tv The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN October 21, 2021 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
representatives just voted to hold steve bannon in contempt of congress for refusing to cooperate with the selection investigation. the justice department to decide whether to prosecute the trump loyals. i'll speak with a prominent member of the january 6 committee, congressman adam schiff, and we'll talk about what happens next. and breaking news just coming in. the fbi has just confirmed the human remains found in a florida nature reserve do belong to brian laundrie. the missing fiance of gabby petito. welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer and you're in "the situation room." we begin with president biden and the enormous challenges he currently faces as he prepares to take the stage for cnn's exclusive town hall less than two hours from now. our chief white house correspondent is at the site of
the event in baltimore. the president has yet another opportunity tonight to try to promote his domestic agenda, but the white house is still negotiating with a key senator who seems to be willing to hold up key parts of the legislation. >> yeah, wolf, and that is going to be the challenge for the president tonight is that he is here selling a bill that is still not finished. it's not just dealing with the components and the size and the scope of this bill, which of course we've been talking about all week. the priorities that the president has that he's had to scale back this this bill, but now is going to be another chief component of it that you've heard the president tout time and time again. that's how to pay for the bill. senator sinema is now still opposed to raising taxes on corporations and high earners. that has been a stance she's held for several weeks, but one we have learned has not changed. what you're seeing is a scramble among democrats as they are trying to figure out other ways to pay for this bill because
that is something the president and top democrats have said time and time again, this is a buill that's fully paid for. you're seeing frustration among some of sinema's fellow democrats. and a congresswoman was speaking to cnn earlier making that frustration very clear. >> i just think it would be outrageous, honestly. i mean, i don't know if we're going to get it done or not, but i think it would be outrageous to not include something that so desperately needs to be done, that is the most popular part of this entire package and you know, that is something that all of us ran on. i think you need to understand that here, you've got 49 senators who support doing that. there's one that doesn't, apparently. i don't know that to be true. i hope it's not true. >> do you think at this point she needs to be more open and transparent? >> i don't know. i'm just going to let the white
house negotiate. i'm just saying we should reform the tax system and make corporations pay their fair share. >> and that, wolf, is a critical point here because if they do change the way they're going to pay for this, that is going to be one of the most popular points. raising taxes on corporations. you've heard the president say it time and time again. that is something they believe should happen. if they change that, one of the most popular components, that will be another question facing the white house, but tonight while the president is here in baltimore, one thing that white house officials say he will focus on is what is still in this bill and what is something they have not taken off the table and they still want to include when they have the final framework they're hoping to get for tomorrow. that includes billions for climate change, universal pre-k and the expansion of medicare that senator bernie sanders has talked about so much. though there are still big questions about what exactly it's going the look like. >> i want you to stay with us.
i also want to bring in our political director, david, and eva. the president emphasized just how high the stakes are. what will you will watching for in tonight's town hall? >> well, first and foremost, i'm going to be watching joe biden's citizensmanship. this is a real opportunity for him in a prime time audience to talk to the nation. not about top line numbers and the weeds of the negotiation, but actually what's in the package. and to sell that as to what he sees will benefit the american people in a pretty transformative way. and so sort of how he handles sa sales man in chief, but also how he navigates around the big concessions. you just heard the whole piece about the taxes that jai was talking about and sinema's opposition to raising the tax
rate on wealthy individuals. she's not wrong when she says basically the entirety of the democratic party, including joe biden, ran on just that. so if that's out and they have to find another way to pay for it, how does the president explain that? and finally, the urgency. is the president going to set hard, real deadlines as to when he wants to be able to sign something or get a framework announced? i'm going to be looking to see if he has any real hard deadlines here. >> good points. eva, watch what president biden said earlier today on voting rights speaking at the martin luther king jr. memorial. watch this. >> today on the right to vote and rule of law are under unlenting assault from republican governors, toattorne general, secretaries of state, state legislatures and they're following my predecessor, the last president, into a deep, deep black hole and abyss. >> how does he view this
important moment? >> i think he understands the gravity of the moment but also recognized his audience. he was speaking to a group largely concerned about the future of voting rights in this country. i also want to note that in that speech, talking about dr. king, he spoke about his legacy and the context of worker justice and rights. that was critically important, too. i think just as important as talking about voting rights. one of the unfortunate consequences of the weaponization of so-called what many wrongfully describe as critical race theory is this absence of talking about dr. king's full legacy. he was also a critic of capitalism and very concerned about poverty and worker's rights. so president biden mentioning that today. but all that being said, him having these eloquent speeches doesn't necessarily translate to results and that's what both the people in the audience were looking for and voters around
the country that elevated him to president, are looking for. >> we'll see if he can deliver in the next few days. david, getting back to these spending issues that are so sensitive, there's mounting frustration, as you point out. with kirsten sinema of arizona. but the white house maintains she's negotiating in good faith. what does that tell you? >> that they need her vote. it's a 50/50 senate and every single democ single democratic senator's vote is needed. when the white house believes she's negotiating in good faith, that is them keeping her at the table because they don't have any other option. that's how i read it. >> the white house insists this plan and the speaker, nancy pelosi, insist the plan will be fully paid for. so what happens now if they can't go ahead and raise taxes on wealthy americans? they can't go ahead and raise taxes for corporation, for
example. how do they pay for it? >> well, that would be a big concession if they cannot find an alternative. what we are told though right now, they are trying to find an alternative, but it's not simple to find a new tax structure that can pay for this given the enormous side. yes, it's come down from what progressives initially wanted. now that range is at 1.75 to 1.9 or roughly $2 trillion. that's still a lot of money to be paid for. that has been one of the chief talking points you've heard from democrats. is telling people not to worry about the spending because they believe with the tax increases it is going to balance each other out. of course now if they don't have that with this opposition from senator sinema, then that's going to be a big question for them. and it's not something that you can really just come up with easily. and so i think that's why you're seeing hesitation from people like senator manchin about whether or not they'll actually have a deal tomorrow or just a loose framework and you hear the
frustration from progressives there. i think they're going to be looking for a pretty detailed framework if they are going to get their support behind that other infrastructure bill that of course hinges upon the suck says of this one, according to those progressives. so big questions facing the white house before this town hall tonight and we'll see what the president has to say about the latest negotiations with senator sinema, obviof course. >> eva, you've spent a lot of time covering the governor's race in virginia. what are the implications of these current talks dealing with these issues for the president? what are the implications for the governor's race in virginia? and for that matter, for the 2022 midterm elections? >> i think we have to be careful not to overstate the implications of this governor's race. yes, this is going to be a disaster for democratic -- it will be a disaster for democrats if terry mcauliffe loses the election, but this is principally a race between
m mccallife and youngkin. i was at a rally of his. huge numbers. couldn't even get in the room. so he is speaking to a vulnerability there. if he's able to pull out a win here, we're going to hear a lot of these same talking points echoed from republicans in their races in 2022, but i don't think we should be overconsumed with the implications of just this one race and use it as an example for national trends across the entire country. >> let's not forget biden carried virginia by ten points last year and if this -- seems to be neck and neck right now, so we'll see what happens. guys, thank you very, very much. stay with cnn as anderson cooper moderates our exclusive town hall with president biden. it all begins tonight, 8:00 p.m.
eastern. and there's more breaking news ahead on the house vote to hold steve bannon in contempt of congress. will the u.s. justice department prosecute the former trump adviser? we'll discuss with adam schiff. deon, hand it over. now how does that make you feel? like a part of me is missing. gabrielle? this old spice fiji hand and body lotion has me smoother than ever. that's what it does.
we've never created anything quite like it. the all-electric, all-mercedes eqs. we're following breaking news on the january 6th investigation. the full house of representatives voting just a little while ago to hold former trump adviser, steve bannon, in contempt of congress. let's go to ryan nobles. he's up on capitol hill. the house just sent the criminal referral letter on bannon to the
u.s. justice department. tell us about that. >> that's right, wolf. nancy pelosi joined by the chair of the select committee assigned that criminal contempt referral almost immediately after it was passed be i the house of representatives. we were told the clerk had it in the hands of the u.s. attorney in washington, d.c. by 5:30 this afternoon. this as the select committee continues its quick work to get the information they're looking for. steve bannon, a long time adviser, former president trump and the man who predicted this on the day before january 6th -- >> all hell is going to break loose tomorrow. >> is now in a legal predicament. >> the resolution is adopted. >> the house of representatives voting to refer him to the department of justice for criminal contempt of congress because he has refused to comply with a subpoena of the january 6th select committee. >> if you act deliberately with
sneering, cavalier contempt for the american people and their representatives, we will hold you in contempt. we will get to the truth of the violent assault on america. do not believe for one moment that if we fail to hold steve bannon accountable that he will be the exception. he will become the rule. not a rule of law. but the misrule of men. either we are all equal before the law or none of us is. this is the essence of our democracy. >> nine republicans joined democrats in the contempt vote. one of them, liz cheney, criticizing her own party. >> in this chamber right now who were evacuated with me and with the rest of us on that day during that attack. people who now seem to have forgotten the danger of the moment, the assault on the constitution, the assault on our congress. >> the vote now triggers a process in the hands of the department of justice. they will decide if bannon's
defiance is worthy of prosecution. if convicted, he could face fines and jail time. attorney general garland will have the final call. >> department of justice will do what it always does in certain circumstances. will apply the facts in the law to make a decision. >> meanwhile, the committee continues to negotiate with other trump allies to get them to cooperate with their investigation. they've postponed depositions for mark meadows and pentagon official, kash patel. dan scavino is now scheduled to appear before the committee on november 4th as some lawmakers sound the alarm about future elections. >> even now, however, the ex-president and his allies continue to cast doubt on the last election and appear to be drafting a plan to overturn the next one. and next time, we may not be so lucky. >> all this while trump himself continues to pedal false rhetoric about the 2020 election in attempts to whitewash the
violence and chaos of january 6th. the insurrection took place on november 3rd, trump wrote in a statement. january 6th was a protest. >> and while the committee does want to get as much information as they can from steve bannon, they are also using today's vote as a signal to the other people that they've subpoenaed that they will do whatever it takes to get that information. they're still negotiating with mark meadows and kash patel. they're hoping to hear from dan scavino the first week in november. >> thank you very much. let's discuss with a key member of the january 6 committee, adam schiff. also the chairman of the house intelligence committee and he's the author of the new best seller, midnight in washington, how we almost lost our democracy and still could. congressman, what's your message to the vast majority of your republican colleagues who voted against holding steve bannon in contempt? >> well, if they think they can do a carve out here and
essentially exempt one of the former president's friends without e vis rating congress' power, they're wrong. whether we're all in this tailgate or we lose out on a fundamental aspect of our democracy that the rule of law applies to everyone and no one is above that law. so they're undermining their own institution. a system of checks and balances, and they're continuing to damage that they did in pushing the big lie about the election. >> republican congressman, jim banks, scoffed at the idea that steve bannon had advanced knowledge saying, quoting, every american knew that violence was a possibility that day. what's your react to that? >> first of all, if steve bannon has nothing to say and nothing to fear then why is he obstructing congress and refusing to testify? so let's find out what he knows.
clearly, he had a reason to say he thought all hell was going to break loose, and it did. he was in communication with the president. he may know something about who organized these rallies, what the participation was going to be among these white nationalists groups. there's one way to find out and that's to put him under oath at this point. if he doesn't, i hope the justice department will put him in jail. >> speaking of the justice department, attorney general garland testified today that the justice department will apply the facts and the law, his words, to consider your referral to hold bannon in contempt. if the department of justice declines to prosecute him, what would that, where would that leave your overall investigation? >> well, i think it would be a real body blow. if they do apply the facts to the law, i think it's actually quite simple. because steve bannon has no immunity to somehow just fail to show up.
i think no valid privilege claim to assert and even if he did, he would need to come before the congress and specify which question, which document, the former president was formally asserting privilege. none of that happened. so the facts could be clear. the law also could be clear. and to me, this is an early test of whether our democracy is recovering. in the justice department shrugs and says we're not going forward, they're inviting other contempt of law by other individuals. not just contempt of congress, but contempt of the law more generally. and i just don't think that's where the garland justice department wants to go. >> how soon will your select committee decide whether to pursue contempt for other witnesses? for example, mark meadows and dan scavino, and kash patel? >> as soon as we decide we're get getting nowhere. if we feel like we're getting
stalled for time, we won't hesitate to move forward with contempt. but if we can work it out and secure their testimony without having to bring up a criminal contempt charge, that is certainly our preference. >> congressman, thanks so much for joining us. >> there's more breaking news we're following here in "the situation room." a major development in the gabby petito homicide case. the fbi now confirming moments ago that the remains of her fiance, brian laundrie, have been found. nah, a stormy day. classical music plays. um uh, brass band, new orleans. ♪ ♪ she drives hands free... along the coast. make it palm springs. ♪ cadillac is going electric. if you want to be bold, you have to go off-script. experience the all-electric cadillac lyriq. imagine a world where we have the tools to sell things that mean something.
like a sunscreen made for melanated skin that blends in. prove that things don't have to be the way that they've always been. the world's been waiting for what you do. >> tech: when you get a chip in your windshield... trust safelite. this couple was headed to the farmers market... when they got a chip. they drove to safelite for a same-day repair. and with their insurance, it was no cost to them. >> woman: really? >> tech: that's service the way you need it. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ step up. prep up. to help keep you free from the risk of hiv. descovy for prep. a once-daily prescription medicine... ...that helps lower the chances of getting hiv through sex. it's not for everyone. descovy for prep has not been studied in people assigned female at birth. talk to your doctor to find out if it's right for you. descovy is another way to prep. descovy does not prevent other sexually transmitted infections, so it's important to use safer sex practices and get tested regularly. you must be hiv-negative to take descovy for prep. so, you need to get tested for hiv immediately before and at least every 3 months while taking it. if you think you were exposed to hiv or have flu-like symptoms, tell your doctor right away. they may check to confirm you are still hiv-negative.
serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a build-up of lactic acid and liver problems. the most common side effect was diarrhea. tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking descovy without talking to your doctor. ask your doctor about your risk of hiv... ...and if descovy for prep is right for you. get help paying for descovy for prep. learn more at stepupprepup.com. (naj) at fisher investments, our clients know we have their backs. (other money manager) how do your clients know that? (naj) because as a fiduciary, it's our responsibility to always put clients first. (other money manager) so you do it because you have to? (naj) no, we do it because it's the right thing to do. we help clients enjoy a comfortable retirement. (other money manager) sounds like a big responsibility. (naj) one that we don't take lightly. it's why our fees are structured so we do better when our clients do better. fisher investments is clearly different. ♪
♪ there are beautiful ideas that remain in the dark. but with our new multi-cloud experience, you have the flexibility you need to unveil them to the world. ♪ moving is a handful. no kidding! fortunately, xfinity makes moving easy. easy? -easy? switch your xfinity services to your new address online in about a minute. that was easy. i know, right? and even save with special offers just for movers. really? yep! so while you handle that,
missing since shortly after the death of his fiancee, gabby petito. randi kaye is working the story for us. the fbi just a little while ago confirming laundrie's remains had been recovered along with some other potentially important evidence. what are you learning? >> well, woclf, it's been more than five weeks since he disappeared from his home. he left just two days after gabby was reported missing and now after that exhaustive search, we have learned, finally, that the remains found here just yesterday have been identified as brian laundrie. the fbi identifying the human remains as brian laundrie after comparing dental records. >> this is tragic. >> one day after the remains of laundrie were found in a southwest florida reserve, investigators returned to further search the area today amid treacherous conditions. >> we're talking about water levels up above almost the chest
area. rattlesnakes. moccasins. alligators. you just can't walk up and look. it's not like you're searching a house or a car. these areas are huge and they're covered by water. >> a source close to the investigation tells cnn the remains appear to have been there a while. clothing believed to be laundrie's was found as well. laundrie, who had not been charged in the death of his fiancee, was last seen september 13th when he went hiking in the carlton nature reserve, his family said. the remains found yesterday were in the carlton reserve, about a 45-minute walk. officials say belongings were found by his father. >> it's quite sad, you can imagine, as a parent, finding your son's belongings alongside them remains. and that's got to be heartbreaking and i can tell you that they are heartbroken. >> but there are questions about when and where the remains were found. including the circumstances of
yesterday's search that involved his parents, roberta and chris laundrie. the area had been underwater until recently and only reopened to the public yesterday. >> as they went further in, chris ventured off the trail into the woods, he was zigzagging in different areas. law enforcement was doing the same thing. at some point, chris locates what's called a dry bag. it's a white bag laying in the woods, i'll say 20 feet or so off the trail. according to chris, it was in some bramble. >> the personal items include a backpack and notebook, but so far, the contents have not been revealed. laundrie disappeared more than a month ago. wednesday, the fbi called him a person of interest in the killing of petito. on september 1st, laundrie returned to his parents' home in florida without petito after their summer road trip. her remains were later found in wyoming. her death ruled a homicide. and not long after those remains
were identified as brian laundrie, law enforcement went to the home of chris and roberta laundrie, where brian used to live with gabby petito, his fiancee, and alerted them that yes, indeed, those remains did belong to their son. one other note, wolf. you heard the attorney there mention this dry bag. i'm told by a source close to the investigation that near that dry bag is where that notebook was found. i'm told that it was quite wet, but they believe it is possibly salvageable. they're going to try and dry it out and see what's inside of it. but this is very important in case brian did write anything down about what happened to gabby, how she ended up dead. certainly the family and many others are going to want sentences. >> randi, thank you very much. let's get more on this. joining us now, forensic pathologist and deputy director, andrew mccabe. andrew, can you walk us through the fbi's role in identifying
these remains as brian laundrie? what resources did the fbi devote to this effort? >> well, wolf, there's no question that this is a case that's been given all the resources it could possibly need. in terms of this current it ration over the last 24 hours or so, i'm quite sure that the local medical examiner was the person who conducted the exam of the remains, but the fbi can be very helpful in terms of getting the either dna samples or dental records and those sorts of things to the medical examiner for the purpose of comparing with the sample, the evidence they recover on the scene. so there's also a coordination piece here between the investigation that's still ongoing out in wyoming. let's not forget that we have a homicide that was committed in a national park. so federal land in wyoming. and i'm quite sure the fbi's still actively engaged in trying to figure out exactly who killed
gabby petito. >> the fbi used dental records to identify laundrie. how complicated is that process? >> yeah, i mean, if you have good x-rays from before, it's quite doable to make a comparison. it's visual. and once you have those next to each other, you can do it pretty rapidly. >> you know, andrew, we just heard randi kaye report that the notebook recovered at the scene might be salvageable. what information might investigators be able to glean from that discovery? >> it's incredibly important, wolf, that the evidence recovery agents and other technicians on the scene recover that evidence in a way that preserves it for exploitation back at the lab. i would expect that most of those articles have been taken or will be flown to the fbi lab in quantico, virginia, where we
have experts who really spend their careers doing things like drying out paper everidence, trying to recover the writing and the ink marks and potentially fingerprints and all sorts of other potentially relevant pieces of evidence from an article just like this. in terms of understanding laundrie's motive, his feelings about petito, maybe even you know, any kind of notes or comments that he may have made about the events we're still trying to understand in wyoming, that notebook could shed a lot of light on all those issues. >> do the laundrie parents, their involvement in the search at all affect suspicions that are out there now? >> i think the laundrie family has conducted themselves in a fairly odd way that's generated
a lot of suspicious right from the beginning, right? there's the oh, he left on the 14th. no, it turns out he left on the 13th. there's been all kinds of suspicions about that. chris laundry yesterday, that's all known to the investigators. so it may be entirely coincidence that he came across his son's remains and articles of clothing and things. that could be the case as the area was recently submerged in water, but we have to leave it up to the investigators. >> as a forensic pathologist, what stood out to you? >> yeah, i mean, usually even when i respond to a crime scene, the family is not allowed. no external people are allowed other than the immediate, you know, investigators. so that was odd to me. but in this case, i do believe that the two major issues again
are identification, which has been completed, and now my colleagues have quite a challenge in determining the cause of death. you know, i don't know how much has been recovered. of his body. so that will be challenging. i know they were out there again today. and maybe the diary or other evidence can shed light as to what happened. >> thank you very much. just ahead, we're counting down to cnn's exclusive town hall with president biden as he hits a new sticking point in trying to get his ambitious agenda through congress. we'll speak with a key democratic lawmaker when we come back. wealth is saving a little extra. worth is knowing it's never too late to start - or too early. ♪ ♪ wealth helps you retire. worth is knowing why. ♪ ♪
principal. for all it's worth. ♪ you pour your heart into everything you do, which is a lot. so take care of that heart with lipton. because sippin' on unsweetened lipton can help support a healthy heart. lipton. stop chuggin'. start sippin'. tums vs. mozzarella stick when heartburn hits, fight back fast with tums chewy bites. fast heartburn relief in every bite. crunchy outside, chewy inside. ♪ tums, tums, tums, tums ♪ tums chewy bites
(vo) how do you know when you've found your team? whether you're winning, or just doing your best. when you're on the lanes, they're right behind you. reunite with your team. go bowling. ray loves vacations. but his diabetes never seemed to take one. everything felt like a 'no'. everything. but then ray went from no to know. with freestyle libre 2, now he knows his glucose levels when he needs to. and... when he wants to. so ray... can be ray. take the mystery out of your glucose levels, and lower your a1c.
now you know. try it for free. visit freestylelibre.us [sfx: radio being tuned] welcome to allstate. ♪ [band plays] ♪ a place where everyone lives life well-protected. ♪ and even when things go a bit wrong, we've got your back. here, things work the way you wish they would. and better protection costs a whole lot less. you're in good hands with allstate. click or call for a lower auto rate today. president biden is about to face voters in a cnn town hall as the divide between a small number of congressional democrats poses a very large threat to his priorities in his agenda. let's discuss with democratic
congressman, ro khanna of california. a key member of the party's caucus. if tax hikes on the wealthy and corporations for that matter are out as senator sinema apparently wants, does that jeopardize progress, progressive support for that matter, for this plan? >> wolf, i don't think so. richard neil, the chairman of the house ways and means committee apparently has a constructive meeting with senator sinema. there are ways to raise revenue by just making sure the big corporations are paying the tax they owe. a 7% minimum. that can raise revenue. tax enforcement can raise revenue. i hope some tax increases are on the table and will be supported. >> you mentioned your fellow congressman, richie torres saying, i'm quoting, there's a sense we live under the tyranny of kirsten sinema? >> i meant richard neil of ways
a and means. i think he's just expressing a frustration that 49 senators believe we ought to raise taxes on the very wealthy. senator sinema already voted on the tax cuts of trump. all we're saying is restore them. we don't understand what is the governing ideology. >> if this spending plan gets whittled down and it's already gone from 3.5 trillion down to below $2 trillion, can democrats afford not to pass at least something for the american people? >> we must pass it and talk about what's in it. it's going to mean childcare. you're not going to pay more than 7% of your income. seniors are going to get dental, vision, hearing. there's a lot of good things to improve working class life and we just need to do a better job communicating. i'm confident the president will do that tonight on cnn. >> if it's going the take longer
to get the so-called reconciliation package passed through the senate, would you at least go ahead and immediately pass the $1.2 trillion infrastructure package which passed the senate with 19 republican senators and all 50 democratic senators? >> wolf, the president has been very clear. the speaker has been clear. they need to pass together. the reason is that the house had absolutely no say in that infrastructure bill so a lot of our provisions on climate are in the reconciliation. i'm confident they both will pass and at least we will have a clear framework for the reconciliation bill. >> so it's basically all or nothing. is that what you're saying? >> it's going to be all. it's not all or nothing in the sense that we're willing to co compromise. we need both. >> appreciate it. thanks so much. coming up, cdc advisers sign off on boosters for moderna and
johnson & johnson. your mission: stand up to moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. and take. it. on... ...with rinvoq. rinvoq a once-daily pill can dramatically improve symptoms... rinvoq helps tame pain, stiffness, swelling. and for some rinvoq can even significantly reduce ra fatigue. that's rinvoq relief. with ra, your overactive immune system attacks your joints. rinvoq regulates it to help stop the attack. rinvoq can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious infections and blood clots, sometimes fatal, have occurred...
...as have certain cancers, including lymphoma, and tears in the stomach or intestines, and changes in lab results. your doctor should monitor your bloodwork. tell your doctor about any infections... and if you are or may become pregnant while taking rinvoq. take on ra. talk to your rheumatologist about rinvoq relief. rinvoq. make it your mission. learn how abbvie could help you save on rinvoq.
another big step tonight on covid-19 booster shots. cdc advisers vote just a little while ago to recommend booster doses of the moderna and johnson & johnson vaccines. the group endorsing the fda's emergency use authorization today earlier. let's discuss this breaking story with a key member of the fda vaccine advisory committee, dr. paul offitt, the author of the new book "you bet our life, from blood transfusions to mass vaccination, the long and risky history of medical innovation."
doctor, what's your reaction to these decisions from cdc vaccine advisers? >> i think they were the right decisions. basically what they're saying is if you're over 65, you benefit from a booster dose. if you're between 15 and 64 and have a medical condition with high risk of severe covid then you too likely benefit from a booster dose. for the most part young healthy people are protected against severe disease. what's been amazing about these vaccines, whether it's moderna, pfizer or johnson & johnson is protection against severe disease has really held up. it's held up for all aiming gr -- age groups and held up for delta. but those two groups the booster dose would be of value. >> what about mixing and matching boosters from different companies based on the data you've analyzed. is that a good idea? is it safe? >> so when we met last time,
kristen light presented data from the university of maryland with 50 people in each group. basically what she foundi is everything cost. if you got johnson & johnson and boosted with moderna or pfizer, that worked. so to make it easier for people, you can be boosted with anything if you're in those two groups i just told you about and it is likely to boost your immune response. what we need to decide we want out of this vaccine is what is the goal. if it's protection against severe disease, we've met that goal. if it's to try to keep your neutralizing antibodies high, then we're talking about more frequent boosting. and i think we'll see how this plays out. we're trying to build the airplane while it's in the air at some level. >> yeah, we get a flu shot once a year. eventually who knows, we might have to do it with this covid vaccine. would you recommend those who receive the johnson & johnson vaccine, more than 15 million americans we're told, would you recommend that they now get a
booster of one of the mrna vaccines, pfizer or moderna, which seem to be more effective? >> well, you're right in that certainly if you boosted with an mrna vaccine on top of johnson & johnson and introduced a greater antibody response than j&j vaccine. but j&j did a 30,000 person trial of the two dose vaccine and it was 94% effective against all manner of illness and greater than that against severe disease so both work. both the johnson & johnson boost or mrna boost. >> and the johnson & johnson, that's a one dose shot, get the booster after two months, right? >> at least two months, but it can be six months later. i think, frankly, in retrospect johnson & johnson's was probably always a two-dose vaccine. when we reviewed those data in february, they were in the midst of a two-dose trial which they finished a few months after that and clearly showed there the efficacy was 94% as compared to
75% against illness with the one dose vaccine. so i think that is a two-dose vaccine. >> dr. paul offit, as usual, thank you very, very much. coming up, former trump strategist steve bannon now in contempt of the u.s. congress. we'll take a closer look at the unusual path that brought him to this point. or lines for family members, you'll get great value on america's most reliable 5g network. like 2 lines of unlimited for just $27.50 a line. only at t-mobile. this wasn't an old bear, it was like a bear squatch. dad, what's a bear squatch? it's a cross between a bear and a sas... it's made up. -he's usually sleeping. -he'll never sleep again. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
in 2016, i was working at the amazon warehouse when my brother passed away. and a couple of years later, my mother passed away. after taking care of them, i knew that i really wanted to become a nurse. amazon helped me with training and tuition. today, i'm a medical assistant and i'm studying to become a registered nurse. in filipino: you'll always be in my heart. is struggling to manage your type 2 diabetes knocking you out of your zone? lowering your a1c with once-weekly ozempic® can help you get back in it. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! my zone... lowering my a1c, cv risk, and losing some weight... now, back to the game! ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds.
in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! you may pay as little as $25 for a 3-month prescription.
one of the most important things you can do is to make sure you call 811 before you dig. calling 811 to get your lines marked: it's free, it's easy, we come out and mark your lines, we provide you the information so you will dig safely. more now on steve bannon, the former trump strategist and enduring ally who's now being held in contempt of congress for defying a subpoena from the select committee investigating the january 6 insurrection. brian todd is joining us right
now. brian, this is the latest chapter in the ongoing drama between steve bannon and the former president. >> it certainly is. steve bannon continues to play this game of chicken with the house select committee. we have new information on bannon's ascent in washington and what drives him to be such a beacon for the far right. tonight this notorious 67-year-old political operative is one of the most sought-after figures in washington. as he continues to elude the house select committee investigating january 6th and risks a contempt of congress charge, those who have covered steve bannon and worked with him are not surprised that he's in the middle of this maelstrom. >> this is somebody who lives by confrontation and believes that sheer force of personality is enough to undo our structures. >> reporter: tearing down the structures of government, stirring chaos in the political establishment are at the core of steve bannon's beliefs and his goals, those who have known him say. something bannon alluded to as he started working for the trump white house in 2017.
>> deconstruction of the administrative state. and if you -- >> reporter: at that time bannon's power and proximity to it had few rivals. in the early months of trump's presidency, bannon had a top white house advisor role, leveraged his relationship with trump to even get himself a seat on the national security council, was called by "the new york times" the de facto president, and displayed a level of ambition tough to live up to. >> i think that he didn't get nearly as much done as he thought. i remember when he came into the de facto role in the white house, he had this board in his office with all these things they were going to do. >> reporter: bannon found himself booted out of his white house job just seven months into it, some say for committing one of the cardinal sins against donald trump. >> bannon's falling out with trump came bosses trump was jealous and resentful of the media coverage that bannon was getting. >> reporter: but bannon eventually got back into trump's good graces by using his podcast and other platforms to amplify false claims that the 2020
election was stolen. and according to the house committee, helping to plan trump's stop the steal rally on january 6th and riling up the base the day before. >> this all converging and now we're on as we say the point of attack. the point of attack tomorrow. >> reporter: all this from a man who according to one of his representatives was born into a family of democrats, got a master's at georgetown university, an mba from harvard and served as a u.s. naval officer. >> what do you think it was that drove him so far right? >> opportunity and access and power and money and fame. >> reporter: kurt bardella believes there's a good chance bannon will return to the epicenter of donald trump's political world, especially if trump runs for president again in 2024. but bardella is also believing that there's just as good a chance that the two of them will turn on each other again. contacted by cnn, a representative for steve bannon did not comment for our story. >> all right, brian, thank you very, very much. brian todd reporting for us.
to our viewers, thanks very much for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in the situation room. you can always follow me on twitter and inst instagram @wolfblitzer. tweet the show @cnn sitroom and it's also available as a podcast. look for us on cnn.com/audio or wherever you get your podcasts. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. outfront next, the breaking news. the fbi announces moments ago that the human remains found in a florida nature reserve are those of brian laundrie. plus the full house of representatives votes to hold steve bannon in contempt. now all eyes are on the attorney general. will merrick garland prosecute bannon? and president joe biden about to face voters in cnn's town hall. anderson cooper is getting ready for that up to hall right now and will join me next. let's go outfront. good evening, i'm erin burnett. we are less than o