tv The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN October 1, 2021 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
be sure to tune into "state of the union" sunday. dana bash will speak to dick durbin and pramila jayapal. tweet the show with "the lead" cnn. our coverage continues now with one mr. wolf blitzer right next door in "the situation room." see you monday. >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." we're following breaking news. tonight, president biden is vowing that democrats will overcome their deep divisions and salvage his embattled domestic agenda, apparently abandoning the urgent timeline created by the house speaker nancy pelosi. the president wrapped up a critical meeting on capitol hill, just a little while ago. he declared, and i'm quoting him now, we're going to get this
done. it doesn't matter when, whether it takes six minutes, six days, or six weeks. we're learning new details, meanwhile, about what the president said behind closed doors, including his call for both infrastructure and the broader economic package be passed, as progressives are demanding. but he's also offering an olive branch to moderates, urging the timeline on the spending bill be lower than the currently price tag of $3.5 trillion. our correspondents are over at the white house up on capitol hill at this critical moment, where the president and the democrats -- we'll go to phil mattingly in just a moment. but first, let's go to our congressional correspondent, ryan nobles for the very latest on the hill. ryan, the president came out of his meeting up on the hill, and gave a very broad timeline on how long these negotiations potentially could last. what took place inside during that meeting? >> reporter: wolf, there's no doubt about that. the president for the most part
had not been directly involved in the negotiations around these two big packages on the type of level that he was today. for the most part, he'd been in a listening mode, his staff had been involved in those negotiations. today, he came to the hill and made his clear to his colleagues in the democratic house of representatives that he wanted two things. he wanted both pieces of legislation passed, and he wanted the price tag on that second piece, the social safety net to come down from $3.5 trillion. and the other thing he said, as he left, as you point to, wolf, is that the timeline is not nearly as urgent as we were led to believe for most of this week. take a listen. >> i'm telling you, we're going to get this done. >> when?! it doesn't matter when. it doesn't matter whether it's in six minutes, six days, or six weeks. we're going to get it done. >> so that is very important, wolf. because for this week, the negotiators have been furiously
trying to come up with an agreement to meet self-imposed deadlines that are set in place by the house of representatives. they no longer have to worry about that. they can now take the time to go through this legislation and find something that they can all agree upon. that is happening right now behind me. the house progressive caucus immediately left that meeting with the president, went behind closed doors to hash out ways to trim that $5.3 trillion social safety net package in a way they could feel comfortable with. this was in no way a win for progr progressives, because they did not want to see a vote without the social safety net, but also a win for moderates because of the scope of that reconciliation package. one of those moderates, henry cuellar of texas, he left the meeting and had this to say about the president's remarks. >> the president said that we've got to get both of them done, so it doesn't sound like there's going to be a vote today. he basically said one thing. one it's going to be 3.5, maybe 2 instead of 3.5.
so he set that. and the other thing he basically said, we need to pass both of them. >> you know, so there you have it, wolf. all sides of this argument losing a little bit and winning a little bit. and the democrats believe that's put them in a position to get on a path to momentum. to get both bills passed. but wolf, as we've said many times this week, they still have a lot of work to do. >> they certainly do, ryan. i want you to stand by. we'll get back to you in just a moment. to the other end of pennsylvania avenue. phil mattingly is at the white house. what is happening behind the scenes where you are at the white house tonight? >> the president returned from capitol hill and huddled with aides, talking about next steps. also, what transpired on capitol hill. and what we saw was a very clear effort to serve as a bit of a pressure release valve. obviously, white house officials and the president, very closely watching. at in points, participating in what has been a serious and feverish set of negotiations and intraparty battles over the course of the last several days.
yet for much of the last several days. we have not actually seen the president. to some degree, that ended up being strategic. deploying him to capitol hill at the moment where officials thought he could have the maximum amount of impact. and ryan laid out very well, the message that he was there to deliver. basically taking the elements of the fights over the course of the last several days and saying, this is the reality of things at the moment. there is no way to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill without that second economic and climate package. there is no way to get $3.5 trillion, given where two senate moderates are in the party. it's going to have to come down. the president giving a range, somewhere between 1.8 or 2.2 or 2.3 trillion. not a firm number that he's looking for, but a reality of where discussion have said with those senators. but wolf, the president behind the scenes, also, i'm told, talking about the stakes. not just the stakes for the party, not the political stakes, but something we've heard from him a lot over the course of the last several months, whether he's talking to lawmakers or foreign leaders about stakes for the country in this moment.
what we've seen over the course of the last several years and the need for democrats to be able to deliver on what they campaigned on. that's so central to how he views his domestic agenda. both pieces of his domestic agenda, and he made very clear, i'm told to democrats today, if there is no compromise, if the party is not able to unite, they will get nothing, and that at this point in time is just simply not an option and to some degree, too dangerous for him to even consider. because of that, wolf, he's making clear, they are moving forward. not necessarily on a timeline, not necessarily at the top line they're looking for, but they're looking forward to moving forward together, wolf. >> they certainly are. phil, stay with us. ryan is coming back into the conversation. we're also joined by our senior political analyst, the former presidential adviser, david gergen. david, president biden has now told congress what he wants. he wants both of these bills to pass together. he says the price tag for reconciliation will need to come down from that $3.5 trillion
number. so what took so long? why is this taking so long? >> because there are deep philosophical as well as political differences within the democratic party. the moderates are mostly from purple districts and they don't want to look like they're in the camp of spending, spending, spending. and tlihe liberals, the progressives who are winning so far, we've never seen a progressive movement be as popular as this or have as much power, until you go back to the new deal, the last time progressives were so powerful. and they really vetoed what the moderates were doing. so it is a -- the moderates and the liberals can both claim some credit, but tonight, wolf, the real story is, this was a failure. this whole effort, it wasn't a question of being able to govern both parties and put together bipartisan, it was within one party. an intraparty fight. that is going to give a lot of
risk for the republicans coming up in the off year midterm elections. this plays right into their hands and donald trump's hands. i think they're going to have a hard time getting a compromise. it seems to me, the most logical thing is to cut the length of the bill, instead of ten years, make it five years. you can save one heck of a lot of money that way without destroying your support for programs. and if you get these programs started and they're popular, it will be really hard for republicans if they win the elections to take them back. >> that's true. a lot of people suggesting, don't do a ten-year legislation bill, do a five-year and the price tag will come down. the moderates wanted an immediate vote on this $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package which overwhelmingly passed in the s senate, but now progressives also need to face reality on the massive $3.5 trillion
reconciliation plan. will they do so? are they ready to go down from $3.5 trillion. >> reporter: yeah, what was remarkable, wolf, as soon as they exited from this meeting. for weeks, progressives have said, for over and over again, the 3.5 trillion number was their concession. that they originally wanted as much as $6 trillion. and as immediately as they came out of this meeting, their tune changed pretty quickly. the house progressive chair, pramila jayapal, acknowledged that they would have come to the table with some cuts, and she said it was going to be the job of the progressive caucus to figure out exactly where they would be able to make those trims, representative jamie raskin of maryland who was a member of this caught left this meeting a few minutes ago and said the same thing. exactly what david gergen is mentioning. can they reduce the time frame for some of these social programs that they consider to be priorities and in that way, find some cost savings, and
revisit them in a couple of years to determine whether or not they should go a little bit longer. but wolf, they are going to have a hard time, because each and every one of these programs has a specific set of constituencies that passionately want them to be a part of this package. and they're going to have to make some tough choices here. so this is not going to be an easy process, but you're right, they have taken that first step of acknowledging that the number has to come down, but getting there won't be easy. >> and that's why the president has just said, it could be six minutes, six days, six weeks to get this done. he promises, it will get done eventually. phil, what are your sources saying over there about president biden offering a range for a possible reconciliation price tag? we know the president wants to pass transformative legislation. do progressives feel right now he's on their side? >> i mean, i think when you look at the remarks that he delivered, and ryan's done a great job reflecting and reporting on this over the course of the last hour or so, how progressives came out of that meeting was a recognition that the president did not go
into that meeting and demand that the infrastructure bill be passed. he did not go into that meeting and tell progressives that it was time to back down. he made very clear that the two bills needed to go together. that would mean, based on just the simple vote counting dynamics of the democratic caucuses that the topline number will go down. i think if you look at it from where the white house sits right now, $1.9 trillion in covid relief. $1.8 to $2 trillion in economic and climate package. that is a significant sum of money with very, very real and tangible becnefits to it for democrats. that's a lot and i think the president thinks that's enough. >> all right, guys. thank you very, very much. just ahead, what exactly did the president tell divided democrats during a closed-door meeting up on capitol hill? i'll ask a key progressive congresswoman, debbie dingell. she's standing by live. we'll discuss when we come back. ♪ i've always been running. to meetings. errands. now i'm running for me. i've always dreamed of seeing the world. but i'm not chasing my dream anymore.
we're following the breaking news president biden just wrapping up meetings with democrats up on capitol hill as he tries to heal the divides inside his own democratic party and seal the deal on two signature pieces of his domestic agenda. let's discuss this and more with democratic congresswoman, debbie dingell of michigan. she's a senior house whip and a deputy whip in the deputy congressional caucus. congresswoman, thank you so much for joining us. i know you were in that meeting with president biden up on capitol hill just a little while ago. can you confirm that he told democrats that he wants these two bills to pass together and that the reconciliation price tag will need to come down from $3.5 trillion? >> you know, wolf, this is what i'm going to tell you. he came and helped lay out very
clearly for the caucus the reality of where we are. i've always said, i've said this to you for weeks, that democrats are united that failure is not an option. he laid out the fact about what our numbers were in the house and the senate. that the build back better is his vision. it's what he wants with the infrastructure bill. and i think that he was trying to just lay out a very clear picture for where people are. he did say that he needs both bills. the reality is, we're not going to get 3.5. i think he made it very clear that the next couple of weeks, we're going to have to -- and he's not talking numbers. he's talking, tell me what you're for. tell me what the programs are that mean the most to the constituents that you represent. then he'll talk about the dollars. so i think he -- you know, i've been saying for a week, they say, you've got to support the president. and i do support the president, but what is it that you want to support. i think that democrats are united that we have to deliver on what his vision is.
he laid out what's got to happen. now we're on a path to making that happen. >> cnn has learned, congresswoman, that the president did suggest a range, a range of 1.8 to $2.3 trillion for the reconciliation package. if moderates like senator manchin, for example, come up from their number. he was proposing $1.5 trillion, are progressives, you think, willing to compromise within that range? >> you know, wolf, first of all, i don't think anybody is going to deal with this publicly. the negotiations need to take place among the caucus members and we shouldn't be talking the numbers. the president made it very clear that every person he talks to, he says, tell me what matters to you. and i think that's where he is. the fact of the matter is pb he's -- i can't remember the number of hours he had said that he had spent with both of the senators. there were a lot of them. and they've made it very clear where they stand and our numbers in the senate are a rally.
there are 50 senators. but he made it very clear that the build back better vision is here. he's going to dleliver on it. all of us understand, this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. we cannot blow this chance. the american people are expecting us to deliver. we are united that failure is not an option. >> progressives, as you know, like you, huddled after this meeting with the president. what was the overall reaction among your colleagues in the progressive caucus? what is the path forward right now? >> so, i was not in that meeting, because i was in a leadership meeting. people are trying to talk about, how do we make sure everybody's got input. the fact of the matter is, we've got to all talk to each other. what matters that has to go into build back better. and there are a lot of programs that we care about. the once that matter to me are everything from home care. but if we don't take this opportunity to get the lead out of the pipes in this country and keep our children safe from lead in their water, if we're going to make electric vehicles a reality, we've got to build out the ev infrastructure, we all
have to go, we all have strong feelings, we'll all talk to ooeach other, what are our priorities and work it out. >> what's your timeline? what's the timeline right now for passing both of these bills? >> the president said it would take a little time. i think stay tuned, i think you may see one pass in a certain way, sooner than later. but they've got to go together. they're not going to move without going together. and people know that we've got to get this done. so you're going to see house members even -- you know, i don't even know if we'll come back in next week. we all know that we've got to work on this right now and i'll leave here and be working with all my colleagues on what we've got to do. >> very quickly, if the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package comes up for a vote by itself without the reconciliation package approved yet, will you vote for it? >> that's not going to happen that way. it's just simpledy --
>> it potentially could happen? >> i don't believe it will. i think the president has made it very clear, we've got to work on both of these together and people are talking about options right now, wolf. people keep pitting us against each other. we're not going to be pitted against each other. failure is not an option. >> congresswoman debbie dingell of michigan. appreciate it very much. >> thank. coming up, a troubling new video of gabby petito at a traffic stop and it's raising serious questions about why officers didn't do more to protect her just days before her disappearance and killing. stay with us. your in "the situation room." there is something i want to ask you. oh um... the new iphone 13pro is here, with the most advanced iphone camera ever. and i got it at t-mobile. whew, i thought you were going to talk about... 'forever'. this is a value that lasts forever. because when you get the new iphone at t-mobile, trade-in value is 'locked in'. so we can always have a new iphone? yes, so, what do you say, switch to t-mobile with me? yes! we are going to t-mobile. fall in love with iphone. get it on us now and upgrade every two years forever.
before we talk about tax-smart investing, what's new? -well, audrey's expecting... -twins! grandparents! we want to put money aside for them, so...change in plans. alright, let's see what we can adjust. ♪ we'd be closer to the twins. change in plans. okay. mom, are you painting again? you could sell these. lemme guess, change in plans? at fidelity, a change in plans is always part of the plan.
we're following developments in the gabby petito investigation. newly revealed body cam video is shedding new light on a troubling interaction with police shortly before petito went missing and was later found dead. cnn's leyla santiago is on the story. >> reporter: newly obtained video gives insight on the state of gabby petito and brian laundrie's relationship and cross-country road trip. >> hey, we got a call about a male hitting a female. >> reporter: this additional footage from an officer's body camera from an august 12th stop in moab, utah, after witnesses reported a fight between the couple. >> so what happened here in here? >> um, i'm not sure. i was just trying to get back in the car and his backpack was in the back -- >> so the backpack got you? >> yeah. >> reporter: but then her story changed when police brought up witnesses who said they saw brian hit her. >> to be honest, it hi him
first. >> did he hit you, though? it's okay if you're saying you hit him. i understand if he hit you. but we want to know the truth if he hit you. >> well, i guess, yeah. but i hit him first. >> where did he hit you? >> on my face. he grabbed my face like that. >> did he slap your face or what? >> well, he grabbed me with like his nails. but he didn't punch me. but i had a cut right here. i could feel it. >> police say the evidence all suggested that gabby was the lead aggressor in the situation. >> so at this point -- >> rather than charge gabby, which both made clear they did not want, officers decided to just separate the two for the night. criminologist casey jordan said that was a bad idea. >> they have labeled her the primary aggressor and she is just distraught.
she can't stop crying. he's 20 feet away smirking. and obviously, the 911 phone call said that he was the primary aggressor. so there was more that needed to be sussed out. >> reporter: but in utah, the law regarding domestic violence cases clearly states the primary duty is for the officer to protect the victim and enforce the law. >> in no way, shape, or form, that can i perceive, does what happened here, a little slap fight between fiancees who love each other and want to be together, can i perceive that this is going to digress into theuatio situation where he's g to be a battered man. >> right. >> but then again, i don't have a crystal ball. >> reporter: two weeks later, brian returned home to his parent's house in florida without his fiancee. as seen in these documents obtained by cnn, a day before laundrie returned home, his mother canceled a camping trip reservation for september 1st for two people, and made a new one for september 6th to include a third person. but where he is today remains a
mys mystery. >> and wolf, between these two body cam videos we've been able to obtain, you hear the couple talk about things that could shed light on growing tensions. you hear him talking about how they're low on funds. you hear her say that they ran out of water. that she doesn't feel like he supports her video website that she was working on. so it clearly speaks to growing tensions on this long cross-country road trip. and here's some perspective for you, wolf. a road trip that ended a month ago today when brian laundrie returned here to northport, florida, without his fiancee. >> leyla santiago reporting for us. leyla, thank you. let's get some analysis right now for the state attorney for palm beach county, florida, dave aaronberg, and major neil franklin, retired officer with the maryland, state, and baltimore police department. dave, why is this new body camera footage so important as investigators rye to piece together what exactly happened to dpgabby petito?
. >> good evening, wolf. to me, this body cam video tells me two things. first, it answers the question as to whether the police on the scene got the message from the 911 operators that witnesses saw brian hitting gabby. and secondly, it also tells me that there was probable cause that day to arrest brian. at first, you know, they were trying to focus on arresting gabby, but now you have witnesses who said that brian was hitting gabby and you have gabby admitting that brian did grab her face, put his nail in her skin, leading to a mark, and she did what many domestic violence victims do, in that she blamed herself for it. and i think that had an impact on the police at the scene. now, whether the police could have arrested brian is different than whether they should have. there will be an independent investigation to determine whether the police followed proper procedures. >> you know, neil, let's watch a little bit more of that body camera footage of petito's interaction with police in utah.
watch this. >> reporter: we're okay. >> i understand. but we don't have -- listen, if i had any discretion in this, i would separate you guys for the day and just give you warnings to stop hitting each other. but i lawfully don't have discretion here. i don't have -- >> is it because somebody said -- a witness said something? >> there's two witnesses and there's what you said and what he said. and it all matches nicely that you were the primary aggressor. >> so, neil, as a retired police officer yourself, what goes through your mind as you watch that? >> what goes through my mind, wolf, especially since when i was in criminal investigation here in the state of maryland, with the maryland state police, and starting the first domestic violence unit for the maryland state police, we had to put our police officers through a lot of training to bring them up to speed on domestic violence and
the cycle of violence. my question is, how much training have these police officers had regarding domestic violence? in the state of maryland, there's a thing such as pro prosecution. and we really train and push our police officers to do thorough investigations, so that they can actually make an arrest without the victim cooperating. and with the witness statement of brian actually hitting her -- i mean, i think the words were actually slapping her, despite what the couple said, an arrest would be possible here in the state of maryland, but we have to research the law there. and again, i'm concerned about the amount of training or lack of training that these police officers may have had. so if they hadn't had the proper training, it's very hard to blame them as individuals. but that's something that needs to be looked at. the training that they've had. >> that's a really important point. dave, we're learning also more about the actions of brian laundrie's parents after their
son returned from that cross-country trip. just how involved are they in the potential fallout from this case? >> well, they have done everything possible to incriminate themselves in the court of public opinion. but in a court of law, it's uncertain, because it's not enough for them to remain silent or lawyer up, to be charged as an accessory after the fact. they would need to know that brian was involved in a crime and then try to cover it up to prevent it punishment or his arrest. and if, in fact, they knew that he committed a crime. and by the way, there's an inference that they knew by the fact that he returned home from this trip without gabby. and they went ahead and sanitized the fan or destroyed evidence or bought him a plane ticket to get out of town, you would see officers walking up their driveway with a shiny new pair of handcuffs. >> dave aaronberg, thank you very much. there's more information we're following in "the
situation room" with the fda's review of moderna and j&j's booster shots and the first vaccines for young children. bipolar depression. it made me feel like i was trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. i just couldn't find my way out of it. the lows of bipolar depression can take you to a dark place... ...and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. this is where i want to be.
latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life threatening... ...or uncontrollable muscle movements, as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. now i'm back where i belong. ask your doctor about latuda and pay as little as $0 for your first prescription.
♪ i thought i was managing my moderate to severe crohn's disease. then i realized something was missing... ...me. my symptoms were keeping me from being there for her. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for people with crohn's disease. the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief in as little as 4 weeks. and many achieved remission that can last. humira can lower your ability to fight infections.
serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. ♪
more breaking news this hour. the fda is moving closer and closer to making some big decisions on whether to greenlight moderna and johnson & johnson booster shots and pfizer vaccines for children ages 5 to 11. the agency is scheduled meetings of its vaccine's advisory committee later this month to debate these truly critical moves. let's get some analysis from our medical analyst, dr. lina wen. so tell us when, based on the timing of these meetings that we might be able to start seeing the moderna and johnson & johnson shots be able, as far as boosters are concerned? >> this is so important, wolf. there are a lot of americans who
have now heard that we need boosters, but only the pfizer booster is approved for people who got the two doses of the pfizer vaccine. people who got the moderna and johnson & johnson vaccine are wondering, what about me? now the fda is showing that they are acting with a sense of urgency. october 14th and 15th is when they are going to be meeting to discuss this issue of the moderna and johnson & johnson booster. i would expect that if the data turn out to show that they're safe and effective, they will be the go ahead for the fda at that point. the following week, presumably, the cdc is going to a meeting and probably the week of the 17th/18th, we could see shots of moderna and johnson & johnson going into arms. very importantly, the fda saying that they're also looking at mixing and matching studies, which is crucial, because there are some people whom want the convenience of being able to get whatever is first available. maybe they are in a place where they can't easily get pfizer and they got the two doses of moderna. they will be able to get the other option. and also for people who got the johnson & johnson one-dose
vaccine, some people also want the option of getting an mrna second dose. so having that approval will be important, too. >> we should know in the next two to three weeks on that front. the vaccine advisers will convene again on october 26th, in about four weeks, to discuss the pfizer vaccine for children ages 5 to 11. does that mean kids that age could start getting vaccinated, potentially later this month. >> at this point, it's looking like the timeline, even if the -- even if pfizer is able to get in their application in time for the fda to review by that october 26th meeting. it looks then like the cdc will be meeting the following week, which i'm not sure if we're going to make the end of october deadline, but i'm hopeful still for end of october, at least early november. >> merck today announced, dr. wen, it has developed an antiviral pill that reduces the risk of death or hospitalization from covid by half. how much of a potential game changer could this be?
>> i think it's really important, although it's really important also to mention that this type of pill, this treatment, does not replace the need for a vaccine. the point of the vaccine is to prevent you from contracting covid in the first place. so the vaccine also reduces the likelihood of getting severely ill. however, there are still going to be some people who are unvaccinated. also, there are individuals who may have breakthrough infections. and having a pill that prevents them from getting hospitalized or dying is still very good. and so this is excellent muse. >> it certainly is. dr. lena wen, thank you very much. coming up, a trump-appointed federal judge accuses the justice department of here in washington of treating rioters who stormed the u.s. capitol unfairly. we have details on this highly unusual ruling. we'll share them with you right after the break. abin. [laughs] with a kitchen where everyone can chef. [laughs] a family room where you can let your hair down. and a backyard that is a tree-lined living room.
but the thing they'll remember forever? watching the game together once again. ♪ the time for getting back together is now. ♪ find it on vrbo. (jackie) i've made progress with my mental health. so when i started having unintentional body movements called tardive dyskinesia... i ignored them. but when the twitching and jerking in my face and hands affected my day to day... i finally had to say, 'it's not ok.' it was time to talk to my doctor about austedo. she said that austedo helps reduce td movements in adults... while i continue with most of my mental health medications. (vo) austedo can cause depression, suicidal thoughts, or actions in patients with huntington's disease. pay close attention to and call your doctor if you become depressed, have sudden changes in mood, behaviors, feelings, or have suicidal thoughts. common side effects include inflammation of the nose and throat, insomnia and sleepiness. don't take austedo if you have liver problems, are taking reserpine, tetrabenazine, or valbenazine. austedo may cause irregular or fast heartbeat, restlessness,
movements mimicking parkinson's disease, fever, stiff muscles, problems thinking, and sweating. (jackie) talk to your doctor about austedo...it's time to treat td. td is not ok. visit askforaustedo.com. mission, life. i get to keep her. we get to have her and enjoy her. and she gets to grow up, which is the best gift anyone could ever give. my plaque psoriasis... ...the itching ...the burning. the stinging. my skin was no longer mine. my psoriatic arthritis, made my joints stiff, swollen... painful. emerge tremfyant™. with tremfya®, adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... ...can uncover clearer skin and improve symptoms at 16 weeks. tremfya® is the only medication of its kind also approved for adults with active psoriatic arthritis. serious allergic reactions may occur.
tonight, a federal judge is lashing out at the u.s. department, suggesting rioters who breached the u.s. capitol on january 6th are being treated unfairly. our law enforcement correspondent whitney wild is joining us right now. whitney, what are you learning? >> we're learning what this judge said, basically, is that he thinks that the justice department is going easier on the rioters from the summer of 2020 than they are going on the rioters who stormed the capitol on january 6th. he said that the justice department just hasn't been consistent in its approach though these rioters. he's echoing this whataboutism that we've heard from republicans. and again, specifically making clear that he thinks that prosecutors are just not being evenhanded. here's his direct quote. he said that the justice department would -- he basically said that the justice department would increase its credibility if it was more even-handed in
its approach. here's the direct quote. the u.s. attorney's office would have more credibility if it was evenhanded in its concern about riots and mobs in the city. when he said that, he was citing concerns from mayor muriel bowser. the mayor here in d.c. the judge who made these comments is district judge trevor mcfadden. he's a trump appointee and this happened during a sentencing for a woman named danielle doyle who pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for unlawfully protesting at the capitol. the doj was asking for a house arrest. instead, he ordered her to pay a $3,000 fine and another $500 to fix up the capitol complex. judge mcfadden had previously denied a january 6th's rider's attempt to get his argument tossed. so mcfadden didn't buy into that argument. but then again saying that these rioters are being treated differently. he also did say in a very pointed way that doyle participated in a shameful event
calling it a national embarrassment, wolf. so he's not drawing a blanket statement, saying that these prosecutors should get off the hook, but he is making the observation, he feels, that there are differences and he thinks it's worth pointing out. >> very interesting, indeed. whitney, thank you very much. whitney wild reporting. let's get some insight from our legal analyst, eliot williams. what's your reaction to the judge's decision that the january 6th rioters, at least some of them, are being treated more harshly or unfairly? >> look, wolf, we have to get off of this fantasy that exists in america that federal judges are not political figures. because he was making a broad point that we should all agree with that, yeah, all defendants should be treated equally. he could make that point without calling attention to another politically charged matter. it's rank, naked politics coming from someone tonight federal bench. >> because he said, they were being treated differently than the rioters who were involved in last year's racial unrest. >> it's apples and oranges,
wolf, and really dangerous to start getting down the road of one class of defendants to another class of defendants. look, judge mcfadden is himself a former fairfax county police officer. so i would love to hear his view on the different treatment of police officers on january 6th, for instance. or with respect to lafayette square, where tear gas was being used against protesters there. it's a really dangerous road to go down there. and i'm sort of surprised that the judge went there, but a little bit disappointed that that was the angle -- >> surprised that he was putting the rioters who stormed the u.s. capitol basically in the same category as those who were protesting george floyd's murder. >> right. and moreover, the cases on january 6th are far more airtight cases than you ever could have gotten at a black lives matter matter protest. even assuming there were people who were lawfully protesting on january 6th, the moment someone crosses into the capitol building, they're committing a
capitol offense. there's surveillance footage and when you're talking about prosecuting a >> we checked. there was a recent survey that came out from pugh research center. and i am checking it right now. about half the american public believe the punishments for those involved in the january-6th insurrection haven't been severe enough. only 20% said the punishments are too severe. what does that indicate to you? >> you know, to paraphrase donald rumsfeld, you go into court with the laws you have and the sentencing rules you have and the charges people got for trespass, obstructing congress, and so on, those are the penalties they come with and if people want to change that, yes, then go to congress and make those more severe penalties. but it's not the justice department is being more lenient than they should be. that's just the penalties that come for those crimes. >> elliot williams, thank you very much. coming upon up, vice president kamala harris's office
on clean-up duty once again. why she is now making amends to israel. 'hook audrey sent. ♪ oh my land and sea, that's mine ♪ ♪ and pardon when i shine ♪ ♪ hands to the sky, all mine ♪ ♪ woah, woah no ceiling woah ♪ ♪ woah good feeling woah woah ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ up to one million dollars. that's how much university of phoenix is committing to create 400 scholarships this month alone. because we believe everybody deserves a chance. see what scholarships you may qualify for at phoenix.edu ♪ ♪ dignity. it demands that we can still do the simple things. so it demands life-changing technology, to relieve chronic pain. ♪ ♪
(kids playing) pnc bank believes that if your phone can help you track your pizza come on, cody. where are you, buddy? then your bank should help you track your spending. virtual wallet® is so much more than a checking account. its low cash mode feature gives you at least 24 hours of extra time to help you avoid an overdraft fee. okay, he's gotta be close. he's six blocks in the other direction. make a left, make a left, make a left! he made a right again. virtual wallet® with low cash mode from pnc bank. one way we're making a difference.
we are the next. the next generation of visionaries. rule breakers. game changers. and world beaters. we certainly aren't here to do what's been done before. and neither are we. at palo alto networks, we are ready to secure our digital future. we innovate to outpace cyberthreats. so you can make the next day safer than the one before. we've got next. ♪ well the sun is shining and the grass is green ♪ ♪ i'm way ahead of schedule with my trusty team ♪ ♪ there's heather on the hedges ♪ ♪ and kenny on the koi ♪ ♪ and your truck's been demolished by the peterson boy ♪ ♪ yes -- ♪ wait, what was that? timber... [ sighs heavily ] when owning a small business gets real, progressive helps protect what you've built with affordable coverage.
vice president kamala harris and her office are on damage control tonight after the latest in a series of missteps. the vp failing to push back at a student who accused israel of engaging in ethnic genocide. our washington correspondent, sunlen serfaty, has details. >> reporter: vice president kamala harris is in damage-control mode after this exchange with a university student earlier-this week. >> there was funds allocated to
help continue backing israel which hurts my heart because it's it's ethnic genocide and i think that -- um -- the people have spoken very often in what they do need. and i feel like there is a lack of listening and i just feel like i need to bring -- >> reporter: harris responding in part -- >> i'm glad you did and again, this is about the fact that your voice, your perspective, your experience, your truth should not be suppressed. and -- and it must be heard. the point that you were making about policies that relates to middle-east policy, foreign policy, we still have healthy debates in our country about what is the right path. and nobody's voice should be suppressed on that. >> reporter: israeli publications jumped on harris for not pushing back against the student's characterization of israel's actions towards palestinians as ethnic genocide. and sources tell cnn, calls came in to the white house from several leading jewish
organizations expressing their concern. the vice president's office is now scrambling to minimize the fallout. putting out a statement today saying the vice president strongly disagrees with the student's characterization of israel. that it was a student who voiced a personal opinion during a political science class. emphasizing the vice president, whose husband is jewish, has been unwavering in her commitment to israel. this dustup is just one in a series for the vice president in her nine months on the job. the west wing having to publicly push back on reports of infighting and dysfunction in the vice president's office. in june, her first foreign trip overshadowed by drit sizm of her blunt delivery of the biden administration's message to guatemalan migrants. >> i want to be clear to folks in this region who are thinking about making that dangerous trek to the united states-mexico border. do not come.
do not come. >> reporter: that answer upsetting many, including members of her open party and calling into question her diplomatic chops. just a day later, harris causing headlines, again, by dismissing the criticism that she's never been to the border. >> we've been to the border. >> you haven't been to the border? >> and i haven't been to europe. i mean, i don't -- i don't understand the point that you are making. >> reporter: and causing friction with a key member of her own party. >> we can't continue this way. >> reporter: for going to west virginia and sitting for local interviews about the covid stimulus plan without giving a heads up to the state's longtime senator, joe manchin. >> i couldn't believe it. no one called me. we are going to try to find a bipartisan pathway forward. i think we need to. but we need to work together. that's not a way of working together. what was done. >> and back on this week's dustup at that school just outside washington, d.c., we spoke today with many of the groups that were originally concerned with the vice president's response when she
was speaking with that student. and they -- they are satisfied they tell me with the outreach the white house reached out to them. and gave them some assurances and in terms of their support for israel. so they were pleased, satisfied overall with outreach. >> thanks very much, sunlen serfaty, reporting for us. finally, tonight, we wish a very, very happy birthday to the oldest-living former president of the united states. jimmy carter is 97 years old today. he celebrating privately at his home in plains, georgia. i was privileged to visit with president carter and former-first lady rosalynn carter in planes plains a couple years ago shortly before his 95th birthday. he shared with me his greatest wish for the nation and the world. >> i just hope that the entire world can -- can recement, recommit themselves to -- to universal peace. and to be made between peace and
war, choose peace. whenever there is a choice to be made between basic-human rights and the violations of people's rights and the equality of people, choose the human rights. so if we would just do this, the world would be a better place. >> again, president carter we wish you a happy birthday. nothing but the very best. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. and outfront next, president biden heads to capitol hill to save his agenda. but he emerged tonight with no deal on a spending plan, and no vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill. should biden have gotten much more involved much sooner? plus, cal cal becoming the first state to require the covid vaccine for students. will more states follow? and new questions about brian laundrie's camping trip with his family. just days after his fiancee gabby petito's disappearance. let's go outfront. and good