting hearing
stephanie grisham in the last segment talk about how he might welcome that to some extent. but that will be the consequence. >> yeah, i certainly think he's looking at himself as a political prisoner and all that. he's going to run, you know, back to his podcast and talk about this i'm sure plenty. when he's out of jail. before the bannon news broke, the other big headline resolved around former white house chief of staff mark meadows defying the january 6 committee. here's what the committee later tweeted. this is fascinating. they tweeted, "mr. meadows has failed to answer even the most basic questions including whether he was using his private cell phone to communicate on january 6th, and where his text messages from that day are." does that suggest that they're worried about communications being destroyed? it sounds like they want their hands on those texts. >> it does, jim. that is really interesting to me. that got my old prosecutorial antenna up because if what they're saying is they have some information that he deleted texts, that's no different than
putting documents through a shredder. that's potentially criminal obstruction of congress, obstruction of justice. so if mark meadows has done this, we don't know, we're reading into the statement here, but i presume the committee wouldn't make that statement unless they had at least some basis for it. if mark meadows has done this, we're not talking about votes of contempt by congress, we're not even talking about criminal charges like we just saw against steve bannon, we're talking about a much more serious piece of conduct there. >> and does meadows have a stronger case for executive privilege than bannon? i mean, you know, i know that mark meadows for all intents and purposes is thumbing his noes committee right now. but he did work for the government at the time of the insurrection. i suppose couldn't he hide behind the technicality? >> meadows does have a stronger case for executive privilege than steve bannon. virtually everybody has a stronger case for executive privilege than steve bannon. i mean, bannon's case has a few fundamental problems. one, it's the former president who's trying to invoke executive
privilege. not to say that's impossible, but the law is sort of stacked against that. two is bannon was not in the executive branch at the time, in contrast to mark meadows, not only was he in the executive branch, but he was the chief of staff. really important to keep in mind with executive privilege, jim, even if it applies, even if someone can invoke it, the courts are still going to look at the content, the substance of the communication. and if they're talking about what's going on january 6 in a positive way, in a way to cover it up, that's not going to be covered by executive privilege. it's not a shield. it's not a cover-up for wrongdoing or potential criminality. >> all right. thanks so much. we appreciate it as always. talk to you soon. up next, closing arguments begin on monday in the kyle rittenhouse trial, and a new twist could dramatically change what the jury can consider as they determine their verdict. you're living in the "cnn newsroom."
you're a one-man stitchwork master. but your staffing plan needs to go up a size. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire ♪ ♪ there are beautiful ideas that remain in the dark. but with our new multi-cloud experience, you have the flexibility you need to unveil them to the world. ♪
5 flips wisconsin national guard troops are on standby ready to be deployed following a verdict in the kyle rittenhouse trial. both sides are preparing for closing arguments monday and the judge may allow the jury to consider lesser charges for rittenhouse. a new twist putting a spotlight on how prosecutors have handled the case. cnn reports. don't get brazen with me -- >> reporter: the challenges of the prosecution in the trial of kyle rittenhouse on full display in front of a national audience. >> is there something that i'm seeing that draws the face that you're making? >> yesterday i was the target of your ire. >> reporter: prosecutor thomas binger sparring with judge bruce schroeder over his questioning
of rittenhouse. on trial for shooting and killing two men and wounding a third during a night of protests after the police shooting of jacob blake. >> why would you think that that made it okay -- >> reporter: the heated exchanges just some of the hurdles facing prosecutors. some of the prosecutor's witnesses seemed to also support a key claim for the defense -- that rittenhouse did not instill ate -- instigate the conflict. >> every time i encountered joseph rosenbaum he was hyper aggressive. >> reporter: witness after witness pointed to joseph rosenbaum, the first person to be shot, as someone acting erratically that night. pursuing rittenhouse prior to being shot. >> he had been acting very belligerently. he had asked very bluntly to shoot him. >> reporter: even gage graskreutz, the lone survivor, should appeal as the star witness. >> the defendant had pointed his
weapon at me, and i put my hands in the air. >> reporter: like other witnesses, he also helped the defense. >> it wasn't until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun, now your hands down pointed at him, that he fired, right? >> correct. >> the witnesses were kind of all over the board. >> reporter: former wisconsin supreme court justice janine gesky agrees binger faced a challenge from the start especially with the videos from the night of the incident. >> i had the sense that he was using too much video. you know, it was sort of -- it reinforces this chaos that was going on. >> reporter: she says it's kyle rittenhouse himself that could pose the biggest problem for binger. >> most the time the prosecution is dancing in the aisles when a defendant takes the stand because often that's what convicts an offender. you know, they're all over the board. there was none of that fromrity house. >> reporter: binger lost pretrial motion, the judge not
allowing testimony on rittenhouse's comments about prior looting in chicago which according to the motion he said, quote, i wish i had my expletive ar, i'd start shooting rounds at them. >> they could have used it because he was saying i only have this gun in case i need it. i'm there to render medical assistance. >> reporter: she says binger tried to push the envelope and went too far when he approached the topic in court anyway. >> you're an experienced trial attorney, and you're telling me that when the judge says i'm excluding this you take it upon yourself to put it in because you think that you found a way around it? come on. >> reporter: and again with his question about rittenhouse's silence prior to the trial. >> i was astonished when you began your examination by commenting on the defendant's post-arrest silence. >> our thanks for that report. joining us, civil rights attorney and legal analyst areva martin. thank you so much for joining us. we appreciate it.
prosecutors, this has been such a bizarre case. prosecutors have asked the judge if he'd give the jury instructions on lesser charges following closing arguments on monday. the judge said he will give his final decision on that i think today. explain the significance of that if he allows this. that seems pretty important. >> this is a big development, jim. as we just heard in that piece, the prosecution has struggled throughout this case. many of its own witnesses that it put on to help buttress this case actually gave testimony that was favorable to kyle rittenhouse and reinforced his theory that he acted out of self-defense in this very chaotic environment. these lesser included offenses i think is a lifeline to the prosecution. from a procedural standpoint, the jury will get instructions on the original charges, and if they can't find that the prosecution has met its burden of proof in terms of being guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, they then move on to those lesser charges.
and we -- there's some reporting that the judge is going to allow the lesser charges at least as it relates to anthony huber, the second person that was shot and killed by rittenhouse, and as it relates to gauge groskeutz, who was shot but not killed. it seems they will include the lesser charges for mr. rosenbaum. essentially it gives the prosecution an opportunity to get some -- a conviction on charges that maybe it wouldn't have gotten if the original charges were the only charges that the jury had to consider. >> and the judge also said he instructed the jury on provocation when they begin deliberating on monday. can you explain what that means and what kind of impact that could have? >> yeah. that's another -- again, i'll i have a bone thrown to the prosecution. this is huge, jim, because this allows the jurors to decide if kyle rittenhouse provoked any of the people that he shot. we know the prosecution's theory has always been here's a young
man that comes into wisconsin carrying a gun that he wasn't legally allowed to carry, under age, posing as a medic even though he had no experience to provide medical care, saying he was there to protect the business, a business that had not asked him to come there, left the premises of that business, and inserted himself into this volatile situation. and by doing so the prosecution gets to argue now that he provoked both rosenbaum, he provoked mr. huber, and mr. groskreutz. if the jurors find that he is the aggressor, that he set all of these actions into motion, they very well could get the conviction they're looking for. >> and rittenhouse's mother gave an interview to sean hannity on fox news, and she made some -- i guess you could describe it as pretty concerning remarks. let's listen. >> have you and your son discussed whether or not if he had to do it over again he would go into a situation like that?
>> with kyle, i know him, and he probably would do it again because that's the type of person he is. he always wants to help people, even since he was a little boy. that's all he wanted to do was help people. >> i mean it sounds like something the prosecutors might want to say in their closing arguments his own mother says he would do it again? i mean, what? >> yeah, jim. such a tone-deaf statement. here her son is on trial for killing two people, and mind you two unarmed men were shot and killed by her son, and she's going on tv giving an interview when his life is hanging in the balance. and to say that he would do it again, it shows no remorse for the lives that he took and the chaos that he created, and you know, the impact that his actions have had on so many people that were involved in that shooting, the night that he literally shot at four people and landed with respect to three of them.
i think it was a totally inappropriate statement. and for many shows that kyle rittenhouse and perhaps his family have not learned very much from this very serious situation. >> does not seem to be the case. all right. thanks so much for those perspectives on what has been such a strange, strange case. we appreciate it. thank you. >> thanks, jim. coming up, pain at the pump and the grocery store and on your utility bill. we'll break down why prices are skyrocketing and when relief may be coming. you're live in the "cnn newsroom."
people everywhere living with type 2 diabetes are waking up to what's possible with rybelsus®. ♪ you are my sunshine ♪ ♪ my only sunshine... ♪ rybelsus® is a pill that lowers blood sugar in three ways. increases insulin when you need it... decreases sugar... and slows food. the majority of people taking rybelsus® lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea
or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. wake up to what's possible with rybelsus®. ♪ please don't take my sunshine away ♪ you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today.
all year americans have been paying more and more to fill up their gas tanks. today california tied its all-time record for gas prices. it hit an average of $4.67 a gallon, tying the high set in october, 2012. here's what some california drivers told cnn about the surge. >> one price one day and then tomorrow it's like up 30 cents. >> no more starbucks, no more like oh, those shoes are cute. no, okay, i have to get to work. i have to have gas. >> cnn chief business correspondent christine romans joins me now. great to see you. >> hi, jim. >> thanks for doing this. what is causing this pain at the pump? i mean, so many people are just grumbling about it these days. you know, you can't blame them. i mean, it's way higher than it has been for a long time. >> yeah. >> is there any end in sight, and what can we explain to say, okay, this is why it's happened? >> there's a couple of things
happening. covid, right? we weren't driving or flying. the economy shut down. and then it reopened again and reopened very strongly. so people are driving again. there's big demand for oil and gas. and you don't have international producers who are pumping enough to keep up with that big demand. this is a big geopolitical story. the u.s. and many of our allies are begging the opec plus produce frs to pump more oil an they're sitting tight. that's part of the story. across the country it's really -- it varies. it is the most in california. in other places it's a little bit less. the way i calculate it, i look at a typical tank of gas, this year paying about $15 more per tank of gas. and that is your real-feel economic indicator, jim. this is what people when they think about the economy, and the economy is strong right now, they think about the economy, they think. their gas prices and that hurts. >> yeah. if you're putting, you know, filling your tank once a week, that's, what, $15 a week, $60 --
that's real money for a lot of folks. >> it is. >> it's not just gas prices. groceries, everyday items that we see on the shelves, and the biden administration says it is pursuing a multi-tiered approach to addressing inflation. but realistically, what can the biden administration do, and are there any signs that should reassure people? are we going to have to deal with this? >> we're going to deal with it for thanksgiving, for christmas, you might not get all the gifts you want. that's not the biden administration's fault, that's the supply chain which is completely, completely all messed up because, again, of covid, the covid shutdown, then the covid recovery. the economy, you know, the global economy isn't keeping up. you look at some of these grocery prices, and again, it is real money. i mean, you think about it, last year we weren't buying up all of these holiday turkeys, so producers of turkeys in the beginning of the year didn't produce as many birds. now it's thanksgiving again and guess what, here we are with an economy that is roaring and
consumers who want to buy. and you might not be able to get your size of bird that you want. you look at meat and milk and everything going up here. the grocery bills are rising, and i think it's going to stay here, jim, in the near term. i'm not going to say the dreaded "t" word, transitory, i just said it. the fed has been saying for months that this is transitory. it feels like this is going to stick for the time being here. you asked what the administration can do. look, fighting inflation is the fed's job. it can raise interest rates, it can pull back on ustill plus. that means interest rates will be higher to cool off an economy. but we'll watch the fed there. what the white house could do, they could tap that emergency petroleum reserve. i think that would just be window dressing. it doesn't really make a dent in the global supply picture for oil. they could maybe roll back some tariffs, those trump tariffs. that could lower costs for importers. but then again that's at cross purposes with trying to make sure we're building things in the united states and not
rewarding importing foreign goods. so there are a few things they could do. they could also change their meningoc-- the messaging. the biden administration made sure american families get $300 per month per child. that is essentially a tax cut for american families. they could be explaining that you have more money in your pocket to withstand these -- to withstand thevis visitudes of economy and try to explain this is the time to be investing in working families so they can absorb cyclical shocks like higher inflation. they're going to have to work on their messaging. they're saying there's a multi-tiered approach that they're going to unveil. i'd like to see what that is. >> they can come on and talk to you, christine. the door is always open as we like to see. christine romans, thank you so much. we appreciate it. >> nice to see you. coming up next, the #f
#freebritney movement and the latest on the ruling next. with mucinex all-in-one you've got unbeatable relief from your worst cold and flu symptoms. so when you need to show your cold who's boss, grab mucinex all-in-one... and get back to your rhythm. feel the power. beat the symptoms fast. like many people with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's disease, i was there. be right back.
but my symptoms were keeping me from where i needed to be. so i talked to my doctor and learned humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for people with uc or crohn's disease. and humira helps people achieve remission that can last, so you can experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. learn how abbvie could help you save on humira.
again in control of her own destiny. a los angeles county judge terminating the conservatorship effective immediately. we understand from her lawyer that there will be some safeguards put in place to protect her and to protect her estimated $60 million estate. we know there will be two more court dates, but those will be for technicalities and this is really essentially the end of the conservatorship at this point. now, there were no objections in court, which is noteworthy considering that we have seen her go back and forth with her father since this started playing out in court this year. in the two explosive testimonies over the summer, she said she was forced to take birth control, forced to perform and she was a victim of conservatorship abuse and she was pointing the finger at her father. her father petitioning the court to end the conservatorship. instead in september, the judge
terminating him, but keeping it on until now finally ending this. the free britney fans out here in great numbers celebrating. saw people who are hugging, crying. you could also see people performing and singing her songs and britney spears herself taking to instagram to post about it, writing good god, i love my fans so much. it's crazy. i think i'm going to cry the rest of the day. best day ever. praise the lord. can i get an amen. then signed off with hashtag freed britney and really when you look at how her fans have played a role in this, her thanks to them makes a lot of sense because without them, who knows if that day would have come as quickly as it did. cnn, los angeles. >> and the top ten cnn heroes of 2021 have been announced. one will be named the hero of the year by you. as you vote, we'll reintroduce
each of the top ten. growing up in maine, linda developed a passion for the array of marine animals living along its beautiful coast, so when state and government funding vanished and organizations working to protect these animals closed their doors, she dove in to fill the gap and care. >> releasing a seal is really bittersweet and as much i'm excited to see the animal released, it's hard in the sense of now seeing the animal gone. know that you're going back to the ocean? any seal we rescue, the ultimate goal is for that animal to be rel released back into the ocean. i feel this intense responsibility to help these animals and really this is what i was put on this earth to do. yay! >> go to cnnheroes.com to cast your vote and we'll be right back.
(man 1) oh, this looks like we're in a screen saver. (man 2) yeah, but we need to go higher. (man 1) higher. (man 2) definitely higher. (man 1) we're like yodeling high. [yodeling] yo-de-le-he... (man 2) hey, no. uh-uh, don't do that. (man 1) we should go even higher! (man 2) yeah, let's do it. (both) woah! (man 2) i'm good. (man 1) me, too. (man 2) mm-hm. (vo) adventure has a new look. (man 1) let's go lower. (man 2) lower, that sounds good. (vo) discover more in the all-new subaru outback wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. at fidelity, your dedicated advisor will work with you on a comprehensive wealth plan across your full financial picture. a plan with tax-smart investing strategies designed to help you keep more of what you earn. this is the planning effect.
is now a good time for a flare-up? enough, crohn's! for adults with moderate to severe crohn's or ulcerative colitis, stelara® can provide relief, and is the first approved medication to reduce inflammation on and below the surface of the intestine in uc. you, getting on that flight? back off, uc! stelara® may increase your risk of infections, some serious, and cancer. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms, sores, new skin growths, have had cancer, or if you need a vaccine. pres, a rare, potentially fatal brain condition, may be possible. some serious allergic reactions and lung inflammation can occur.