tv Erin Burnett Out Front CNN October 4, 2021 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT
wolf. >> certainly is. camila bernal, thank you very, very much. and to our viewers, thanks very much for watching. you can always follow me on twitter and instagram @wolf blitzer. situation room by the way is also available as a podcast. look for us on cnn.com/audio or wherever you get your podcasts. "erin burnett out front" starts right now. outfront next. facebook catastrophe. the world's largest social media company just coming back online after six hours off as facebook is facing damning accusations of putting profit over all else. the lawyer of the whistle-blower who uncovered all of this, and now says the company could destroy her for speaking out is my guest tonight. plus, the clock is ticking. president biden calling republicans hypocritical and dangerous for abandoning democrats in raising the debt ceiling. all as the nation faces the very real possibility of a first default in american history.
and stephanie grisham, a trump insider, selling books by warning of a 2024 trump run that she is, quote, terrified about. but is her book tour all about her own image? let's go outfront. and good evening, i'm erin burnett. out front tonight, facebook's disaster. just hours before a whistle-blower is set to testify before congress against the tech giant about its quest for profit over public safety, facebook's site is coming back online. after it was done almost six hours today. and the other sites facebook owns, instagram and whatsapp, also, offline. it's one of the longest outages for facebook which has 3 billion users. it impacted the planet. massive outage comes as we are learning damning new claims of the internet giant putting profit above all else. >> the thing i saw facebook over and over again was there were conflicts of interest between what was good for the public, and what was good for facebook. and facebook, over and over again, chose to optimize for its
own interests, like making more money. >> that was frances haugen. a former-product manager who is about to tell all to congress. according to her prepared testimony, she will say and i quote, facebook's products harm children, stoke division, weaken our democracy, and much more. the company's leadership anyways ways to make facebook and instagram safer and won't make the nice changes because they have put their immense profits before people. she will also say facebook could quote destroy her for speaking out but that she believed that, quote, as long as facebook is operating in the dark, it is accountable to no one. she says she has tens of thousands of pages of internal documents to help prove her point and since "the wall street journal" has started reporting on those documents and they have had a trove of them and they started this series. you may have seen it on the front page. started back on september 13th. well, since "the wall street journal" started that, facebook shares have plunged more than 13%. they have been plunging on this news and all of this could be just the tip of the iceberg
because haugen knows the significant influence facebook has over its billions of users wo around the world. >> misinformation, angry content is enticing to people and -- >> very enticing. >> -- and keeps them on the platform. >> yes. faceb facebook realized that if they change the algorithm to be safer, they will click on less ads, they will make less money. >> haugen is also expected to be grilled on facebook's role in the deadly insurrection. her team which was reportedly charged with helping to protect the democratic process, that was actually the -- the formal description. and reducing, again, quoting, the spread of viral misinformation and fake accounts was dissolved last december. and then, obviously, the deadly insurrection came after that. she told "the wall street journal" that she was, quote, dismayed when facebook publicly played down its connection to the violence despite widespread internal concern that its platforms were enabling dangerous social movements.
and of course, we all now know that to be the case. the lies and conspiracy theories related to the election still running rampant on facebook. our donie o'sullivan spoke to one trump supporter, and just listen to what she shares with her 3,000 facebook friends. >> the audit is showing that they are actually imitation ballots. >> reporter: with this video you shared, right? >> mary is talking about the sham audits in arizona and georgia. for the record, there was no notable fraud in either election. but mary's 3,000 friends shared with their friends, and on and on and that conspiracy theory went far and wide. and with every press of the like button, facebook got more information about each user who engaged in that conversation. in fact, facebook's algorithm knows more about you than you do. according to a study mentioned in a book, after ten looks -- ten likes, facebook knew more about the nearly 90,000
participants in the study than their colleagues at work. 70 likes, facebook could predict the participant's opinion better than their friends. 150, it knows you better than family members. and after 300 likes -- that's it, 300 -- facebook knew the study's participants better, their interest, what they believed, better than their spouse. okay. now, that is power and look. when you have that kind of power, you are not going to give it up. the social-media company in a statement defends itself. saying, quote, to suggest we encourage bad content and do nothing is just not true. donie o'sullivan is outfront on capitol hill to begin our coverage tonight. and, donie, facebook just coming back online after a very troubling day for the company. i mean, six hours out was stunning, on its own. never mind, against the backdrop of this incredible moment. >> that's right, erin. and you talk about power. today was a reminder of facebook's power. that platform, that company controlling three of the world's biggest social-media platforms.
facebook, instagram, and whatsapp. we are learning now that the -- the services are slowly coming back online. this was very unusual, by the way. facebook was out -- out for almost six hours today which basically never happens. um, why that all happened? we don't know, yet. it sounds like the company is still trying to figure that out. but as one headache ends today for facebook, a new one begins tomorrow here behind me in capitol hill when a whistle-blower will testify about all of the company's ills. about their corrosive impact on democracy, and a key component of this whistle-blower's allegations is about the negative effects that instagram and facebook can have on teenagers' mental health. have a listen. >> imagine you know what's going on inside of facebook, and you know no one on the outside knows. >> reporter: meet frances, a 37-year-old data scientist from iowa. she left facebook in may after working on the company's civic
integrity team through last year's election. that team charged with protect the democratic process and reducing the spread of viral misinformation and fake accounts. >> they told us we're dissolving civic integrity. like, they basically said, oh, good, we made it through the election. there wasn't riots. we can get rid of civic integrity now. fast forward a couple months, we got the insurrection. and when they got rid of civic integrity, it was the moment where i was like i don't trust that they are willing to actually invest what needs to be invested to keep facebook from being dangerous. >> reporter: a facebook executive responded on twitter sunday night saying they didn't shut down the civic integrity team. instead, he said they folded it into a wider team. haugen walked out of facebook with thousands of company documents including the company's own research like this. a presentation about the dangers of instagram for teenagers. we make body issues worse for one in three girls, reads one slide. teens who struggle with mental
health say instagram make it worse, reads another. >> what's supertragic is facebook's own research says as these young women begin to consume this eating disorder content, they get more and more depr depressed it actually makes them use the app more. and so, they end up in this feedback cycle where they hate their bodies more and more. facebook's own research says it is not just that instagram is dangerous for instagram, that it harms teenagers. it's that it is distinctly worse than other forms of social media. >> reporter: eternally starved. i have to be thin. skin and bone. all instagram pages the platform's algorithm suggests an account registered to a 13-year-old girl should follow. >> what we did was to create a 13-year-old who expressed interest in weight loss and dieting. and within a day, she was flooded with recommendations for
accounts concerning eating disorders and personal intrigue. >> instagram said eternally starved i have to be thin skin and bone, the account it had promoted through its algorithm broke the company's rules encouraging eating disorders but they only removed the accounts after being contacted by cnn. >> this experience shows very graphically how these claims to protect children or take down accounts that may be dangerous to them are absolute hogwash. in fact, it was not taken down until cnn brought it to their attention. >> reporter: a spokesperson for instagram's parent company, facebook, said it uses technology and reports from users to remove content that violates its rules and eating disorders as quickly as it is. adding, they are always working to improve. and viewers affected by issues mentioned in that report can contact the national eating disorder association help line. # but just finally, erin, just
to underline what you saw in that report there. the senator's office set up an instagram account designed to look like it was a 13-year-old girl and instagram began pushing pro-eating disorder accounts to this 13-year-old after the account searched and followed a few accounts that were talking about anorexia and were glorifying eating disorders. but instagram was feeding into that. erin. >> donie, thank you very much. it's so disturbing. i want to go now to andrew. he is a lawyer representing facebook whistle-blower frances haugen and he works with legal nonprofit whistle-blower aid. look, i appreciate your time and there's so much to talk about here. first of all, can i just ask you given what happened, you know, now your client's speaking out. we know her name. she's going to testify. have you or your client heard directly from facebook since she revealed her identity? >> to my knowledge, we have not heard directly from facebook, not yet. >> wow. so i want to read part of a statement from facebook in response to her claims because i guess that's all we have since
they haven't reached out to you. um, they say cbs 60 minutes ran a segment that used select company materials to tell a misleading story about the research we do to improve our products. the segment also disregards the significant investments we make to keep people safe on our platform. we continue to make significant improvements to tackle the spread of misinformation and harmful content. to suggest we encourage bad content and do nothing is just not true. so, when you hear that, andrew, are you confident, is your client confident that she knows everything that facebook is doing to keep the platform safe? and that she hasn't missed anything significant? >> i think we are very confident. the truth of the matter is their own internal documents establish they could have done more. i think a key important element of frances's courage and making these disclosures to the scc and to congress is facebook has not only done the research to identify the problems that it fosters here at home, as well as abroad. they know the mechanisms, the
tools in which they can take to effect positive change. to mitigate against hate, against viral misinformation because one thing i just want to point out is that facebook is a vehicle by which misinformation spreads globally. it has impacted children here in the united states, and it has impacted even individuals as far as myanmar where there was a genocide that was influenced by facebook. >> so, one specific facebook -- um -- claim -- one claim they take issue with is the one about the instagram impact on teen girls. you refer to children and i know you just heard, obviously, the report that talks about that. and the company says it's not accurate that leaked-internal research demonstrates instagram is toxic for teen girls. the research actually dpemen straighted that many teens we heard from feels instagram helps them when they are struggling with the hard moments teenagers have always faced. this research found teens report having both positive and fwhefw negative experiences with social media. how do you respond to that? i mean, i guess the broader
point here is that they are not saying there is no bad. they are saying, though, that there can be great good. >> well, my response would be that -- it is my understanding that they were looking to create an instagram for teens. and after my client had made her disclosures and after it became public, that they put a pause on that effort. so, they presumably know that they have a problem. we all now know that what they know and when they knew it. and now, it's up to congress and to regulators to determine how best to help facebook fix itself and go back to its roots. >> so, andrew, i want to ask you because i know the prepared testimony has come out tomorrow and obviously she is going to face a lot of questions. but ms. haugen will say she knows facebook can, quote, destroy her. that's the word she used. she came forward at great personal risk. obviously, these are -- these are very significant things to say. is she concerned about her physical safety? has she been threatened. >> >> i would say this. we have one individual making a world of a difference because she had the courage to come forward. and disclose what she believed to be wrong to federal
government regulators. and it's her against a trillion-dollar company. so to say that, you know, she is intimidated. perhaps, a little bit by a trillion-dollar company is not an understatement. >> all right. well, andrew, i appreciate your time. thank you so much. >> thank you. >> obviously, tomorrow, crucial day to hear ms. haugen's testimony. i want to go now to david axelrod, former senior adviser to president obama. david, because you tweeted these algorithms and alg rigm, it's a method, it's a process that -- that is used. you say they're as dangerous to our democracy as any terrorist. tell me why? >> well, i think we've seen that disinformation and conspiracy theories travel wildly on the internet. on social media. and particularly, on facebook. look. they are a very successful business. they're not a public trust, erin, and their business relies on people clicking and clicking and clicking and staying online. and they've found that, you
know, hate -- hate sells. keeps people online. conspiracy theories sell. keeps people online. appeals to resentment sells. keeps people online. and they've -- and -- and they've -- they've become the vehicle for radicalization. and that is very, very dangerous. how does it happen that an -- that a -- an oddball cult like qanon now has millions and millions and millions of adherents and two members of congress, two followers in congress? how is it that republicans, up to 78% of republicans in one poll, now believe the big lie even though it's been disproved again and again and again? i'm not saying facebook is responsible for all of that. but it is responsible for -- for a lot of it. >> okay. then, i mean, look. it's such an existential conversation. i mentioned the study earlier. you know, ten likes on facebook
and it knows more about you than the people you work with. 70, more than your friends. 150, more than your family members. and all it takes is 300 and facebook knows you better than your spouse. and i mention it, david, because t the algorithm has such power because it knows us. and it enriches our lives in many ways, right? and i guess the question is facebook could lose control of its algorithm, right? that's why i emphasize it's not an equation, it's a process. it gets a lot of information and data and it feeds into that. um, you know, so saying a company puts profit above people. that's not new. that's been something lodged in various times, at various companies, right? but -- but what i wonder about here from when they say congress needs to do something, maybe the biggest issue here is that i'm not sure really what can be done? >> yeah. look. throughout history, we've had private concerns that have ventures that, in some way, threaten the public interest. and we take action. that's why we have regulatory agencies. there needs to be more
transparency about these algorithms. people need to know why certain things jump on their news feed on facebook. we just -- and -- and i think that regulators can do something about that. there also is the question of whether anti-trust action and -- and breaking up the facebook monopoly might be helpful. if you have more wholesome competitors, together, with transparency who are rewarded by -- by people for -- for doing the right thing, and not advancing hateful speech and conspiracy theories. i think all of these things need to be explored. but, eastrin, there is a tremens cost to us as a society, us as a democracy. it's being gamed by malign forces around the world against us and we have seen it happen in europe and elsewhere. we just can't be passive in the face of this. i respect the fact that there are private concern but private concerns are general -- you know, are often regulated when
they cross into the public interest. and i think we have to look at that here. >> all right. david, thank you so much. i appreciate your insight. always do. >> good to be with you. and next, trump backing this woman for arizona governor who says she would not have certified that state's election results. is trump setting the stage for another run? plus, ambush. activists upset with the war over biden's agenda chase senator kyrsten sinema into a bathroom. how did it come to something so low? >> build back better, back the bill. build back better, back the bill! and millions of confidential documents are exposing the hidden millions of the world's richest, and those around them including putin's alleged mistress. who is reportedly worth more than $100 million. # battery is even more powerful. the stronger, lasts-longer
energizer max. ♪ ♪ your new pharmacy is here. and here. and here, too. it's here to help you save time and money and trips to the pharmacy. it's here to get you the medication you need when you need it. who knew it could be this easy? your new pharmacy is amazon pharmacy. bipolar depression. it made me feel like i was trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. i just couldn't find my way out of it. the lows of bipolar depression
can take you to a dark place... ...and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. this is where i want to be. latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life threatening... ...or uncontrollable muscle movements, as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. now i'm back where i belong. ask your doctor about latuda and pay as little as $0 for your first prescription. you booked a cozy vrbo mountain cabin. with a kitchen where everyone can chef. (mixed chatter, laughter) a family room where you can let your hair down.
and a backyard that is a tree-lined living room. but the thing they'll remember forever? watching the game together once again. (cheering) the time for getting back together is now. find it on vrbo. our retirement plan with voya, keeps us moving forward. hey, kevin! hey, guys! they have customized solutions to help our family's special needs... giving us confidence in our future... ...and in kevin's. voya. well planned. well invested. well protected. helen knew exercise could help her diabetes... but she didn't know what was right for her. no. nope. no way. but then helen went from no to know
with freestyle libre 14 day, now she knows what activity helps lower her glucose. and can see what works best for her. take the mystery out of your glucose levels, and lower your a1c. now you know. freestyle libre 14 day. now covered by medicare for those who qualify. tonight, former-president trump baselessly claiming he may have won the state of arizona. it's a pretty stunning thing to do because remember he trumpeted the audit, so-called audit, that was led by his allies? right, kept saying it was going to show the whole thing, that he won it. then, of course, the audit came out and actually said that biden won arizona by a wider margin than originally reported. >> this was an election that was rigged. if you look at the findings of that report done by the senate, not done by me. it was done by the senate of arizona. those findings are -- are
damning. >> again, i remind you that his -- his own audit -- audit showed that biden won by a wider margin than the already-formally-audited results in maricopa county, arizona. this comes as trump's pick for arizona governor, though, says she would not have certified biden's victory in 2020. >> considering how much, already, at the time information we had about serious irregularities and problems with the election, i would not have certified it right then. >> outfront now, lawrence tribe, constitutionalle law professor at harvard law school. so, professor tribe, you know, she is saying that now, right, after multiple audits, after the -- the republican committee in charge of the elections has repeatedly said from day one who won after trump's own backed audit said that biden won by a wider imagine than had actually been reported in the state. she is coming out and saying that and trump is backing her, right? and she said she wouldn't have certified biden's win.
it's like -- it's like groundhog day, right? he is now pressuring texas governor, greg abbott, to do an arizona-style audit despite the conclusions of that arizona, quote/unquote, audit. so what does all this translate to for you? >> it translates into a big lie. nonstop. i think until the end of time, some people are going to claim that he won when he lost. asking for a further audit in texas which he won just shows that this guy is insatiable in his thirst for power. and that's what is leaking out day by day as we learn more about the plot that he was engaged in. he was working with this right-wing lawyer, john eastman, to try to pressure the vice president, mike pence, into declaring -- basically, declaring him the winner. the plot thickens. and the conspiracy is unfolding. we're learning about a meeting a few days before the insurrection
with pence's chief lawyer, greg jacobs. again, to try to bend pence into the trump fold. we were lucky that pence resisted. but the more we learn, the closer we discover we were to a successful coup. and he is not giving up. he is trying again in 2024. so we have to make sure that we are ready for whatever happens and it's not going to be pretty. >> well, you recently wrote an op-ed for t"the boston globe" titled how to prevent the legal strategy that nearly undid the last election from ending democracy. and you pointed out that this would happen, again. this would happen, again. if -- if -- if it wasn't stopped. and one way you said he could be stopped is for the attorney general, merrick garland, to prosecute him for the crimes. those were -- that was what you wrote. garland was just asked about that quote from you moments ago. i don't if you know this because he literally just spoke out.
i wanted to play it for you, professor. here is merrick garland. >> we are doing everything we can to ensure that the perpetrators of january 6th are brought to justice. we will follow the facts and the law wherever they lead. i'm not -- as you're quite right -- i am not able to talk about any particular individuals or particular investigations. there's a long-standing policy of the justice department. it's an element in the rule of law. it's very good reason why we follow that policy. >> okay. does that give you more confidence? or no? >> well, not very much. as i understand it, jay meyers specifically asked him what he thought of his former-law professor lawrence tribe suggesting that just prosecuting the foot soldiers and letting the generals go scot-free was not going to do the job in terms of preventing the commander in chief, the former-commander in chief, from coming back and trying essentially to subvert democracy again.
now, i fully understand that merrick garland, like any other attorney general, except for perhaps some of those like bill barr who just completely went off the rails, he can't talk about specific prosecutions. i understand that. and i'm hoping that there's more going on behind the scenes than -- than we're aware of. but at the moment, i'm not reassured yet that the department of justice is going full steam ahead to pursue justice in connection with the insurrection and -- and the coup. and the reason it really matters isn't so much a matter of, you know, punishing the former president. it's a matter of preventing him from doing it again. he will have no incentive to obey the law if he learns that he can be impeached, and then acquitted by the senate. and not fully investigated by any grand jury. and under the existing laws, we
have ample tools. the federal-criminal law makes seditious conspiracy a very serious crime. now, i understand that the attorney general doesn't want to appear to be prosecuting out of some political motive. but a politically motivated desire not to prosecute so that it doesn't look like you're being political is equally political, and much more dangerous. so i'm hoping the department of justice really pursues the truth in these matters, and doesn't leave it only to congress. >> we'll have to see because as you -- as you're -- you're very clear. you know, his answers there were -- i mean, not that he could say anything but certainly did not lead you in that direction. professor tribe, i appreciate your time as always. >> thanks, erin. and next, biden tears into republicans for bailing on democrats as the nation inches dangerously close to defaulting for the first time in u.s. history. >> i think, quite frankly, it's hypocritical, dangerous, and
discover card i just got my cashback match is this for real? yup! we match all the cash back new card members earn at the end of their first year automatically woo! i got my mo-ney! it's hard to contain yourself isn't it? uh- huh! well let it go! woooo! get a dollar for dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover. i've always dreamed of seeing the world. but i'm not chasing my dream anymore. i made a financial plan to live it every day. ♪ ♪ find a northwestern mutual advisor at nm.com ♪ ♪ ♪ hey google. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
by scanning for threats every 10 minutes. and unlike some cybersecurity options, this helps protect every connected device. yours, your employees' and even your customers'. so you can stay ahead. get started with a great offer and ask how you can add comcast business securityedge. plus for a limited time, ask how to get a $500 prepaid card when you upgrade. call today.
tonight, get out of the way. president biden calling republicans hypocritical and dangerous as the u.s. heads towards its first debt default possibly in history. >> not only are republicans refusing to do their job. they're threatening to use the power, their power, to prevent us from doing our job. saving the economy from a catastrophic event. i think quite frankly, it's hypocritical, dangerous, and disgraceful. >> and when asked if he could guarantee the united states wouldn't default, biden said this. >> no, i can't. that's up to mitch mcconnell. >> but minority leader mcconnell tells biden, no, this is your problem. >> democrats need to tackle the debt limit. i suggest that our colleagues get moving. >> of course, he won't raise the debt limit.
i do, of course, have to point out that is the same mitch mcconnell who voted to increase or suspend the debt limit 32 times, already, in his career. 32 times according to "the washington post." i guess, 33's the charm? but hypocrisy aside, let's be clear. america has long had a spending problem. under trump, the united states racked up nearly $8 trillion in new debt. under then-president obama, the debt rose by more than $9 trillion over eight years. 86% of the total debt he inherited. and congress voted to raise the debt limit 78 times in the last 50 years for both republican and democratic presidents according to the treasury department. and not once has that resulted in any serious change in how the united states continues to borrow money. outfront now, democratic senator, alex padilla of california. he is a member of the budget committee and, senator, i really appreciate your time. so you got republicans now saying they will filibuster any vote to raise the debt limit. which means you got to get 60 votes and you don't have 60 votes so you are not going to
avoid a default that way. and that would mean you have to do it alone, through reconciliation. that's more time consuming. means that democrats are going to have to own this completely, right? you are not going to get anyone coming across party lines to support you. but that may be the only way you can get this done. do you support doing it that way? >> well, first of all, good evening, erin. good to be with you. and look, i think it's exactly what mitch mcconnell wants because even the reconciliation option is -- a lot of pitfalls that he is ready to exploit. so there's still time, and i still hope that we can appeal to our republican colleagues to do the right thing. i mean, if they're just not going to -- if they're not going to be helpful on raising the debt ceiling, and -- and do what they are doing now which is to actually obstruct democrats willing to do it alone, then they should also explain why they are doing this. are they going to apologize for having voted to add to the deficit in the past? or are they going to apologize for having voted to raise the debt ceiling, as you said, mr.
mcconnell himself, 32 times in the past. fiscally, it's the right thing to do. they have done it over and over again. it's just a sign of where republicans are these days. >> right. well, of course, you know, the right thing to do is to pay down debts that you have already incurred which is what this is about. the whole point of the debt ceiling was to, theoretically, every time you were going to do something new, to spark the conversation. and as i pointed out, it has not. or resulted in a cut in borrowing. and so, some are calling for the debt limit to be eliminate the altogether. take a listen to this. >> would you support simply eliminating the debt ceiling so that we don't have to deal with this in the future and can focus on real crises? >> yes, i would. >> it's really a very counterproductive piece of legislation. so, yeah, i -- i'd get rid of it. >> so, j.p. morgan chase ceo jamie diamond told reuters the debt limit is all politics. you have got a lot of people saying this. would you support eliminating it, altogether? >> look, erin, this is my first year in the senate. i think that's a very worthwhile
conversation to have but we are not going to rush that conversation here in the -- the handful of days between now and hitting the debt ceiling that's due october 18th, at the very latest. so we need to do now, what we need to do now to make sure that the government does not default. i also want to make this play because when we talk about debt ceiling and the government defaulting, it can be over a lot of people's heads. let's really be clear as to what this means, especially for working families across the country. if the government cannot pay its bills, what does that mean? does that mean federal employees aren't being paid? does that mean medicare is not being paid or reimbursed? does that mean unemployment insurance for people who are still struggling to get back to work because of the covid pandemic are going to be impacted? that's what republicans are doing here. when they play with fire, like they are doing with this debt ceiling, it's working families that feel it the most. it's them that are hurt. >> so, you know, i know obviously you are in the middle of well, theoretically, some negotiations here on this much larger bill that's bipartisan infrastructure bill that, so
far, progressives have not allowed a vote on. and then, there is the bigger bill. your democratic colleague, senator kyrsten sinema, of course, is at the center of that and she was confronted by protestors who were angry that she opposes the $3.5 trillion bill making its way through congress. and they even followed her into a bathroom to make their point. here they are. >> can i talk to you real quick? >> hey, actually, i am heading out. >> right now is the real moment that our people need in order for us to talk about what's really happening. we need a build back better plan right now. >> so that we can have justice and solutions that we need for immigration, labor. >> build back better, back the bill! build back better, back the bill! >> okay. that -- that obviously is not okay. but what does it tell you about how ugly this fight is getting, senator? >> well, look, i think it's indicative of how urgent a lot
of these infrastructure investments are and we know there is two packages. there's the bipartisan package that was already approved by the senate. we are looking at the bigger infrastructure package that's through this reconciliation process and that's why i think people are so attuned to how much money are we going to be investing in? and, you know, what the negotiations are like because it's really hard for working parents to get back to work if you don't have a safe place to leave your kids. so yes, we need to invest in childcare. have you seen the homeless situation in most cities across the country? yes, we need to invest in housing. and if we have learned nothing else from this pandemic, it's the need to modernize our healthcare infrastructure and expand capacity of our healthcare infrastructure, in addition to what we are doing with other parts of the packages. investing in public transit, transportation, the electrical grid, broadband deployment, and more. it's not what american people want, it's what american people need. >> all right. well, senator, i appreciate your time. thank you so much, senator
padilla. >> thank you. next, a massive and jaw-dropping new report revealing where some of the richest people in the world are after stashing their money. we are talk being celebrities, athletes. plus, trump's former white house press secretary says she is quote terrified of her former boss running again. then, why did she speak up for him for so long? rilliant. the lexus nx. experience the crossover in its most visionary form. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. ♪ feel stuck with credit card debt? move to sofi and feel what it's like to get your money right. ♪
♪ move your high-interest debt to a sofi personal loan. earn $10 just for viewing your rate — and get your money right. ♪ what do we want for dinner? burger... i want a sugar cookie... wait... i want a bucket of chicken... i want... ♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win. [uplifting music playing]
tonight, former-british prime minister tony blair, vladimir putin's alleged mistress and so many more. millions of confidential dook yumts that reveal the systems that help them and others hide their wealth. alex marquardt is out front. >> reporter: an explosive trove of documents revealing a stunning range of efforts by some of the most powerful people in the world to stash assets and purchases through networks of shell accounts and trusts. >> we are talking about some of the most famous people in the world that are in these documents. presidents, prime ministers,. >> the international sconsortiu of investigative journalists collaborated for more than two years to analyze almost 12 million documents they obtained.
calling them the pandora papers. among the outlets was "the washington post.." >> highlights that this is a -- that the persistence of the offshore financial system, this parallel universe that wealthy, elite, rich leadership-type people around the world take advantage of. >> reporter: the documents from 14 offshore services firms highlight often legal but ethically questionable avenues used by the rich and powerful, like former brit ibish prime minister tony blair and pop superstar shakira. both of whom deny any wrongdoing. in monaco, an offshore company in 2003 bought a $4 million luxury apartment. the owner of that company? a woman who has reportedly been romantically linked to russian president vladimir putin. she had given birth to a daughter. a russian investigative group claims the father is putin. the same group found that the woman shared assets with others in putin's inner circle, and has amassed significant wealth.
>> it reinforces the perception of russia and its economy and its system as a state in which those who are close to putin, um, benefit. so that story to me is one of the most astonishing kind of, um, bit of detective work that we were doing. >> reporter: putin's spokesman called the reports a perversion of information, a number of rather unsubstantiated allegations. one story unlikely to go down well is about the king of jordan whose country receives billions in aid. yet, king abdullah ii appears to have spent over $106 million on properties in london, washington, d.c., and malibu, california. nearly 70 million of that was on three adjoining malibu cliffside mansions. jordan's royal court said that the report distorted and exaggerated the facts. it is no secret that his majesty owns a number of apartments and residences in the united states and the united kingdom. this is not unusual, nor improper. what is unusual is seeing u.s. states included alongside
well-known foreign tax havens. fortunes moving from the caribbean into the u.s., the icij says. with trust companies appearing in florida, delaware, texas, nevada, and more. nowhere more than in south dakota, the icij says which has become a major detect nation for foreign money. with assets and trusts quadrupling in the past decade to $360 billion. >> they are competing on this global economy. um, and they are trying to draw business to their states. and they're doing it by offering secrecy to people offshore. >> reporter: given the staggering number of documents here, there are countless other stories about how all kinds of powerful people have moved their money around with more revelations sure to come. erin, viewers may remember the panama papers from five years ago. that was just one firm's documents. this is 14 firms. now, the state department spokesman said today that the biden administration is reviewing the findings. the treasury department is deeply engaged in that. erin. >> thank you very much, alex. next, more on our breaking
news. facebook just coming back online after one of the longest outages in the company's history coming as the company faces damning accusations from someone who is on the inside. so what caused the outage? was it all a coincidence? plus, a former member of trump's inner circle says she is terrified her former boss will run again. well, why then was she singing such sycophantic tunes while in the white house? % online. now we've created a brand-new way for you to sell your car. whether it's a year old or a few years old. we wanna buy your car. so go to carvana and enter your license plate answer a few questions. and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds. when you're ready, we'll come to you, pay you on the spot and pick up your car, that's it. so ditch the old way of selling your car, and say hello to the new way at carvana.
(judith) in this market, you'll find fisher investments is different than other money managers. (other money manager) different how? don't you just ride the wave? (judith) no - we actively manage client portfolios based on our forward-looking views of the market. (other money manager) but you still sell investments that generate high commissions, right? (judith) no, we don't sell commission products. we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in our client's best interest. (other money manager) so when do you make more money? only when your clients make more money? (judith) yep, we do better when our clients do better. at fisher investments we're clearly different.
facebook along with its other companies, instagram and whatsapp, slowly coming back online after one of the longest outages in the company's history. an outage happening just hours after a damning interview with a former employee caming the company is aware of how its platforms are used to spread hate, violence, and misinformation. and has actively chosen to not do anything to stop it. i want to go outfront now to jeff horowitz. he is the technology reporter for "the wall street journal" who is behind the journal's explosive project facebook files. where i know you received thousands of pages of internal documents from that facebook whistle-blower, frances haugen. you received this over time. and you have been breaking this over the past couple weeks. stock's down 15% since your reports started. of course, we just found out her name last night. # but, jeff, let me ask you about this outage just to start. because it's -- it's massive, right? you have now got 3 billion people who interact with those products around the world. the company's still not confirming the cause. so is this timing really just a bad coincidence for facebook as it is dealing with this very, very massive moment?
>> in terms of if you are asking if there is any link between the reporting that's come out recently about them and this or the whistle-blower, i -- i think coincidence, very definitely. this is facebook basically managed to disconnect itself from the internet at large. um, just kind of the map of the internet. they are kind of -- severed those ties briefly. they are back up now and -- or at least in the process of restoring across a whole bunch of services and this is just hugely damaging to the company. i think what it does show is just the -- how much responsibility facebook has taken on to be in charge of the world's communication systems. and, um -- >> right. >> -- also, the fact that we don't have a clear sense of why this is happening does sort of suggest how hard it is for outsiders to get information about societally vital things happening inside that company. >> i know this may sound a little strapg but we are having one conversation about why don't they do more to change all these
things? and it sounds like they are not even able to know or to figure tou out how to get themselves back connected to the internet. it's pretty incredible they are out for six hours and they don't seem to know what happened. that should be pretty terrifying to people. >> there's been a lot of concerns and just to tie this back into some of the kind of concerns about content and regulation of the platform. about complexity at facebook and about the company's ability to manage the extremely convoluted and complex machine it's built. and i think, obviously, i'm not going to connect infrastructure to, you know, misinformation-type things or -- or, you know, civic integrity type concerns. but it does seem that sometimes the company's held together with duct tape. >> so, you spoke to the facebook whistle-blower, frances haugen, for months. ten months, right? i mean, you know more about this than anyone. i know we now know her name but you have known her for a long time and you have seen all these documents. so she is going to tell congress tomorrow that the company could quote/unquote destroy her for speaking out. is that a legitimate worry?
>> um, facebook does require all of its employees to sign nondisclosure agreements. and they are very strict. so theoretically, facebook could try to make a case that she'd violated it. um, that said, there is protection for people who report things to the government as whistle-blowers -- um -- which obviously she's pursued those protections. >> all right. well, we will see. i mean, this is pretty stunning and, you know, again, congratulations on all your reporting. it's been fascinating to read it. getting front-page treatment as, of course, it so deserves. thanks so much, jeff. >> thank you. all right. next, a former-trump insider turns on her boss of five years. why now? r son had autism, his future became my focus. lavender baths calmed him. so we made a plan to turn bath time into a business. ♪ ♪ find a northwestern mutual advisor at nm.com as a dj, i know all about customization. that's why i love liberty mutual. they customize my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need.
how about a throwback? you got it. ♪ liberty, liberty - liberty, liberty ♪ uh, i'll settle for something i can dance to. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ♪ ♪ only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ every day in business brings something new. so get the flexibility of the new mobile service designed for your small business.
introducing comcast business mobile. you get the most reliable network with nationwide 5g included. and you can get unlimited data for just $30 per line per month when you get four lines or mix and match data options. available now for comcast business internet customers with no line-activation fees or term contract required. see if you can save by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities.
tonight, terrified. that's how trump's white house press secretary stephanie grisham says she feels about a possible return to the white house for president trump. >> i am terrified of him running for president in 2024. i don't think he is fit for the job. >> cnn correspondent kate bennet is out front. so, kate, grisham worked for trump for more than five years. she is out with a new book "i will take your questions now." i suppose maybe that shows she understood she didn't take them then, when she had the job of -- of -- of working with the press. but now, she is speaking out saying she is terrified and he's not fit for the job. what else is she saying? >> well, she is saying that a second term with donald trump might mean four years of revenge. of going after his political adversaries. of going after people who voted for impeachment. i think her point is, or at least part of the reason she is saying she wrote this book is to
warn against that. to say what she saw was -- was pretty much hell-bent on revenge for the second term and a second term would probably mean no guardrails for donald trump. >> oh, for sure. isn't that what -- >> once he takes office, if he were to win, he doesn't have to worry about re-election anymore. he will be about revenge. he will probably have some pretty draconian policies that -- that go on. >> yeah. i mean, this is, again, what grisham was saying is that without the worry of a prolonged political career after a second term, who knows what could happen? and that's certainly part of the concern for saying she is terrified about him. >> i mean, kate, it's amazing during her time in the white house, of course, grisham told -- said a lot of things that weren't true, you know? she also spoke glowingly of the president and the first lady. here is just a few examples. >> this is a first lady that really embodies the american dream. >> i've seen him behind closed doors, and all the president cares about is this country.
>> she is doing such good work on behalf of children and has such a heart of gold and is actually quite a rock for this family. >> all of his policies are working. it's just that we are not getting any coverage of it. >> i mean, i have seen it behind closed doors and all he cares about is this country on one hand. and on the other, i'm terrified he's not fit for the job. why is she saying this now? >> well, she says that after spending time in the west wing, that what she saw was an administration that was run on chaos and not about the country. and it was just about survival. so clearly, as we saw, her opinions changed. now, whether or not, you know, she is to be believed, that's up to people reading the book. of course, donald trump has pushed back ard had on this. he said she was never fit for the job. she was never up for it. melania trump, today, released a statement to cnn calling stephanie grisham a troubled individual. um, there's some irony, though, erin, in having these -- the former president and first lady attack stephanie grisham using the same language and the same tactics, the same personal
takedowns that she probably helped orchestrate herself when she was on the other side of that trump administration from the inside. >> right. right. right. i mean, yeah, such -- such a great point. and of course, as you point out, hired her. kept her on. promoted her. um, you know? >> many years. >> yeah. all right. thank you so much, kate. and thanks to all of you for joining us. anderson starts now. good evening. the lawyer for facebook whistle-blower frances haugen joins us tonight on the eve of her testimony before senate subcommittee. and perhaps, it was just a coincidence but today, the world's largest social network went down. facebook and facebook-owned instagram and whatsapp were all unreachable for much of the day. prompting one twitter user to write half jokingly, instagram and facebook are currently not working as our democracy, society, and a healthy sense of self. except, it's no joke according to the whistle-blower in question. former-facebook employee, frances haugen, who revealed herself last night on cb